If Vanessa lived in Colorado I would hire her if I could.

On December 5th, 2008 at 8:33 am, cs89 said:

“Both Doug and Carri can access the (child-support) system and could have accessed a file without my involvement,” Niekamp said. “To this day, I do not understand why they asked me to look at this information when they could have easily done this themselves.”

My guess- so if this came to light, their computer records wouldn’t show the search. They knew it was wrong, and if she hadn’t blown the whistle in investigation could have ended with her being fired while they skated by in the clear.

Absolutely. Why else would he have her write an email to the IT security guy. It’s likely the database has logs as to who accesses it, when, and for what.

She was very smart to speak to the IG immediately. The snakes in charge there would have fired her within a few weeks anyway to cover their tracks if this would not have become so public.

On December 5th, 2008 at 7:51 am, FruNobulux said:

Sue, Joe, sue! Sue for millions and give the taxpayers of that state a good reason to clean house at the next election.

Why wait? Yes, JtP should sue, but the recall petitions should already be drawn up. The only question remaining is how many names to add to it.

“He then told me that we needed to make sure that we answer questions about what happened the same way, so that our versions were not different from each other.

This is a clear case of Subornation of Perjury.

Thompson came to her office with a different explanation – that he, Jones-Kelley and assistant director Fred Williams had requested the check.

Since the subornation of perjury is a felony, this completes the requirement for Conspiracy…”When there is a criminal conspiracy to suborn perjury, the conspirators may be prosecuted whether or not perjury has been committed.”

Heads should roll, but they won’t. These three people have one big thing in their favor…they’re Democrats.

Maybe there is a requirement that Ohio Department of Job and Family Services’ Office of Child Support employees are given background checks of their child support status. Knowing the power of state employee unions, I would bet even money that they aren’t checked.

Unfortunately, as has been written here and in real life, many times the opposite happens. That is immoral and disgusting.

TooMuchTime said:

What Joe needs to do is to file a lawsuit but make the damamges for one dollarand his tax bill paid in full. No jury would ever vote against that. He could tell the press he’s doing it for the right reasons. $1 means it’s the principle, not the money. Just make sure his lawyer handles the case like he’s a criminal prosecutor! Get it?

Might as well get something out of it.

On December 5th, 2008 at 8:14 am, Mercy4Me said:

Sue the socks off those idiots. You must teach people a lesson, and $$$$ talks baby.

Maybe she should sue for Toledo…. but then again, Easton would be a much more valuable commodity.

Just WHEN will the Repubs get some ballz and point out the obvious?
Wheeeeen ? ? ?

They won’t until the clear majority of their candidates and officials do so..the problem is we keep getting candidates who are already so wealthy to begin with that I think (that they think) their money covers them from harm no matter what…and this is how we end with RINOs…they just can’t feel what we feel.