Anti-Prop. 8 Mob Watch: A new blacklist published

Angry gay activists in Austin, Texas, have published their own blacklist to punish supporters of California’s Proposition 8. The anti-Prop. 8 mob in Texas is targeting entire businesses over private individual donations. The insane rage rages on:
Gay marriage activists who lost at the ballot box in California are now lashing out at businesses that supported the ban — and their anger reaches way beyond the borders of Golden State.
In Austin, a gay community Web site has published an “Austin Anti-Gay Blacklist” that encourages consumers not to spend money at companies that financially supported California’s recent Proposition 8 ballot initiative that rescinded gays’ right to marry inside the state.
…According to figures from the California Secretary of State’s Office — which requires campaign donors to list their place of residence, their employer and their occupations — more than 750 Texans donated tens of thousands of dollars on either side of the campaign. One of the biggest Texas donations was $50,000 to a Yes on 8 group that apparently came from the president of a Midland oil company.
About 115 Austinites gave about $180,000 — most in increments of $100 — to fund both sides of the campaign. About 20 of the Austin contributors supported the gay marriage ban; the rest opposed it. Computer giant Apple Inc. is listed as the biggest donor from Austin, with a $100,000 donation in opposition to the measure.
Some gay rights activists say any business that supported Proposition 8 should be boycotted.
“We strongly believe that one of the best ways for the gay community to be heard is by speaking with our wallets,” said Austin resident Warren Clark, whose warrenandderrick.com Web site published the “blacklist” of Yes on 8 donors.
“Blacklisted” by the gay rights Web site are Austin attorneys and tech companies, investment fund managers and doctors, real estate developers and even the Los Angeles Dodgers. Former Dodgers infielder and Austin resident Jeff Kent gave $15,000 to the Yes on 8 campaign.
“It’s a shame,” said Austin real estate developer Michael Knepp when a reporter told him he was on the list for his $10,000 donation to the Yes on 8 campaign.
“Everyone has a responsibility to support the issues they feel strongly about,” Knepp said. “If someone else was offended by that, I apologize, but we just feel very strongly about how (gay marriage) could affect our society - so we made a donation.”
He should not feel compelled to apologize.
No. 1 on the group’s anti-gay “blacklist” — errantly enough — is Dell Computer Inc. That’s because the biggest Austin-area donor to the Yes on 8 campaign was apparently Spencer Wheelright, a Dell marketing employee who gave $25,200 to support the gay marriage ban, according to records from the California Secretary of State’s office.
Dell had nothing to do with the donation and, in fact, the company has an internal rule prohibiting it from taking a position or making a donation regarding any state or local ballot initiatives, said company spokesman Bryant Hilton.
Dell usually gets good marks from gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender groups. It is a supporter of the gay rights group Human Rights Campaign as well as other national and local gay organizations.
“This was an employee who made a personal donation and employers are listed because of California’s reporting laws,” Hilton said. “But this doesn’t reflect the company’s position at all.”
Wheelright did not return a reporter’s e-mail seeking comment. He couldn’t be reached otherwise.
After Hilton contacted warrenandderrick.com about Dell’s inclusion on the list, the site was updated to include a statement from the company. Clark later acknowledged he “may have been a little overly tough” on the company.
“We had some reservations before putting up that list because we realize those were private donors and they may not have been speaking on behalf of the company they work for,” he said.
But they did it, anyway.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Anti-Prop 8 Bullies Strike Deep in the Heart of Texas « Jane Q. Republican
- The New Civil Rights Movement » Michelle Malkin Just Can’t Understand Why We’re Upset.
- Big Brother comes to Change.gov… or why I love my country but really fear the incoming government… : P.U.M.A
- More Victims of a Proposition 8 Blacklist - This Time Texas Style | FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
- PROP 8 OPPOSITION HEATS UP IN TEXAS « The Salty Pundit
- Thought Cloud For November 30, 2008
- Oklahoma tells “married” lesbians to take a hike « Sharp Right Turn
- Gay McCarthyism (Explain the difference of techniques) « Zipline Conservative
- Wochenend-Schaschlik « abseits vom mainstream - heplev
- AN INDEPENDENT AUTHENTIC CONSERVATIVE VOICE » Angry Gay Activists “Punishing” Calif. Prop. 8 Supporters
- Daily News « Capitalist View
- They say potatoe, I say potato…
- Gay Marriage - Page 16
- AllMilitary.com » Blog Archive » The Weekly Claw 12-2-08
- Gay Marriage - Page 17
- Above the Hate: Below the Propaganda | Maine Gay Bars
- Ambiguity Rushes In Where Candor Fears To Tread: NoMobVeto.Org and the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty Conflate Anti-Prop-8 Violence With Anti-Prop-8 Protests | Popehat
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Proposition 8
Bench Memos
» Sunstein to OIRA
Riehl World View
» An Unnecessary President
Weekly Standard
» Beat to the Punch
NewsBusters.org
» R.I.P., Rev. Richard John Neuhaus
Hot Air
» Video: Hamas’s greatest hits
Hot Air
» Remember when deficits were evil?
Right Wing Nut House
» IRAN OPENS SECOND FRONT AGAINST ISRAEL


NewsBusters.org
» Obama's Proposed Energy Czar Scrubbed From Socialist Website

NewsBusters.org
» Newsweek’s Meacham: Don't Expect Obama to Undo 'Awful, Terrible Stuff that Bush and Cheney Did'



Global warming removed any integrity that peer-reviewed journals once enjoyed.
AzN crossed the line and was called on it. It’s definitely not ban-worthy.
Personally, I enjoy AzN’s perspective on a wide range of topics, just as I enjoyed Blind Mule’s. If we keep allowing trolls to be offended and get commenters banned, there will be nobody left but the trolls, and that’s exactly what they want.
Two quick things:
DarthRove–I don’t want people to advocate those things. I also don’t think gay marriage should be banned. My point is that anyone who cites ‘protection of marriage’ as a justification for banning gay marriage should also work to legislate morality in those other ways.
Second, as an aside, I’m with John Deaux–AzN’s comment was over the line, but he should not be banned for it. I enjoy reading this blog particularly because commentators will disagree with each other, and call each other out when need be.
I figured that. My point was that such actions were done in the past to “legislate morality”, but such social sanctions for bad behavior vanished into the politically correct landscape.
When shame is removed, why be surprised if people behave shamefully?