See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On December 5th, 2008 at 7:46 am, Craig said:

   As a parent myself, I’m going to teach my children respect for the law and respect for each and every community.

   SAY WHAT? We wouldn’t be having this discussion if the Muslim community were doing so.

2. #2
   On December 5th, 2008 at 7:46 am, Cameron said:

   A range of Lego-style fighting figurines – including an Islamic terrorist militant – has sparked outrage among Muslims.

   “Hey, Joe? It’s been a slow day for us so far.”

   “Think we can get outraged about something, Bill? How about teddy bears named Muhammed?”

   “Done already and they let the woman live.”

   “Hold on…here we go! Legos that look like terrorists!”

   “PERFECT! Let me get my bomb vest on and we’ll go express outrage at this!”

3. #3
   On December 5th, 2008 at 7:55 am, rightside said:

   unmaksing Mr. White.

4. #4
   On December 5th, 2008 at 7:55 am, ajmontana said:

   You nailed it Michelle with the first sentence.

5. #5
   On December 5th, 2008 at 7:57 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

   “As a parent myself, I’m going to teach my children respect for the law and respect for each and every community.

   Riiiight. That precept can be found in which section of the Qu’ran?

6. #6
   On December 5th, 2008 at 8:00 am, FruNobulux said:

   “As a parent myself, I’m going to teach my children respect for the law and respect for each and every community.

   So deranged, barbaric, murderous savages are now a “community”? The mind boggles.

7. #7
   On December 5th, 2008 at 8:07 am, ctmom said:

   Oh no! I ordered one yesterday, I hope it won’t be backordered!

8. #8
   On December 5th, 2008 at 8:19 am, FamilyMan said:

   Hey! The LEGO company could sell a companion set of blocks with a design of the twin towers. The marketing potential could be endless as long as Islamic terrorist are around.

9. #9
   On December 5th, 2008 at 8:28 am, MrVIBEMAN said:

   I hope these aren’t recalled. I’d love to see an American company actually stand up to Islamic Terrorists and Sharia Law, instead of caving to the PC crowd.

10. #10
    On December 5th, 2008 at 8:43 am, tre said:

    I think those toys would be good for target practice.

    Where can I buy them?

11. #11
    On December 5th, 2008 at 8:50 am, Roman Con said:

    “All I want for Christmas…”

    These are fantastic – I bet they’ll go well with a model airplane and a couple of cherry bombs.

    Light the fuse!

12. #12
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:01 am, Craig said:

    He said: “I don’t think there’s any difference between someone that shouts hatred through a megaphone and someone that creates a doll that glorifies terrorists.

    Let’s continue that abstract thought process Einstein- Do you believe there’s any difference between an adult male who rapes a 9 year old girl and an adult male who enters into a contractual marriage with a 9 year old girl and then consumates the union?

13. #13
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:19 am, chiwatcher said:

    The BrickArms website doesn’t say anything about Muslims, Islam, or terrorists (at least on the page selling the “BrickArms Bandit – ‘Mr. White’”). The author of that article is guessing at it.

    Here’s a tip: If some Muslims stop looking and acting like terrorists, then people will stop associating toys like this with them.

    This is a great quote from the SunTimes columnist Neil Steinberg:

    How can those so indifferent to the hurts they cause be so sensitive about perceived slights?

    That pretty much sums it up for me.

14. #14
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:23 am, maine yankee said:

    Under the scarf–is that bill ayers ?

15. #15
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:30 am, mojoe said:

    “As a parent myself, I’m going to teach my children respect for the law and respect for each and every community. Except those filthy Jews and infidel Christians, and those bloody Hindus, and of course the Buddhists have to go too, not to mention Athiests, Agnostics and Zoroastrians.”

    There you go, fixed it for you!

16. #16
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:52 am, BKennedy said:

    Just one more reason to allow any future kids I have access to my old Lego chest, which I’ve not been able to get rid of.

    Lego is a dutch company, as I recall. Good on them.

    Besides, lego men are yellow. As my liberal betters inform me, Muslims are categorically “brown” people. They’re mocking a plastic Adam Gadahn.

    If we can’t have Lego terrorists, the terrorists have already won.

17. #17
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am, lgm said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

18. #18
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:58 am, passingtramp said:

    The organisation which is complaining about this toy itself condemns the Mumbai attacks on the front page of its website. It’s a bit much to complain

    Imagine if these Muslims groups were as vocal in their criticism of actual jihadists as they are in expressing their “disgust” with toy terrorists

    when you haven’t even bothered to check the group out.

19. #19
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:10 am, SCTeacher said:

    The fact that a person is Muslim does not mean they support terrorism. While many Muslims do, many do not. Some Christians support the bombing of abortion clinics…many do not. Does no one find the image of young children playing with terrorist dolls slightly disturbing? I certainly wouldn’t want my child to have this toy.

20. #20
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:13 am, garydt said:

    Cair does not condemn terrorism and you are indeed a simpleton if you believe that, but again you believe that abortion mills are bombed by Christian terrorists daily. CAIR also has aims to take away first amendment rights but they do it so slowly that most people don’t notice. Examples are that one can’t be critical of Islam or you are branded as a racist or bigot in doing so.

21. #21
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:14 am, pueblo1032 said:

    If only this organization had voiced as much “DISGUST” over the attacks in MUMBAI… If only any MUSLIM GROUP had expressed any “DISGUST” over any MUSLIM TERRORIST ATTACKS… Remember “THERE ARE MANY RELIGIONS IN THE WORLD, BUT ONLY ONE RELIGION OF PEACE”…

22. #22
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:16 am, Viper1 said:

    We need more of these!! more more more!!

23. #23
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:19 am, CleanGuy said:

    If the toy fits…

24. #24
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:19 am, Viper1 said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am, lgm said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    Say what? Give us a frikkin break with that okay. They condemn what they support when its politically or economically lucrative to do so.

25. #25
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:36 am, madmonkphotog said:

    One opponent to this toy says:

    Chief executive Mohammed Shafiq said the figures were “glorifying terrorism”.

    The koran says:

    Koran 8.60: “Prepare for them whatever force and cavalry ye are able of gathering to strike terror, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies.”

    Koran 4.56: “Those who have disbelieved our signs, we shall roast them in fire. Whenever their skins are cooked to a turn, we shall substitute new skins for them, that they may feel the punishment; verily, Allah is sublime and wise.”

    Koran 47.4: “Therefore, when ye meet the unbelievers, smite at their necks and when you have caused a bloodbath among them, bind a bond firmly on them.”

    Koran 4.89: “They but wish that ye should reject faith as they do, and thus be on the same footing as they, so take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah. But if they turn renegades, seize them and kill them wherever ye find them, and take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

    Koran 8.39: “Fight them until there is no dissension and the religion is entirely Allah’s.”

    You tell me. Which is worse? Legos, or the koran?

26. #26
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:52 am, mchristian said:

    Ha! My little green Army men would kick Lego terrorist ass.

27. #27
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:01 am, mojoe said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:52 am, mchristian said:
    Ha! My little green Army men would kick Lego terrorist ass.

    Especially the guy with the flamethrower, he rocked!

28. #28
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:10 am, Gorebot said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am, lgm said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism.

    That’s the problem, El Dopo: they only “condemn”, they don’t resolve.

    Lip-service “condemnation” is easy. “Gettin’ it done” is what actually matters.

29. #29
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:12 am, hawkeye54 said:

    A range of Lego-style fighting figurines – including an Islamic terrorist militant -

    Say, does the range include US Rangers, SEALs, Marines and IDF figurines?

    Gotta have the good guys too!

    Especially the guy with the flamethrower, he rocked!

    I always preferred the bazookaman : )

30. #30
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:14 am, tonyr951 said:

    Dirka dirka Mohammed lego dirka

31. #31
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:18 am, Kevin K. said:

    SCTeacher (#18). I suspect that more of these figures (I don’t think they’re dolls) are bought for adults than children. However, if the kids are already playing with toy soldiers, why not have more choices for them?

    Having said that, I don’t plan on buying any for my nephews. (Now for me, after the Christmas rush? … well…)

32. #32
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:24 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Ramadhan Foundation has branded the figurines “absolutely disgusting”.

    I suppose the Japanese and Germans would have considered my toy soldier set back in the ’60′s having included German and Japanese soldier figurines with assault rifles, grenades and belts of explosives “absolutely disgusting.”

    Hey, my US soldier figurines had to have an enemy to fight and kill, after all.

    “These are the lessons parents should be giving to their children – not lessons about weapons and violence.”

    Lesson about weapons and violence given to children are essential, if done in an appropriate manner, so they know how to deal with each rationally as an adult.

    Not every moment will be filled with love, peace and joy in an adult world – unless you live in Obamaland.

33. #33
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:42 am, Gorebot said:

    Especially in Europe, there have been many radical-Muslim street mob-scenes, composed of protesters holding signs like “Behead those who mock Allah”, and effluent along similar lines.

    Question:

    Does anyone know of counter-protests, wherein someone holds up a sign saying something like “Allah has sex with donkeys”, or some such?

    If so, I’m just wondering to what extent there’s a double-standard reaction by the media, police, etc?

34. #34
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:49 am, Mommaofmany said:

    I don’t understand all the fuss. Lego heroes need enemies to fight. I wish I had known about this company sooner; I’d have ordered some cool bricks for my family for CHRISTmas! Well, there’s always birthdays.

35. #35
    On December 5th, 2008 at 11:52 am, b-cat said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am, lgm said:
    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    CAIR is a trojan horse from the Muslim Brotherhood. Its aim is to pretend to be a human rights advocacy group, but it is an actual propaganda arm using liberal mushheads to undermine the resolve of western civilization.

36. #36
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:01 pm, lgm said:

    Viper1 said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism.

    Say what? Give us a frikkin break with that okay. They condemn what they support when its politically or economically lucrative to do so.

    MM said Muslim organizations don’t condemn terror, but they do.

37. #37
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, b-cat said:

    Does no one find the image of young children playing with terrorist dolls slightly disturbing?

    Not disturbing if said terrorist doll is getting his butt kicked by Sergeant Rock.

38. #38
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Does anyone know of counter-protests, wherein someone holds up a sign saying something like “Allah has sex with donkeys”, or some such?

    Not allowed in Western Europe, I believe. Muslims are a protected class there. Anyway, youd’d have to have a death wish doing some such in Europe as it may most likely would result in dire consequences courtesy of the Religion of Peace.

39. #39
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Not disturbing if said terrorist doll is getting his butt kicked by Sergeant Rock.

    Yes, that should be the whole point and the proper use of a terrorist figurine.

40. #40
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, paboperfecto said:

    The bandit figure was cool but I liked the “WW2 German Soldier PanzerGrenadier” much better. I’d like to complain that the US Marine Sergent looks like the weakest out of the bunch.

41. #41
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Fishing with dynamite or grenades works wonders for improving the quantity of ones catch.

    Will tossing a few of these babies in the water have the same effect?

42. #42
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:14 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Does no one find the image of young children playing with terrorist dolls slightly disturbing?

    GI Joe was a baby-killing rapist in Nam – any correlation?

43. #43
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I’d like to complain that the US Marine Sergent looks like the weakest out of the bunch.

    Ah, he may look weak, but he can kick terrorist butt!

44. #44
    On December 5th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, b-cat said:

    How about a Gitmo detainee figurine just for laughs? CAIR would really howl and the lefty loonies would be beside themselves!

45. #45
    On December 5th, 2008 at 1:06 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    LGM

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    LOL…CAIR was under investigation for ties to terrorism, and its leaders want sharia law for America.

    If you thought Bush was a conservative, wait ’till they see what they’ll have in store for you…the utter death of Western liberalism.

46. #46
    On December 5th, 2008 at 1:31 pm, cheapseat said:

    lgm, i have NEVER seen any real muslim protests of this carnage. what religion endorses sending retarded children packed with bomb vests out to be remotely detonated in the name of god. this supposed religion is nothing more than a terrorist organization posing under the disguise of a religion to more easily conquer the the good citizens who want to just get along. if you looked at islam as a foriegn government, it’s activities would lead to war in virtually every nation on earth. but because it says it is a religion, it is afforded a legitimacy it certainly doesn’t deserve.

47. #47
    On December 5th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, Send_Me said:

    I’d love to get a few of these Lego terrorists. I’d also like to get a platoon’s worth of U.S. Army Lego men. I’ll use them as teaching aids for when I “teach my children respect for the law and respect for each and every community.” To “love your neighbor” also means to protect them from terrorists, Muslim or otherwise.

48. #48
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I know Michelle said “Lego-style”, but I want to remind you ALL that these are NOT Lego brand toys! It is really sad that Lego is saddled with the blame here. Their company is going to suffer because their name has been linked (pardon the pun!) to this horrendous toy. Please, when referring to this, leave the Lego name out of it. It’s not fair to that company.

49. #49
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Mark said:

    All of the figurines are “back-ordered.”

    Did anyone else notice the Mr. White is better ‘geared’ than the US fighters?

    … and don’t’ those figurines have a shaving kit? I don’t think a Marine Colonel would be caught dead looking that ragged.

50. #50
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, Gorebot said:

    What we could use is our own “anti-George Soros”; someone who would purchase 10 million of these things (being strangled by a GI Joe), then pay to have them air-dropped all over Kashmir.

    I wonder who it would piss off more, the Taliban/al-Qaeda jihadist birth defects, or the Keith Olbermann nutjobs (?).

    I can just see the NY Times headline: “Conservative Hardliner Provokes Muslim Outrage, Entire Nation Now at Risk”.

51. #51
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:33 pm, Mark said:

    Happy Scrapper the company is saying they have LEGO parts.

    BrickArms Custom Minifig

    BrickArms Bandit – ‘Mr. White’
    Tan two-sided minifig LEGO torso with crossed-bandoleer print

    White LEGO Scarf Headwrap

    Black BrickArms RPG

    Black BrickArms C96 Broomhandle Mauser Pistol

    Black BrickArms AK Asault Rifle

    8 Black BrickArms M67 Frag Grenades

    Black LEGO Rubber Band Bandoleer

    Now I don’t see a copyright or trademark symbol on the site, so it may be them using the name. Seems odd that they would do that considering they are getting tons of press, and have been making this items for some time.

52. #52
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, Mark said:

    This do appear to be the same as the “Indiana Jones” Figurines.

    Indy Figures

    With obvious changes.

53. #53
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, b-cat said:

    Did anyone else notice the Mr. White is better ‘geared’ than the US fighters?

    Our guys only need one shot.

54. #54
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:41 pm, Mrs. Happy Housewife said:

    My son says, “Suh-weet!” Ahem. I guess I know what’s on his Christmas list.

55. #55
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:33 pm, Mark said:
    Happy Scrapper the company is saying they have LEGO parts.

    Oh…I wasn’t aware of that. If Lego is indeed involved, they should be ashamed.

56. #56
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, paboperfecto said:

    It is really sad that Lego is saddled with the blame here

    I was wondering who to give CREDIT to.

57. #57
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, b-cat said:

    Oh…I wasn’t aware of that. If Lego is indeed involved, they should be ashamed.

    Of what?

58. #58
    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, b-cat said:
    Of what?

    Um…Maybe I am missing the point here. Isn’t this a rather disgusting use of Legos? I mean, do we want our kids playing with toys made into terrorists? I may have misunderstood the whole thing…it wouldn’t be the first time.

59. #59
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, Mark said:

    Lego lashes out at figurines

    LEGO is not happy about this.

    “BrickArms is not licensed by Lego UK to customise Lego figures and has no links to the Lego brand.”

    It just keeping getting weirder and weider.

    How about some Free Arms? Get them here!

    Now that is disgusting.

60. #60
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, Send_Me said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Mark said:
    All of the figurines are “back-ordered.”
    Did anyone else notice the Mr. White is better ‘geared’ than the US fighters?

    I like this guy’s Lego depiction of U.S. Soldiers a lot better.

61. #61
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, b-cat said:

    Um…Maybe I am missing the point here. Isn’t this a rather disgusting use of Legos? I mean, do we want our kids playing with toys made into terrorists? I may have misunderstood the whole thing…it wouldn’t be the first time.

    Heroes need a villain. Boys want to play the hero. Often, they grow up to be heroic. Nothing disgusting about that.

62. #62
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, b-cat said:

    I know a boy that collects Legos. He puts the Star wars equipment on Batman. That is a terrorists nightmare, Batman with a light saber.

63. #63
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Heroes need a villain. Boys want to play the hero. Often, they grow up to be heroic. Nothing disgusting about that.

    I guess so. I raised two daughters, so not too familiar with boys! We do have 2 and one-half grandsons now, so I’d better get with the program!!

64. #64
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, b-cat said:

    I guess so. I raised two daughters, so not too familiar with boys! We do have 2 and one-half grandsons now, so I’d better get with the program!!

    I’m sure they’ll tell ya, happy. LOL

65. #65
    On December 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm, BKennedy said:

    Oh heavens folks, we wouldn’t want TOYS based on ACTUAL REALITY to be available for purchase now, would we?

    There’s no difference between this figure and Lego Joker.

    Yes, I understand terrorists are real and that Joker is a fictional white-make up’d sociopathic supervillian.

    But sociopathic crime lords do in fact exist, as do terrorists.

    Heroes need villians to fight, that is basic toy lore.

66. #66
    On December 5th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, RetFireman said:

    Shocked by the playthings, British Muslim organisation the Ramadhan Foundation has branded the figurines “absolutely disgusting”.

    I see. So the toys that depict ACTUAL TERRORISTS are “absolutely disgsting, but the REAL Terrorists they remain silent about.

    Why is he not going public against those of his faith that have made such a toy possible? In true Islamic fashion, they continue to remain silent about those that have commited over 12,000 separate terrorist acts in the name of Islam since 9-11, and will only speak out against those that call them what they are.

    When Muslims begin to rise up, expose all those that they know to be terrorists based on OUR definition of the word, then maybe we should listen and take them seriously. Until then, they should just shut up and return to bowing down to their falsr moon god.

67. #67
    On December 5th, 2008 at 6:51 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am, lgm said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    You mean the very same CAIR investigated for supporting terrorism.

    Didn’t take lgm long to open his mouth and insert his foot. Par the course for our resident whacko.

68. #68
    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:27 pm, frontierguy said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    Whooo hooo!! I needed a laugh today, had a little too much sauce at a christmas party last night and i’m still paying for it. This lgm guy, there is no way he is for real. He comes in here to joke obviously. If anyone actually believes this, do they mean when CAIR officials are not being indicted and investigated for supporting terror organizations?

69. #69
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:24 pm, Doctor Hook said:

    That entire quote by Mohammed Shafiq is a parody of itself.

    “glorifying terrorism”. What, and you guys don’t? The martyrdom videos, and the posters all over Palestine of murderous thugs who blew themselves up killing others don’t glorify terrorism?

    “As a parent myself, I’m going to teach my children respect for the law and respect for each and every community.” O.K., how ’bout you start with the Jews?

    “These are the lessons parents should be giving to their children – not lessons about weapons and violence.” Yeah, besides, the madrass will teach them the latter.

70. #70
    On December 5th, 2008 at 10:57 pm, Terry_Jim said:

    These would be way more fun to set on fire than the plastic army men we played with as kids.

71. #71
    On December 6th, 2008 at 4:48 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On December 5th, 2008 at 9:27 pm, frontierguy said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism. Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    …This lgm guy, there is no way he is for real. He comes in here to joke obviously.

    frontierguy,
    I thought that at first when I noticed lgm several months ago. I now have no doubt that lgm is serious. He goes over to Kos or similar and thinks he sees a really slam-dunk put down on the conservative movement. Then he’ll come over here and drop his little “coup de grâce”. His points and method of delivery or so juvenile and shallow. When others try to engage him he does not respond. Every now and then, he’ll have a follow up post or two, but it doesn’t matter. They’re all empty words, hypocrisy, non sequiturs, or just bizarre. It’s as if he thinks, “this will get them” and hits the submit button. He probably thinks he can singlehandedly bring down conservatism. I know that he cares about how people react to him because several times he has remarked about people insulting him. lgm is not trying to be outrageous or funny; he is trying to be “cool” and to be king-of-the-hill. Instead he comes of as immature, unoriginal. He is supposedly a math teacher and refers to himself as a “technical person”. I know he is really proud of that and has probably fallen into the intelligence trap
    It wouldn’t be surprising if he also suffers from Asperger’s syndrome
    Anyway… that’s my take on him.

    I can’t make up my mind whether lgm should stay or go (up to Michelle). For a long while I wished that he would be banned because of his annoying posts. Now, I find myself looking for his posts. It’s like watching a really stupid movie – so stupid that it is fascinating.

    I’m up late (3:30am CST) because I’m afraid to go to sleep. I had sinus surgery today and I just don’t know how sleep will work tonight. I guess I should try.

72. #72
    On December 6th, 2008 at 5:58 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Cool, I want a few for Christmas to go with my Shipwreck G.I. Joes!

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

73. #73
    On December 7th, 2008 at 2:32 pm, RetFireman said:

    Hope ou got some rest Jet.

74. #74
    On December 8th, 2008 at 1:02 am, Prime Director said:

    witless dhimmi who cites CAIR as a prime example of moderate islam lgm said:

    Mainstream Muslim organizations also condemn real terrorism.

    Oh, no doubt. Everyone hates the real terrorists. We just don’t all agree on who the real terrorists are.

    When conservatives condemn terrorists, they generally mean Al Q’aeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, et al.

    When progressives condemn terrorists, they mean Big Oil CEOs, parents who homeschool their children and anyone who drinks water from a disposable platic bottle.

    When muslims condemn terrorism, they mean Israelis, the American military, immodest women (who don’t wear chadris) and homosexuals.

    But yes, we all hate the real terrorists. That’s a trivial point.

    witless dhimmi who cites CAIR as a prime example of moderate islam lgm said:

    Look, for example, at the web site of CAIR.

    CAIR’s website is illegal. In fact, CAIR itself is illegal.

    That’s right: in a legal sense, CAIR no longer exists.

    The only actions in which CAIR can legally engage involve dissolving the organization and distributing its assets.

    Whatever will witless dhimmis who cite CAIR as a prime example of moderate islam do?