The insane rage of the same-sex marriage mob

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 19, 2008 12:55 AM

My first syndicated column of the week today chronicles the insane rage of the anti-Prop. 8 mob that’s not on your newspaper front pages or nightly news. The lawsuits are piling up: “Four Bay Area counties are the latest to join the legal fight to try to stop state Proposition 8, a ban on same-sex marriage in California that voters approved Nov. 4. The Board of Supervisors for Alameda, Marin, San Mateo and Santa Cruz counties have approved joining a lawsuit filed in the California Supreme Court by the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles and Santa Clara and Los Angeles counties. The lawsuit is one of six cases filed directly in the state high court in San Francisco to challenge the Proposition 8.” California AG Jerry Brown wants fast action. The buzz over potential judicial recalls is building. Meantime, the anti-Prop. 8 mob is plotting its next action: “Day Without a Gay.” And the latest on the witch hunt against the Mormon Church is here.

***

The insane rage of the same-sex marriage mob
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

Before election day, national media hand-wringers forged a wildly popular narrative: The Right was, in the words of New York Times’ columnist Paul Krugman, gripped by “insane rage.” Outbreaks of incivility (some real, but mostly imagined) were proof positive of the extremist takeover of the Republican Party. The cluck-cluckers and tut-tutters shook in fear.

But when the GOP took a beating on Nov. 4, no mass protests ensued. No nationwide boycotts erupted. Conservatives took their lumps and began the peaceful post-defeat process of self-flagellation, self-analysis, and self-autopsy. In fact, there’s only one angry mob gripped by “insane rage” in the wake of campaign 2008: The mob of left-wing, same-sex marriage activists incensed at their defeat in California. Voters there approved a traditional marriage initiative, Proposition 8, by 52-48.

Instead of introspection and self-criticism, however, the sore losers who opposed Prop. 8 have responded with threats, fists, and blacklists.

That’s right. Activists have published an “Anti-Gay Black List” of Prop. 8 donors on the Internet. If the tables had been turned and Prop. 8 proponents created such an enemies’ list, everyone in Hollywood would be screaming “McCarthyism” faster than you can count to eight. A Los Angeles restaurant whose manager made a small donation to the Prop. 8 campaign has been besieged nightly by hordes of protesters who have disrupted the business, intimidated patrons, and brought employees there to tears. In fear for their jobs and their lives, workers at El Coyote Mexican Café pooled together $500 to pay off the bullies.

Scott Eckern, a beleaguered artistic director at the California Musical Theatre, was forced to resign over his $1,000 donation to the Prop. 8 campaign. The director of the Los Angeles Film Festival, Rich Raddon, is next on the chopping block after the anti-Prop. 8 mob discovered that he had also contributed to the Yes on 8 campaign. Calls have been pouring in for his firing.

Over the past two weeks, anti-Prop. 8 organizers have targeted Mormon, Catholic, and evangelical churches. Sentiments like this one, found on the anti-Prop.8 website “JoeMyGod,” are common across the left-wing blogosphere: “Burn their f—ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers.” Thousands of gay-rights demonstrators stood in front of the Mormon temple in Los Angeles shouting “Mormon scum.” The Mormon headquarters in Salt Lake City received threatening letters containing an unidentified powder. Religious-bashing protesters filled with hate decried the “hate” at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church in Orange County, Calif. Vandals defaced the Calvary Chapel in Chino Hills, Calif., because church members had collected Prop. 8 petitions. One worshiper’s car was keyed with the slogans “Gay sex is love” and “SEX;” another car’s antenna and windshield wipers were broken.

In Carlsbad, Calif., a man was charged with punching his elderly neighbors over their pro-Prop. 8 signs. In Palm Springs, a videographer filmed unhinged anti-Prop. 8 marchers who yanked a large cross from the hands of 69-year-old Phyllis Burgess and stomped on it.

In San Francisco, Christians evangelizing in the Castro district needed police protection after the same-sex marriage mob got physical and hounded them off the streets.

Enthusiastically shooting themselves in the foot, anti-Prop. 8 boycotters are now going after the left-wing Sundance Film Festival because it does business in Mormon-friendly Utah. Also targeted: Cinemark Theaters across the country. The company’s CEO, Alan Stock, donated just under $1,000 to the traditional marriage measure. Never mind that Cinemark theaters are hosting the new biopic about gay icon Harvey Milk. They must pay for the sins of the company head who dared to exercise his political free speech!

Corporate honchos, church leaders, and small donors alike are in the same-sex marriage mob’s crosshairs, all unfairly demonized as hate-filled bigots by bona fite hate-filled bigots who have abandoned decency in pursuit of “equal rights.” One wonders where Barack Obama (himself an opponent of Proposition 8 and an opponent of gay marriage) is as this insane rage rages on. Soul-Fixer, Nation-Healer, where art thou?

Posted in: Proposition 8

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Obama, White Guilt, Pay Back Time! « Riggword Weblog
  2. Gay Marriage? | Nicholas Fitzgerald
  3. Traditional Values Still Fighting On Even Under an Obama Presidency « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  4. Arrested for “erotic driving”? « Mark Epstein
  5. Take Our Country Back
  6. Democracy speaks… « Welcome to Lindy’s Blog: Where Mom is Always Right
  7. Homosexuals in California Scapegoat Mormons for Prop 8 Loss « The Sisyphus Files
  8. Jesus is Lord, A Worshipping Christian’s Blog » Blog Archive » “The Insane Rage of the Same-Sex Marriage Mob” by Michelle Malkin
  9. Why Can’t We Accept The "Will of The People"? | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  10. Militant homosexuality and anti-Prop 8 efforts « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  11. Michelle Malkin » Gagging pro-lifers in New York City
  12. What About the Right to Choose Where You Protest? | BipolarNation.com
  13. Prop 8 should not have happened — The Opposite of Jim Bunning
  14. What I’m reading instead of working… : Pursuing Holiness
  15. If McCain Had Won - « Kerfuffles and Flourishes
  16. Angry Gay Crowds/Gangs Reject Laws - Attack And Intimidate | BigMouthFrog
  17. Todays Links | The Second Opinion Today
  18. Moderate Blogger » To Prop. 8 Opponents: Your Not Doing It Right
  19. GayPatriot » Will the Juvenilia of the Prop 8 Sore Losers Ever Cease?
  20. Random Jottings
  21. Wizbang
  22. WO’s Daily Roundup | Without Objection
  23. BelchSpeak » Post Topic » EHarmony Settles With Gays; Makes Website for Gay Hookups
  24. Michelle Malkin » eHarmony forced to offer same-sex dating services
  25. GayPatriot » Michelle takes on the insane rage of the anti-Prop 8 Rallies
  26. Sierra Faith
  27. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Michelle on the “insane rage” of the anti-Prop 8 mobs
  28. Jesus is Lord, A Worshipping Christian’s Blog » Blog Archive » eHarmony Forced to Offer Same-Sex Dating Services
  29. Prop 8 Goes to Court! Voting; why bother? « Riggword Weblog
  30. BizzyBlog » Couldn’t Help But Comment ….. (112008, Morning)
  31. Political Opinion « Capitalist View
  32. KEEPING THEM HONEST - by Katy Grimes » Blog Archive » Coming Soon to eHarmony: Adam & Steve
  33. GayPatriot » Gay Activists Need to Learn from Conservatives
  34. Separation of Church and Hate « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  35. Enough Already | America Needs Me
  36. Culture War Continues in California « The Right Knight
  37. Michelle Malkin » Anti-Prop. 8 mob watch: L.A. Film Festival director resigns over donations
  38. Tolerance in action — San Francisco style! : Stop The ACLU
  39. Jon Swift
  40. Let Us Remember the True Meaning of Thanksgiving Before It’s Abolished - The Political Hotwire
  41. Part of the job description « Datechguy’s Blog
  42. Michelle Malkin » Who will make the other Prop. 8 musical?
  43. Liberal Elites to People of Faith: “Please ignore your religion.” | Without Objection
  44. Prop 8 Protests Still Ineffective When Set to Music : Jenn Q. Public
  45. The New Civil Rights Movement » Dear Michelle Malkin: Stop Calling Gays Insane and We’ll Stop Calling You A Bigot. Well, If You Stop Calling Everyone Else A Bigot Too.
  46. Above the Hate: Below the Propaganda | Maine Gay Bars
  47. Once is an Event. Twice is a Coincidence. Three or more times is a pattern. « Teh Resistance Blog
  48. New York Times: Thumbs Up to Prop 8 Protesters Strategy! « Jane Q. Republican
  49. Skewering the Religious Right: Not Another Word on Gay Marriage Until They Execute an Adulterer » A Couple Things » A couple things about politics, sports, travel, and other stuff.
  50. My Pledge « Sockpuppet Politic
  51. Militant Homosexual KGB “Sleeper” Agents Described Over 25 Years Ago « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  52. GayPatriot » Left-wing Logic Justifies Gay-baiting
  53. Michelle Malkin » This is what mob rule looks like

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #550726
    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, Mookie said:

    AllahPundit has been banning anyone who uses the word f** or fa****. I wonder why the standards are different here since Michelle runs both sites.

    MM is obviously more tolerant! :)

  2. #550727
    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, feebiebabe said:

    r4f stupidly thinks that discriminating against gay people is the Christian thing to do, and making it illegal to discriminate against gay people violates his freedom of religion.

    Eagle – discrimination happens with or without laws.

    By leaving the religious institution of marriage up to interpretation allows religions to be dictated by other cultures and the governement.

    If same sex marriage is legal and a certain religion does not chose to accept that (because that is what they believe) then what keeps same-sex couples from suing these establishments for discrimination (or the government removing their tax exemption status)?

    How then are religions protected from the government so their followers may freely practice their beliefs?

    They wont be.

  3. #550731
    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:56 pm, dominigan said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    I’m a Christian too, dumbass.

    So either…

    1) You know God condemns homosexuality as an abhorrent sin, and you are knowingly siding with the evil one against God, or…

    2) You just think you’re a Christian, and don’t know or want to know Scripture. You are the “church” that Jesus refers to when he refers to the lukewarm being spit out of his mouth and that he never knew you, or…

    3) You’re lying.

    We are told to judge others by the fruit of their actions. Jesus called many “religious” people hypocrites for not applying scripture. Jesus also said that those that do not bear fruit will be pruned from the vine and thrown into the fire to be burned.

    As a Christian, I am backing up my arguments with Scripture, the very Word of God. If feel you must refute me, then use the Word to correct me. Otherwise, your tongue is nothing more than a restless evil, full of deadly poison.

    Ten points to the true Christians who can point out all the Scripture references I just made…

  4. #550733
    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:57 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, eaglehaslanded said:


    Look up “bisexual”. Then look up “homosexual”. Then look up “idiot”. Your picture is next to the last one.

    Calling dominigan a homo, eh?

  5. #550735
    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:58 pm, Mookie said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:48 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Check out the posts #92,97,99 on the Hagel thread. Specifically…those comments.

    Sweet Jesus. Please tell me she’s been banned. That was ridiculous.

  6. #550738
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, ajmontana said:

    Mookie, she should have been long, long time ago.

  7. #550741
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:01 pm, right4life said:

    I’m not quite sure why this is such a problem for other Christians. No one is equating Christ with Satan. The doctrine is simply stating two brothers who chose entirely different paths. Anyone who has a “black sheep” sibling can no doubt relate.

    this is exactly why mormonism will never be christian. in Christianity, JESUS is God Almighty, creator of heaven and earth, and yes of Satan. they are not ‘brothers’ in any way shape or form. Jesus didn’t become a God, he Always was and Always will be God almighty.

    There is ONE GOD only. you are polytheists. the Shemah: Hear oh Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one…and in isaiah 43:10 before Me there were no gods formed and there shall be none after Me.

    The bottom line is I am a Christian. I believe in Christ. Period. Point. Next.

    only other mormons will consider you so. no other real christian will

  8. #550742
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, Mookie said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, ajmontana said:

    Mookie, she should have been long, long time ago.

    Wait, which one? Tanya? I thought she was new?

  9. #550744
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:05 pm, redpeach said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Homosexual behavior is not a “civil right”,
    but the Vast LEFT-Wing Conspiracy insists that it is.

    Al-Gayda strikes again…

    Eric McKinley filed a complaint with New Jersey’s Civil Rights Division against a California-based company that provided heterosexual-only online matchmaking.

    The result?

    Online dating service eHarmony will be forced to begin providing
    same-sex matches and pay up…

    Under terms of the settlement, the company can create a new or differently named Web site for same-sex singles. The company can also post a disclaimer saying its compatibility-based matching system was developed from research of married heterosexual couples.

    Neither the company nor its founder, Neil Clark Warren, admit any liability.

    In addition, eHarmony will pay the division $50,000 to cover administrative costs. It will pay McKinley $5,000 and give him a free one-year membership to its new service.

    What in the world has this country come to? This is absolute insanity. Forcing a company to spend money to extend its product offering to appease someone who felt the company was violating their civil rights? How can this even be possible??? That’s like a Muslim woman suing a clothing manufacturer for not making a headscarf to match her new sweater.

    In the run up to election day many of my friends, co-workers, would say, “But gay people are not going to force churches to marry them. They’ve assured the voters they will not start suing churches.”

    I would always ask, “Who is this ‘they’ you speak of? Do they have control over every homosexual in California? Because it only takes one person to file a lawsuit and win.”

    Thanks for the info…it will be shared with many!!! Isn’t the founder of eHarmony a Born Again Christian??? I thought I heard that somewhere…

  10. #550745
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, ajmontana said:

    The piece of trash Jusstafakelawyer.

  11. #550746
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:08 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Does it really matter who is on what side of religious practice. Point being, if you are not allowed to practice your religion, it really doesn’t matter folks…

    Who cares what someone else believes. Its their OWN BELIEF…is it not? That’s the really nice thing about Free Will, isn’t it?

    The common thread here is Mormon, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddist, Wiccian… whatever, if same-sex marriage is passed then freedom to practice YOUR religion of choice without interference from society and government will be non-existent.

  12. #550750
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, feebiebabe said:

    AJ – Mookie was reading Tanya’s posts. Mookie, i have no clue if she was banned.

    Mistress Justice is pretty close. There is a smattering of the same (on the hagel thread too – attacks about sexual nonsense on the same post) nature.

  13. #550753
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:12 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81446

    Another example of them using the coercive power of government to force private organizations to bend to their will.

  14. #550755
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:12 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Don’t Be A Judge, But Do Be A Fruit Inspector

    Looks like bad fruit to me…

  15. #550757
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, Mookie said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, feebiebabe said:

    AJ – Mookie was reading Tanya’s posts. Mookie, i have no clue if she was banned.

    Mistress Justice is pretty close. There is a smattering of the same (on the hagel thread too – attacks about sexual nonsense on the same post) nature.

    I don’t understand that. There’s no reason for it. You can disagree with someone until the cows come home but there are some places you just don’t go. I obviously disagree with almost everyone here about gay marriage but I wouldn’t even think of going in the direction they went. You just don’t do it.

  16. #550760
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:17 pm, ajmontana said:

    IC,
    Thought you were speaking of her foursome fantasy and such.
    anyway, both are equally vile.

    I think they’re going for folsom follies grand marshall gig.

  17. #550761
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:17 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Mookie, although we disagree…and there is some slightly intense banter…i wouldnt peg you as one of them.

    I dont get it either.

  18. #550770
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Homosexual behavior is not a “civil right”,
    but the Vast LEFT-Wing Conspiracy insists that it is.

    Al-Gayda strikes again…

    They’ll call it “eSodomy.com”

  19. #550774
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, Gorebot said:

    They can shove a splintered telephone pole up their collective posteriors, with no vaseline.

    Oh wait, no, they’d enjoy it.

    Dang!

  20. #550782
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    Yuck, Gorebot. Just… yuck.

    full body shiver

  21. #550783
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, wighttrasch said:

    feebie & aj; methinks tanya & mj are the same poster/poseur

  22. #550784
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, happy2behere said:

    Gayness has not been proven to be genetically determined in the same way as blackness or femaleness. Therefore your civil rights camparisions are not valid. Civil Unions give all the legal rights to same sex couples as marriage, except the moral equivalence.

    So the question is, why would LGBTs want moral acceptance from the rest of us? Or maybe they want something else, like to silence the church by suing it out of existance the moment they get their first marriage discrimination suit.

  23. #550786
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, feebiebabe said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, wighttrasch said:
    feebie & aj; methinks tanya & mj are the same poster/poseur

    I had my own “Michael and Latoya Jackson” conspiracy theories….

  24. #550788
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, happy2behere said:

    P.S. If you dont believe the lawsuits are coming, just look at post #295.

  25. #550811
    On November 19th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    deviant cruelty:

    masochist to sadist: Hit me!

    sadist to masochist: No!

  26. #550828
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:10 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Original link:

    Al-Gayda strikes again…

    H/T to mattymatt10 for the following link w/ additional detail:

    Dating site promoted by James Dobson bows to lawsuit, creates special service

  27. #550834
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    #312/295;
    Thanks for the heads up and sadly I will leave eHarmony once my term is up in about five months. Sadly, I will tell them that I am leaving because of their refusal to fight.

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

  28. #550836
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, sonofdy said:

    The Obama eefect has now droped the dow below 8000

  29. #550838
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:15 pm, sonofdy said:

    eefect = effect…

  30. #550854
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:22 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Spiritual warfare is real, and is currently manifested in
    legal warfare,
    political warfare,
    ideological warfare,
    and it is getting closer and closer to manifesting into physical warfare.

    God works through His people, and Satan works through his people.

    Those of us who know Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior have nothing to worry about. (Don’t worry. Be happy.)

    Those who don’t know Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior would be wise to lower their pride and talk frankly with a friend who does.

  31. #550855
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    “Day without a gay?”

    Yes please. In fact, can you make it 365 days without a gay?

    I’ll settle for them to just SHUT UP and keep their sexuality to themselves. They can do whatever they want in their own bedrooms, I just DO NOT CARE.

  32. #550860
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    and it is getting closer and closer to manifesting into physical warfare.

    Too many people think it could never happen here. It will happen here eventualy. The only question is when.

  33. #550874
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:35 pm, cicerokid said:

    concerning e-harmony,

    mattymat said:”Another example of them using the coercive power of government to force private organizations to bend to their will.”

    and cicerokid says:”WRONG” This is another example of E-harmony saying “sho me da money!!”$$$

    e harmony is not what they appear to most, and certainly not “supporting traditional family values”. They never have.

  34. #550907
    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:55 pm, redpeach said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, sonofdy said:
    The Obama eefect has now droped the dow below 8000

    News like this was the front and center of every newscast before the election. You couldn’t get away from bad news about the economy – it was nonstop and never a glimmer of anything positive. Yet today I have checked numerous news sites and noticed it’s always in the “other news” section and never a main story. News on the economy has been completely toned down since The One was elected, and the news since then is worse than the news before. The MSM makes me ill.

  35. #550916
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:05 pm, Leatherneck said:

    When humans enguage in Homosexuality, they are given over to a deviant mind.

    Just look at the video. Look at the pictures of Up Your Ally. You do not have to believe me, just look at what the sick Homos are doing.

    Deadly force ahould be use to protect those being attacked. It is lawful to do so.

  36. #550940
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:24 pm, 55dodger said:
  37. #550948
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:31 pm, BigAnge said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:24 pm, 55dodger said:

    CA Supreme Court Order….
    http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/documents/S168047_S168066_S168078-11-19-08_ORDER.pdf

    Take THAT, al-Gayda!!!! Sorry, the law is on our side. Now head back to the bathhouse and shut the hell up.

  38. #550956
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:44 pm, Mookie said:

    Take THAT, al-Gayda!!!! Sorry, the law is on our side. Now head back to the bathhouse and shut the hell up.

    You do realize that it’s going in front of the CA Supreme Court where there’s about a 95% chance it’ll be overturned, right?

  39. #550968
    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:53 pm, Salt said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 6:44 pm, Mookie said:

    You do realize that it’s going in front of the CA Supreme Court where there’s about a 95% chance it’ll be overturned, right?

    I believe your estimate is overly generous considering that they denied the stay of the operation.

  40. #550993
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:16 pm, Mookie said:

    I believe your estimate is overly generous considering that they denied the stay of the operation.

    Everyone already knew that would happen, though.

  41. #550996
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:20 pm, scrubjay said:

    The anti Prop 8 violence should called Homosexual Kristallnacht — just replace the swastika with “=”.

  42. #550999
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:22 pm, ajmontana said:

    This game has to stop, California has voted twice now, enough already. All the money spent on this fiasco could have done some fantastic projets around this state. What a flippin waste.

  43. #551003
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:27 pm, BigAnge said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:22 pm, ajmontana said:

    This game has to stop, California has voted twice now, enough already. All the money spent on this fiasco could have done some fantastic projets around this state. What a flippin waste.

    Yes, like treating all the diseases and mental trauma that this particular deviant lifestyle causes.

  44. #551007
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:30 pm, purplepeep said:

    Mookie said:
    You can disagree with someone until the cows come home but there are some places you just don’t go.

    Yo’ momma, Mooks! :)

  45. #551011
    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:34 pm, purplepeep said:

    ajmontana said:
    This game has to stop, California has voted twice now, enough already. All the money spent on this fiasco could have done some fantastic projets around this state. What a flippin waste.

    Or the money could have just as well stayed in working folk’s wallets, AJ.

    I think the vote totals to defend marriage will just keep getting higher if the 3-4 elites (perhaps homosexual themselves?) keep ticking off the public.

  46. #551039
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:16 pm, vickisoup said:

    Two brothers who were diametrically opposed to one another: one (Christ) sought to preserve our agency–as His Father intended; the other (Lucifer) sought to destroy it. For that he was cast down, as a consequence of his decision.

    I’m not quite sure why this is such a problem for other Christians.

    That whole explanation is rife with confusion. Even the word, “agency” in this context, is Mormon-speak. Christ makes clear in the Word that He came to die for the sin of mankind. He rose again on the 3rd day and ascended to heaven, and all who believe in Him will be saved. For it is by faith you are saved, and not of works, so that no man may boast. It is a gift of God, through Jesus Christ alone. Mormons reject faith as a means to salvation. That’s why you have to follow the D&C, PGP and BOM, as well as the ongoing JD’s from the present church leaders. It’s a changing landscape and the target keeps moving.
    Lucifer (Satan) is a created angel who sought to exalt himself as equal with God. God cast him out of heavn with 1/3 of the other created angels, and Satan’s entire mission is to deceive, distract and confuse mankind in the hope that he can grab their souls before they are committed to Christ and sealed by His Holy Spirit, no longer accessible to Satan.
    Jesus Christ is not a created being and is therefore not Satan’s “brother”, spirit or otherwise. God is triune, manifest in 3 persons, one Holy Trinity; not separate beings as Mormons teach.
    Christ never was equal to or similar to or related to Lucifer. This belief if exclusive to Mormons and denies the eternal existence of Jesus Christ.
    That is why folks take issue with the claim that Mormons are Christians.
    Even you, Cosmo, separate Mormons from Christians by referring to us as “Huckabee Christians”. It is by its self-imposed segregation, and explanation for that segregation, that Mormonism illuminats its distinction from followers of Christ.

  47. #551042
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, vickisoup said:

    (sorry for the typos; new keyboard.)

  48. #551054
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:49 pm, Joy said:

    vickisoup – Well, from your post I can see you don’t believe in the Oneness Jesus spoke of in his Prayer in John 17, so we’ll skip that question and throw that chapter out. But I do have other questions for you.

    Do you believe in the Rapture? If so, are you a pre-trib, mid-trib or post-trib believer?

    Tongues or no tongues? Predestined or Forordination or totally individual choice?

    Once saved, always saved? Or can you lose your salvation?

    Do you believe in the Restoration of All Things?

    Are you a Daniel 70-weeker?

    Does Jesus now have a body in His resurrected state or no? Or are you one of the ones who thinks part of the punishment for our sins is His having a body for eternity?

    Are we joint-heirs with Christ and Israelites by inheritance based on belief or is the Gentile destiny different than the Israel one?

    Who inhabits the earth during the Millenial reign of Christ?

    Do you believe in Faith only or James 2:17-20 that says we’re not saved by faith alone but must have works as well?

    Is Jesus going to have to step down from his glorified state so you can partake of His glory and be like Him as Paul says? Or will He raise you up? In what way will you be like Him?

    And the most important one… are you a child of God for real or just metaphorically speaking? Kind of like an adopted pet? Not same species so to speak, or of the same species as in real child? Whose exact image were you made in?

    For 20 years I learned all the answers to the above questions and oh so many more. Do you have any idea of the diversity of teaching from church to church even on the basics of salvation??? Even in evangelical churches?

    I look forward to your answers on all of the above… Thanks.

  49. #551059
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:53 pm, Joy said:

    PS – Answers are to be based solely on evangelical teachings.

  50. #551062
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:57 pm, Joy said:

    Oh yeah, and about that Daniel 70 weeker… are we currently suspended between the 69th and 70th week, or where would you say we are in that prophesied time period.. has the 70th week started yet?

  51. #551063
    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:58 pm, Jean said:

    Little bit of advice for those who are listed on antigayblacklist.com….or anyone in the gay rights extremists path

    Be sure your prepared to defend you and your family if these mobs decide to attack you.

    From what Ive been reading and seeing… that may not be too far off.

    I can tell you personally if anyone or any group attacks me and my wife on our property I will use my firearm in defense.

  52. #551065
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:01 pm, Joy said:

    Oh AND… Vickisoup needs to answer those questions. I didn’t ask anyone but her!

  53. #551069
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, Trollman said:

    Joy said:

    I look forward to your answers on all of the above… Thanks.

    Do you remember, Joy, how you were making claims that the Bible taught different levels of heaven and different levels of glory in resurrection? And then I pointed out the context, which refuted your claims. Then I asked you to kindly respond, but you refused?

    How then do you now ask someone else to answer questions?

    To the point, Ephesians 4 lists 7 things that the Church is to be united on. Christians do not have to be united on everything in order to still be Christians (see Romans 14, for example). But some things are non-negotiable, according to Ephesians 4. You hold to a different Father, a different Spirit, a different Lord, and a different faith (the Christian faith is monotheism, as was Judaism before it, unlike the polytheistic Mormonism).

    Now either answer the questions that have already been asked of you, or go away.

  54. #551076
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:11 pm, Salt said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:01 pm, Joy said:

    Oh AND… Vickisoup needs to answer those questions. I didn’t ask anyone but her!

    Is there any chance you might take the debate elsewhere (please)?

    It’s bad enough to go off topic, but then to stipulate that you are only having a conversation between yourselves is pushing it even further.

  55. #551081
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, ajmontana said:

    Mookie said:
    You do realize that it’s going in front of the CA Supreme Court where there’s about a 95% chance it’ll be overturned, right?

    Ugh :roll: and I heard not until March before all this starts up.

  56. #551082
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:20 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Joy,

    Vickisoup does not have to answer any of your bloody questions. Now, bugger off back to topic.

    Homo Americans need to keep their sex lives private. That is an order!

  57. #551088
    On November 19th, 2008 at 9:27 pm, Jean said:

    I have a question with Dont Ask Dont Tell policy In The US Military…

    Why does Obama and liberals want to repeal this policy?

    Im in The State Defense Force, so I do augmentation of The National Guard… and have to use the barracks and latrine while on duty. Personally Im not comfortable with taking a shower with a gay person next to me (Our latrine doesnt have any dividers in the shower).

    When I go back to The Army National Guard and do US Army basic… Itll be very weird for me to shower with homosexual men. I think something like that needs to stay dont ask dont tell or they shouldnt be in the military.

  58. #551128
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:15 pm, Joy said:

    No, Vickisoup doesn’t have to answer. No doubt she can’t. I didn’t expect answers.

    I did that to give you an example of how you treat Mormons. You expect people to answer what takes years of study in comments on a blog. Noone is TOTALLY educated on what their Church Canonized beliefs are. Everyone is at different stages of knowledge. But you all think you’re the only ones who can interpret Scripture… but none of you agree either. Why can’t you guys just give it a rest? Why can’t you just acknowledge LDS as allies in the morality war? Why the constant attacks?

    We’re taking it from the front lines by the Gays, and you all are shooting from the rear…. seems it should be the other way around though. lol

    I haven’t seen you defend LDS like you are Vickisoup. Why is that? Why don’t you tell the evangelicals who just can’t seem to stop attacking LDS to bugger off? Seems that too should be aimed at the gays…

  59. #551144
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:27 pm, jangar said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 7:22 pm, ajmontana said:
    This game has to stop, California has voted twice now, enough already. All the money spent on this fiasco could have done some fantastic projets around this state. What a flippin waste.

    Yea, and what was it spent by the anti-Prop 8 crowd to keep it off the ballot, like $25 million? At least that was spent in false advertising.

    Like I said, it isn’t about marriage, and it really isn’t about money either. It’s about changing culture and silencing the opponent.

  60. #551147
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, FireBlogger said:

    Wow, I just voted yes on this proposition and it’s already in the courts.

    I am actually sad for my State and my Country.

    Out of 52 counties in California only about 8 counties voted against prop. 8.

    The lowest common denominator now determines rule.

    My faith in the system is gone.

  61. #551161
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:40 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    You do realize that it’s going in front of the CA Supreme Court where there’s about a 95% chance it’ll be overturned, right?

    And you do also realize there’s also actioni right now to recall these activist judges? It’s happened before.

  62. #551162
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:41 pm, vickisoup said:

    I haven’t seen you defend LDS like you are Vickisoup. Why is that?

    I am former LDS.

  63. #551166
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:45 pm, vickisoup said:

    jangar, if Prop 8 wasn’t telling the truth about gay marriage being taught in schools, then why did the CTA (teachers’ union) spend over a million dollars trying to defeat it? If it wasn’t about what gets taught in schools, why would any teacher be OK with its union spending dues on such a measure?

  64. #551172
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:49 pm, right4life said:

    . Noone is TOTALLY educated on what their Church Canonized beliefs are. Everyone is at different stages of knowledge. But you all think you’re the only ones who can interpret Scripture… but none of you agree either

    but every christian knows the basics..the nature of God..the Trinity…which you mormons deny. therefore you are not christian.

    Christians ALL agree on the Trinity, the Cross, the divinity of Jesus, etc. thats what makes us christian, and mormons disagree on these ESSENTIALS thats why mormons are NOT christian.

    you try to shift the focus to secondary issues that we disagree about, but are not the essence of the faith.

    I haven’t seen you defend LDS like you are Vickisoup. Why is that? Why don’t you tell the evangelicals who just can’t seem to stop attacking LDS to bugger off?

    you sound like a liberal wacko. telling the truth is an ‘attack’ cry me a river. you are the ones claiming to be christians. but you are not. you call christians apostate, and the mormons the only true church, so why do you want to be associated with us anyway?? its simple, stop calling yourselves christian. as long as you do, expect to be ‘attacked’ :roll: ie disagreed with by real christians…

  65. #551175
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:52 pm, right4life said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:41 pm, vickisoup said:

    I am former LDS.

    I’m very pleased for you lady!! :-) what was it that led you out of the kingdom of the cults?

  66. #551179
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:55 pm, vickisoup said:

    joy’s questions are very typical. When I was in the LDS church, I attended seminary every morning before high school and we learned how to debate with Christians by trying to confuse the discussion and focus on the doctrinal differences between the denominations, in order to cause non-Mormons to question their faith. Thanks for the support, right4life.

  67. #551181
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:57 pm, FamilyMan said:

    The bottom line folks, is homosexuals may only claim marriage as a right if they can prove that there life style is not a choice, but that they are born that way. Anti-discrimination laws apply only when there is no choice of circumstances by those being discriminated against.
    The good news is that 40 years have past with not one accepted scientific study that will validate homosexual claims. Scientific methods requires multiple experiment that confidences levels are assigned to. The studies are then peer revued and after a time, are accepted or rejected.
    The mathematical probability of discovery decreases over time. That is why the left is so earnestly trying to made gay marriage legal now. They know time is not on their side.

  68. #551182
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, vickisoup said:

    What led me out was the ways of deception we were being taught to confuse others. I asked questions, challenged their premise and methods, was falsely accused of being “immoral” (sex before marriage…at age 15) and left. They tried relentlessly to get me to come back, sending missionaries to my home for years. My parents (non-LDS) were so happy when I was old enough to demand, on my own, that they stop coming.

  69. #551183
    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, torabora said:

    It’s beginning to look like 1860…

  70. #551184
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:01 pm, vickisoup said:

    Anti-discrimination laws apply only when there is no choice of circumstances by those being discriminated against.

    FamilyMan, not meaning to argue with your post except just want to point out that it is also illegal to discriminate on the basis of one’s religion, which does involve choice.

  71. #551196
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:13 pm, vickisoup said:

    At least it’s illegal now to discriminate on the basis of religion.
    Duhn duhn duuuhhhhhnnnnn…..
    :shock:

  72. #551198
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:15 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I would have stayed out of the LDS discussion (because for the topic of this post we are on the same side, not opposite sides), but Cosmo’s mention of Huckabee requires an appropriate response…

    On November 19th, 2008 at 3:42 pm, Cosmo said:

    As much as it perplexes the Huckabee Christians, I do believe that Lucifer is a spirit sibling. Isaiah 14:12 is clear that Lucifer was in heaven–and fell. His fall came because he sought to destroy the agency of man. Much akin to the anti-8 crowd seeks to do (nice segue…). Think of it as an apple that fell very far from the tree. Two brothers who were diametrically opposed to one another: one (Christ) sought to preserve our agency–as His Father intended; the other (Lucifer) sought to destroy it. For that he was cast down, as a consequence of his decision.

    I’m not quite sure why this is such a problem for other Christians. No one is equating Christ with Satan. The doctrine is simply stating two brothers who chose entirely different paths.

    On November 19th, 2008 at 8:16 pm, vickisoup said:

    That whole explanation is rife with confusion. Even the word, “agency” in this context, is Mormon-speak.

    So basically, Cosmo has shown that Mike Huckabee was correct when he asked, “Don’t Mormons believe that Christ and Lucifer are brothers?”

    And Mitt Romney was dishonest when he didn’t answer “yes” to that question. Another LDS even said so.

    On November 19th, 2008 at 10:41 pm, vickisoup said:

    I am former LDS.

    Have you seen exmormon.net? I found this page very helpful in understanding the differences in theology.

  73. #551199
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:17 pm, FamilyMan said:

    vicki
    Religion in the original Bill of Rights. It has nothing to do with newly discovered rights.

  74. #551204
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:26 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Correction to my previous post…

    Mormon Doc was not talking about Mitt Romney’s response to Mike Huckabee’s question.

    Mormon Doc said this:

    As members of the LDS faith we believe in a modern day prophet who directs the Church as he is inspired and directed by God. We have the same regard for “modern” prophets as we do for prophets of the Old Testament. In fact, the words of a modern prophet are given precedence over prior prophets since they relate directly to what is going on now. Mitt either lied to the members of his congregation when he sustained President Gordon B. Hinckley as the prophet, seer and revelator of the LDS church or he lied in his on camera interview when he rejected the idea that God speaks to people today.

    I needed to correct my earlier mistake, but I’m done with talking LDS/Evangelical differences in this thread.

    Back to being unified in our stand against Al-Gayda terrorists and extortionists.

  75. #551210
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:39 pm, vickisoup said:

    Thanks for the reference, ITTRP.
    And this being my last on the LDS issue, too, I will say that I have tried to refrain from studying too much about their doctrine, finding it beneficial to point people to the truth of the bible and allow its beauty to speak to the heart of the listener. And, to joy, I would only wish to say that I have not attacked the LDS church; I have only pointed out what I was taught when attending.

  76. #551223
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:52 pm, Joy said:

    Vickisoup – And I am a former evangelical. 20 years of serious Bible study, with scriptures twisted every way they could get twisted.

    I even took Greek so I could translate the Bible for myself to unravel all the false teachings. Then I found out that none of the Scholars agree on what the Greek means. Or the Hebrew for that matter.

    What led me out of the every wind of doctrine churches was reading the Book of Mormon, studying the LDS teachings and then praying about it. The same Holy Ghost that had 20 years prior testified to the Divinity of Christ, testified to the truth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    Then I read the entire New Testament with the new knowledge and it made perfect sense. Gone were all the doctrines of men.

    The bottom line about Satan is that he is Satan and is the father of all lies. He would do anything to keep us all battling between ourselves. He is evil through and through. Huckabee insinuated that we, as LDS, worship Lucifer along side of Jesus Christ.

    And again, there is NO WAY to explain any of this in context by pulling one thing out and twisting it out of context.

    Jesus many times didn’t answer his accusers either. He knew their questions were traps. We can’t answer anything without you twisting it all up and throwing it back at us remaining nothing like what we say.

    We believe we are ALL brothers and sisters. And NO, Jesus wasn’t CREATED!! What a way to twist things up. NONE of us has said that or implied it. You are so resistant to simply hearing us out that you continue to twist everything said into something we didn’t say.

    I could decimate the evangelical beliefs using the same Bible you all are quoting. What would be the point? I could open the Bible and take many things out in one sentence snipits and make you all sound like lunatics. Again, what would be the point.

    The fact is you’re so insecure in your own faith, you feel the need to rip apart others’ faith. Why? Is that Christlike? Are any of you showing the LOVE of Christ while you do this?

    I know whatever you’re selling isn’t true because I see your fruits and the ugly way you treat anyone who doesn’t agree with you.

    Carry on. Feel proud of yourselves in your contentious attitudes. Believe in your creeds that were VOTED ON by men long after the death of the Apostles. Ignore what Paul warned about the apostasy that would kill the Church from within. Ignore that Jesus said He would be rejected by that generation.

    Ignore the Dark Ages. Ignore anything that you simply don’t like. Pick and choose what you like and what’s easy and ignore the rest. Keep saying saved by faith alone, when James and Jesus Himself tells you otherwise.

    The Scriptures have to be taken as a whole.

    We are all children of God. Brothers and Sisters. Jesus died for ALL. And the day will come that EVERY KNEE will bow and every tongue will confess Jesus is Lord. And it will be willingly, not forced. Because He came to save the world. Not just a few, but all of us. The only ones lost will be a handful such as Judas, who KNEW the truth because he saw Him and knew Him, but betrayed Him anyway.

    For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)
    6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. 1 Cor 8:5,6

    And speaking of Satan, he comes to stir up contentions. He’s doing a great job!

  77. #551225
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:54 pm, Joy said:

    I will say that I have tried to refrain from studying too much about their doctrine

    And there you have it.

  78. #551229
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:55 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:15 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    ….
    Have you seen exmormon.net? I found this page very helpful in understanding the differences in theology.

    ITTRP, Thanks for the link. ..an excellent resource.

  79. #551235
    On November 19th, 2008 at 11:58 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I wonder how the anti Prop 8 crowd would argue the theory of evolution.

  80. #551238
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:01 am, vickisoup said:

    The same Holy Ghost that had 20 years prior testified to the Divinity of Christ, testified to the truth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    So, which testimony is true for you: The former or the latter?

  81. #551240
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:03 am, Joy said:

    Both

    Jesus Christ is Lord and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is His Church restored through the prophet Joseph Smith.

  82. #551241
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:03 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:01 am, vickisoup said:

    The same Holy Ghost that had 20 years prior testified to the Divinity of Christ, testified to the truth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    So, which testimony is true for you: The former or the latter?

    The “latter” of course; they’re latter day saints.

  83. #551243
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:05 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    I break myself up sometimes.

  84. #551246
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:08 am, Joy said:

    Ezekial 37:16-20

    The Stick of Judah is the Bible

    The Stick of Ephraim is the Book of Mormon

    Reading the Book of Mormon helps me love the Bible more. Understand it better. They go together.

  85. #551248
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:11 am, FamilyMan said:

    This thread is really off topic, but I enjoyed all of you.
    Have a very good night.

  86. #551251
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:15 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    g’nite, FM

  87. #551252
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:15 am, vickisoup said:

    Jet, yer killin’ me!
    :P

  88. #551253
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:16 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    Reading the Book of Mormon helps me love the Bible more. Understand it better. They go together.

    I’ve read the Book of Mormon once to… was tough getting through so much heresy.

    Oh and thanks for the link ITTRP.

    Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is His Church restored through the prophet Joseph Smith.

    Yeah, and Islam is the “Church” restored through the Prophet Muhammad.

    So much heresy, so little time. :lol:

  89. #551259
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:28 am, vickisoup said:

    joy, if Mormonism is compatible with Christianity, then why won’t Mormons let their children attend any other church with their friends? It cannot be because they are afraid they will hear bad things about Mormonism. I guarantee you that there are no Christian churches with which I’ve ever been associated in 28 years that have taught anything about Mormonism, good or bad. There are no evil “Christian ministers”, as was previously implied. Evangelical churches do not teach about other religions. We are taught from the bible. Why are Mormons so afraid of their children attending another church and being taught from the bible?

  90. #551260
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:29 am, Joy said:

    So much venom from so-called Christians. How inspiring.

    I’m sure your Savior is well-pleased.

  91. #551261
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:31 am, vickisoup said:

    (um…is that your answer to my question?)

  92. #551262
    On November 20th, 2008 at 12:31 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Joy,
    Jesus loves you, and so do I.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Climate of hate: More threats from the gay marriage mob

November 10, 2009 05:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Left-wing thug of the day

November 5, 2009 01:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Maine votes down gay marriage

November 4, 2009 01:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

759 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Breaking: Prop. 8 upheld

May 26, 2009 01:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

100 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

They’ll be back.

Courting trouble

May 26, 2009 06:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

A pageant Perez Hilton won’t be judging

May 7, 2009 05:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 3 Trackbacks


Categories: Proposition 8



TigerHawk

» Negative equity
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook