See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Re: Kathleen Parker | PAWaterCooler.com
2. Four words about Kathleen Parker « Top Daily Digest Reading

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On November 20th, 2008 at 7:35 am, bansharia said:

     Off topic:
     I don’t like links that say nothing but link me to another Michelle blog.
     Say something or put on rightside and let folks link that way.
     On topic:
     Am very very tired of all this
     infighting by selfdescribed conservatives and am more than happy for any to fight it out. You may or may not be welcome when you are done to be part of the solution.
     HINT: Don’t hold your breath you look good in blue

102. #102
     On November 20th, 2008 at 7:59 am, Chief RZ said:

     I do wonder what happened to her. Drugs? Failed marriage? Intimidation? Taking an easy way out?

     I did notice her left turn about two months ago, then I stopped reading her and did not attend an event she was to be.

103. #103
     On November 20th, 2008 at 8:23 am, tre said:

     CJ #49

     I agree. I used to like to read her. But, something happened to her during this election. She’s not the same writer I used to know.

104. #104
     On November 20th, 2008 at 8:47 am, pianoman said:

     On November 19th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

     But with that aside, we’re having Sushi tonight! Does anyone have any fresh slabs of Whale?

     Too late for your dinner, RS, but I did find this:

     Found Nemo

105. #105
     On November 20th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, newton said:

     You know, that woman reminds me of something my husband says sometimes: “Opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one.”

     But with her, I can see there is a fine line that can be crossed between having one… and being one!
     

     Heh!

106. #106
     On January 1st, 2009 at 1:08 pm, yohannbiimu said:

     I have never heard of this woman before hearing ABOUT her on a re-airing of a Glenn Beck program this morning. So, after finding and reading what she said about the oogedy-boogedy God “fans” who doomed John McCain and the Republican party during the last election cycle, all I can say is that there is no way that Parker ever WAS a “conservative.”

     Why? Because her rants are not about “white Christians” (in a party that has become “to the exclusion of others”) as she claims, but rather standards. She has a problem with people who hold to standards regardless of the circumstances and times in which we live (hence, where the root word for “conservative” comes). If I believe that our states should decide upon abortion laws as the Constitution says OUGHT to happen, then the problem isn’t one of faith, but rather in the rule of law. Therefore, it isn’t my faith that Parker has a problem with, but rather my political belief that our Constitution should rule us, not the dictates of the Federal government and bitter old men in black robes.

     She has a problem with the people who could not get as excited about John McCain (a toothless worm who holds to no beliefs in anything whatsoever) as 99.9999% of the media got whenever Barack Obama uttered a single syllable, regardless of whether it made any sense or not. Exclusionary “white Christians” did not doom John McCain, and anyone who actually believes this (as Ms. Parker apparently does), then I have some beach-front lots for sale on the “Sea of Tranquility” that are going cheap.

     An ignorant (to the point of being imbecilic) populous, an enormous media outpouring of support (to the point of literally carrying Barack Obama across the finish line), AND being the worst Republican presidential candidate since Wendell Willkie doomed John McCain. So, for Parker to simply parrot the liberal leftist propaganda regarding the Republican party being too “white” and “Christian,” and that it needs to distance itself from these people displays either rank stupidity on her part, or that she wishes to join in on the dog-pile that will inevitably destroy the GOP.

     Regardless of her “reasons,” she has declared that she is devoid of any standards whatsoever, and that is the liberal way. Liberals were pro-life forty years ago, and now the very same will vote against preserving the life of a born baby who survived a botched abortion. Liberals always throw away standards and principles if “the times” dictate that they do so. Kathleen Parker is a liberal, and if she has an honest bone in her body, she’ll admit it.

107. #107
     On January 1st, 2009 at 1:29 pm, yohannbiimu said:

     BTW, just about every conservative I know does not identify themselves as Republicans anymore. The Republican party is as complicit with the destruction of our nation as it was founded as the Democrats. They have betrayed the citizens of this country by their joining the liberal Democrats in the corruption of our national governance, rather than fighting for us.

     I no long identify with ANY party, and that is a problem that the GOP can’t fix by distancing themselves from ideals and standards. If Kathy Parker gets her way, the GOP will go the way of the Whigs in the mid-1800’s.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]