Michelle Malkin » “It is not the intent of the alleged harasser, but the impact on the recipient.”

“It is not the intent of the alleged harasser, but the impact on the recipient.”

By Michelle Malkin • November 22, 2008 09:54 AM

For those of you who have ever worked in a corporate environment and been subjected to mandatory sexual harrassment training:

Bill Whittle speaks truth to p.c. power.

Wait ’til you get to diversity training, Bill.

Oy!

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

Posted in: Political Correctness

Printer Friendly

comments (103)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

« Older Comments

#101

On November 23rd, 2008 at 6:52 pm, Republicanvet said:

On November 23rd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, backwoods conservative said:

On November 23rd, 2008 at 12:47 pm, ajmontana said:

quick! someone throw a bucket of cold water on oldbuckaroo.

Here!

AJ wanted a bucket of water not a “I’ll never look at woman again”.
#102

On November 23rd, 2008 at 7:12 pm, backwoods conservative said:

AJ wanted a bucket of water not a “I’ll never look at woman again”.

If I had wanted to do that I would have chosen Helen Thomas.
#103

On November 24th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, Chief RZ said:

lgm. You had the analogy right, but misplaced the victim and perp.

A man is legally driving his own car, with insurance, registration and license. He is hit by a female while she is text-messaging and runs a stop sign. She blames the man.

She is the drunk driver.