See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:16 am, Paul Revere said:

   Just tell the libtards the animals were saved from global warming climate change

2. #102
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:23 am, 24Klady said:

   Fabulous Ms. Malkin – you do run in the best circles. Beautiful and setting the example our daughters need. You can be attractive, brainy, and accomplished – what a package.

3. #103
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:24 am, John Deaux said:

   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:08 am, Paul Revere said:
   Kellyann…wow! That is a gorgeous mink! WOW!

   Ok, to start with, you’re a conservative. Now you’re acknowledging that a conservative of the opposite sex is attractive. They are so going to kick you out of the club.

   But at least you’re welcome here.

4. #104
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:26 am, On-my-soap-box said:

   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:16 am, Paul Revere said:
   Just tell the libtards the animals were saved from global warming climate change

   That will not work. Are you forgetting GW is man caused?

5. #105
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:35 am, corona said:

   It takes quite a makeup job to make MKH look that bad.

6. #106
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:47 am, Paul Revere said:

   Ok, to start with, you’re a conservative. Now you’re acknowledging that a conservative of the opposite sex is attractive. They are so going to kick you out of the club.

   But at least you’re welcome here

   I was actually more enamored with the mink. But pretty is pretty no matter who it is. Besides, it’s a known fact that conservative women are prettier than libs.

7. #107
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:47 am, On-my-soap-box said:

   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:35 am, corona said:
   It takes quite a makeup job to make MKH look that bad.

   Fo shizzle! Me thinks she could roll out of bed after sleeping 3 days with bed head and wrinkled clothes and she would still be a bombshell!

8. #108
   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:57 am, Mulligan said:

   Very beautiful calendar, and Michelle, you looked especially lovely. Fur is a wonderful fashion statement, so glamorous and elegant.

9. #109
   On November 25th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, backwoods conservative said:

   On November 25th, 2008 at 11:35 am, corona said:

   It takes quite a makeup job to make MKH look that bad.

   Bright red lipstick turns me off no matter who it’s on. And yeah, that was a disappointing result, especially considering what they had to work with.

10. #110
    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, Khyris said:

    A regular on the Fox News Channel’s O’Reilly Factor, Mary Katherine Ham is the online editor of The Washington Examiner. Formerly, the managing editor of Townhall.com, O’Reilly is wearing a green three-quarter length sheared mink coar with laser grooving from Miller’s Furs.

    Don’t look now ABC, but yer Freudian slip is showing.

11. #111
    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, frostrt said:

    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, Khyris said:
    A regular on the Fox News Channel’s O’Reilly Factor, Mary Katherine Ham is the online editor of The Washington Examiner. Formerly, the managing editor of Townhall.com, O’Reilly is wearing a green three-quarter length sheared mink coar with laser grooving from Miller’s Furs.
    Don’t look now ABC, but yer Freudian slip is showing.

    ————————————-

    I would say “spew alert”, but fortunately, I don’t happen to be trying to drink anything right now.

    

12. #112
    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, purplepeep said:

    englishqueen01 said:
    You can pretty much measure how accurate, correct, and right your thinking and worldview is in correlation to the level of hatred and vitriol such behavior elicits in the left. The more outlandish their rage, the more I’m convinced I’m correct. (Which is why, for example, I am a Catholic. Few religions get up the ire of liberals as much as Catholicism (and Christianity in general), so we must be doing something right).

    Yup, EQ1. If a person weren’t sure on what to base his/her worldview, but wanted to have the one that is correct, intelligent and morally superior, all they have to do is note what liberals hate & despise – and then just adopt the opposite viewpoint(s).

13. #113
    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, greenfairie said:

    G. Gordon Liddy’s annual Stacked and Packed calendar filled with gun-totin’, scantily-clad babes makes the p.c. crowd see red too.

    I’d love it if they did one with conservative hunks .

14. #114
    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, purplepeep said:

    greenfairie said:
    I’d love it if they did one with conservative hunks.

    Problem is that we’re all too busy commenting here to make it to a calendar photo shoot, GF.

15. #115
    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:38 pm, tre said:

    Okay Greenfairie, since G. Gordon Liddy made a calendar with pretty women holding guns, here is a picture of a man holding a gun for you.

16. #116
    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, CyberCipher said:

    ogle?..Gloria Steinem?

    Sorry, LGM. I’d rather drink snake venom.

    My collie says:

    LGM, you just keep drinkin’ that People’s Temple koolaid, okay? Is Helen Thomas starting to look good to you yet?

17. #117
    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, Regulus said:

    I’d buy the calendar, but only if every month were “June.”

18. #118
    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, Regulus said:

    I’d buy the calendar, but only if every month were “June.”

    Now that’s an idea!

    Michelle, if you ever wanted to raise some money for charity, an all Michelle Malkin calendar would probably find a lot of buyers.

19. #119
    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, frostrt said:

    On November 25th, 2008 at 12:32 pm,
    greenfairie said:
    I’d love it if they did one with conservative hunk

    ————————————–

    I second that idea!

20. #120
    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, RetFireman said:

    This is just another prime example of Liberal Jealousy. They just cannot get past the fact that the women out their speaking for them look like they were drug through a dogs throat. Come on…would anyone really buy a calendar with Andrea Dworkin, Susan Estrich, Hillary Clinton, and/or Michelle Obama in swimwear, furs, or actually anything?

    There is a very simple reason why, for the most part (Hollywood bimbos excluded) women on the Left tend to look far worse than Conservative women. It is because Conservative women are not filled to overflowing with hatred, anger, hypocrisy, racism, lck of true morals and values etc.

    Hatred and anger alone tend to put so much mileage on a person as to render them ancient years before their time. Just look at Helen Thomas, for Chissake. Does anyone think she ever looked like anyone but her mother could find her attractive?

    But just in case anyone needs convincing, all they need do is do a little comparison between the two sides. It doesn’t take a Nobel Peace prize in emotion-based drivel to see the difference.

21. #121
    On November 25th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Regulus said:

    On November 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, RetFireman said:

    There is a very simple reason why, for the most part (Hollywood bimbos excluded) women on the Left tend to look far worse than Conservative women. It is because Conservative women are not filled to overflowing with hatred, anger, hypocrisy, racism, lck of true morals and values etc.

    I have a similar take on it; although I’d express it by saying that conservative women, as opposed to their lib counterparts, generally haven’t let themselves forget that the first thing that attracts a man to a woman is that she’s not a man.

    Looking at her calendar photo, it’s patently clear that Michelle is quite comfortable in her femininity, and knows how to use it to eye-riveting effect.

    On the other hand, too many of the “feminist” type of lib female seem to be so interested in competing with men that they end up trying to “become” men … right up to eliminating the central distinction between males and females (i.e., only the latter can bear children). Since they can’t force men to have children in the name of “equality,” they settle for the next best thing: creating an environment where women are encouraged not to have them, either.

    So what they end up with are Amanda Marcotte-style harpies who feel they have to be “easy” because no ordinary man would want to invest any time or effort to pursue them, yet at the same time see babies as “punishment.”

    Thank God for conservative women.

22. #122
    On November 25th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, RetFireman said:

    Thank God for conservative women.

    Unfortunately the best ones are already taken. Damnit.

23. #123
    On November 25th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, thebronze said:

    Nothing against you Michelle, but I have the serious hots for Amanda Carpenter!

    Too bad she’s too young…

24. #124
    On November 25th, 2008 at 3:29 pm, RetFireman said:

    lgm said: “And, in terms of looks, no conservative woman holds a candle to Gloria Steinem.”

    Oh yeah..what a hottie!Seriously…does this guy even know what he is talking about eve 0.0001% of the time?

    Then again, if this is this chode’s ideal of beauty, if this is what he thinks that no one could hold a candle to…especially compared to the women on that calendar…good Lord…the implications are Biblical in proportion. I mean, the little troll probably has pictures of Helen Thomas plastered all over the ceiling above his bed.

25. #125
    On November 25th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, RetFireman said:

    Besides, no one would want to hold a candle to her…out of fear of her going up in flames.

26. #126
    On November 25th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, reshas1 said:

    I hated seeing this.. You know the libtards will blow it ALL out of proportion….

27. #127
    On November 25th, 2008 at 5:36 pm, rowsdower said:

    I just saw the photo of MM on the abc website.Cold shower time.

28. #128
    On November 25th, 2008 at 6:35 pm, JenninMD said:

    my friend received the calendar as a birthday gift and all of the ladies look lovely. the left needs to get over themselves. I’m with frostrt and greenfairie conservative men calendar would be great too!

29. #129
    On November 25th, 2008 at 6:53 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Classic beauties, all, inside and out.

    Way to go, ladies. I’m proud to be counted as a conservative woman!!

30. #130
    On November 25th, 2008 at 7:37 pm, RetFireman said:

    Conservative Men’s Calendar? Well…ok, but I will NOT wear a Speedo.

31. #131
    On November 25th, 2008 at 9:58 pm, purplepeep said:

    RetFireman said:
    Conservative Men’s Calendar? Well…ok, but I will NOT wear a Speedo.

    Hmmm…the Fireman’s up for a nude shoot!!!

32. #132
    On November 25th, 2008 at 11:01 pm, oldbuckaroo said:

    Now THERE’S a reason to get a “tingly feeling running down my leg”!!

33. #133
    On November 25th, 2008 at 11:10 pm, Republicanvet said:

    HHHOOOTTTT!

    Which is likely why the left has their panties in a wad…most lefty women look like hippie chick pie wagons!

34. #134
    On November 25th, 2008 at 11:21 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On November 25th, 2008 at 9:16 am, lgm said:

    You can dish it out but you can’t take it. How ironic that you would complain about a childish photoshop job on a photo of a conservative.

    And, in terms of looks, no conservative woman holds a candle to Gloria Steinem.

    QUICK! Put the calendar away…your mom’s coming!

35. #135
    On November 26th, 2008 at 7:52 am, MikeOK said:

    Nice effort on the calendar. And outside of Hollywood, could the Left come up with a dozen better looking women? I doubt it.

    Maybe next year, you’ll be able to get Megan Ortagus and Dr. Helen Smith on board!