Comments on: Is a California judge having second thoughts on Prop. 8?

By: Don Surber » Blog Archive » Prop 8

Don Surber » Blog Archive » Prop 8 — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:17:06 +0000

[...] Hat tip: Michelle Malkin. [...]

By: Moderate Blogger » Is a California judge having second thoughts on Prop. 8?

Moderate Blogger » Is a California judge having second thoughts on Prop. 8? — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:50:41 +0000

[...] Read this post » [...]

By: jt3151

jt3151 — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:30:41 +0000

On November 25th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, dan708 said:
More likely, if Judge Kennard doesn’t do what the gay lobby wants, they will set up a tent in her front yard and have another SanFran-style spank-fest!

Well.. maybe that’s what she wants.

By: jangar

jangar — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:44:40 +0000

On November 25th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, garyganu said:

It goes a lot deeper than that…

…a sign of the times.

By: Thought Cloud For November 26, 2008 — ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected

Thought Cloud For November 26, 2008 — ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:00:56 +0000

[...] Is a California judge having second thoughts on Prop. 8? [...]

By: Linkapalooza Part II: My Favorite Blogs « The Pugnacious Irishman

Linkapalooza Part II: My Favorite Blogs « The Pugnacious Irishman — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:24:15 +0000

[...] she gets to news stories sooo quickly and regularly calls the MSM out on their bias. I often see news from her before I see it anywhere else. Her coverage of the anti-prop 8 madness has been stellar. She’s [...]

By: How To Win Friends and Influence People, by Al-Gayda « Jane Q. Republican

How To Win Friends and Influence People, by Al-Gayda « Jane Q. Republican — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:16:16 +0000

[...] Influence People, by Al-Gayda Jump to Comments It looks like the anti-Prop 8 bullies might be losing some friends as a result of their heavy handed tactics since the passage of Prop 8 on November 4. The [...]

By: happy2behere

happy2behere — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:26:41 +0000

Her vote against the hearing was just window dressing. The supremes want to show that the fix isn’t in, except it already is, they wrote it into the decision on 5/15/2008. See above post #32.

By: TooMuchTime

TooMuchTime — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:24:17 +0000

My feelings on the gay marriage issue:

net helpmsg 4006

By: leepro

leepro — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:45:06 +0000

…sexual-orientation law.

G.G.Almighty

What are we coming to?

By: Tazed and Confused

Tazed and Confused — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:23:51 +0000

The best thing about gays is that they are headed to self-extinction.

By: dan708

dan708 — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:04:38 +0000

More likely, if Judge Kennard doesn’t do what the gay lobby wants, they will set up a tent in her front yard and have another SanFran-style spank-fest!

By: Gay “marriage”: Stop the Madness! « Mark’s Political Musings

Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:59:42 +0000

[...] these lines, there may be a glimmer of hope. There’s hope that a California judge is having second thoughts on supporting the gay [...]

By: David’s Blog of Common Sense » Trouble for Anti-Prop 8 ActivistsI

David’s Blog of Common Sense » Trouble for Anti-Prop 8 ActivistsI — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:22:32 +0000

[...] just came out that a long time supporter of Gay Rights, Justice Joyce L. Kennard, who usually sides with gay rights, is leaning towards not [...]

By: Valerie

Valerie — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:10:13 +0000

She may have concluded that the civil rights question has been asked and answered.

http://www.sos.ca.gov/dpregistry/

excerpt:

The California Supreme Court decision issued on May 15, 2008, regarding same-sex marriages did not invalidate or change any of the Family Code statutes relating to registered domestic partners. Until a Notice of Termination is filed with our office, a registered domestic partnership will remain active on the California’s Domestic Partnership Registry. This office will continue to process Declarations of Domestic Partnership, Notices of Termination of Domestic Partnership and other related filings as permitted by the domestic partnership law. If you have specific questions about how the Supreme Court’s decision may apply to your circumstances, you should consult with a private attorney.

California Family Code

297.5. (a) Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they derive from statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.