A Georgia reader holds his nose and votes; Update: Chambliss wins
It’s runoff day in Georgia. The lines at the polls have been short, which is probably good news for GOP incumbent Sen. Saxby Chambliss.
The bad news is that a lot of conservatives aren’t happy about the pro-bailout, pro-amnesty Republican, but feel they have to hold their nose and vote for him.
Ugh. I thought those days were over.
Reader Ryan e-mails about his voting experience this morning:
I just wanted to let you know that I just got back from voting here in Ga. Both the Atlanta Journal and the local poll workers are saying its been a light turnout today in the runoff election between RINO King Saxby Chambliss and Squirrel Head Jim Martin.
As much as I hated to vote for the RINO King, I had to cast ballot for him, if for nothing else to keep our Noble Chairman MaoBama from getting his Super-Majority…
Ryan, in Ga.
***
Update: Chambliss wins the runoff. Now, conservatives must hold his feet to the fire.
One more thing: Guess the ‘Cuda Effect trumped the Luda Effect.
One other thing: Stacy McCain defends Saxby’s immigration record. Points taken, but the takeaway from his shamnesty dalliance is that the guy went wobbly went it mattered most — and it took massive resistance and vigilance to set him straight.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
More CPAC speeches in 20 words
February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin
72 CommentsRomney gets Rick-rolled: Santorum sweeps Missouri, Minnesota, and Colorado in 2/7 trifecta
February 7, 2012 07:24 PM by Michelle Malkin
332 CommentsMiddle Class Payroll Tax Cut Extension Comes Courtesy of Mortgage Fees on Home Buyers
February 6, 2012 01:36 PM by Doug Powers
35 CommentsSantorum’s got game
February 6, 2012 10:05 AM by Michelle Malkin
184 CommentsNevada Caucuses Open Thread; Update: Romney Wins
February 4, 2012 04:30 PM by Doug Powers
139 Comments
BlunderMitt: Let Them Eat Food Stamps; Plus: PPP results point to Santorum
February 1, 2012 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin
122 Comments
Florida Primary Open Thread; Update: Romney Wins
January 31, 2012 07:24 PM by Doug Powers
163 Comments
Fly Them To the Moon. Please.
January 27, 2012 12:32 AM by Michelle Malkin
114 Comments
Categories: GOP
Pundit & Pundette
» Obama's war on conscience, cont'dRedstate
» Media MattersHot Air
» National Review to Newt: Get outAmSpecBlog
» Explosion Near Israeli Embassy in IndiaNRO
» Santorum’s Turn
On December 4th, 2008 at 2:57 pm, MtsEdge said:
McCain was a weak candidate on many levels, but he was what came out of the primaries. At some point you need to not let the perfect be the enemy of the not intolerable.
Name the biggest “RINO” out there. What immediately springs to my mind is Lincoln Chaffey formerly of RI. He was a lousy senator and a full on democrat. The very definition of a RINO. He did however caucus with the republicans and could be leaned on to occasionally do the right thing. When he was in the senate the Republicans chaired the comities and could set the agenda. When he was voted out and replaced with an Authentic democrat the republicans lost the chairmanship of the comities, the control of the Senate and the ability to set the agenda.
He was a lousy senator and a lousy republican, but he was the best Republican that could have gotten elected in… and lets face it: a lousy state. Purifying the party by tossing him out just lost us the seat. Norm Coleman is a RINO, but the best that you are going to get in Minnesota at the moment. He is a hell of a lot better than Al Frankin, who wasn’t even a good comedian. Chambliss isn’t a sterling conservative… but without him the democrats can get their union card check law passed.
We are seriously screwed as it is. I empathize with your frustration, I REALLY do. But driving people away isn’t going to get us to where we want to go.
Perhaps, I don’t know. But the analogy doesn’t transfer to McCain’s situation. Americans are hungry for a strong, conservative leader, witness Palin’s impact…
Then I must ask, what IS going to get us there? Assuming we’re both talking about a return to conservatism.
On December 4th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, JHSII said:
Congratulations; you tried to deviate from your generic cut and paste retort and managed to come up with something that made no sense. Moron.
Asked and answered. Repeatedly. You are not a conservative, you are a crybaby. Go back and re read what I wrote until you understand it. That ought to be a while.
At a boy, back to the cut and paste retort. It’s safer than thinking for yourself.
n December 4th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, MtsEdge said:
President Obama?
What I witnessed was Palin getting raked over the coals by the media.,
Electing people who wont screw up. That is a 2 part process, the first part is electing them.
Yes. This is made incredibly difficult on a societal level with the educational system and the media being what it is. If you want a true conservative revolution in the USA it is going to have to be a holistic approach. Otherwise it is just going to be what it is now: trying to stop the other side from doing damage.
MtsEdge:
good post. I’m afraid your analysis will go over the troll-heads here, but never fear: as my overflowing emailbox attests, there are many more eyeballs passing over these comments than the responses posted here indicate. It seems most people only comment to disagree.
Yet more of the same lies, ad hominums, projection from Bill Grant.
Bill Grant said that he doesn’t like me. Of course not – I am a Conservative and I think for myself. Bill doesn’t like that in anyone.
I’ve switched to a newsreader for he PDA. I don’t see grant droppings…
Unfortunately I still have to use the browser to post, so I just jump to the editbox from the reader. Its not a perfect system, but I’m certain you could set something similar on a PC.
Its not as if he ever says anything intelligent anyway, after all.
I say the first part is identifying (and wholeheartedly backing) a conservative. Once a RINO is elected, it’s too late.
It’s painful and awful to watch (and have to live with), but continuing to “suck it up” and take whatever is handed to us means we wind up with McCains, who will continue to lose to dems who are at least honest about their intentions.
I know you’re a McCain supporter. I am a conservative supporter, who voted for the R ticket (Palin), which happened to include McCain. I say kick out the RINOs and start over. Anything else is just prolonging the agony of a slow death, kind of like this bailout nonsense.
Mike M, thank you for your encouragement.
On December 4th, 2008 at 3:55 pm, JHSII said:
So.. when I wrote “…be sure to follow this up with some non-sequitur effluence[…] Make sure that it is cut and paste-able so that you can post it over and over like the brainless parrot that you are. That will prove MY point; that you are an idiot” you must have taken that very seriously.
And the ‘ol rubber/glue gambit… I don’t like you because you are an idiot, I thought I spelled that out clearly enough even for you.
On December 4th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, MtsEdge said:
Sure. But 1) Saxby Chambliss was already chosen and 2) you aren’t going to be able to elect an ultra-conservative in every state. (Surely you must acknowledge that.) Then what?
Agreed.
No one is advocating just taking whatever is handed to you.
I didn’t vote for him in the primaries, however when he was chosen by a majority of republican voters I backed him as best as I could because I didn’t want the results that we got. I am pretty aggravated that the campaign had to fight off attacks from “friend” and foe alike and think that those who couldn’t see the necessity of keeping out the obamamessiah shouldn’t really have a role in rebuilding.
I say we don’t have the luxury of “kicking out” anyone. I also say some of the self-appointed arbiters of who has the right of of running as or voting for a Republican need to get off their high-horse and realize that there are people of good faith who are going to disagree with them on the occasional issue. All or nothing is going to leave them with nothing.
Bill Grant doesn’t change; still the same old liar and troll that he was the last time he polluted this blog with his friend Irish Rose some months ago. He drops in to launch a barrage of attacks against Michelle, me, and any other Conservatives who happen to cross his path.
He does provide a pretty good insight into how the liberal mind works – as he blames everyone else for everything and tries to prove how “superior” he is to everyone else by putting everyone else down.
One wonders if he really believes all of his own BS, or if he just uses the responses he gets to get laughs from his friends at DU, Kos, and HuffPo.
Based on what you said about Chafee, et al., let me see if I have this straight.
You seem to think that anyone who puts an “R” after their name, no matter how they behave, believe, or vote, should be worthy of the support of conservatives. However, when said conservatives try to hold these RINOs accountable (e.g., by calling them out on faulty positions or better yet, voting them out of office), your contempt is directed at the conservatives.
I can’t go there with you. Sorry.
MtsEdge, I think you’ve figured Bill out, and now you know why he attacks me so viscerally.
People like Bill are the reason Conservatives are becoming fewer and fewer in the Republican party. It’s hard to take the party back when there are people like Bill around.
JHSII, I can’t say that I blame Bill for conservatives leaving the Rs. I think the Rs have in fact moved away from conservatism. I understand what you are saying, conservatives no longer seem to have a home in the R party…and if not, we will make our home elsewhere…but without conservatives, the R party will fade into oblivion or be swallowed by the dems. We can’t let go of our principles, this is the essence of the battle between people who feel the way Bill does and those who are ready to fight for conservatism.
On December 4th, 2008 at 8:40 pm, JHSII said:
Not that you ever could point out where I have lied… You just have your head shoved so far up your rectum that the only thing you can do is call whatever you can’t rebut a “lie”. Yet another indication that you are a complete moron.
Conservatives don’t help elect liberals. Even a fool like you has to be able to wrap your head around that simple concept at this point.
You have first hand knowledge of how an idiot’s mind doesn’t work. Your drool cup must be full by now, go empty it before it shorts out your keyboard.
I blame your parents for feeding you lead paint chips.
I don’t put “everyone else” down.. just you, the village idiot.
Hey parasite; I actually worked to elect conservative candidates. At the very least I didn’t throw an infantile hissy fit all the way to defeat. You just b!tched and complained.
On December 4th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, MtsEdge said:
No. What I have stated is that letting the perfect be the enemy of the good is going to leave us with nothing.
The Republican Party has suffered a huge loss of credibility over the Bush administration because they blew it. Simply pit they blew it. They spent way too much, they weren’t able to communicate an agenda with the country indeed they didn’t really have one. (The last time they did was the “contract with America”.) At this point we (republicans) have suffered a rout and the way that we are going to get back is to elect competent administrators who are not going to screw up. Not by insisting on fat headed ideologues who tow the narrow line of some peoples misguided notions of conservatism… (Ie: it’s OK to spend like a maniac as long as we get the religious lip service)
Most importantly; Since on a federal level we are down to just over 40 senators we can’t afford to be playing “king of the tree house” and calling allies RINO’s. It is tough enough to win an election against an organized democrat opposition, getting BS heaped on you from myopic “allies” is tough to take.
It isn’t conservative to toss the baby out with the bathwater. What is conservative is to keep the pressure on our elected officials. People here seem to believe that if they hold out for the perfect person all they have to do is sit back while he or she does their bidding. If that is what tyou are waiting for then run yourself. I may vote for you and take up your cause whole this online think tank trashes you.
One more important detail: The term “RINO” has become a Democratic tool to split the right off the moderate wing of the Republican party. It only serves the democrats when republicans point at teach other and seek ways of throwing each other out of the party. When you hear someone using it you should question their motivation.
On December 5th, 2008 at 2:11 pm, JHSII said:
What part of “I think that you are a moron” are you not understanding?
You sure it isn’t because morons are calling them RINO’s?
You aren’t going to take anything back. All you will do is sit on the internet and proclaim what a true conservative you are as you help elect liberals.
On December 5th, 2008 at 3:24 pm, MtsEdge said:
Nothing will drive the country to the left faster. Nothing. It is a 2 party system. For conservatives to be tossing their votes away on Alan Keyes and the moderates to be voting for Republicans it will only serve to elect Obamas.
Without the R party so will conservatives.
And Bill comes back and proves that everything I’ve posted about him is exactly right. Thanks Bill. Good job.
BTW, Conservatives will survive without the Republican Party, the Party cannot survive without Conservatives.
On December 5th, 2008 at 7:02 pm, JHSII said:
And another generic post confirming that you are an idiot.
Survive? Sure. Have any say in the electoral process? Nope. The democrats will be thrilled to watch unbelievable morons like you split the party and vote for whatever “pure” ideologue that you can dig up who couldn’t stand a chance of getting elected to dog catcher. You can be a drooling sanctimonious circus clown with an Alan Keyes bumper sticker on your AMC Pacer… but you aren’t going to get him elected. You idiot.
Understand that? Idiot?
Got it yet? Idiot?
Of course you don’t. Cue the previously predicted non-sequitur effluence indicating that you are a brainless parrot.
No it can’t, which is probably why douche bags like yourself want to split the party.
More lies, trolling, attacks, and projection from Bill. Nothing unexpected. It’s his SOP.
He finishes off his rant with another personal attack.
It appears that Bill still believes that by attacking Conservatives he can bring them to see his point of view. Too bad for him that it doesn’t work that way.
I too am going to resort to cut and paste from here on in: So.. when I wrote “…be sure to follow this up with some non-sequitur effluence[…] Make sure that it is cut and paste-able so that you can post it over and over like the brainless parrot that you are. That will prove MY point; that you are an idiot” you must have taken that very seriously.
What part of “I think that you are a moron” are you not understanding?
Conservatives don’t help elect liberals. Even a fool like you has to be able to wrap your head around that simple concept at this point.
What part of “I think that you are a moron” are you not understanding?
And here Bill once falsely accuses me of “cut-and-paste” when that’s not what I’m doing. Of course Bill wouldn’t know that because he’s so filled with hate and anger and thinks everything is all about him. Malignant narcissist indeed.
You’re not winning over any converts by attacking me, Bill. All it does is expose you as the one with the problem. Any point you might have been trying to make – other than your intense dislike of me and other Conservatives – gets lost in your rants. What you post doesn’t reflect on me at all, especially by anyone else here who has read my posts.
I don’t expect you to listen to me though, even if by listening you might be able to regain a few shreds of dignity or credibility. You are projecting – and no, I didn’t learn that term from you which you very well know because this isn’t all about you at all.
On December 6th, 2008 at 8:31 am, JHSII said:
You are quite simply the biggest moron on these boards, if not on the internet.
What part of “I think that
” are you not understanding?Where have I “said” that I wanted your support? I am not asking for your “support” for anything
You aren’t a conservative, you are an idiot.
You do not speak for conservatives, you speak for idiots.
…be sure to follow this up with some non-sequitur effluence[…] Make sure that it is cut and paste-able so that you can post it over and over like the brainless parrot that you are. That will prove MY point; that you are an idiot.
you are a moron
I wish that when I teach you a shiny new word that you would bother to try to use it in a context where it might make some sense…
As previously outlined ( On June 25th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, Bill Grant said:
Just FYI: When you learn a new word like “projection” it is often best not to use it in every other sentence. You are probably best off sticking with the phrases you already know like: “Would you like fries with that”?) you hadn’t used the term “projection” or referenced the concept of “psychological projection” before it was thrown in your face.
you are a moron
More of the usual standard lies, trolling, projection, and personal attacks from the usual suspect.
Looks like he’s added denial of reality into his repertoire.
On December 6th, 2008 at 1:12 pm,
So do you just sit there all day and hit refresh? Aren’t “conservatives” supposed to have jobs? Are you conserving your mothers basement and your virginity you unbelievable loser?
JHSII said:
So.. when I wrote “…be sure to follow this up with some non-sequitur effluence[…] Make sure that it is cut and paste-able so that you can post it over and over like the brainless parrot that you are. That will prove MY point; that you are an idiot” you must have taken that very seriously
you are a moron
and Bill responds exactly the way I predicted with the usual Bill Grantisms.
The funniest thing of all is that he claims I cut-and-paste!!
Go back and have your laugh with your friends at the Kos, DU, and HuffPo, Bill. You’re not generating the kinds of laughs you want here.
I agree that the Repubs screwed it up. And I think Pres. Bush isn’t helping at ALL with his “pre-socializing” of the economy for the next administration. That is just WAY over the top…the least he could do is put a halt to ALL bailout nonsense and let the next administration deal with it…who knows, the situation may have self-corrected by then, e.g., bankruptcy, mergers, trimming dead wood, etc. And I am so disappointed that a former Texas Governor is so apathetic about dealing with the illegal immigration problem in this country.
It seems that we see the problem similarly, but as to the solution we are at different points on the spectrum. I say tough love is in order, and I think you are saying we should salvage what we have. I’m at the point where I don’t see much left to salvage. I am eager for a strong, conservative leader who will galvanize the party, and I recognize that no one will agree 100% with anyone else. The problem is that there has been NO strong conservative leader for quite some time in the R party. That’s why so many people are excited about Gov. Palin, Gov. Jindal, and others who “walk the walk” and are widely loved by their constituents and others throughout the country who witness their efforts.
I don’t agree with electing anybody who sees fit to put an “R” after their name into office, then trying to mold them into a conservative. There are too many pols who have put Rs after their names STRICTLY for political expediency, Chafee being one, and Schwarzenegger, and of course many others. The list is quite long. In my mind, electing these people only heightens the slide on the banana peel that conservatism has taken in recent years. This is a war for the soul of the country, there will be a winner and there will be a loser. No second place, no middle ground.
At this point, I’m ready to close this thread. I’ll check back for your response, but I may not respond any longer on this thread…thanks for the dialogue. I hope it leads to a more fruitful dialogue within the R party.
On December 6th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, MtsEdge said:
I believe we don’t have much of a choice but to salvage what we have. “Tough Love” will be fine once we get off the canvis but i don’t think it will ever be in our best internists to be forcing people out of the party. Indeed, I believe a lot of this is propelled by self-aggrandizement.
Me too, a genuine conservative; not one who wants to set up an inverse of the liberal nanny state (A “conservative” nanny state which is an oxymoron.) which is also a popular theme here.
Both of them will be raked over the coals by the press. Jindal is a creationist who has attended an exorcism. Palin might be up to the task in 4 years but she was just too green this time around.
Better to elect a liberal?”
Look at where we are. We have just elected the most liberal senator in congress as president. He hasn’t chosen the leftist whack jobs but overall smart but decidedly left of center administrators.
If he doesn’t screw up in a spectacular fashion your war will have been lost and it will have been lost by the idiots who call themselves conservatives and who effectively helped to elect a liberal.
Me too…
On December 6th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, JHSII said:
Hey- Drop dead.
You might as well be…
You must be used to people laughing at you.
Nope, you and they are on effectively perusing the same agenda though. Did I mention that you should drop dead?
More of the usual trolling, lies, personal attacks, projection, and paranoid delusions from the usual suspect, Bill Grant.
Bill wants blind obedience from all of us unwashed out here to our betters – a group in which Bill includes himself. He’s not interested in saving the Republican Party – if he was interested in that he wouldn’t be so viscerally attacking the Conservatives who are trying to take the Party back.
MtsEdge
Not if Bill has anything to say about it.
on December 7th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, JHSII said:
Is getting the last word a substitute for having something clever to say in your little stupid world?
Nope, I want you to stfu.
I am more interested in saving the country; you are more interested in being a needy lemming looking to others to define yourself.
Once again, moron: Conservatives don’t help to elect liberals. Conservatives aren’t big whining idiots. You are not a conservative, you are an idiot. Take the party back? Idiots like you who sat on their asses and helped to elect Obama, and who seek to trash whomever is running with an R shouldn’t have any say in where the party is going. Indeed, you might as well be working for the democrats. I don’t think that you are because not even they would want your help.
You don’t do “fruitful dialog”. That has been established here and elsewhere. You simply have nothing of value to contribute.
Bill Grant with more of the usual lies, trolling, projection, etc., etc., etc….
Yawn.
I would make a comment about Bill thinking for himself, but that would imply that Bill could actually think.
Is getting the last word a substitute for having something clever to say in your little stupid world?
Bill projects again. Different hour, same delusions.
On December 8th, 2008 at 10:40 pm, JHSII said:
Hey-JHSII, Drop dead.
Yes, Bill, we know you have major maturity issues. You don’t need to keep reminding us.
Hey-JHSII, Drop dead.
Yet another post where Bill makes my point. Thanks, Bill.
You don’t have a point, idiot.
My basic point is that you are a troll. You being a liar merely adds to that point.
Thanks for confirming my point, Bill.
Your are a moron. In going through your previous posts here that isn’t just my opinion. Calling someone a “liar” without a shred of evidence is itself a lie.
Again, you haven’t got a point, idiot.
Another of my points proven by Bill. You are a troll and a liar. In fact, saying that I lie is yet another lie of yours.
Yawn.
Doesn’t make any sense, as usual you moron. You don’t have any points and you haven’t shown where I have lied… You are just pathetic at this point.
Get a life.
My points are that you’re a liar and a troll. I’ve shown where you’ve lied – including a very specific example.
The problem is yours. Don’t keep trying to project it off on me.
On December 9th, 2008 at 3:48 pm, JHSII said:
So.. when I wrote “…be sure to follow this up with some non-sequitur effluence[…] Make sure that it is cut and paste-able so that you can post it over and over like the brainless parrot that you are. That will prove MY point; that you are an idiot” you must have taken that very seriously
So when you do that over and over that is spamming.
As you have done here, and here, here…
Wonder how the moderators feel about you spamming.
No spamming from me. I wonder how the moderators feel about your continued and repeated violations of the TOS, Bill.
I have been copying and pasting today because you seem to be posting the same lies and attacks over and over again, and I don’t feel like typing in my responses anymore like I have been doing.
The problem is yours, Bill. Stop trying to push it off on me.
(and yes, I’ll copy and paste this one too as long as you continue to prove my points about you.)
Another provable lie.
Well done, you deny something then confirm it… You prove yourself to be a liar.
And yet more lies and trolling from Bill.
Get a job.
I have a job.
All you have are lies and trolling.
My creepy stalker?
I suspect that it wont earn you enough to escape your parents basement. Loser.
Another post of projection from the troll and liar.
And miss originality scores another projection point.
You idiot.
More trolling and lies from Bill.
Nothing new here.
More idiocy from the idiot. Get a life.
Another post of trolling and lies from Bill.
Still nothing new.
Here is something new: You have got to be the most brain-dead clown who has ever dragged it’s knuckles across a keyboard. If brains were dynamite you couldn’t blow the fuzz off a peach. Someone needs to pull your ventilator plug kiddo, because you are just wasting space.
Figure it out: getting the last word is not a substitute for having something intelligent to say. I know it is all that you are left with, but it just marks you as an infantile idiot.
More trolling and lies from Bill.
Apparently his definition of new is more trolling and lies.
Yawn.
More lies and spam from the idiot.
You obviously don’t understand what “new” is since you repost the same thing over and over. Idiot.
Another post of trolling and lies from Bill.
Another post of nothing new.
Thanks for the spam, moron.
More trolling and lies from Bill. The more he posts, the more he remains the same.
Now THAT’S projection. You spamming, infantile little turd.
And here Bill continues to prove my point.
Good going, Bill!!
You don’t have a point you pathetic wanker.
More proof of my points by Bill.
Thanks for playing!!
You don’t have a point you pathetic wanker.
Bill is correct one one thing. I don’t have a single point. I have multiple points – all of which Bill is proving correct.
And now, by Bill’s own definition, he’s spamming.
LMAO
If your “points” were that you are an arrested development, infantile child who has nothing to do but post the same nonsensical line over and over even if it means looking like a complete fool then yes, I am proving you correct.
Bill is a troll and a liar.
Thanks for proving me right again, Bill.
I stated that you would do just what you are doing at the beginning of this latest exercise in futility:
So, even when it is spelled out to you that you were going to make a fool out of yourself in just the way that you have, and even though your nose has been rubbed in it several times throughout this exercise you couldn’t help, still can’t help doing the same exact thing that you were told would ark you as a “brainless parrot”.
You still wont be able to help it. It is your only defense. Over and over again, just as predicted. Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
The usual trolling, lies, attacks, and projection from Bill. I’ll say one thing for him – when Bill gets a hate-on, he doesn’t let go.
On December 9th, 2008 at 5:45 pm, Bill Grant said:
On December 9th, 2008 at 5:47 pm, JHSII said:
See? Told ya…
Yes, Bill Grant told us something all right – that all he can do is troll and lie. Then he does it. And keeps doing it. And keeps doing it. And keeps doing it. ad infinitum.
You still wont be able to help it. It is your only defense. Over and over again, just as predicted. Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
Bill has now added delusional to his repertoire.
Still, it’s just the same trolling and lies.
You still wont be able to help it. It is your only defense. Over and over again, just as predicted. Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
Thanks JHSII… It has been fun ensuring that you never enjoy a shred of credibility.
Yep, Bill proves my points again. I’m not the one without any credibility.
Now, be sure to follow this up with some non-sequitur effluence about how I have proved your non existent point…
That will prove MY point; that you are an idiot.
Anyone who reads this crap will look on you as an infantile moron with nothing of value to say. I come across as a jerk for encouraging it but who cares… You come across as a vegetable.
So again, why don’t you post something about how I have proved your point… That would be pretty interesting.
Anyone reading these posts will wonder why Bill doesn’t spend his time in a padded room. That’s what they’ll be wondering.
Is that what they will be wondering projection boy?
What’s the matter? Starting to get a bit embarrassed? This display gone on a bit too long? Not working out the way you thought it would?
Come on, you are overdue: here, cut and paste Einstein: Bill proves my points again.
More trolling and lies from Bill.
Will his posts never change?
You still wont be able to help it. It is your only defense. Over and over again, just as predicted. Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
More delusions from Bill, added to his usual trolling and lies.
Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
I consider it a badge of honor to be called an idiot by Bill.
IIRC, Ronald Reagan was called an idiot by the left so I’m in good company.
Of course you do, you are an idiot.
You are no Reagan. Not even a Ron Reagan.
Attacks, lies, and trolling by Bill. Nothing new here.
You still wont be able to help it. It is your only defense. Over and over again, just as predicted. Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
Are you still here trolling and lying about me?
You prove my points with every post.
You still wont be able to help it. It is your only defense. Over and over again, just as predicted. Every time confirming that you are indeed an “idiot”.
The ‘ol rubber/glue response. You are a pathetic pus$y JHSII, a real idiot.
Thanks for comparing me with Ronald Reagan, Bill. I stand proudly with my heroes.
You are too f-ing stupid to understand the simple sentence “You are no Reagan” evidentially.
You would have been calling him a RINO if enough people around you were, you needy lemming.
It turns out I was wrong about Bill. As I reread his posts from today he’s repeatedly compared me to Ronald Reagan.
Gotta give credit where credit is due.
You have been wrong about everything.
You are too f-ing stupid to understand the simple sentence “You are no Reagan” evidentially.
Go drink draino.
If I am “no Reagan”, then why do you keep comparing me to him?
Thanks again, Bill. I knew I could count on you.
I disputed your comparison to him and yourself, idiot.
Anytime, idiot.
Another favorable comparison between Ronald Reagan and myself from Bill.
Liberals called Reagan an idiot, and Bill keeps calling me an idiot. I am in good company.
Moron.
Liberals also see what they want t see, by your logic that makes you a liberal, idiot.