The rabid anti-Prop. 8 mob demands total submission

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 14, 2008 11:49 AM

You must read this. Read the whole thing. Make sure you get to this part:

The mainstream media have so far failed to get across the intensity of the ordeal that supporters of Prop 8 may now be subject to–something I realized on coming across this extraordinary blog account of a meeting at the legendary restaurant El Coyote in Hollywood, not far from where I grew up in Laurel Canyon. The meeting was between the elderly Mormon owner, who donated $100 to support Prop 8, and Prop 8 opponents, who are threatening a boycott, and it is as soul- grinding as something out of Soviet show trial history.

Yoo-hoo. Soul-fixer. Hello?

Posted in: Proposition 8

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. ‘Okie’ on the Lam » Blog Archive » Anti-CA Prop 8 Protests Get Ugly — El Coyote Ugly!
  2. Mandates and Will of the Electorate | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  3. Left Of Center
  4. JABbering Stooge :: Consistency FAIL :: November :: 2008
  5. Gay Mafia Demands America Bend Over To Their Demands « The Chronicles Of A Rogue Jew
  6. Prop 8 Madness | The Daily Conservative
  7. Prop 8, YES - NO | BigMouthFrog
  8. El Coyote Manager Attacked for $100 Donation to Prop 8 campaign | Political Vindication
  9. Prop 8 Protesters Use Fear and Intimidation « Jane Q. Republican
  10. Prop 8: DON’T EVEN TALK ABOUT IT! | My Zen Arcade
  11. Michelle Malkin » Restaurant bullied by anti-Prop. 8 mob offers up payment
  12. Prop. 8 Opponents Bend It Like Stalin
  13. Christian bloggers on Proposition 8 Persecution | blogs4God
  14. Let the Facism Begin « Mary Victrix
  15. Fashionable Fascism « Mary Victrix
  16. The insane rage of the same-sex marriage mob « Jane Q. Republican
  17. Michelle Malkin » Another Mormon run over by the anti-Prop. 8 mob’s bus

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #544591
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:59 am, AlohaGuy said:

    This could easily turn into a “boycott gay” thing as well.

  2. #544594
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:01 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The world has sure gone crazy! Call to arms! Wolverines!

  3. #544596
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    I agree with AlohaGuy (#1).

    My “tolerance” levels are are getting lower.

  4. #544597
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    Let’s face it. Lawbreakers are now a protected class, fully recognized by our government. Our society can not continue to function. There are no rules anymore. Anarchy is going to break out. The country has gone to the looters.

  5. #544598
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, tre said:

    I suppose we should boycott anything gay. That would mean just about all Hollyweird movies and anything concerning San FranSISSYco.

  6. #544600
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    it is as soul- grinding as something out of Soviet show trial history.

    Well, by golly! Of course. Where do suppose these vermin got the idea in the first place?

    Believe me, communism is alive and well and suporting radical groups such as this in the far-left fringe.

    They won’t stop until they have taken over the USA, or util their ideology is exposed and irradicated.

    Want to take a stab at which will happen first?

  7. #544601
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, cpodug said:

    Clean, lock and load.

  8. #544603
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, John Deaux said:

    Ya know, I don’t like the way this election turned out. Therefore I am going to spend as little money as I possibly can to boycott the U.S. economy until the president I want takes office.

    Stimulate that, Nancy.

  9. #544604
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Mookie said:

    The AFA and CWFA have been boycotting companies that donate to gay organizations for years. Lots of selective outrage and indignation in these parts lately.

  10. #544606
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Misscheryl said:

    words are noise, action thunders

  11. #544608
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, ErinF said:

    I think it’s funny that the GLAAD populus overwhelmingly voted for Obama, whom has stated over and over again he is against gay marriage. Didn’t they know that muslims are anti-gay?

    These people are so very tolerant.

  12. #544618
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, ErinF said:

    I suppose we should boycott anything gay. That would mean just about all Hollyweird movies and anything concerning San FranSISSYco.

    That’s fine with me. I boycotted these years ago. The last movie I went to see was American Carol, and the last movie I saw before that was Titanic!

    Done with Hollyweird and done with the San Fran-SICKO trash. Michael Savage makes a lot of sense.

  13. #544620
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, Mookie said:

    Leaders of the campaign to outlaw same-sex marriage in California are warning businesses that have given money to the state’s largest gay rights group they will be publicly identified as opponents of traditional unions unless they contribute to the gay marriage ban, too.

    ProtectMarriage.com, the umbrella group behind a ballot initiative that would overturn the California Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage, sent a certified letter this week asking companies to withdraw their support of Equality California, a nonprofit organization that is helping lead the campaign against Proposition 8.

    “Make a donation of a like amount to ProtectMarriage.com which will help us correct this error,” reads the letter. “Were you to elect not to donate comparably, it would be a clear indication that you are in opposition to traditional marriage. … The names of any companies and organizations that choose not to donate in like manner to ProtectMarriage.com but have given to Equality California will be published.”

    The letter was signed by four members of the group’s executive committee: campaign chairman Ron Prentice; Edward Dolejsi, executive director of the California Catholic Conference; Mark Jansson, a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; and Andrew Pugno, the lawyer for ProtectMarriage.com. A donation form was attached. The letter did not say where the names would be published.

  14. #544623
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, walterc said:

    How about the El Coyote advertise dining in a hetero atmosphere? Might bring in a whole new set of clientele. Oh wait, that would be hateful wouldn’t it? /sarc

    What is it these people expect to get from this? Do they really think all of the targets will go to the Sec of State and ask to withdraw their ballots?

  15. #544628
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, DBNinKY said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, ErinF said:

    I think it’s funny that the GLAAD populus overwhelmingly voted for Obama, whom has stated over and over again he is against gay marriage.

    I wonder if, in their zeal to “get out the vote” for Obama in CA, GLAD ever once stopped to think just what kind of vote they were getting out? I mean really, hasn’t GLAD ever heard of socially conservative Democrats?

  16. #544631
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, mike.musculus said:

    Here is what I almosted posted when we went through this the 1st time. I thought better of it, not wishing to disrupt the attempts to quell the mob that some homosexuals commenting here said were occuring.

    I changed my mind on reading MM’s most recent post & the link contain therein.
    =================================

    Before anything else, let me say that I hold no position to speak in any offical capacity for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, (The Mormons). All that I am saying comes as some one who has studied the Doctrines, the Scriptures, and spent many hours in prayer. One who also was a member, left, smartened-up and returned.

    (NB: What I have to say about the homosexual community is at the bottom, those here who are members of that community can tell me if i’m correct.)

    First there was:

    Missouri Governor Lilburn W. Boggs’ Order of Extermination, Missouri Executive Order Number 44
    recinded 25 June 1976

    Pursuant to the order, hundreds of Mormon civilians were, as applicable, attacked, lynched, looted, tarred, raped, and murdered.

    The Mormons, having fled from Pennsylvania to Ohio to Missouri, subsequently moved to Illinois.

    Despite more assertive subsequent efforts to maintain political autonomy and security, Mormons experienced a similar sequence of events in Nauvoo, Illinois. Illinois Governor Thomas Ford called out the state militia, imprisoned Mormon leaders, and allowed a mob to assassinate Mormon leaders during the Mormons’ imprisonment. Governor Ford also sanctioned a campaign of violence, destruction, and expulsion.

    …Most Mormons subsequently moved from Illinois to Utah (which was part of Mexico at the time), where Mormons then lived in peaceful isolation. This changed with the end of the Mexican War (Mormon troops fought on the side of the United States), when Utah became a territory of the United States under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.

    Political, military, and cultural hostilities erupted in 1857-58 when President James Buchanan fulfilled an 1855-56 campaign promise to suppress Mormons and sent the United States military to occupy Utah in what is now known as the “Utah War.” Mormons regarded this as a violation of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and an attempt to renew the campaign of violence against Mormons that had occurred in Missouri and Illinois. Mormons felt that they no longer had anywhere new to migrate, and that they had to stand their ground. It was during this period, on September 11, 1857, that a controversial incident known as the “Mountain Meadow Massacre” occurred in which some resentful Mormons and Piute Indians killed a group of civilian settlers passing from Arkansas to California via Utah.*


    Once Utah was occupied by the United States military, an effort was made over several decades to disenfranchise Mormon voters, deny Mormons participation in local governance and juries, and seize Mormon-owned assets. Eventually tax-funded government schools were created
    with the express purpose of culturally cleansing Mormons. This system of schools was (and is) funded with government trust lands. Today Utah is, in some ways, a kind of Indian Reservation for Mormons. Approximately 90% of Utah is owned by governmental entities, most of which is federal or state school trust property.

    *evidence that the Mountain Medows incident wasn’t as characterized has been ignored by the MSM.

    And Mormons fled to Utah so as to try to live in peace. We are no strangers to persecution, nor to people trying to brainwash our children. We’ve had our buildings, Temples, lands, livestock, all that we owned confiscated twice by the US government. Now, the call is to define religion as hate-speech, burn down the buildings, and tax the ashes — or maybe the US government will just steal them… again.

    Next:
    Our Church has always held that certain things were sinful. Among these is, yes, homosexuality. Our church always has and even still teaches that we are to hate sins, but love the sinner. This is easy to understand if you think of the sinner the way the Church teaches, as a literal brother/sister: a child of God. I am often saddend by one of my siblings, for he has left the Church and is deep in sin — but I don’t hate him. The man who introduced me to my wife was a homosexual, and he’s one of my (3)best friends. I hope to see him again after this life.
    The Church maintains that it is The Lord’s perogative to punish sinners, and I have known people disfellowshipped for hatred of homosexuals, which is the 2nd most potent sanction the Church has.

    There are a few documents that explain our views, and might help people to understand why we’re standing up at this time.

    When our Church published:“The Family: A Proclaimation to the World”

    © 1995, 2008 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
    English approval: 5/08. 35602

    We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator’s plan for the eternal destiny of His children.

    All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.

    In the premortal realm, spirit sons and daughters knew and worshipped God as their Eternal Father and accepted His plan by which His children could obtain a physical body and gain earthly experience to progress toward perfection and ultimately realize their divine destiny as heirs of eternal life. The divine plan of happiness enables family relationships to be perpetuated beyond the grave. Sacred ordinances and covenants available in holy temples make it possible for individuals to return to the presence of God and for families to be united eternally.

    The first commandment that God gave to Adam and Eve pertained to their potential for parenthood as husband and wife. We declare that God’s commandment for His children to multiply and replenish the earth remains in force. We further declare that God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.

    We declare the means by which mortal life is created to be divinely appointed. We affirm the sanctity of life and of its importance in God’s eternal plan.

    Husband and wife have a solemn responsibility to love and care for each other and for their children. “Children are an heritage of the Lord” (Psalm 127:3). Parents have a sacred duty to rear their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, and to teach them to love and serve one another, observe the commandments of God, and be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives—mothers and fathers—will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.

    The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.

    We warn that individuals who violate covenants of chastity, who abuse spouse or offspring, or who fail to fulfill family responsibilities will one day stand accountable before God. Further, we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.

    We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society.

    This proclamation was read by President Gordon B. Hinckley as part of his message at the General Relief Society Meeting held September 23, 1995, in Salt Lake City, Utah.

    (emphasis added)

    (what eevviiillll bigoted people we are! We content that those who abuse spouse of child will PAY! How horrible! Who do we think we are, calling for the protection of women and children!! How evil is that! Kill Mormons! /sarc off

    …and again after “The Living Christ: The Testimony of the Apostles”, we were and have been warned that standing for our values would bring evil down upon us. We have been counselled to follow the teachings of Chirst:

    “Fear not to do good, my sons, for whatsoever ye sow, that shall ye also reap. …
    “Fear not, little flock; do good; let earth and hell combine against you, for if ye are built upon my rock, they cannot prevail. …
    “Look unto me in every thought; doubt not, fear not” (D&C 6:33–34, 36)
    .

    But, in a sort of synopsis of our beliefs, called the 13 Articles of Faith, 11-13 are relevent here:

    11 We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.
    12 We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.
    13 We believe in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous, and in doing good to all men; indeed, we may say that we follow the admonition of Paul—We believe all things, we hope all things, we have endured many things, and hope to be able to gendure all things. If there is anything virtuous, ilovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.

    We simply want to be left alone in our beliefs. Let us tell you about them — or not. If you don’t like our views, don’t join our Church! We won’t force our POV on you, and we want the same from you! But today, those seeking the destruction of religion have mis-equated “tolerence” with not just acceptance, but to compulse coercive advocation!
    The express purpose of forcing the legality of homosexual marriage is to destroy our faith. And other Christian faiths! To force Mormons to no longer perform marriages in our Temples and Chapels, because The Lord has said that homosexuality is wrong, and we will not perform Holy Ordinances not sanctioned by The Lord. For other Christians, the Left has eroded marriage, chastity, honesty, hardwork, faith in God, faith in country, and what-all. This will be another brick in the houses’ walls – eventually the house crumbles because the support from the swiss-cheese walls is insufficient. There’s no principles or doctrines left to compromise. At that point the Left will like us: we’ll have only a misshapen shell of our religion!
    I have spoken with many people, both homosexual and not, attourneys and bureaucrats. The Civil Union covers all the bases for marriage, those who say otherwise are lying.

    And from this month’s magazine: (Ensign November 2008, “Christian Courage: The Price of Discipleship”)

    To respond in a Christlike way cannot be scripted or based on a formula. The Savior responded differently in every situation. When He was confronted by wicked King Herod, He remained silent. When He stood before Pilate, He bore a simple and powerful testimony of His divinity and purpose. Facing the moneychangers who were defiling the temple, He exercised His divine responsibility to preserve and protect that which was sacred. Lifted up upon a cross, He uttered the incomparable Christian response: “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (see Luke 23:34).
    And:
    This is especially important in our interactions with members of other Christian denominations. Surely our Heavenly Father is saddened—and the devil laughs—when we contentiously debate doctrinal differences with our Christian neighbors.
    This is not to suggest that we compromise our principles or dilute our beliefs. We cannot change the doctrines of the restored gospel, even if teaching and obeying them makes us unpopular in the eyes of the world. Yet even as we feel to speak the word of God with boldness, we must pray to be filled with the Holy Ghost (see Acts 4:29, 31). We should never confuse boldness with Satan’s counterfeit: overbearance (see Alma 38:12). True disciples speak with quiet confidence, not boastful pride.

    (emphasis added)

    I don’t believe the homosexual community – those not flaming Liberals – really want to riot and cause trouble. This is from people who hate religion – any religion, and it is a taste of what is coming. Do not believe those who say otherwise. Look at how both parties treat Christians, and when fighting bullies, things don’t get better by themselves. It has happened before, and it has happened here. Last time it was Mormons, next time it will be Mormons, Jews, then most other Christians, then all Christians. If nothing else, this election should teach that those Lefty’s who call us crazy for saying that they are out to destroy us are either lying or duped. Functionally, it doesn’t matter which. Look at the video of the Dumbocrat who said “that Conservatives have this out-moded view that just because you make a pile of money, you should be allowed to keep it.” How long have they sworn up&down that they weren’t this man, yet their actions show otherwise. There are going to be people on this board, and people in the world, that will say I’m crazy, over-reacting, hysterical. Of course they will say that! Every tyrant in history used that line: don’t worry, it is not as bad as it looks! We really won’t load loyal germans into a truck and pipe exhaust in, or later on into cattle cars and drag them away! Oh, no – don’t act so crazy! Go back to sleep! They are going to try to divide us: look at how the division between Romney & Huckabee worked out! Don’t take what the MSM says about us! They hate us, (especially in Utah), go to us, at at http://www.lds.org and look around. Most everything about us is there, and the goal of the Church is to place all of our materials online by (I forget when, but within the next 5 years I think). It is the same materials we use in Church, and often we just download it and go, so there is very little I have access to that you don’t.

    Lies from the mouth and truth from the actions! In their euphoria of triumph and jubilation they are revealing themselves. We, Christians, Jews must stand together, or they will hang us separately.

    Michelle, please forgive the length of this, but I honestly think it needed to be said.

  17. #544632
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, cpodug said:

    Clean, lock and load.

    Conservatives talk a big game.

    As Mark Twain said: “Everyone complains about the weather, but no one does anything about it.”

  18. #544635
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:18 pm, RetFireman said:

    In Sacramento, the Artistic Director of the California Musical Theatre was forced to resign from his position. He had been working for this company for over 25 years. They forced him into resigning because he had donated money to the “Yes on 8″ campaign, and thus the Theatre was threatened with boycotts from all angles.

    That’s right kids, you can have your own thoughts, your own beliefs etc., so long as they go along with the Liberal Agenda. Otherwise you will be threatened, boycotted, forced out of making a living, attacked etc.

    Just wait kids. The next 4 years will see this country continue down this path. Those that claim to be against such things have now become the very thing they spent so much time convincing the weak minded they were against.

    Wait until the “New Gestapo” is finally formed and funded “As well as the military”.

    Stand up for what you believe. Stand up against the thugs of Liberalism. Do not allow them to force you out of your beliefs or out of your ability to earn a living.

    I used to think those that would claim that there is a new Civil War coming were nutso conspiracy theorists or worse. However, just watching the events of the last 6-12 months has made me rethink that position and decide maybe there truly is one coming…and the outcome will be the very survival of morality against immorality.

  19. #544636
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:18 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Mookie said: #13

    I push back when pushed hard enough too.

  20. #544639
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, Paul Revere said:

    This is embarassing to me as a gay dude. Those people are nuts. If we boycott California, we’ll only hurt the majority who voted for this measure. Perhaps the governor could do something forceful. (Yeah, I know)

  21. #544642
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, BrianNY said:

    I can’t even imagine the media outcry had the restaurant owner been a homosexual Prop 8 opponent and the protesters had been straight.

    The outright filth and thuggish behavior on the part of the most militant in the homosexual community should come as no surprise. One has only to review the late 1980s and early 1990s in NYC to see what some of these individuals did to St. Patrick’s Cathedral and rush hour commuters at Grand Central Station.

    Sad to say, but my disinterest in anything regarding “homosexual rights” began the day that those, in the name of homosexuality, violated the sanctity of my Cathedral under false pretense and threw the most sacred of my Church’s sacraments on the floor.

    Homosexual rights end where my nose begins, and a vile few decided to ruin it for the majority by jumping ugly and getting in my face that infamous day.

    I chalk it up to another instance of learning who my true friends and who my true enemies really are.

  22. #544643
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, cheapseat said:

    seems to me the code pinkos in berkley learned a lesson about political clout and economic reality. perhaps some economic backlash of gay and lesbian corporate sponsors is in order. hey disneyland, and miller beer, and gay friendly cruise lines, not to mention corporations who contributed to prop 8 defeat (freedom of information works both ways)gays are 5%, heteros are 95%. which is the bigger target audience, unless you are selling nambla subscriptions. diane fienstien and patty ******** in washington both lost senior advisers on their staffs recently for being pedophiles, yes that would be gay pedophiles, collecting kiddie porn.

  23. #544644
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, tre said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, Paul Revere said:
    This is embarassing to me as a gay dude

    Paul Revere, I’ll add you to my prayer list.

  24. #544648
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, HeatherRadish said:

    The rabid anti-Prop. 8 mob demands total submission

    Until they’re willing to take those demands to mosques or African-American churches who don’t approve of gay marriage, I refuse to take them seriously.

  25. #544649
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Well, I guess CA has turned into mob rule by the left. I hope they’re happy with themselves because this is definitely not going to help their cause.

    They’re only making themselves look extremist (as if they weren’t already).

  26. #544650
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, Speakup said:

    A single $100 donation to a political cause is worthy of boycotts, protests and verbal abuse but huge numbers of $200 campaign contributions to a jury rigged hacker friendly Obama web site must remain anonymous, not even subject to legal scrutiny?

    So, non liberal cause contributors are subject to all kinds of abuse but liberal causes don’t even have to be transparent?

    I’m sure glad we got that straightened out.

    Hypocrisy meter pegged again.

  27. #544651
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, tonyr951 said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, SoCal said:

    Conservatives talk a big game.

    Good, bad, hey…doesn’t matter. We’re the ones with the guns.

  28. #544653
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, Salt said:

    Mookie, if you’re going to quote something so long, it would be courteous to include a source.

    From the same article:

    While an anti-Proposition 8 group called Californians Against Hate has posted lists of gay marriage ban donors on the Internet and even launched boycotts of selected businesses, Kors said that work has been independent of the official No on 8 campaign.

    “They are going after our long-term funding and trying to intimidate Equality California donors from giving any more to the No on 8 campaign and from giving to Equality California ever again.”

    Though unusual and disturbing, Stern said there was nothing illegal about ProtectMarriage.com hitting up Equality California supporters for money.

    Sonya Eddings Brown, a ProtectMarriage.com spokeswoman, estimated that 36 companies were targeted for the letter and said those that do not respond with a contribution would be highlighted in a press release and on the campaign Web site.

    She called the tactic “a frustrated response” to the intimidation felt by Proposition 8 supporters, who have had their lawn signs stolen and property vandalized in the closing days of the heated campaign.

    I don’t support any intimidation, but no matter what ProtectMarriage.com did, it does not justify what has been happening to churches in California.

  29. #544656
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    As far as I am concerned, the gays have shown themselves to be the real danger here. This is the most hate filled display of bigotry I have seen in this country. They are actively trying to destroy this old lady for one thing only, disagreeing with them. This is exactly what the NAZIS did. These gays are dispicable scum that should be jailed under the RICO laws. They are demanding protection money and are no different from common mafia thugs. Mookie, if you support this crap then F&*( you and all your gay friends.

  30. #544660
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, greenfairie said:

    But today, those seeking the destruction of religion have mis-equated “tolerence” with not just acceptance, but to compulse coercive advocation!

    The express purpose of forcing the legality of homosexual marriage is to destroy our faith. And other Christian faiths!

    I think you are right. Is it not a coincidence that atheism is so resurgent right now too. I am not the most devout person in the world but I am a traditionalist. It’s obvious to me that this has gone from “please let us live the way we want” to “you must be sufficiently pro-gay or else.”

    Jonah Goldberg wrote about “liberal fascism” and Orson Scott-Card recently wrote about today’s neo-Puritans who cannot tolerate any thought that’s not ideologically pure. Instead of a hardcore Calvinist interpretation of Christianity, it’s the hardcore secular humanist creed of political correctness.

    It’s Salem all over again and we’re the witches.

  31. #544663
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, sonofdy said:

    BTW they are now sending envolopes full of white powder to mormon temples. That is terrorism. These guys are scum.

  32. #544664
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, RetFireman said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:01 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The world has sure gone crazy! Call to arms! Wolverines!

    That’s funny. I just watched “Red Dawn” on Tuesday. It is being shown this month on “Encore”. As I watched it, I remembered not only how realistic a situation like that seemed back in 1984, but how much it is becoming realistic again.

    Hard to think there would have returned to this country such a time when I would return to thinking about how and where I would go in the Sierra Nevada Mountains when things go that way…especially after the fall of the U.S.S.R., yet here it is, and I have dusted off the ol plans and started contemplating how much more needs to happen now that i have my own children involved.

  33. #544665
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, Freddy said:

    This kind of ‘retribution’ is among the reasons I never voice any opinions or responded to any ‘pollsters’ at any time.

  34. #544666
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    I submit this warning;
    Should any gay/ lesbian, left wing, anarchist faction attempt to attack my church, I will risk arrest to physically stop them. I have no choice.

  35. #544668
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, tuffy said:

    Harassment is not okay. It doesn’t matter what you’re thinking about at the time. There is no cause that justifies these behaviors.

  36. #544670
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, sonofdy said:

    Its time for armed guards at mormon churches.

  37. #544672
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, cpodug said:

    SoCal, if one of them so much as tries to step over my threshold and threaten either me or my wife, I will introduce him or her to my friend, Col. Colt.

    I agree, talk is cheap. But I can honestly say that my actions will make a lot more noise than my talk. Won’t be the first time I’ve fired in anger, and looks like it may not be the last.

  38. #544674
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:35 pm, in_awe said:

    Looking more broadly, we have seen the Obama campaign and its supporters use the legally required disclosure of donor information to target political opponents for intimidation, harassment, and other uncivil behavior.

    Coupled with the widespread destruction of political signs and posters, we are entering a period of time where anyone opposed to a liberal position or candidate will be fearful about making a political contribution or publicly expressing their opinion. How can the people attacking our free speech rights and our civil rights to vote without fear not be guilty of a hate crime?

  39. #544677
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, Mookie said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    As far as I am concerned, the gays have shown themselves to be the real danger here. This is the most hate filled display of bigotry I have seen in this country. They are actively trying to destroy this old lady for one thing only, disagreeing with them. This is exactly what the NAZIS did. These gays are dispicable scum that should be jailed under the RICO laws. They are demanding protection money and are no different from common mafia thugs. Mookie, if you support this crap then F&*( you and all your gay friends.

    I have no problem whatsoever with boycotts. Again, the AFA and CWFA have been doing the exact same thing to businesses that support gay organizations so I’m sure you think they’re nazis as well.

  40. #544679
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, SoCal said:

    n November 14th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, cpodug said:

    SoCal, if one of them so much as tries to step over my threshold and threaten either me or my wife, I will introduce him or her to my friend, Col. Colt.

    I agree, talk is cheap. But I can honestly say that my actions will make a lot more noise than my talk. Won’t be the first time I’ve fired in anger, and looks like it may not be the last.

    Okay then!

  41. #544680
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, Kim said:

    This is insane. WHY aren’t people fighting back? We cannot roll over and be led to the slaughter, like the Jews in Europe 70 years ago. If the past 8 years have taught me anything, it’s that having good ideas is NOT enough. We have to fight back. How about a showing of support for El Coyote? How about filing civil rights law suits against Los Angeles for failing to protect the civil rights of the churches?

  42. #544686
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, Stubby said:

    This outrageous, yet predicable behavior, will lower all societal tolerance and awake the sleeping wrath of our instincts.

    I would like to see a list of all businesses owned by queers and those supportive of their agenda as well. Boycott would have a new meaning.

    To renew my vigor on this issue, I just revisit Michelle’s Folsom Street Fair coverage. It only more clearly demonstrates their total lack of respect for the 99% of society who have exhibited amazing tolerance to this point. If this doesn’t stop, all the progress the queer community has made will be rapidly undone, resulting in a very uncomfortable environment for all.

  43. #544687
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    See? We were right. It’s not about tolerance, it’s about force acceptance and stripping the First Amendment rights from anyone who disagrees.

    No liberal here can argue otherwise anymore. YOU are the bigots, the fascists, and the intolerant ones and YOU only have YOURSELVES to blame.

    I’m done being told I need to be compassionate and understand. Until the left stops spitting on my FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS and finds the part of the Constitution that says they’re entitled to live without feeling offended, this is an all-out culture war.

    And we will be victorious.

    Again, the AFA and CWFA have been doing the exact same thing to businesses that support gay organizations so I’m sure you think they’re nazis as well.

    You find me ONE story of AFA or CWFA people ganging up on a woman, a la the Nazis, and engaging in what can only be described as a fascist show trial, and then you’ll have an argument.

    Until then, no dice. This is beyond boycotts and full-out religious persecution.

  44. #544691
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    A single $100 donation to a political cause is worthy of boycotts, protests and verbal abuse

    Don’t forget a spokesperson wearing a patterned handkerchief. That’s apparently worthy of all that too.

  45. #544693
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    The homosexual and lesbian practices are simply depraved. The acceptance of those practices by a nation is similar to a canary in a coal mine who dies first because of its sensitivity to CO. The more we tolerate gays, the more we decline as a nation.

  46. #544694
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, Mookie said:

    I have no problem whatsoever with boycotts. Again, the AFA and CWFA have been doing the exact same thing to businesses that support gay organizations so I’m sure you think they’re nazis as well.

    Actually it’s stuff like smacking a cross out of an old lady’s hand, stomping on it, and then physically showing that poor woman that reminds me of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, otherwise known as NAZIs.

    Oh, that and the fact that most of these activists are also socialists.

  47. #544695
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, FilmLadd said:

    physically shoving, I meant to write.

  48. #544700
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Mookie said:

    You find me ONE story of AFA or CWFA people ganging up on a woman, a la the Nazis, and engaging in what can only be described as a fascist show trial, and then you’ll have an argument.

    Until then, no dice. This is beyond boycotts and full-out religious persecution.

    Protesting with your wallet=fascism. Got it.

  49. #544703
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Mookie said:

    Don’t forget a spokesperson wearing a patterned handkerchief. That’s apparently worthy of all that too.

    Nicely played, Chap. I forgot about that.

  50. #544704
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    Don’t forget a spokesperson wearing a patterned handkerchief. That’s apparently worthy of all that too.

    All the red-meat for discuss here, and you dredge up ancient history.

    Sad.

  51. #544707
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, zorro said:

    Michelle, that account was disgusting. The homosexual left have taken on the persona of Nazi Brownshirts. Is this what the “Obama years” will bring??? Well, I for one, intend to defend my freedom of expression. Vigorously.

  52. #544714
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, nail49 said:

    Mookie said,

    I’m sure you think they’re nazis as well.

    No, the ones who send white powder to churches, disrupt church services and seize and destroy a cross carried by an elderly lady are the nazis. They act either anonymously or from a position of power where they cannot be constrained – i.e., they outnumber all others or they ‘dare’ anyone to interfere with their actions so as to draw the sympathy card.

    As those thugs were stomping on that elderly lady’s cross I heard the newscaster say, “There are ugly actions by both parties.” What a buffon when you can’t differentiate between a peaceful protest and thuggery.

    I can guarantee this church-goer will be “carrying” not to stop any protests, but to make certain they don’t get out of hand. I know my pastor will not condone violent action against those who are speaking out, but he also won’t stop those of us who are prepared to stop any violent actions against our church family.

  53. #544715
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Protesting with your wallet=fascism. Got it.

    No. Protesting by intentionally looking up donors, showing up at their place of business, and forcing them to apologize is facism. The strong arm scare tactics of the left are facism.

    Again, no dice. But keep trying, this is fun!

  54. #544716
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, SoCal said:

    BTW I demolished your nice little smear in the other thread about this subject.

  55. #544718
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    All the red-meat for discuss here, and you dredge up ancient history.

    Sad.

    Please. Ancient history? It was a few months ago. And a perfect example of the silly hypocrisy going on here.

    People have every right to boycott whatever businesses they want for whatever reason they want. I thought it was stupid to threaten Dunkin Donuts over that silly Rachel Ray commercial, but I certainly didn’t throw histrionic fits and wail about Nazism and the loss of Dunkin’s precious first amendment rights.

  56. #544720
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I know my pastor will not condone violent action against those who are speaking out, but he also won’t stop those of us who are prepared to stop any violent actions against our church family.

    Agreed. Show up at my parish, and attempt to harm, harass, disrupt or otherwise bother parishioners, and I’ll remove you by non-lethal force.

    The time has come to decide if you’re wheat or chaff. And I will defend my faith – and the right of others to express their faith, Mormon or otherwise – to the death.

  57. #544721
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, walterc said:

    It’s Salem all over again and we’re the witches.

    Quote of the day.

  58. #544729
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I thought it was stupid to threaten Dunkin Donuts over that silly Rachel Ray commercial, but I certainly didn’t throw histrionic fits and wail about Nazism and the loss of Dunkin’s precious first amendment rights.

    Again, did people force Rachel Ray to apologize? All that was missing from the little get-together at the cafe were the guns.

    Boycotts and harassment are two different things.

  59. #544730
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Mookie said:

    No. Protesting by intentionally looking up donors, showing up at their place of business, and forcing them to apologize is facism. The strong arm scare tactics of the left are facism.

    Again, no dice. But keep trying, this is fun!

    What’s fun is your glaring hypocrisy. Do a little research into what the AFA/CWFA has done with Pepsi, Ford, McDonald’s, etc. It’s the exact same thing. Looking up donors, showing up at their place of business and forcing submission. Only they do it on a much larger scale.

  60. #544732
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, sierra.caddis said:

    HOLY CRAP! It has finally started.

  61. #544734
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:57 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, chapoutier said:
    Please. Ancient history? It was a few months ago. And a perfect example of the silly hypocrisy going on here.

    People have every right to boycott whatever businesses they want for whatever reason they want. I thought it was stupid to threaten Dunkin Donuts over that silly Rachel Ray commercial, but I certainly didn’t throw histrionic fits and wail about Nazism and the loss of Dunkin’s precious first amendment rights.

    No, what you did was blame the Right in general and Michelle in particular for an action you considered petty and meaningless.

    Now you think boycatts are a fine idea.

    If Liberals didn’t have double standards, they’d have no standards at all.

  62. #544736
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    Boycotts and harassment are two different things.

    Yeah. There were NO nasty emails and letters sent to DD and RR personally. None whatsoever.

    At least the gays are protesting something substantive, whether you agree with gay marriage or not. You all were protesting a freaking fashion faux pas.

    Now THAT is sad.

  63. #544737
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, Brian Paasch said:

    #2, , yes, I got the reference.

    Very scary.

  64. #544743
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, right4life said:

    At least the gays are protesting something substantive

    yeah their ability to silence christianity was averted. I can see why they are so upset.

  65. #544744
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Do a little research into what the AFA/CWFA has done with Pepsi, Ford, McDonald’s, etc. It’s the exact same thing. Looking up donors, showing up at their place of business and forcing submission. Only they do it on a much larger scale.

    As StanW said, now you think boycotts and such tactics are fine.

    And the fact that there is minimal coverage of those things in the MSM means you’re exaggerating – because the MSM is hardly sympathetic to our causes.

    Liberals have no standards. They’re just bullies. Hypocritical bullies. Tolerance for me, but not for thee.

  66. #544745
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, chapoutier said:

    No, what you did was blame the Right in general and Michelle in particular for an action you considered petty and meaningless.

    Now you think boycatts are a fine idea.

    If Liberals didn’t have double standards, they’d have no standards at all.

    Your post makes no sense whatsoever. I can blame MM specifically for that and many of the posters here because she was at the forefront of that whole DD thing. Protested and wailed until DD apologized for doing absolutely nothing and pulled an innocuous ad.

    And again genius, I said it was fine for her to do that. Stupid, but fine. Just as any boycotts of businesses whose owners supported Prop 8 is fine.

  67. #544746
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, sonofdy said:

    I have no problem whatsoever with boycotts. Again, the AFA and CWFA have been doing the exact same thing to businesses that support gay organizations so I’m sure you think they’re nazis as well.

    No I think the people you support are nazis. They are dispicable scum for hunting an old woman to her place of work, destroying her job and causing her great distress. Mookie, you are a facist.

  68. #544751
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    yeah their ability to silence christianity was averted. I can see why they are so upset.

    Yeah. Another day where the First Amendment can live on. See they’re totally trying their best to end that, though.

  69. #544756
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, sonofdy said:

    Mookie and chap are with the black shirts I see. No point in discussing this with them. If this type of thing continues, there will be a civil war.

  70. #544759
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, chapoutier said:
    At least the gays are protesting something substantive, whether you agree with gay marriage or not. You all were protesting a freaking fashion faux pas.

    Really?

    The electorate of California rejected the gays demand to change the definition of marriage, so those same gays are lashing out at anyone and everyone that opposed them… except blacks and muslims that is.

    And you call that substantive?

  71. #544760
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, chapoutier said:

    Mookie,

    This is useless. Seriously. They all want to play the sad little victim card, wax hyperbole, and wallow in hypocrisy.

  72. #544762
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, right4life said:

    Yeah. Another day where the First Amendment can live on. See they’re totally trying their best to end that, though.

    expanding their ‘rights’, at the expense of others, is what the gay movement is all about.

  73. #544764
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:06 pm, Texas T said:

    Has anyone posted this Onion article yet? It makes me laugh every time. It’s just so… true!

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28491

  74. #544767
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Mookie said:

    No I think the people you support are nazis. They are dispicable scum for hunting an old woman to her place of work, destroying her job and causing her great distress. Mookie, you are a facist.

    I think it’s funny that you’re assuming I agree with the way they confronted her.

  75. #544768
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, FruNobulux said:

    You ain’t seen nothing yet. Under OFumbDuck, we’re going to descend further and further into chaos as every “Lou Scannon” group who projected their “Hope” onto The Zero gets let down by his impotence and takes to the streets, and decides to make targets of whomever their deluded little minds perceive as being the “enemy”. Of course, this will be used as an excuse for OCokeHead to declare martial law… See where I’m going with this? It’s going exactly to Ayers’ plan.

  76. #544769
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, chapoutier said:
    Protested and wailed until DD apologized for doing absolutely nothing and pulled an innocuous ad.

    And again genius, I said it was fine for her to do that. Stupid, but fine. Just as any boycotts of businesses whose owners supported Prop 8 is fine.

    First, if RR and DD did nothing wrong, then why did they cave so easily?

    Second, it’s interesting to note that the gay boycott is fine in your book, but the DD boycott was fine and stupid!

    Nope, no double-standard here. Move along!

  77. #544770
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, sonofdy said:

    Mookie, you are supporting them, so shove it.

  78. #544772
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    First, if RR and DD did nothing wrong, then why did they cave so easily?

    Second, it’s interesting to note that the gay boycott is fine in your book, but the DD boycott was fine and stupid!

    Agreeing with the objective of one protest and disagreeing with the objective of another protest, while at the same time recognizing the legitimate right to do so is NOT a double standard, genius.

    And the reason they caved was because they made a business decision it was not worth it to go to the mat on such an inconsequential and inane issue.

  79. #544774
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:12 pm, ajmontana said:

    How wonderful, a two year old tripping over the no on 8 sign she was carrying at a 400 he/she/it protest in palm springs at the thurday evening village fest (arts and crafts booths and such) downtown P.S.

    PS Idiots.

    They aren’t helping their cause much when out of town visitors are on vacation experiencing this display.

    My niece, her hubby and two small children were in town from Seattle and weren’t impressed much.

  80. #544776
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, nail49 said:

    They all WE want to play the sad little victim card, wax hyperbole, and wallow in hypocrisy.

    Fixed it for you ol’ chap

  81. #544777
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:14 pm, TheHeartofitAll said:

    Good Good Good!

    Anyone who donated a cent to passing Prop 8 is a bigot who won’t be getting my business.

    Taking crosses from old ladies? Bad. Boycotting bigots? Good.

    Could someone explain to me why the gay community shouldn’t boycott business where owners have spent money to deny them of their human rights? That seems like a totally reasonable protest.

    And, again, to reiterate: supporting Prop 8 is bigotry. There is no gray area here. Frankly, people should be protesting all day and all night to have this charade overturned.

  82. #544783
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, sonofdy said:

    So theheartofitall, anyone who disagrees with you is a bigot? That is intoleraqnce right there. Do you agree that a waitress should be fired and destroyed for her religous beliefs?

  83. #544784
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, mike.musculus said:

    Look at the tactics here by the people minimizing the property damage (objects) and physical damage (people).

    1) complaining is “overblown”. It matters not how much damage is done.

    2) you do the same thing… equating physical intimidation w/strongly worded letters and boycotts.

    Mookie and chap draw equivilance by calling 1grain of sand a mountain and a mountain of sh!t a turd.

    I get email 1x/wk from my youngest son… an LDS missionary in the SF Mission area.
    He’s in the boondocks, but several homosexuals (so they said) have approached him & his companion and 1 out of 6 apologized for the bad behavior. 3 of 6 were openly beligerent. The remaining 2 just wanted to squawk. I wonder how that holds up, overall.

  84. #544785
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, sonofdy said:

    Exactly how is having a view different from yours bigotry or hate? The only ones trying to destroy people here are the gay thugs and thier supporters.

  85. #544787
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:14 pm, TheHeartofitAll said:

    Not quite sure what rights were denied. A homosexual man can marry any woman who would marry him. Likewise, a homosexual woman can marry any man who would marry her. Works the same way for heterosexuals, so I can’t see any disparity in “rights”.

  86. #544791
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, cpodug said:

    Lan Astaslem

  87. #544792
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, right4life said:

    Boycotting bigots? Good.

    I agree!! thas why I plan to boycott every homosexual business around.

  88. #544793
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Just the spectacle of an American citizen expressing regret for her political conviction to avert economic harm is gruesome

    I’ll gladly be the next target. I’ll express no regret. Where do I sign up?

  89. #544794
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, SoCal said:

    The only ones trying to destroy people here are the gay thugs and thier supporters.

    Leave the nice gay people alone. They are good people that don’t cause trouble except when they are pushed. If you tried to take away my wife I would KILL you dead.

    Gay people are good people. They pay taxes, speak English and love America. Why don’t you haters all start focusing your hate toward people that DESERVE it? The gang members, crack whores, etc. Heck, pick on someone worth picking on!

  90. #544795
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, teachem2 said:

    It never ceases to amaze me that those who want the advantages of tolerance simply cannot practice tolerance themselves. It’s like I tell my kids, if you want respect, then you better be prepared to show it. Same goes for tolerance. You want tolerance, then show some!

  91. #544796
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, Mookie said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, sonofdy said:

    Mookie, you are supporting them, so shove it.

    Show me where I said I agree with how they confronted her. I’ll wait.

  92. #544798
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, right4life said:

    Leave the nice gay people alone

    you mean the ones like you, that have to lie and smear people?? uh huh :roll:

    Gay people are good people.

    if you’re the example, then its quite the opposite.

  93. #544799
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:14 pm, TheHeartofitAll said:

    Could someone explain to me why the gay community shouldn’t boycott business where owners have spent money to deny them of their human rights?

    Be happy to oblige, Heart.

    Because Prop 8 had nothign whatsoever to do with denying anyone any right.

    Prop 8 stopped an insignificant minority of people from changing the definition of a generations old sociatail construct.

    The people spoke, your side lost, get over it and ‘MoveOn’!!!

  94. #544801
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, right4life said:

    If you tried to take away my wife I would KILL you dead.

    more tolerance and love from those wonderful gays… :roll:

  95. #544802
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    ACTION DOES SPEAK LOUDER THAN TALK_TALK_TALK___

    I’m Starting a NEW list>>>>>>>>

    SUPPORT:

    NRA
    ACLJ
    Thomas Moore Law
    Phyllis Saffley’s groups
    (I’ll add as the day goes)

    Boycotts—
    Utilizing our Second Amendment rights to protect our FIRST Amendment rights….
    are both GOOD…

    Also–Suing the ____ (the wonderful -open minded left (-: ) works too…
    C-CS

  96. #544809
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, Mookie said:

    Oooh, List Boy is back!

  97. #544810
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, sonofdy said:

    Mookie, what part of you and the intolerant thugs you support can shove it don’t you understand? Last post to mookie the hater.

  98. #544812
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, SoCal said:
    Leave the nice gay people alone. They are good people that don’t cause trouble except when they are pushed. If you tried to take away my wife I would KILL you dead.

    And here it is Folks. There is no amount of crime or perversity or thuggary that gays can commit on a grand scale that will even register with SoCal.

    Invade a church? Accost an old woman? Extort a business? “But, but, but… they are good people!!!!”

    SoCal, we ARE picking on someone worth picking on… that being the group that started this fight.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Climate of hate: More threats from the gay marriage mob

November 10, 2009 05:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Left-wing thug of the day

November 5, 2009 01:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Maine votes down gay marriage

November 4, 2009 01:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

759 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Breaking: Prop. 8 upheld

May 26, 2009 01:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

100 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

They’ll be back.

Courting trouble

May 26, 2009 06:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

A pageant Perez Hilton won’t be judging

May 7, 2009 05:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 3 Trackbacks


Categories: Proposition 8



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook