The ObaHillary morph: Recycling you can believe in

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 18, 2008 10:49 PM

Back in March, The New Republic lamented that Democrats could only choose one: Clinton or Obama. How wrong they were.

The Obama inner circle now includes:

Clintonite Rahm Emanuel as Obama chief of staff…

Clintonite Deputy AG Eric Holder as rumored Obama AG…

Clintonite lawyer Greg Craig as Obama chief counsel…

Clintonite chief of staff John Podesta as Obama Transition Team leader…

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s entire economic team

And maybe — a remote maybe — even Hillary herself.

Next thing you know, Michelle Obama’s gonna start wearing those headbands…

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Jules Crittenden » Clinton’s (Coat) Holder
  2. El cambio según Obama « Sarah Palin en Español
  3. Barack O’Clinton? « Jane Q. Republican
  4. The Obama Administration: A Clintonian Redux « Decidedly Right
  5. Whatever happened to “change”? « Boiling Frogs
  6. Health Care BS - SMALL CHANGE: A RETREAD FOR HHS
  7. OBAMA’S CABINET OF “CHANGE”… « FactReal
  8. Obamanic Hilarity » Winds Of Jihad
  9. More Evidence that Obama is Becoming Bill Clinton « Jane Q. Republican

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #549597
    On November 18th, 2008 at 10:52 pm, ajmontana said:

    This is like the worst Horror movie ever. (barf)

  2. #549601
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:02 pm, regularguy said:

    Yup. Change we can believe in.

  3. #549602
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:03 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    So much for Change We Can Believe In.
    It’s just a change back to another time.

  4. #549604
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:05 pm, Drews2Cents said:

    Good news! Flannel, torn jeans, and work boots will be cool again! Eddie Vedder will storm the stage screaming “I’m still alive.” We’re gonna party like it’s nineteen ninety five!

  5. #549609
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    Holy cow, Michelle!! That photoshop underneath the post headline is gonna give me nightmares!

  6. #549610
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:16 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    Holy cow, Michelle!! That photoshop underneath the post headline is gonna give me nightmares!

    You mean more nightmares…

  7. #549611
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:16 pm, RockyR said:

    Does this mean that the Obama administration will be centrist (center-left) like Clinton’s was? It’s not like we’re lining up a bunch of rabid radicals, here. What am I missing?

  8. #549612
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:18 pm, Flyoverman said:

    War on Terror reverts to Cops and Robbers. Miranda Rights and Habeus Corpus for all jihadists.

    Oh joy.

  9. #549615
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:22 pm, BKennedy said:

    I still have my doubts that OClinton won’t turn into OKarl.

  10. #549616
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:24 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I still have my doubts that OClinton won’t turn into OKarl.

    That is a given. Ideology is what makes him tick.

  11. #549618
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:25 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well we certainly know what the meeting between Clinton and Odopey was about after she lost the Nomination.

    How come nobody spotted Monte Hall there?

  12. #549619
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:26 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:16 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    You mean more nightmares…

    You are correct, of course. Yucky…

  13. #549620
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:26 pm, zmdavid said:

    The photoshop under the headline looks like John Edwards.

  14. #549624
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:28 pm, ajmontana said:

    You mean more nightmares…

    and Daymares. :shock:

  15. #549625
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:28 pm, feebiebabe said:

    America, Hell + Hanbasket….hold on for the ride.

  16. #549626
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:29 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Hanbasket

    Hand Basket…

  17. #549628
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:29 pm, feebiebabe said:

    hey Ajers. Mistress is some piece of work, eh?

  18. #549629
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:31 pm, rightisright said:

    going back 8 years was the change the Zero was referring to? Biggest problem with those crooks is now there is no conservative Congress to keep ‘em in check…you know the conservative congress that many went left or crooked themselves.
    It scares me the damage these elitist dolts will bring to this once great country. Who was it ‘30 pieces’ on another thread today, reminded us tomorrow is ‘ammunition day’, getting “oo” buck and 357 ammo myself.

  19. #549634
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:34 pm, ajmontana said:

    Who feebz? lol

    and hiya :)

  20. #549638
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:42 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Change. Humph.

  21. #549643
    On November 18th, 2008 at 11:46 pm, JimC214 said:

    What do you get when you have President Obama, Vice President Biden, Speaker of the House Pelosi and President pro tempore of the Senate Byrd in a room at the same time right after Clinton becomes Secretary of State? Ask Vince foster for the answer.

  22. #549651
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:03 am, Micheleeroo said:

    “Change” you really didn’t want (and wasn’t sold to us that way).

  23. #549655
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:07 am, RockyR said:

    We have a burgeoning plutocracy ruled by two dynasties… The Bush dynasty and the Clinton dynasty. Obama, apparently, is a eunuch.

    Still. This doesn’t look radically left-wing to me, yet. Maybe my senses are just dulled to this because the Clinton campaign was rather mollified by Gingrich and the Contract with America… but, I’m starting to wonder if the right-wing pundits have exaggerated Obama’s leftism. Maybe that’s what I’m SUPPOSED to be thinking :-D

  24. #549657
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:09 am, simcoe said:

    Holy crap! I thought we were rid of these ridiculous Clintons. Like a dirty stain down deep in the carpet, they eventually work their way back up to the top.

    At least it’s only for four years. Sarah better do her homework in the next four years. Or maybe Jindal/Palin in 2012.

    Just hope we get some damn leadership with backbone back into the political conservatism.

    That cover looks like an Obama limp-wrist.

  25. #549665
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:17 am, AlohaGuy said:

    You mean more nightmares…

    I actually know someone who looks like that…

    Will Jamie Gorelick be in charge of Homeland Security? :(

  26. #549668
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:22 am, Micheleeroo said:

    Ugghhhhh! My eyes!!!!

  27. #549670
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:23 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:22 am, Micheleeroo said:

    Ugghhhhh! My eyes!!!!

    Yeah, I kinda had a Large Marge moment myself.

  28. #549674
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:32 am, simcoe said:

    The stupid people, unable to think for themselves, wandering around bumping into walls because there is no one to tell them to turn this way or that, won’t even know they’ve been lied to unless the Obamedia tells them that they actually ended up voting for the Clinton machine.

  29. #549689
    On November 19th, 2008 at 1:02 am, PrestoPundit - Greg Ransom said:

    You really should be punished for posting that photoshop.

    If I could scrub my brain, I would.

  30. #549729
    On November 19th, 2008 at 2:32 am, farmgal said:

    I’m hoping with Bill & Hill in there they will undermine everything Obama wants to do and he’ll get nothing done.

  31. #549781
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:42 am, karenhasfreedom said:

    I thought they made a movie about this, called, “Back to the Future”

    Wow, wait until the idiots who voted for this clown wake up and realize how bad off they are in a couple of years.

  32. #549795
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:00 am, Dandapani said:

    Nearly the same team that brought us the 1994 so-called Assault Weapons Ban. Where’s Janet’s place in the team? We need another Waco? How about Ruby Ridge?

  33. #549826
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:48 am, Lifeofthemind said:

    Reunions in the Lincoln bedroom?

  34. #549845
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:34 am, Lindsay said:

    Deja vu type of change?

  35. #549848
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:36 am, rambler said:

    Does he have a job for Bill?

  36. #549894
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:28 am, lgm said:

    The country was prosperous under Bill Clinton and sank into a deep recession under Bush. Rightly or wrongly, this gives the impression that Clinton was a better President.

    All those photoshopped pictures are third grade humor. In the old days, third graders thought it was funny to draw mustaches and blacken teeth in pictures. Now there are so many more not so original or clever possibilities. It makes this blog look angry, not serious.

  37. #549935
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:54 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    lgm said:

    The country was prosperous under Bill Clinton and sank into a deep recession under Bush.

    WRONG AGAIN.

    Holy sheet. How far is your head in the sand…or somewhere else.

    The internet bubble was created under Bubba Clinton.

    It also BLEW UP under Clinton in April of 2000.

    That’s right… April 2000… under Clinton’s watch.

    My how liberals love to change history.

    Stick to the facts.

  38. #549952
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:07 am, cicerokid said:

    That dude looks like a lady!

  39. #549964
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:21 am, torabora said:

    Did we REALLY need that photoshop?

  40. #549975
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:30 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    And any photo of Hillary makes me ill. Stir in one part Obama… and I’m hurling in buckets.

  41. #549981
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:33 am, pianoman said:

    There are some things that cannot be unseen.

  42. #549989
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:36 am, DBNinKY said:

    It makes this blog look angry, not serious.

    You should know! Over the past year, you’ve posted more negative comments and opinions on everything from President Bush’s bike to MM’s I-net fundraiser for the troops, than any other poster I’ve read. You’re in no position to judge.

  43. #550014
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:50 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    So who’s going to be the next Monica Lewinsky? :?

  44. #550020
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:57 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:28 am, lgm said:
    The country was prosperous under Bill Clinton and sank into a deep recession under Bush. Rightly or wrongly, this gives the impression that Clinton was a better President.

    How many terrorist attacks happened on Billy Jeff’s watch versus those under GW’s watch… and how many since September 11, 2001? And what impression, does the answer to that question give you?

  45. #550043
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:13 am, Paul Revere said:

    30 pcs of silver said:
    So who’s going to be the next Monica Lewinsky?

    The dinosaur media is already kneeling.

  46. #550053
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:22 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:13 am, Paul Revere said:
    30 pcs of silver said:
    So who’s going to be the next Monica Lewinsky?
    The dinosaur media is already kneeling.

    Good one!

  47. #550054
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:23 am, garydt said:

    LGM, do you ever answer? You are a poor debator indeed! Remember when Janet Reno went after Microsoft, and shortly later Clinton’s boom was over. Besides Clinton wasn’t watching the terrorist stuff and had kept that on the back burner. Anyway you seem to have some anger in your tone today, and by the way are you happy at all?

  48. #550106
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:54 am, eaglehaslanded said:

    Yeah, eight years of prosperity and budget surpluses would be a terrible thing to go back to.

    And we have this to look forward to:
    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/08/31/business/0831-sbn-webVIEW.gif

  49. #550119
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:01 am, right4life said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:54 am, eaglehaslanded said:
    Yeah, eight years of prosperity and budget surpluses would be a terrible thing to go back to.

    the only reason any of that happened is because we had a republican congress.

    oh and remember the stock market crash of april 2000??? hmmmm?? the nasdaq has never recovered.

  50. #550124
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:05 am, Laree said:

    This is by Blogger Janet Crain, who has changed her blog from Meet the Real Sarah Palin to “Sarah Palin 2012″ There is a Poll on this blog, currently asking if Obama’s visiable online records- Birth Certificate, actually a (live birth document) Selective Service Record (doesn’t correspond) ect…is troubling to Americans.

    This Post below, is about his position on Energy. How will he make US Energy Independent without putting more people out of jobs like the coal industry.

    http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-vows-to-move-full-steam-ahead-but.html

  51. #550144
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:18 am, farmgal said:

    One thing that was interesting to me in The Clinton years,was when he was sending troops to Bosnia and Kosovo and bombing aspirin factories,none of the lefties ever complained.In fact you not only didn’t hear a peep out of them,but you had people like Cheryl Crowe going on tour to support the mission.Talk about hypocrisy.

  52. #550151
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:24 am, CantCureStupid said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:23 am, garydt said:

    LGM, do you ever answer? You are a poor debator indeed!

    LGM and Omu drop turd bombs on threads and then leave. If you respond to whatever idiocy they’ve posted, you are responding to a troll ghost. I rarely see either of them engage in debate.

  53. #550162
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:29 am, lgm said:

    DBNinKY said (#42):

    It makes this blog look angry, not serious.

    You should know! Over the past year, you’ve posted more negative comments and opinions…

    I try to disagree without hyperventilating.

    30 pcs of silver said (#44):

    How many terrorist attacks happened on Billy Jeff’s [William Jefferson Clinton] watch versus those under GW’s watch… and how many since September 11, 2001?

    Terrorists killed more Americans under Bush’ watch than any President since Reagan.

    garydt said (#46):

    Remember when Janet Reno went after Microsoft, and shortly later Clinton’s boom was over.

    You’re blaming the tech bubble burst on the anti trust suit? That’s a stretch.

  54. #550173
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:39 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    From Drudge:

    AL-QAIDA INSULTS OBAMA IN NEW MESSAGE

    OMG, I thought the world LOVES us unconditionally after Nov 4th! CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN??

    (maybe they just didnt get the message out to the caves of Pakistan….)

  55. #550187
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:45 am, Paul Revere said:

    Anyone remember when Janet Reno deported one of God’s children?

  56. #550191
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:47 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    deported one of God’s children

    Castro is god?

  57. #550222
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, DBNinKY said:

    “…hyperventilating.”

    Oh really. And I suppose MM’s use of photo shop – the e-version of traditional print’s political cartoons -was a prime example of hyperventilating?

  58. #550289
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, Right By-The-Sea said:

    There has to be a nice plum assignment in the works for Jamie Gorelick. Her fingerprints were all over the Janet Reno Justice Department’s evil deeds, as well as her being a major player in Fannie/Freddie’s meltdowns. She literally made out like a bandit with her Fannie Mae ill-gotten gains. And, let’s not forget her high visibility on that dog-and-pony-show known as the “9/11 Commission.” I cannot wait to find out what Federal Agency/branch of government she plans to RUIN next!! Hmmm…Maybe a SCOTUS nomination???

  59. #550347
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, dadinseattle said:

    I knew he was the American idol contestant…does that picture resemble Sanjaya?

  60. #550361
    On November 19th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, dadinseattle said:

    lgm wrote:

    It makes this blog look angry, not serious.

    Maybe you should ask MM if you can work for her for the new emotion police position on her site!

  61. #550404
    On November 19th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, eaglehaslanded said:
  62. #550422
    On November 19th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, sandyb said:

    lgm said:
    All those photoshopped pictures are third grade humor. In the old days, third graders thought it was funny to draw mustaches and blacken teeth in pictures. Now there are so many more not so original or clever possibilities.

    You want original, lgm? Maybe Michelle could just post close-ups of The One’s ginormous ears. And Hillbilly? Geesh, people gag when they see regular shots of her. No touch-ups needed. Nothing juvenile to see here.

  63. #550450
    On November 19th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, scrat said:
  64. #550767
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, bear1909 said:

    I am surprised the King of The New USS Banana Boat hasnt changed the “Secretary” title to “Minister”.

    :lol:

  65. #550878
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, sonofdy said:

    Yes the market fell under bush because of economic problems we have been ignoring since FDR. The market was starting to recover right up till obama was elected, and is now lower than ever. I call it the Obama effect and it will continue.

  66. #551025
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:46 pm, zorro said:

    Oh man Michelle! Halloween is over, but you are scaring the heck outa me with those photos… I’ve seen better heads on an iodine bottle.

  67. #551041
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:17 pm, garydt said:

    LGM,,, Bill Gates is a good democrat so what are you harping about anti-trust, I do have to give you credit for partially answering but you still fail to respond to the abortion clinic bombings?? any chance of an answer there? YEah LGM I have the Joy of the LOrd with me and I know how the end times will end. You as of yet have not once gave us a joyous message. As for Clinton having fewer deaths on his watch ,, rememember the 9-11 guys were planning this way back in Bill’s administration.

  68. #551178
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:54 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 1:02 am, PrestoPundit – Greg Ransom said:

    You really should be punished for posting that photoshop.

    If I could scrub my brain, I would.

    I think Obama and his “truth squads” will handle that for you.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook