Michelle’s ring thing Updated

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 1, 2008 11:34 PM

Update: Not true?


Bling.

I have just a few comments about the Michelle Obama Thank You Ring thing (assuming it’s true), and then I’ll get out of the way and let you have at it.

1) Remember when MichelleO cracked her joke about how women would use the $600 stimulus check to buy earrings?

Man, I thought that was a sign of elitism run amok. But now we’re talking about a $30,000 piece of rhodium just for doing what a supportive spouse should do? Out of this world:

She loves her inexpensive outfits from the mall, but Michelle Obama will soon be sporting something much fancier than anything you’ll find at J. Crew. It is being reported that President-elect Barack Obama is buying his wife a new ring for her support during the election. A spokesperson for top Italian designer Giovanni Bosco allegedly said that President-Elect Barack Obama is looking to purchase a $30,000 Harmony ring made of rhodium and encrusted with diamonds as a thank you gift to Michelle. The future First Lady is expected to receive the ring just in time for her husband’s January inauguration ceremony. One of the world’s rarest and most precious metals, only about 25 tons of rhodium are mined each year, setting the price at over $7,660 per ounce — or about ten times the cost of gold.

2) Is it really a good idea to have let this slip just days after a Wal-Mart temporary worker died in a hyper-consumerist stampede?

3) Speaking of bad timing, is it really a good idea to be crowing about this extravagant present when — as Barack Obama so ably reminded us in campaign infomerical before Election Day — Americans are hurting in the midst of tough economic times that will only get tougher?

4) What is it with some women who feel entitled to receive lavish presents from their husbands for work that should be its own reward? Reminds me of this ridiculous “Push Present” phenomenon involving women who expect big-ticket gifts from their husbands for bearing their children (see Dr. Helen’s column here).

Criminey.

If Michelle thinks she should receive a present for contributing to the successful Obama campaign, what gift is she getting him for winning it?

5) How long before someone screams RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST?

Posted in: Michelle Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Bling! Bling! Are “rotating wheels” next? « Mark’s Musings
  2. Good News! Michelle Obama to Get $30,000 Diamond Thank You Ring : Stop The ACLU
  3. Barack Hussein Obama's $30,000 Bling Thing | Stuck On Stupid
  4. MORNING INTELL: Senator Slick Willie and Robot Soldiers | DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP
  5. Terrible Michelle And Barack Obama Don’t Give Their Kids Christmas or Birthday Presents « Goodtimepolitics
  6. Gorgeous Ring, But Not for Michelle Obama
  7. The Irascible Chef » Extra! Extra! Read all about IT !
  8. Some Bling Bling For The First Lady Of Commietown (Updated) | Democrat=Socialist
  9. American Street » Blog Archive » Bling we can believe in
  10. 2009 Sarah Palin Calendar Tops Best Seller List « Goodtimepolitics

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #560867
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:25 am, FamilyMan said:

    purplepeep said:
    I stand firm on the $20. Afterall we are talkin’ Michelle Obama here, not a trophy supermodel.

    Your right. Make that $1.25.

  2. #560868
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:26 am, sonofdy said:

    You are making it up, as usual. Obama is well off, as conservatives reminded us during the campaign (though not as well off as McCain, but that’s another story).

    Which is why this is only mildly amusing to me.

    He wrote two books that have been on the bestseller list for years.

    This is a new trend I see in politics. You get your sheep supporters to pay for the propoganda instead of having to pay for it yourself. You even make money off of it.

  3. #560869
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:27 am, RThomasETC said:

    I have never heard of Rhodium before.

    While that sets her apart from us, and what I am about to say doesn’t in any way negate the post … that’s nothing compared to what the celebrities parade around with … hello? Remember J-Lo’s pink diamond that cost around 1.2 million?

  4. #560871
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:30 am, iamsaved said:

    Over the past 30 or 40 years, can anyone name 10 Senators (single termers don’t count) who became members of the Senate having a “middle class” networth and then left the Senate not considered wealthy?

    The pay and cost of living in the DC area for a Senator is not conducive to becoming wealthy.

    If they had to follow the same ethical standards regular government employees have to follow, they’d never leave wealthy. Regular employees are not allowed to accept gifts of any kind over $50.00 or so – it was $5.00 for a very long time.

    As to Obama, a State Senator makes even less.

  5. #560872
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:30 am, ajmontana said:

    Why doesn’t he just take the ring out of his nose and give her that one?

  6. #560873
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:31 am, jangar said:

    I’m waiting for the rapper to explain it.

  7. #560876
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:33 am, sonofdy said:

    I’m waiting for the rapper to explain it.

    yo he just givin’ bling to his ho, yo
    Its just his thug thizzle, why you be a hater cracker?

    ———-
    I think that makes sense in rapper talk.

  8. #560878
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:34 am, RedRepub said:

    I guess it’s none of our business unless he used campaign money to buy it.(Hmm, maybe she’ll donate it to charity after the inauguration??)

    This reminds me of how the AP reacted to Palin’s clothes bought by the RNC.

    We are pointing out hypocrisy of the Dems by pointing this out. If this had been Bush, the AP would have gone all “French revolution” on his butt. “The people starve while the King gives an expensvie ring to his wife!!”

  9. #560879
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:35 am, airbrush101 said:

    I would like to think that this news will get out to all the Democrats that did without or put aside something so they could donate $5 to them. Not going to happen though.

  10. #560880
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:37 am, jangar said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:33 am, sonofdy said

    Thanks! I’m better now.

  11. #560881
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:37 am, sunshinerbray said:

    Wellsy said:
    Indeed, a rhodium ring seems rather trivial at this point.

  12. #560882
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:39 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    Obama’s on record telling Michelle they didn’t need to get married, even if they were going to have children. But for some reason, he did decide to marry her. So whose idea was the expensive ring? His, hers? Marriage, not important. Jewelry, important. Was the label “baby’s mama” so far off? Maybe we’re making a big thing out of nothing. Hard to know what’s in their minds.

  13. #560883
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:39 am, purplepeep said:

    Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    You do realize that the “guy” who made this an international news story is the presumptive President-elect of the United States and self-proclaimed champion of the poverty-stricken, no?

    Yes, I had heard that. That news did in fact reach the remote area of the DC suburb that I live in.

    This points out several things, Kevin – most obviously, as I noted, Obama’s tone-deaf “out of touchness”. If nothing else, one of his PR people show have given him a clue.

    Likewise, he clearly has no idea of how he keeps playing into the “ghetto thug/pimp” stereotype and the Jefferson’s “Moo-hoovin’ On Up” image. It’s embarrassing to even watch.

    At any rate, the lesson here is that such things vividly illustrate Obama’s ongoing lack of better judgment and good sense. Those are not good qualities in any “guy”.

  14. #560884
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:39 am, sunshinerbray said:

    Wellsy said:
    Indeed, a rhodium ring seems rather trivial at this point.

    I completely agree that it is trivial. As in, let’s all get a grip here. It’s their money, it’s their business, it’s their relationship.

    I didn’t vote for Obama and he scares the hell out of me, but there are plenty of other things to discuss that are far more substantive than whether or not he bought his wife a gift.

  15. #560886
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am, simon77047 said:

    Most of you on this post sound just like the angry left. Get over it. The annointed one won. Now go spend some money and get this economy working again. Thank you.

  16. #560887
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am, jangar said:

    I would like to think that this news will get out to all the Democrats that did without or put aside something so they could donate $5 to them

    Oh, we all hold a share in the monumental Obama presidency!!! /sarc

  17. #560888
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:41 am, sonofdy said:

    It is also possible to extract rhodium from used nuclear fuel

    Does barak like michelle??? :shock: (Just kidding, I am sure the ring is harmless)

  18. #560889
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:42 am, Misscheryl said:

    yo he just givin’ bling to his ho, yo
    Its just his thug thizzle, why you be a hater cracker?

    yeah, what I said!

  19. #560890
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:42 am, purplepeep said:

    airbrush101 said:
    I would like to think that this news will get out to all the Democrats that did without or put aside something so they could donate $5 to them. Not going to happen though.

    Maybe the DNC will start a special “Buy ‘Bamas Bling” pledge drive.

  20. #560891
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, Misscheryl said:

    simon77047 said:
    Most of you on this post sound just like the angry left

    correction…the angry right..and we are – get over it!

  21. #560892
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, purplepeep said:

    sunshinerbray said:
    let’s all get a grip here.

    You feel as if you’ve lost your grip, sunshine?

  22. #560893
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, WarEagle82 said:

    I am going to be contrary here. I don’t care how Barack spends HIS money. He wrote two books and earned several million. It is his money and he can spend it as he pleases.

    I do take exception to how he is going to spend MY money but that is a different issue.

    If the man wants to buy his wife a big ring he has the right to do so, at least until he is sworn in. Then, all bets are off.

  23. #560895
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:45 am, sonofdy said:

    simon77047 said:
    Most of you on this post sound just like the angry left

    I see no reason not to treat obama exactly like they treated bush.

  24. #560896
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:46 am, mngirl said:

    Hhhhmmm….and Sarah Palin has a $30 wedding ring? Now tell me who is closer to “understanding” everyday Americans.

    (Btw, that’s 30, not abbreviated for 3,000 or 30,000 just $30……)

  25. #560897
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 am, sonofdy said:

    Hhhhmmm….and Sarah Palin has a $30 wedding ring? Now tell me who is closer to “understanding” everyday Americans.

    (Btw, that’s 30, not abbreviated for 3,000 or 30,000 just $30……)

    My wifes cost me exactly $130 and has lasted 12.5 years. Thats more than twice as long as some of those $30,000 rings. So much for expensive rings.

  26. #560898
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am, simon77047 said:
    The annointed[sic]one won.

    I smell a rat.

  27. #560899
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, WarEagle82 said:
    I am going to be contrary here. I don’t care how Barack spends HIS money. He wrote two books and earned several million. It is his money and he can spend it as he pleases.

    If that’s the case then she was short-changed on the ring. $30k…that’s it?
    ;-)

  28. #560900
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am, purplepeep said:

    Misscheryl said:
    correction…the angry right..and we are – get over it!

    Well, Cheryl, you do have to accept that there are some timid souls out there. It’s “let me have my toaster and tv and don’t rock the boat”. Remember this scene from Network?

  29. #560901
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am, sonofdy said:

    30 pcs of silver: Are you dispargaing our lord and savior, the one, Lord OBAMA the great? PBUH :shock:

  30. #560902
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:52 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am, simon77047 said:
    Most of you on this post sound just like the angry left. Get over it. The annointed one won. Now go spend some money and get this economy working again. Thank you.

    Ha! Spoken like a true Rino. Ignore the hypocrisy. Ignore the lies (unless it was a BOOSH lie). We are the champion of the poor – “see my new ring made of rhodium that costs $30k?”

    It was ignoring the liberal left that helped oBingo get elected. It was play nice politics that made conservatives weak. We are not the angry left. The left are fine with this purchase and upset with us because we will NOT ignore the oBingo hypocrisy and they know it.

    I will never forget how this election was won. I will teach my kids and grandkids about the left double standard ($30k ring – $300 to an orphanage). I think I can speak for most of us that we are not upset about BHO spending money – we are upset that we are told to tighten our belts while a ring is being waved in our faces and then being told by others to “get over it”.

  31. #560903
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:52 am, jangar said:

    he clearly has no idea of how he keeps playing into the “ghetto thug/pimp” stereotype and the Jefferson’s “Moo-hoovin’ On Up” image.

    The Urban Nightmare from Hell

  32. #560904
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:54 am, simon77047 said:

    Angry “right”… angry “left”… so sad.

  33. #560905
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:54 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am, sonofdy said:
    30 pcs of silver: Are you dispargaing our lord and savior, the one, Lord OBAMA the great? PBUH

    Why, yes. Yes, I did. 30 lashes, right? Same as the last time? Perhaps, I can spread my punishment around… any takers?

  34. #560906
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:55 am, jangar said:

    Good one, soap!

  35. #560907
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:56 am, sonofdy said:

    Angry “right”… angry “left”… so sad.

    After being pissed on by the angry left for 8 years, did you really think we would just all hug and forget about it? Not likely. Obama can not unite this country because of the angry people on the left who worked damn hard to generate heaps of angry people on the right.

  36. #560908
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:57 am, jangar said:

    … any takers?

    Please sir, may I have some more?

  37. #560909
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:57 am, tiredofit08 said:

    time to redistribute the wealth from dear leader….take the ring, break it down to smaller ones and hand it out to deserving peasants….

  38. #560910
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:58 am, FamilyMan said:

    Good GOD!
    Four years of threads like this one.

  39. #560911
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:58 am, sonofdy said:

    Why, yes. Yes, I did. 30 lashes, right? Same as the last time? Perhaps, I can spread my punishment around… any takers?

    No your punishment this time is to watch the entire newsone video (all 7.5 hours) and write a 100 page essay on how great The lord obama is (PBUH).

    Obama security force agent 4287.

    ;-)

  40. #560912
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:01 am, dfern said:

    Michelle, I am surprised at you…

    If the money used to purchase the ring was his money, then it is nobody’s business to criticize him buying a ring for his wife. All of this carping in this post sounds like a whole bunch of class warfare sour grapes — everything the left tries to incite in the public.

    If there is existing evidence to suggest that the money for the ring was obtained improperly, then let’s see that evidence and discuss THAT —- otherwise, you should devote your column to more pressing issues, like the psychopath running the Treasury Department.

  41. #560915
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:02 am, purplepeep said:

    FamilyMan said:
    Good GOD!
    Four years of threads like this one.

    I have a feeling that with 6 months-year from now calls to cut Obama more slack will pretty much vanish.

  42. #560916
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:03 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:58 am, sonofdy said:

    Ouch! You sure do evil well. Sheesh.

  43. #560918
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:03 am, WarEagle82 said:

    Well, obviously Barack is a little more concerned about spending HIS money than OUR money. Maybe she gets something else, like Mama living in the White House, to make up part of the balance due?

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, WarEagle82 said:
    I am going to be contrary here. I don’t care how Barack spends HIS money. He wrote two books and earned several million. It is his money and he can spend it as he pleases.

    If that’s the case then she was short-changed on the ring. $30k…that’s it?

  44. #560919
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:05 am, John Deaux said:

    The part they didn’t tell you is that this is only the first installment. When all of the others arrive she can put up her fists and the rings will spell out “Fist Lady”.

  45. #560922
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:07 am, jangar said:

    CAUTION: 4 years of fundraising ahead!

  46. #560923
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:07 am, purplepeep said:

    dfern said:
    it is nobody’s business to criticize him buying a ring for his wife.

    You missed the central issues, fern; one being Obama’s lack of good judgment and his hypocrisy as illustrated by this “let ‘em eat cake” episode. He is the Savior Of The Destitute afterall.

  47. #560924
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:09 am, sonofdy said:

    Ouch! You sure do evil well. Sheesh.

    5 years in the infantry and a strong intrest in military history will do that too you.

  48. #560925
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:09 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:03 am, WarEagle82 said:
    Well, obviously Barack is a little more concerned about spending HIS money than OUR money. Maybe she gets something else, like Mama living in the White House, to make up part of the balance due?

    So many examples of him being a cheapskate with his own money… so little time.

  49. #560926
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:10 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:55 am, jangar said:
    Good one, soap!

    Back at you.

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 9:08 am, jangar said:
    But, I agree, for someone who was a community activist for the poor and underprivileged, this seems a little excessive.
    Should be a cigar band ring, but that might be too Clintonesque…

    Coffee – screen. You owe me a Flatron – thanks!

  50. #560927
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:10 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:09 am, sonofdy said:
    Ouch! You sure do evil well. Sheesh.
    5 years in the infantry and a strong intrest in military history will do that too you.

    Stay on sonofdy’s good side…got it.
    ;-)

  51. #560928
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:11 am, sonofdy said:

    My governor is asking for money from the feds. I guess I can’t blame him too much since they are printing so much money…

  52. #560929
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:12 am, jangar said:

    So far it’s all about showing love to the campaign supporters…and will continue to be so for the next 4 years of campaigning.

  53. #560931
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:12 am, Savage24 said:

    I notice he’s not buying American.

  54. #560933
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:13 am, sonofdy said:

    Stay on sonofdy’s good side…got it.

    Read this book on torture. Its amazing what the japanesse used to do with a little bamboo stalk or a couple of needles. (okay putting the dark side away now.)

  55. #560934
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:15 am, jangar said:

    Just building the legacy that the common folk won’t do.

  56. #560937
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:18 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    BroBama and friends can call for cutting the man some slack all they want-that is their right. I plan on giving the man as much slack and respect as the Liberals and assorted jerks gave Presidents Reagan and Bush-none.
    We know who he is and what he stands for. This smoke screen of Center Right and Bi-Partisanship is just that-a smoke screen. To quote a Democratic Party activist after the 2002 Congressional elections-”we don’t get along with anybody on the Right-we ride at dawn”.

    dfern
    If the money used to purchase the ring was his money, then it is nobody’s business to criticize him buying a ring for his wife–All of this carping in this post sounds like a whole bunch of class warfare.

    Yes it does-did you read “Dreams From My Father“? BroBama does in fact call for Redistributive Wealth and Class Warfare-it is his stock in trade.

    Yes it is his money–the trouble is he wants mine also. I could care less about the ring–but it does high light his and Michelle Obama’s elitism and hypocrisy.

  57. #560938
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:12 am, Savage24 said:
    I notice he’s not buying American.

    If only we were more like our pals on the Left… this would be a good point to hammer home. He’d give that rign back so fast MO’s head would spin.

  58. #560940
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 am, Laree said:

    We are having a similar discussion on Imus truth.

    http://imustruth.typepad.com/index/2008/11/the-imus-news-hour/comments/page/11/#comments

    LOVE Chris Matthews (when he’s not obnoxious and talking over everyone); The beautiful intelligent Michelle DESERVES a ring for the time her husband spends away from the family while trying to save this drowning ship. Agree the “real news” LOVES to stress everyone out with every detail….exaggeration is not a shock- they would have nothing left to say.

    Posted by: Taryn | Tuesday, December 02, 2008 at 09:31 AM

    This Me responding:

    The Economy is tanking, and Obama is buying his wife expensive bling? Because she deserves it? Really, the man who blocked legislation and regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who helped gets us where the country is financially today. Who got the most campaign money from Fannie Mae? It isn’t a secret….So Obama is buying his wife expensive baubles while Rome Burns. Okay he has a half brother in Kenya, doing without, he has an Aunt who is living in public housing, who gave money to his campaign, getting deported, and a school in Kenya he said, he would help but DIDN’T-
    http://baldilocks.typepad.com/

    ..but Michelle Obama deserves an expensive piece of jewelry? Because her husband made her First Lady by running for the Office of President of the United States. That is some of the most “Superficial Nonsense” I have read in a long time. It’s his money he can spend it anyway he wants but I don’t buy that Michell Obama deserves expensive bling, for her husband making her First Lady. I wonder how many needy people that 30,000 could feed in the US or an African Country?

    Yeah that’s some special sensitive value system, the two of them have going on there. (We are in a Recession, people are out of work, and looking to be laid off, high unemployment)…At least we don’t have to listen to Obama lie, and say he feels any ones pain, like Bill Clinton used to.

    Posted by: Ree | Tuesday, December 02, 2008 at 10:11 AM

  59. #560941
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:20 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:12 am, Savage24 said:
    I notice he’s not buying American.

    SNORT!

    Keep ‘em coming! :lol:

  60. #560943
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:22 am, sonofdy said:

    Huh, Obama is denying the story. Werid.

  61. #560948
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:25 am, heroyalwhyness said:

    From washingtonpost.com, Obama supporter, Peter Funt makes the observation:

    Americans barely have the stomach, or the money, to bail out the banks, the automakers and various foreign governments. Now the Democratic National Committee is seeking a handout?

    But Michelle is finally proud of her country and is being visibly rewarded.

  62. #560949
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:27 am, johnsteele said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:58 am, jencab said:
    Hey Obama, Mr. Citizen of the world, didn’t you learn anything from your liberal Hollywood friends who did the movie, “Blood Diamond” of Africans being tortured and work in captivity and slavish conditions in mining those diamonds?! The nerve! What does Leo DiCaprio have to say about this?

    All the Hollywood types will be wearing copies of MO’s new ring next year. I’m betting the Franklin Mint has a silver plated knock-off for sale inside three months along with a fawning *ss-kissing commercial about the gentle eyes of our Dear Leader and his Empress.

  63. #560951
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:29 am, mileslibertatis said:

    It’s his money. Right?

    If anything, he’s just a hypocrite. But then, we never thought he was honest.

    Let’s not fall into the trap of wealth-hating. That’s fine for Marxists, but not for us. We should praise his industry (even if he got rich on his trash books – it doesn’t make him any less industrious than trash romance novelists or purveyors of smut), and not concern ourselves with what sorts of gifts he chooses to buy his wife.

    Let him buy her an elephant, if he wants. Just keep your hands out of my pocket to do it.

  64. #560952
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:30 am, Buy Danish said:

    Here’s my problem with this:

    Barry has constantly criticized George Bush with the specious charge that he responded to 9/11 by telling people to “go shopping” (which falsely implies that that is all that Bush did, and that shopping is immoral).

    Apparently the proper response was to 9/11 was to “sacrifice” and become self-righteous community organizers, like the Obamas and all those people who work for ACORN.

    Yet, in a flagrant act of hypocrisy, Obama is responding to the recession and his election by going shopping for bling for his wife.

    Tsk tsk.

  65. #560953
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:30 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    Giovanni Bosco needs to eat, too. Spread the wealth!

  66. #560955
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:32 am, sonofdy said:
  67. #560957
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:34 am, Paul Revere said:

    It’s obviously hush money in the form of bling. Kobe Bryant did the same thing with his wife. Keeping up appearances is expensive.

  68. #560960
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:35 am, jangar said:

    Hey Michelle O – this is not going to help your children!

  69. #560964
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:38 am, Misscheryl said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    BroBama and friends can call for cutting the man some slack all they want-that is their right. I plan on giving the man as much slack and respect as the Liberals and assorted jerks gave Presidents Reagan and Bush-none.
    We know who he is and what he stands for. This smoke screen of Center Right and Bi-Partisanship is just that-a smoke screen. To quote a Democratic Party activist after the 2002 Congressional elections-”we don’t get along with anybody on the Right-we ride at dawn”.

    D.I.T.T.O.

    Giving slack is what got us here in the first place.

  70. #560971
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:41 am, vickisoup said:

    When he redistributes the wealth, I have first dibs on that ring.
    :P
    (Unless someone else has already claimed it here….I didn’t read all the comments, sorry)
    Seriously, as a proud capitalist pig, I have no problem with a rich husband buying his wife a $30k ring, no matter who they are.

  71. #560975
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:46 am, jangar said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:32 am, sonofdy said:
    GUYS the story may not be true. The press may have screwed up again.

    If so, sure didn’t take long to cancel the order.

  72. #560976
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:47 am, Laree said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:32 am, sonofdy said:

    GUYS the story may not be true. The press may have screwed up again.

    If this started getting bad feedback and it has – The Obama spokesperson could be back peddling.

  73. #560977
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:48 am, WarEagle82 said:

    Oh, wait! He is buying the ring for Michelle OBAMA and NOT Michelle MALKIN! Well, that is just plain WRONG!

  74. #560978
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:49 am, jangar said:

    “I did not buy a $30k ring for my wife”

    “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”

    Is this a trend?

  75. #560982
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:52 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:46 am, jangar said:
    If so, sure didn’t take long to cancel the order.

    That seems to be the theme now. BHO is under a magnifying glass now. I hope he likes it. It was the press that took out W. His approval rating was over 80 after 9/11. The press eroded that to nothing by this tactic. Look what the press did to Palin. BHO might as well get ready for a wild ride. The press that helped him get elected will throw him under the bus after they get what they want – quicker if they do not.

    I have no pity for this man – none.

  76. #560983
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:53 am, Laree said:

    We the American Tax Payers are paying Obama’s salary. He is going to decide when in office, who to bail out with OUR money- while we pay him his salary, he uses to buy Michelle “eye candy” what can you do with a Ring but wear it so others can feel “envious” ??? The Messiah lording it over the Little People, aka The American Tax Payers. Well it isn’t like the Man’s judgment wasn’t called into question during the campaign.

  77. #560985
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:53 am, purplepeep said:

    mileslibertatis said:
    Let’s not fall into the trap of wealth-hating.

    You feel as if you’ve fallen into the trap of wealth-hating, Miles?

  78. #560986
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:54 am, jangar said:

    The press that helped him get elected will throw him under the bus after they get what they want – quicker if they do not.

    I doubt it. They still suck up to the most vial of Hollywood, and any has-beens in DC.

  79. #560989
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 10:59 am, sandyb said:

    graysonret said:
    If McCain was elected and he decided to buy his wife that ring, there would be nothing else on the news, except “special reports” and “interviews” with every celebrity they could find, in order to condemn him.

    Bingo. But, the news of new bling for Cindy McCain wouldn’t have come out. It’s only the low-rent folks who like attention for their possessions and $$. The Clintons, anyone?

    Bueller? Bueller?

    And besides, how does this help Mike’s kids?

  80. #561018
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 11:29 am, Ahh a Lion! said:

    This is retarded, we are seriously going ape-sh*t over a present between two married people? We have no idea if Michelle expected any present for her role in the campaign, we have no idea the dynamics of the marriage, and we have no idea of the intentions behind the gift. But that doesn’t stop us from frothing at the mouth over wealthy people doing what they want with their money.

    Did we exhibit such mania when Laura Bush wore a $10,000 Oscar De La Renta dress at the 2004 inauguration during wartime? Honestly, get a grip – I bought my wife a shiny new $7,000 ring when we had our first child. Not because we’re trying to live the “Thug Life”, or we want to be better than other people, but because I love her, I could pay cash for it, and I believe that precious metals and gemstones keep their value.

    This is a new low for this site. I can see the headlines now, “Righty blogosphere loses it over jewelry.” It’s also quite telling that this thread will probably net over 400 comments in a couple days, where relevant posts about the economic catastrophe hardly ever break 100 comments.

    Congrats “conservatives”, our movement really is dead.

  81. #561043
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 11:44 am, DBNinKY said:

    I do not resent the Obamas in the least for being able to afford luxuries like a multimillion dollar home and expensive jewelry – they’ve earned the right to such spoils through their own hard-work and ambition. But I do think it is hypocritical of them to continue with the “common folk” persona-/image, when they are spending on a single ring more than what the average Wal-mart worker will earn in a year!

  82. #561059
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 11:52 am, purplepeep said:

    Ahh a Lion! said:
    we are seriously going ape-sh*t

    You feel as if you’re going ape-sh*t, Lion?

  83. #561062
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 11:52 am, jdsbc98 said:

    That isn’t a ring u give for a “Thank you” That is a right u give your wife after you have been busted cheating on her with a white girl.

  84. #561078
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:02 pm, Laree said:

    7
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 11:29 am, Ahh a Lion! said:

    This is retarded, we are seriously going ape-sh*t over a present between two married people? We have no idea if Michelle expected any present for her role in the campaign, we have no idea the dynamics of the marriage, and we have no idea of the intentions behind the gift. But that doesn’t stop us from frothing at the mouth over wealthy people doing what they want with their money.

    First Off it is the Topic of the Post 2nd he is on the Tax Payers Dime, has been since he has held his first public office…Mr Spread the Wealth – Mr Redistribution, has called for “Fairness” in the way of Taxes on American Citizens…So right now the American Taxpayer is paying his salary. So when he buys his wife an expensive piece of Bling it is his prerogative, and it is The American Tax Paying Citizens prerogative, to comment on his LACK of sensitivity. Considering the Man helped drive us into the Financial Situation we are in Today-RECESSION. Which he plans to Fix by using more of OUR Tax Paying Dollars to Bail Out failed Businesses. Ape S**t, not at all just pointing out The Messiah likes to lorded it over the “little people” aka The Tax Paying American Citizens. While he is sticking it to them. in the way of using OUR taxes to Bail Out Failed Business…what is that called Socialism…or do as I say, not as I do?

  85. #561097
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    2nd he is on the Tax Payers Dime, has been since he has held his first public office…Mr Spread the Wealth – Mr Redistribution, has called for “Fairness” in the way of Taxes on American Citizens…So right now the American Taxpayer is paying his salary.

    He made plenty (if not most of his money) before public office, but it wouldn’t matter either way. Should the government regulate what government employee’s can buy with their government salaries? There are millions of people who get payed through tax dollars – I believe many of them need to lose their job – but it is still their money. If you want some Christ-like president, who forgoes all earthly possessions, you are living in a fantasyland.

    So when he buys his wife an expensive piece of Bling it is his prerogative, and it is The American Tax Paying Citizens prerogative, to comment on his LACK of sensitivity.

    Sensitivity towards what? The fact that he’s rich and you’re not? Tax policies have nothing to do with this. If he can afford a $30k ring while you can’t afford food, it doesn’t matter, they aren’t related. Class warfare is a staple of the left – now we are engaging in the same shenanigans.

    in the way of using OUR taxes to Bail Out Failed Business…what is that called Socialism…

    No, it’s called Fascism.

  86. #561099
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, bear1909 said:

    First, i am not an ape. I do go ca-ca. But it is bear ca-ca. Yet still, i must clarify that i dont go bear ca-ca when confronted with classless idiocy of the newly elected fops who are entering the white house in January (or sooner if Keith Olberdoodie and Chris “Be Still My Tingling Leg” Matthews get their way).

    I just say “Who the f*ck cares what token one token gives to another token?” It is smoke and mirrors to distract from the upcoming US Supreme Court justices conference on the Obingo Birth Certificate.

    The MSM is spitting all over themselves on this Bored by A Ring story. And, yet, while they froth, the birth certificate story is being treated as some kind of lunatic fringe conspiracy story.

    Not too hard to see why this stuff gets such coverage….. that the One would get dumped on his ass for being an illegal alien would be just too much to bear.

    :lol:

    bear…get it?

    :)

    Bear1909 out

  87. #561107
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm, rocketman said:

    I remember the O’Bummer telling us that we needed to change our lifestyles to save the planet and our economy–to “LIVE WITH LESS”–kindov like Jimmy Carter said in the old days.
    ***
    I thought this would be a problem–lowering my thermostat, putting on another sweater, etc. However, after seeing Michelle Obama’s super expensive ring I think it will be easier to do than I thought!
    ***
    The Obamas (and most other politicians) are “do as I say–not as I do” people. One prime rule for good leaders is “LEAD BY EXAMPLE”. Don’t say it unless you intend to do it–then do it.
    ***
    John Bibb

  88. #561140
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:48 pm, shooter said:

    Actually I think bho got a great deal. If you had guessed 8 months ago how much it would cost him to shut her up ’til after election day you probably would have guessed much higher.
    Like I said, it is hush money.
    Honeydoo not money.

    The ‘hussein obama’ (crappy) part is that he(they?) spent 6 times more on the ring than they gave to charity this entire century. And even that is after a huge infusion/donation after he started his campaign.

    Unethical selfish liars.
    At least now she can’t ever wear it.

  89. #561145
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:51 pm, ArmywifeArmymom said:

    Gee, I gave birth to 4 children, and I am supportive of my husband’s military career, and all I got was a lousy t-shirt. :p

  90. #561146
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Laree said:

    Exactly rocketman #184

    Obama: Do as I say- NOT as I do!

    Obama is not ABOVE criticism, and I can criticize him all day long. Right after I get done checking the air in my tires.

  91. #561155
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Laree said:

    shooter #185

    AND Obama isn’t even buying American….Obama can’t feel my Pain, where is Bill Clinton, only Bill Clinton knows the troubles I’ve I seen…GRIN!

  92. #561160
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:58 pm, Laree said:
  93. #561187
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 1:17 pm, NotPC said:

    Did this ring have anything to do with Vera Baker?? Maybe ??

  94. #561239
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm, lgm said:

    judging from the number of comments, this is the most important story for MM conservatives today.

    There’s likely to be wrong. It is likely that Mr. Obama is not planning to buy an expensive ring for Mrs. Obama.

    It’s obvious that it’s likely to be wrong. There is only one source, a guy not close to Obama with a strong reason to lie.

    Conclusion: MM conservatives don’t care whether the “information” they use to bash Obama is true. Just like they didn’t care whether the information they used to invade Iraq was true, or global warming, or …..

  95. #561258
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 2:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, bear1909 said:
    I just say “Who the f*ck cares what token one token gives to another token?” It is smoke and mirrors to distract from the upcoming US Supreme Court justices conference on the Obingo Birth Certificate.

    Ummm, correct me if I am wrong dear Bro but, he did not submit a birth certificate did he? He submitted a “certification of live birth” .oO(wondering what a cert of dead birth would look like) which is completely different. Supposedly, the Health Department of Hawaii holds oBingo’s original birth certificate but will not release it to anybody unless they have a tangible interest. Of course, oBingo could clear this all up by releasing his Birth Certificate. That might be incriminating.

  96. #561263
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 2:04 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 2nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm, lgm said:
    Just like they didn’t care whether the information they used to invade Iraq was true, or global warming, or …..

    Idiot,

    The liberals were SCREAMING to stop Sadam long before Bush entered office.

    AGW is a hoax.

    Conclusion: You a COMPLETE IDIOT (and your grammar sucks too).

  97. #561296
    On December 2nd, 2008 at 2:30 pm, RetFireman said:

    So the same people who were outraged over the money that was spent on the entire Palin family in order to outfit them so that they could look like a family who has someone running for the Vice Presidency are just fine with this chunk of metal?

    And we are still supposed to buy that crock about how they are not elitist and just regular folks?

    Does it come with a gift certificate for free arugula?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stanford alumni blow the whistle on Valerie Jarrett

November 15, 2009 10:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

“An educated scoundrel is still a scoundrel.”

Visitor logs: Knock, knock, knockin’ on Barry’s door

November 2, 2009 09:51 AM by Michelle Malkin

113 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Who’s there?

StopJarrett.com

October 29, 2009 02:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

66 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Look who called out Fox News-basher Valerie Jarrett

October 28, 2009 05:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Speaking truth to power.

FLOTUS plays the woman card to sell Obamacare

October 26, 2009 10:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

46 Comments | 1 Trackback

And now, Barack Obama is afraid of…San Francisco?

October 14, 2009 03:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 1 Trackback

Michelle Obama is afraid of…South Carolina?

October 13, 2009 10:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Michelle Obama



Mudville Gazette

» War costs money (2)
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook