Chuck Hagel auditions for Obama appointment
Question: How does a RINO secure a position in the Obama administration?
Answer: Bash Rush Limbaugh.
As his Senate career nears its end, Republican Chuck Hagel isn’t holding back when it comes to criticizing members of his own party — including conservative talk radio hosts.
“We are educated by the great entertainers like Rush Limbaugh,” Hagel said Tuesday during a speech in Washington, according to the Huffington Post.
“You know, I wish Rush Limbaugh and others like that would run for office,” a sarcastic Hagel continued. “They have so much to contribute and so much leadership and they have an answer for everything. And they would be elected overwhelmingly. [The truth is] they try to rip everyone down and make fools of everybody but they don’t have any answers.”
Hagel has increasingly become critical of his party in the aftermath of the Iraq War and notably held back endorsing his longtime friend John McCain during the presidential campaign. He’s reportedly under consideration for a cabinet post in the Obama administration.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Fake Republican Chuck Hagel slams Limbaugh, GOP | Mofo Politics | Everything McCain, Obama, Palin, and that other guy-related
- Obama To Crown Al Gore ‘Captain Planet’ | BigMouthFrog
- Mofo Gear » Blog Archive » Fake Republican Chuck Hagel
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Rush Limbaugh
Power Line
» More From the East Anglia Archives
Founding Bloggers
» Did The New York Times Just Tell Glenn Reynolds To “STFU”?Doug Ross @ Journal
» BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! Boston Globe Climate Beclownment SpectacularDoug Ross @ Journal
» 'Hope is fading fast' --- the T-ShirtRadio Equalizer
» Media Matters Admits Rush Didn't Make Key Racist RemarksDoug Ross @ Journal
» The CRU Climate Scam In 90 SecondsHot Air
» 3rd quarter GDP 2.8%, not 3.5%Mudville Gazette
» Threatswatch: US Embassy Denies Secret Eikenberry Talks With Taliban
Methinks a nonentity like Chuck Hagel is a wee bit jealous of Rush, a man people actually listen to.
You know who else millions of people listened to………….?
HITLER!
As I said on HA, Chucky dear, check with harry on what Rush can do. He has more people listening and agree with him that voted for you. It is nice to make Rush upset. Gotta love those rino’s!
L
What a pr$#k. Wonder if it ever occurs to people like Hagel that there just might be a reason so many people listen to Rush?
Good riddance!
Now, can we elect people of substance for a change? I know that’s tough to follow after 1/2 this country elected Obama, but let’s at least try.
You know who else millions of people (idiots) listen to and voted for?
Obama
#3
S/B it is NOT nice
L
So, when all else fails, and to gain some cache with the new administration, let’s bash the biggest advocate for conservativism and Reagan principles, two things that Hagel has never fought for.
What, exactly, has this RINO ever accomplished in his much-vaunted Senator career? What did he do to make the country better except to skewer conservatives and stab fellow Republicans in the back? Do his fellow Nebraskans even know what he stands for or accomplished? I’m sure Hagel is as much in the dark about where he stands as Colin Powel.
One tidbit from this underwelming politician makes sense. I encourage all retired military members to run for local, state, and national political seats all across the country. Even regular Joe Schmoes. Regular Americans aren’t being represented fairly by their own… only the minions (both sides) of the special interests.
On November 18th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, chapoutier said:
Now that we’ve established that you understand the concept of “lots of people” let’s work on your being capacity to distinguish between left-wing socialists from Germany (Hitler) and right-wing talk show conservatives (Limbaugh).
What a toad. Good riddance traitor.
He’s talking about Obama. Right? Doesn’t he realize that Obama already ran for office?
Chap #2
Millions of people listened to and voted for a Marxist. Look at the video of how stupid many of the Obama voters were. Rush has and will last much longer than many a politician. Good riddance to Hagel–a pathetic excuse for a conservative–Air America is more his style.
A hundred years from now when people look back at what happened to The United States people may well spit out Hagel’s name with the same contempt now used for Laval or Moseley.
Watch out MM. Hagel alert, he may be coming for you next. Let us know what the underside of the bus looks like.
Rush Limbaugh is a poison to American society. His brazenly misguided reinterpretation of conservatism is dying, and I’m glad of that!
Can anyone say knee pads? What a traitor.
Okay, no more liberal meanness.
Omu, I doubt that you have listened to Rush Limbaugh enough to know what you are talking about.
I’m not sure what motivated Chaps to make the Hitler comment but if he’s trying to do the comparison game, he’s a little off.
I don’t know if Chaps was angling for irony or sarcasm (though I didn’t see any tags) but Hitler and Limbaugh are worlds apart. Yet, when politicians exploit times of economic turmoil/weakness and civic apathy, people choose to ignore history and its lessons. Also, 52% may mean a plurality of Americans in Chap’s mind, but almost half of the same population voted against Obummer.
In my mind, both Hitler and Obummer took advantage of a waning American economy and “prestige” as a rationale for why their leadership would usher in a new “hope.” Yet, leadership that is only built on promises and nothing else isn’t very confidence boosting.
Rush has no use for politicians and lampoons them at every opportunity. That folks like Hagel have such a thin skin really reveals the empty shell of a politician he was before he chose to retire.
His reinterpretation? LOL…
Chap,
That comment was not like you. Millions listened to Billy Graham, Walter Cronkite, Oprah, and the Pope.
I have never had any respect for Hagel. All one has to do is look at his conduct during the Operation Vanguard raids of meat processing plans in 1988 by the INS to understand Hagel’s integrity or lack thereof.
Hagel voted for the very immigration laws he a) pressurred the INS Director to ignore and when the Director followed through to enforce the law then b) used his position to get the INS Director removed.
I think Hagel is a reprehensible individual, which has ZERO to do with his politics.
Chaps proves Godwin’s law. Where is the trap door to the alligator pit?
emjem,
I don’t know of any tags for irony, but if you saw the number of “brownshirt” “Hitler” “Stalin” references and comparisons being thrown around these comments lately, I think you’d get it.
Ahhh…see there we go.
First off….
53 PERCENT!!! HE GOT 53 PERCENT!!!
Second, 53% is not only a plurality in my mind, it also is by definition.
Always fascinated by statements like this. I would love to see examples of what Limbaugh says that are “poisonous.”
I would also like to know given the writings or William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, and Ronald Reagan, what specific conservative principles Rush is reinterpreting.
Here’s you chance to shine Omu. Get some!
Two words for you: atheling.
Watch your step.
______________________
BTW, where’s atheling?
Are Chuck Bagels good to eat?
Christianity is dying. Conservatism is dying. Anything else you don’t agree with and would like to see croak? Sheesh.
More words to ponder:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/13/AR2008111303347.html?nav%3Drss_opinion/columns&sub=new
You need an account; it’s free, and you can lie, since you’re not asked to verify anything before proceeding to the articles.
I know nothing about that. I have an alibi for that night.
On November 18th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, chapoutier said:
Did you forget your meds Chap? Usually you sound more reasonable, at least for a collectivist.
Dancing With the Stars.
Chuck might be traitor for blasting republicans…but he definitely got a point above…Why isn’t Rush running for office? I would surely vote. Why not give a chance?
I don’t always agree with Limbaugh, but he nailed global warming back around 1991 or so.
He predicted, with the fall of the Soviet Union, and the discrediting of communism, communists would seek a new method to promote the goals of communism in a guise that most people don’t object to, and it would be environmentalism.
He didn’t know the specifics, global warming, but Limbaugh, over 15 years ago, accurately predicted environmentalism as the next mode of attack of the communists.
All right people,
The Hitler thing was a joke and gentle jab at all the people making comparisons here of Obama to Hitler or Stalin or whatever.
Rush is not in any way shape or form like Hitler. He is good and kind and pure.
Everyone feel better now?
Hmmm.
Reminds me of certain bloggers…
Chap, I’m with you brother!
P.S. but don’t tell the wife.
On November 18th, 2008 at 5:38 pm, chapoutier said:
Ah, something we can both agree on.
I will not however apologize for correcting the 52/53%.
It has now become my personal raison d’etre to make sure everyone knows that he won by a whopping 7 points and not a measly, paltry 6.
Why don’t plumbers teach woodworking? It is not his vocation. He’s the first to tell you he’s an entertainer.
What you expect from a pig but an oink? Actually, I didn’t know he was a RINO. I thought he was a dem. Go figure.
Sarcastic would be the gentlest term I could use for Chucky of the Left. I am sure he and BroBama will be happy together.But no, Rush should not run-I need to hear him 3 hours at day with my Zicam.
–
That Every Man Be Armed–You Too ladies
On November 18th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, chapoutier said:
I think most people are not per se making comparisons, but are frightened by the possibility that Big O has more in common with Big H and S.
Allow me to list a couple of traits:
1) An interest in controlling the public’s access to firearms
2) An interest in controlling the media through regulation
3) A lack of interest in private property rights
4) A belief in the strength of the collective
5) Socialist tendencies
6) Communist tendencies
7) Thuggish behavior (Acorn, Ayers, etc.)
chapoutier said:
I didn’t miss those references. That you yourself would use the same camparison in the context of Rush Limbaugh says a lot.
Why is it that liberals have no tolerance for historical comparison? I compare the styles of two different politicians from two different eras, not the individuals themselves. If you could get past your Obama glow, I would think you’d understand that. Both politicians exploited weak economies for their own ends. If you don’t think that was a key ingredient to Obummer’s win then I guess you missed the exit polls.
Actually, Obummer got 52%. I wasn’t aware he had gained a percentage point since all the counting seems to have continued post-election. No need for the exclamation point. Please link your statistic.
This was not a runaway election by any means. Just as many Americans voted against Obummer. I hope you realize that. We’re just as much a divided country as we were before and no shyster of a politician will ever bridge that until Americans themselves take responsibility for their own lives.
Libs wouldn’t say this stupid crap about Rush if no one listened to him. And having read your posts here, Omu, I can safely say that you loathe conservative principles anyway, so you are unqualified to assess whether Rush or anyone else represents a “misguided reinterpretation of conservatism.” Being an actual conservative, I can tell you unequivocally that you are full of it.
On November 18th, 2008 at 5:42 pm, chapoutier said:
I’ll give you that 7 if you can show me they weren’t comprised of dead voters or multi-voters. Otherwise I’m afraid I’m going to have to handicap your vote by 10 points.
#40,
November 19 is National Ammo Day.
It is a nationwide BUYcott of ammunition. You buy ammunition. 100 Rounds a person.
The goals of Ammo Day:
The goal of National Ammo Day is to empty the ammunition from the shelves of your local gun store, sporting goods, or hardware store and put that ammunition in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Make your support of the Second Amendment known–by voting with your dollars!
There are an estimated 75 MILLION gun owners in the United States of America. If each gun owner or Second Amendment supporter buys 100 rounds of ammunition, that’s 7.5 BILLION rounds in the hands of law-abiding citizens!
The gun/ammunition manufacturers have been taking the brunt of all the frivolous lawsuits, trying to put these folks out of business. Well, not if we can help it! And we CAN help it by buying ammunition on November 19!
L
Let’s all pray that Hagel gets an appointment. Then hopefully Gov. Heineman can appoint a Republican to replace him.
He sure did, along with 365 electoral votes. That was pretty dominant performance.
You’ll continue to see the Hitler and Stalin talk, because fringe groups are detached from reality and overcome with disgust for the opposition. People that think this way should only be mocked and laughed at no matter what side of the political aisle there on. I have an aunt who can tell you a thing or two about what it’s really like to see a Hitler rise to power. For one, the nations’s problems are blamed on one ethnic/racial group i.e. the Jews for example. I’m not sure what the moral equivalent is with Obama, but I’m certain that the weirdos will think of something. Let’s see, “the ______ are to Obama, what the Jews were to Hitler in the rise to power”. It should be amusing.
One could use the taking advantage of economic problems with charisma amd ambition model to compare Obama with someone like Reagan. But no, “Hitler”! screams the lunatic. Wow, just wow.
Well, when Chaps starts using false statistics and indulging too many Hitler comparisons, somebody’s gotta step in, 30.
I suppose that atheling’s busy with life like the rest of us. I’m sure she’s busy with the work, the holidays, all that. Somebody’s gotta do the work after the Dems start paying their voters with the kickbacks they promised.
Limbaugh has more influence now on the national stage than he would as one of 100 senators.
He makes good money now, and doesn’t have to deal with ads distorting his addiction to pain killers that developed after failed surgery on his back, or the other junk and distortions, and out of context quotes, that his potential Dem opponent would throw at him.
Good riddance to Hagel. Better a Democrat in a Senate seat than someone like the RINOs like Hagel and Lincoln Chaffee (and sometims McCain) that allowed the MSM to claim “see, even other Republicans disagree with Bush on that issue”.
Obama-67,170,935 McCain-58,604,962
Can we get back on the topic of Chuck Hagel’s comment about Rush Limbaugh now?
So, I suppose that people who compare political styles historically are wack jobs, right? So, if you see similar patterns historically, similar rhetorical flourishes, you are part of a fringe group, even if you didn’t do it on a personal level but more on a stylistic, what they said and did level. Not the person, or individual, but the politics.
I’m really am getting quite sick of the Reagan and Obummer comparisons. There are striking differences between the two and I think you know it. Reagan had the charisma, but he had proven track record of governance to back him up. Reagan didn’t threaten to take one’s first and second ammendment rights away. Reagan didn’t threaten to put whole industries like Coal out of business.
I’d be careful, Tanya, who you label “fringe.” Historians compare political, social, even economic movements and it’s useful to know what happened before to understand our history now. Now, yes, there are people who take it to a more popular and personal level. You need to distinguish between those sorting out the patterns and the history from those sorting out the personalities and individuals.
OR
I don’t think Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin came to power talking about the Jews. Or Mugabe. Or Hugo Chavez. Or Castro. Or Mussolini, for that matter.
Now, Stalin was no great friend of the Jews, but antisemitism didn’t launch him to power.
Obama may not be Stalin. He may not try to take us to a one party state.
He may just try to make us like France or Sweden, government control of well over half the GDP, established businesses stay in business, but don’t grow much, as they are heavily taxed and regulated. Don’t hire much either, so unemployment is permanently high. No sudden loss of liberties, just a slow erosion from a cradle to grave ‘nanny state’.
We can assume the latter, if, like Tanya, we assume his close links to violent Marxist revolutinaries, who actually had conferences about reeducation camps and executions, people like Ayers and Dohrn, were just matters of political convenience.
Actually, I don’t think ‘Tanya’ is smart enough to know anything about Ayers, Dohrn, planned bombings of enlisted men’s dances, the murder of several police officers, Dohrn’s admiration of Charlie Manson, any of that.
She just knows Obama is really cool, and hip, and talks about ‘hope’, and ‘change’, and she is really proud of herself that she voted for a Black dude. Doesn’t matter what his background or views or experience are. She is hip and with it.
National Ammo Day? For what? There are no firearms left for sale in America. Obama’s election has done what the anti-second amendment people have never been able to do – prevent Americans from purchasing the gun of their choice.
On November 18th, 2008 at 5:51 pm, Tanya said:
See #41
Oh, I’m sorry, you must be another Obummer accolyte. I didn’t realize.
Let’s reiterate. I’m not disputing that Obummer won. Six or seven points doesn’t necessarily mean a runaway when you had a media kissing Obummer’s feet and predicting a double digit victory.
I would also like to see your link. You do have one, right? Have all the states finished counting? I didn’t realize since I’ve moved on. I would also suggest to you that you take a look at the map on how evenly divided the country actually is.
Cut it out Chap…
Obama’s margin of victory was about the same as Prop 8’s, percentage wise.
How come nobody is calling Prop 8’s win a landslide?
Because election results can only be considered real mandates when the left comes out on top.
I knew he was kidding about the Hitler comparison. With respect to the stats… he and Soap have a running joke about it. Personally, it doesn’t matter to me whether he won by a margin of 6 or 2… he won. I would have preferred it if the opposite had occurred. No since in crying over spilled milk.
If the Un-fairness Doctrine is reimposed, I would like to see just that.
Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, and all the other guys and gals run for office.
Make the libs regret the day they heard the words “Fairness Doctrine.”
No sinceNo senseTo reiterate, Obummer accolyte:
Take a look at the district map. Things tend to get a little more fuzzy. Not the national map, but the congressional district map.
November 18 is National Drift-Off Topic Day. Just keeding. I was curious what today was so I did a search. Came up with several interesting “awareness day” lists. September 13 is National Iguana Awareness Day. I did not know that.
52%? I take it as a given that there is a 3% fraud factor added to the Democratic count. That does not absolve my anger at the people who stayed home, yes I am talking about people from this site, because McCain wasn’t pure enough for them and they wanted to punish America.
The Fairness Doctrine will help ensure that all talk radio dies. (Air America, anyone?) If it gets passed, we might as well move on from AM radio. We will likely never see such a doctrine applied to broadcast television.
However, I doubt that the doctrine will ever silence folks like Limbaugh, Hannity, Ingraham, and Levin. In this day and age, we’ll find formats for them to be heard. So long as there are those of us that want to hear their message, they’ll get through. As it stands now, I get my talk radio on PodCast.
Neither did the iguanas. They’ve been celebrating on June 2nd.
Hagel Bagels, puddin and pie,
Emu wants everything to die.
All the Crapweasels, not just Hagel have had their nose so far up Odopeys rump they need a cave lantern.
Okay, compare the politics, or political style of Obama to someone like Hitler. If you think that argument or comparison holds up, you have no grasp of reality concerning Hitler’s rise to power.
Me too, but Obama’s rise, style, and politics have more in common with Reagan than Adolph Hitler. I’m sure you would disagree. Out of all of the leaders in the history of the planet, folks of your ilk choose Hitler as a comparison model. It’s ludicrous, but if you can say that with a straight face out in public, or around children, I just don’t know what to say, but “NUTJOB”. If you just vent such craziness on a private blog for shock, then maybe it’s just cathartic for you. I think you know a name like Hitler is not to be thrown around lightly, unless it’s part of some joke angle.
Again, you could pick from hundreds of political models, but you choose the most evil, heinous leader of the past few hundred years. It just says a lot. People outside the fringe simply don’t think this way. I say the same thing about people on the left demonizing Bush for the past 8 years.
Yes, I knew he was kidding also, 30. Yet, to indulge such a comparison on a farcical level is interesting. I don’t quite believe the stats since there was fraud involved in multiple states and these same stats are being given by news sources such as CNN who actively engaged in campaigning for Obummer.
I, too, would have preferred a McCain victory. I just find it a little odd that Obama boot lickers like Chaps and Tanya are now going to get all panicky about the margin of victory. Six or seven percentage points doesn’t matter when, in the end, Obummer played class warfare politics, as do all Dems, to win. He also played on fear. And yet, the stock market didn’t greet Obummer with the kind of acceptance you would expect. Why is that?
As to Rush… he’s just a cute, little, misunderstood furball that needs some love (or a hug).
Tanya, on this thread, as a joke, Chap brought up the Hitler comparison. You’re responding to a poorly timed joke and are getting off topic.
You just got done saying in a previous post that this kind of nonsense happens on both sides of the aisle.
Obama is not like Reagan and he is not like Hitler.
Can we move on now?
Hey Chucky: you left out one thing about Rush Limbaugh- and most every other potential candidate- he is smarter than you. (You shoe horn.)
I’m not certain this would be wise. First, it plays directly into the hands of those claiming the FD is necessary in order to promote “balanced” political coverage – having a self-avowed politician on the airwaves clearly biases them. Second, Rush’s talents are focused on entertainment; I don’t see him being an effective politician. In the end, any such move toward politics would wind up removing him from the airwaves.
He stands a much better chance at beating a re-imposition of the FD by sticking to his guns and continuing to claim he is an entertainer, not a political commentator.
Who gives a rip about Tanya and what Tanya is doing?
ROFLMAO
Bear 1909 out
Well, there’s one more can of 440 rounds of 7.62×54R at the shop. I hope it’s there tomorrow!
ECS
I figured we were on the same page.
As for Tanya… I just skip over her posts.
The Fairness Doctrine swings both ways….can u see Savage going head to head with OlberWeenie or Randy What’s Her Name? ROFLMAO
you bet the libs are gonna regret it.
equal time for everybody.
Bear1909 out
Agreed.
You know, I’m having difficulty with believing that Omu’s problem is drugs. Somewhere, sometime he’d have to sober up, at least for a little bit. His problem must just be stupidity.
“You can’t fix stupid.”
ECS
Push the Med Alert button and just patiently wait. Also, try losing some weight in the future.
And for today’s fourth grade poetry exercise, the topic is OBINGO is like…..
most anything dangerous-better when it is not around.
and thus, yet again, my point is proven ten times over. ROFLMAO
Bear1909 out
Nope, just riding an emotional high and engaging in occasional gloating.
Obama will have republicans in his administration. Hagel will certainly have a job, unless he decides to retire.
I expect Obama to anger many on the fringe left in the coming years with his decision making. His views on issues like gay marriage and the death penalty are hardly in line with mainstream, “typical” liberals. He’s a smart calculating politician, and I most certainly expect him to govern from the center.
Odinkee looks like he’s seen a ghost. LMAO Every news clip of this buffoon looks like the sword of damoclese is hanging over his coconut.
Course i would feel that way too if i had just stuff a viper down my pants by appointing the Clinton as Secretary of State. ROFLMAO Way to go Obinkee.
Obinkee is a front man for a globalist faction. If that matches your definition of a smart calculating politician, well so be it.
He is a bend over kinda guy who is having his narcissism rewarded in spades. They will be finished with him in 150 days after inauguration.
By then the Treasury will be fully plundered and the NAU well on its way to being a reality.
Useful idiot= Obinkee.
End of story.
Bear1909out.
PS: Governing from the center of a cesspool is still governing from the cesspool.
Tanya: “Ya, like totally, because he has, like, so much experience and STUFF. I mean, not even a full term in the Senate and he has become President of our great nation on political savvy alone….and stuff.”
News flash to the pea brain posting here…its called Money, Thuggary, and bias- mass media cooperation. Not Political Savvy or intellegence for that matter.
And from the deepest part, forbye.
Hagel is an unrelenting idiot with little or no redeeming value. He is so incredibly dumb that he poses a serious threat to whatever government entity he may be associated with. Obama appears to be resurrecting the Clinton administration with a few added kooks of his own.
Obama is a friggin Idiot, a puppet nothing more nothing less. He couldn’t come up with one single thought on his own if his life depended on it… ever.
Do you have a background in History? As someone who does, and who learned the comparative method from History professors who engage in comparative history, all sorts of things, like different politicians and movements are compared. Hitler didn’t start out as an evil, megamaniacal dictator. The German people believed in Hitler for his potential to put Germany back on the path of prosperity as do Obummer’s voters.
Do you have some kind of special bond with Obummer? Obummer isn’t Reagan. You either don’t know Reagan well or think that linking Obummer to him gives him more cudos or gravitas than he actually deserves. Folks of my ilk? Okay, said by someone with a very thin skin who doesn’t either study/understand history on ANY LEVEL. That’s okay, since the American people don’t pride themselves on an education that doesn’t bother to make connections anymore.
I also don’t throw around Hitler lightly, but you must know that he’s a topic of continued fascination by academia. I am not a crazy person, nor am I doing this for cathartic reasons. I’m doing so based on my knowledge of modern European history. Right now, the USA is showing signs of the same economic instability as the Weimar Republic but because people really are reluctant to learn the entire history of Hitler, not just how he rose to “fame” but what got him there, there will be constant assertions from those like “you” that those who make such comparative studies are “wack jobs” or the “fringe.” You’d be surprised who’s making studies, on both sides, in academia right now.
Again, you, like many people, attach a lot of personal animus/emotion to Hitler. You do realize that historians study the likes of Hitler and Stalin for a reason, right? I’m a historian, and I’m engaging this topic on a historical level, not a personal one. Any time someone even brings up Hitler, people clap their hands over their ears. There is such a reluctance to look beyond the evil. There was more to Hitler than that. History is never, ever that simple.
Let’s be clear, since you’ve come to your own conclusion about me. I’m not scapegoating any particular group, nor am I making a DIRECT, personal comparison between Hitler and Obummer. I’m deeply troubled by Obummer because he exhibits signs that don’t represent the kind of bi-partisanship he supposedly embodies.
I’m not saying that Obummer will kill millions of people, or even start a war. However, Obummer has made some supportive noises about restricting both first and second ammendment rights in America. Did you miss that? That doesn’t indicate to me that he cares about all Americans or their rights, only the “fringe” lefties who got him where he is today.
You seem to be attached to your own history but refuse to make connections. Historians study this stuff to spare you the hard work. I don’t know who or what Obummer is. And I also think you and many of his supporters don’t either.
I guess we’ll learn together.
Ah… real life calls… no, don’t worry, I never discuss Hitler over dinner, just dessert.
/joke disabled
Hey Sybil. Get a different prescription. Who was it an uncle, father, or a neighbor. Was it somebody else altogether? It’s not your fault
LolitaFeebiebabe. Just focus, pray, and take your meds.I see that you blame everything, but your own party’s shortcomings. Even people like Newt and Rove have compliemented Obama for being a brilliant politician. It you want to spend the next 4 years blaming, whining and moaning, I’ll have fun mocking you. If you can’t get over your hatred for Obama to give him any credit at all, it just shows your immaturity.
I didn’t mean to threadjack this thread to the topic of Hitler. Please place the blame on Chaps and his fellow Obummer bootlicker, Tanya.
My deepest apologies to those who don’t share, according to Tanya, a deep, abiding love affair for all things fringe.
I’m sorry, MM. I had to stand up and just say that Reagan was a one of a kind man, Republican, Conservative, and politician. No one, not even Tanya’s St. Obummer, will hold a candle to him.
Now, let’s return to our standard, socialized programming.
/sarc off
Pretty low-rent tack I’d say, coming from anybody for any reason.
You seem to hit the meds thing a lot. Have they had a role in your life, TANya? Many a joke is said in truth as they say.
With replies like this you demonstrate your own sense of self-worth.
The word IGNORAMOUS comes to mind.
Tag. You’re it.
You libs have hysterics every time anybody points out the one person whose rhetoric really resembles Hitler’s.
You have some freakin nerve accusing anyone of immaturity after a filthy and unsupportable remark like this. Who the hell do you think you are?
Tanya – who is immature and hateful? I certainly dont think incest is a funny subject…do you?
I have been watching your incoherent statements all day. You are ridiculous. Have fun mocking me. I enjoy the stupidity of your posts. It must be bliss to live in such ingnorance, no?
“it, what, huh, wha,” HUH? Slow down, what are you trying to say? LMAO
That is incorrect, Hagel is quiting (thank God), there will not be an appointment. Mike Johanns has already been elected to the seat. Hopefully he is better, but he has shown over the years that he is always looking to move up and not necessarily interested in finishing the job he was elected or appointed to do.
Also, I apologize for my state keeping Hagel in office for so long. I have long known that he was a RINO.
I’m not telling jokes. I’ll pray for Feebiebabe. She introduced herself to me as a bipolar “Bastard out of Carolina” type. I hope she’s okay and I hope the cycle is broken. Now go back to not caring about what I say, or what I think. We’ll see about your 150 days talk. I’m laughing now.
Bye.