Michelle’s ring thing Updated
Update: Not true?

Bling.
I have just a few comments about the Michelle Obama Thank You Ring thing (assuming it’s true), and then I’ll get out of the way and let you have at it.
1) Remember when MichelleO cracked her joke about how women would use the $600 stimulus check to buy earrings?
Man, I thought that was a sign of elitism run amok. But now we’re talking about a $30,000 piece of rhodium just for doing what a supportive spouse should do? Out of this world:
She loves her inexpensive outfits from the mall, but Michelle Obama will soon be sporting something much fancier than anything you’ll find at J. Crew. It is being reported that President-elect Barack Obama is buying his wife a new ring for her support during the election. A spokesperson for top Italian designer Giovanni Bosco allegedly said that President-Elect Barack Obama is looking to purchase a $30,000 Harmony ring made of rhodium and encrusted with diamonds as a thank you gift to Michelle. The future First Lady is expected to receive the ring just in time for her husband’s January inauguration ceremony. One of the world’s rarest and most precious metals, only about 25 tons of rhodium are mined each year, setting the price at over $7,660 per ounce — or about ten times the cost of gold.
2) Is it really a good idea to have let this slip just days after a Wal-Mart temporary worker died in a hyper-consumerist stampede?
3) Speaking of bad timing, is it really a good idea to be crowing about this extravagant present when — as Barack Obama so ably reminded us in campaign infomerical before Election Day — Americans are hurting in the midst of tough economic times that will only get tougher?
4) What is it with some women who feel entitled to receive lavish presents from their husbands for work that should be its own reward? Reminds me of this ridiculous “Push Present” phenomenon involving women who expect big-ticket gifts from their husbands for bearing their children (see Dr. Helen’s column here).
Criminey.
If Michelle thinks she should receive a present for contributing to the successful Obama campaign, what gift is she getting him for winning it?
5) How long before someone screams RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST?
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
How to Make a Liberal Politician Stand Up Against Intrusive Government
February 6, 2012 04:28 PM by Doug Powers
95 CommentsMr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants
January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin
138 CommentsWarren Buffett’s Secretary to Sit with First Lady at State of the Union Speech
January 24, 2012 12:35 PM by Doug Powers
93 CommentsMichelle Obama’s Unsavory School Lunch Flop
December 21, 2011 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin
206 CommentsMichelle’s “Women for Obama” versus Obama’s women
November 14, 2011 11:38 PM by Michelle Malkin
54 CommentsA fun fact about Michelle Obama’s chummy fries police
September 15, 2011 05:50 PM by Michelle Malkin
95 CommentsThe Unhappy Meal makeover; Photoshop contest call!; Updated
July 26, 2011 09:36 PM by Michelle Malkin
126 CommentsLunch Tip: Order the ‘Michelle Obama Special’ at Shake Shack — They’ll Know What it Means
July 20, 2011 01:32 PM by Doug Powers
91 Comments
Categories: Michelle Obama
Patterico
» Sockpuppet Friday (a la carte edition)



JustOneMinute
» Send Better BS
Hot Air
» Rumor of the day: New North Korean leader assassinated in Beijing; Update: Untrue, says U.S.
AmSpecBlog
» The Burke-Hayek Double Play Combo
Pundit & Pundette
» Obama's compromise is not a victory for religious liberty [updated]










sonofdy said (#198):
Good Grief!
“… an anonymous spokesman for the manufacturer of the rhodium ring…”
ANONYMOUS, what does that tell you?
Italian designer Giovanni Bosco just recieved beaucoup free publicity. And people bit.
sonofdy said (#198):
Moral equivalency?
(sorry about hitting “submit” prematurely)
Just because they were shamed out of purchasing it openly (re: a Dick Morris wannabe advised it wouldn’t poll well) doesn’t mean someone else won’t buy Mrs. “O” the ring as a Christmas present, now that their wealthy donors know what she wants; who knows, the ring may end up as one of Oprah’s “favorite things” and she can give it to M.O. in a holiday special!
Too bad, I was kinda hoping it was made out of Rhodium-101
pretty sad that you had to stoop so low to generate content for your blog Michelle… how about you focus on the topics that draw me and millions of others to your blog: expose the crap sandwich bailout being fed to us and focus on reigning in the threats to our national security and leave the sleaze to the tabloids.