Laura Ingraham hosted Lila Rose, editor-in-chief of the UCLA Advocate, on her battle against the nation’s largest abortion provider, and how they’ve targeted her in response. Rose said she got into her sting operations because Planned Parenthood has …

“While we cannot be certain whether this video has been altered…

Typical Liberal BS. This couldn’t POSSIBLY have happened, and the only explaination is that the tape is a fake, right?

Thing is, this is NOT an isolated incident. These people think it is far moe important to detroy a life than to protect one. It is the evidence that shows their complete and utter disdain for young women, not their caring.

Not only was this woman more concerned with destroying the baby than anything else, she also did not care that there was an alleged child molestor running around. She was not concerned about this alleged 13 year old’s health and welfare…only that one more life be snuffed out.

This goes on in every abortion clinic across the country in one form or another. There is no “planning” involved in their “Family Planning Clinics”. There is no one there that advocates keeping the child, marrying the father, or even maintaining a relationship with the father and child, no where do they even want to tell the father at all that there is a baby involved. The laws themselves say that the father has no rights at all as to the decision involving an abortion. In their mind, the only responsibility a father has is monetary and he is forbidden from anything else.

This goes so much farther than just abortion. It is the total and complete destruction of families from the ground up. Hell, in California, you must have the parent’s permission to be sick from school, but not to leave school and have an abortion.

What if she accepts the offer of immunity and then takes full responsibility for implementing the unofficial policy? Then no one gets punished. Forget that.

I worded it poorly, but generally immunity is only given once the prosecutors KNOW what she is going to say and entirely conditional on her saying it.

chapoutier said:

give her immunity until she spills the beans on her boss as to what the real policy was, go after her boss and offer the same deal and up the chain. Just like RICO investigations.

What if she accepts the offer of immunity and then takes full responsibility for implementing the unofficial policy? Then no one gets punished. Forget that.

Instead, punish her, and all those who chose to implement the “unofficial” policy. Do this consistently and as a result, frontline abortion clinic workers will be far less likely to engage in criminal behavior at the behest of a superior.

Stomp on the little guy. He’s much easier to crush, and doing so sends a powerful message to all the other little guys who might be similarly inclined to abett illegal policies in the name of “choice.”

Once the workers see that their employer will solicit criminal behavior and then expect them to pay the price when they get caught, they’ll stop implementing the policy.

For it to be a lone rogue employee would defy the laws of probability.

But didn’t you know that these clinics are operated only to HELP women and children?

/sarc off

I’d argue that makes them worse than Herod.

Yes, those who kill their own children are doing a despicable thing, an abomination to the LORD.

I was referencing the PP clinics themselves, and of course the timing and bloodthirstiness of Herod’s act, but it may be moot. Evil is evil.