Or you can catch me on PJTV later today talking about “Conservatism 2.0″ with Instapundit Glenn Reynolds.

Michelle Malkin,
I watched this PJTV program, and you were truly unfair to Mike Huckabee. You mocked him as being against companies making profits, but he had already made it perfectly clear (earlier in the program) that that is not true and a misrepresentation.

Please go back, watch Huckabee’s segment, and ask yourself if you were fair or whether an apology to Mike Huckabee is in order.

You know that I love you and appreciate all you do. But when I believe you are out of line, I will raise the issue.

Thanks,
Red Pill

Did you know that Mitt Romney’s father ran for President (in 1968) when he was not Constitutionally eligible?

George Wilcken Romney was born in Mexico and was not a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States of America.

Did that stop him from running for President? No.

Now, with all that said…

Can’t we all just get along?
Yes.

Your “FACT” is “FICTION”. If you were right, then why didn’t Huckabee quit the race at CPAC after Romney quit?

Here’s what another LDS had to say about Romney:

I don’t know why anyone would support Mitt for dog catcher let alone anything else. He is disingenuous at best and a pathological liar at worst. Please let me provide a specific example that was very revealing for me.

As members of the LDS faith we believe in a modern day prophet who directs the Church as he is inspired and directed by God. We have the same regard for “modern” prophets as we do for prophets of the Old Testament. In fact, the words of a modern prophet are given precedence over prior prophets since they relate directly to what is going on now. Mitt either lied to the members of his congregation when he sustained President Gordon B. Hinckley as the prophet, seer and revelator of the LDS church or he lied in his on camera interview when he rejected the idea that God speaks to people today.

I must stress that this is not a matter of him not being religious enough. It is more fundamental than that because it speaks to his integrity. He lied to one group for his own reasons. That is fine. Maybe he doesn’t believe anything. But the fact is that if he will lie about something that is a key element of what it means to be LDS then it should say something about his character. He claims membership in the church so it is a key issue.

I don’t want someone in a leadership position that denies the tenets of his faith because he is embarrassed by them. I also don’t want someone pretending to believe in something they don’t. I would have more respect if he simply rejected the ideas. I have said this before because I believe that he is dangerous because he is a man without a core set of values.

Mormon Doc on May 19, 2008 at 10:15 PM

“a man without a core set of values”…

February 5th, 2008: Mitt Romney adamantly insisted that his campaign was going on all the way to the convention:

“Ann came to me, and she said, ‘You know, the one thing that’s clear tonight is that nothing’s clear,’” Romney said to hundreds of cheering supporters in Boston. “But I think she’s wrong. One thing that’s clear is this campaign’s going on!”

“I think there’s some people who thought it was all going to be done tonight, but it’s not all done tonight,” Romney said. “We’re gonna keep on battling. We’re gonna go all the way to the convention. We’re gonna win this thing, and we’re gonna get in the White House.”

A mere two days later, Mitt Romney was not good for his word
and broke his promise…

February 7th, 2008:

Now if I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention — (cheers, applause). I want you to know I’ve given this a lot of thought. I’d forestall the launch of a national campaign and, frankly, I’d be making it easier for Senator Clinton or Obama to win.

AUDIENCE MEMBERS: No! Boo!

MR. ROMNEY: Frankly, in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror. (Cheers, applause.)

FACT – Huckabee joined the race late SOLEY to counter Romney.

Huckabee was the spoiler. Over… end of story. And Huckabee wouldn’t have won either.

John McCain, Mike Huckabee, and Ron Paul were the only three Republican candidates who “went the distance”.

Of those three only Huckabee and Paul cared about Values Voters.

Huckabee and Paul were not the problem.
Either one of them would have been vastly better than McCain.

What guaranteed McCain as our nominee?
A combination of:

1) Fred Thompson (McCain’s stalking horse in SC to ensure McCain, not Huckabee, won)

2) Media, who started calling John McCain the “presumptive nominee” soon after he won SC (less than three weeks after his 4th place Iowa finish!)

3) Rudy Giuliani (McCain’s stalking horse in FL to ensure McCain, not Romney, won)

4) Democrats in FL (where exit polls showed 20% of those voting in the Republican Primary were not Republicans)

5) RNC, joining the MSM to prematurely declare McCain the “presumptive nominee” less than four weeks after after his 4th place Iowa finish, and pressuring Republicans:

It is time to unite behind John McCain to be the nominee of our party.

Chuck Yob
Vice Chairman, Republican National Committee
January 30, 2008

6) Mitt Romney. Read more here.

But we have one thing in common, neither one of us can spell religious.

As a values voter, I do not trust any of the four Presidential candidates who chose, of their own free will, to disrespect conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly and values voters like you and me by refusing to attend the Values Voter Debate.

If you would read Schlafly’s 1964 book A Choice Not an Echo: The inside story of how American Presidents are chosen, you would understand the Machiavellian moves that are the defacto behind the scenes activity, and were performed in this election to make John McCain be the nominee and lead the Republican Party to its slaughter (by supporting the bailout).

I believe the four men who refused to attend the Values Voter Debate all played a huge part in that.

I wish Romney had kept his word and continued his campaign all the way to the convention.

It was Romney who decided to break his promise two days after he made it and quit the race for dishonest reasons (didn’t want his campaign to “aid a surrender to terror”). It was Romney who a week later “released” his delegates to McCain in a move designed to try to make Huckabee quit.

Romney wasn’t fighting against McCain, he was actively helping McCain.

Oh, and that caucus in West Virginia had nothing to do with Huckabee…it was John McCain who instructed his own people to vote for Huckabee.

I’ve written pleny about this on my blog. Look it up if you care.

You claimed:

Huckabee’s message was that Mitt was unqualified to be POTUS based SOLEY on his relious affiliation.

Then you linked to a page that said:

Mitt Romney, Huckabee’s principle rival in Iowa, comes in for the roughest treatment. Huckabee writes that the former Massachusetts Governor’s record was “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.” He notes that Romney declined to make a phone call of congratulations after Huckabee beat the oddsmakers to win the Iowa caucuses, “which we took as a sign of total disrespect.” He mocks Romney for suggesting, during one debate, more investment in high-yield stocks as a solution to economic woes. “Let them eat stocks!” Huckabee jokes.

1) Huckabee is right that Romney’s record was anything but conservative before he decided to run for President.

2) Romney was wrong to not call Huckabee the night Huckabee won Iowa.

3) Huckabee is right to call Romney out on that. Huckabee is right that it was extremely disrespectful.

4) All of the above combined with mocking Romney for his suggested solution to economic woes has NOTHING to do with Romney’s relious affiliation.

So your claim about Huckabee’s message is patently false.

1. Bought Unhinged by Michelle Malkin

2. Planning to buy Defending Internment by Michlle Malkin

3. Watching TV News that features Michelle Malkin

Michelle what are you doing to me lol

nah but seriously we love you… keep up the great work

We’ll have to bat around the idea of a “conservative” convention sometime next year. My fear is that something like that would draw too many pretenders like McCain who would just serve to gum up the discussions.

*cough* What were you saying about Huckabee?

Pfffft… Is there anyone he’s not shooting in his new book? Nails in his coffin anyone?

…are a site to see.

Should be “sight”!