So, who in Congress, or elsewhere, is going to propose carving Obama’s face on Mt. Rushmore?

In his latest book, Chuck Hagel wrote that if it were up to him to decide who should be added to Mt. Rushmore, he would choose Dwight David Eisenhower, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and … his mother.

I am NOT making that up.

What I DID see were a lot of people who were inspired and motivated by his win and wanted to do something to honor that.

“Honor” for a man who was virtually CARRIED by the media and billionaires, and who was opposed by the silliest, most inept presidential candidate in US history? Honor is bestowed upon folks who have ACCOMPLISHED great things. Barack Obama has accomplished NOTHING in his life. He’s been coddled and GIVEN his place in the world.

There is no honor earned, so none can be given. These STUPID people naming their unfortunate children “Barack” and “Obama” in “honor” of this corrupt degenerate is a mockery. It is insanity. The children themselves are being doomed in the process, because they are being ushered into the world by people who have no idea who this man is, for a man who’s name will be a blight upon humanity.

Barack Obama will go down in history as the most corrupt and criminal president in history (not just OUR history)…I guarantee it, and there WILL be baby-name-remorse.

Some folks are simply too stupid to be ALLOWED to have children. They’re doomed from the moment they leave the womb.

As for the toilet seat…hey, not bad. I actually am trying to put a couple of t-shirts up but I have yet to figure out how to make the design fit them over at cafepress.

It really takes a special kind of weak-minded person (aka Ihatemycountry) to think naming one’s kid after somebody famous means anything or will change that kid’s life for the better.

That’s funny, because not anywhere in that article did I see any think their child’s life would be better simply by naming them after Obama. What I DID see were a lot of people who were inspired and motivated by his win and wanted to do something to honor that.

Ilovemycountry said:
You people should name your children George Bush

Too old:

Richard Nixon
Ronald Reagan
Calvin Coolidge

But not the boys-I named them all George Foreman.

It really takes a special kind of weak-minded person (aka Ihatemycountry) to think naming one’s kid after somebody famous means anything or will change that kid’s life for the better.

That special bit about the Gypsies (or the Roma) is hillarious because I grew up with their music and culture (my Dad introduced it to me as a kid) and they’re some of the biggest scam artists of going. Yes, there are some deep-seeded prejudices but there is also a lot of complacency (like in the black community) about their identity and the special sort of treatment they “deserve.”

Ilovemycountry said:
You people should name your children George Bush

How laughably infantile. Most of the people here aren’t that thrilled about some of the things Bush has done. But whatever you need to believe to fuel that leftist fantasy you’ve got going there.

Sorry, I HAD to go there!

Found a Trojan horse on a friend’s computer:

Trojan.Bho.DI – Symantec.com

They might want to update how bad this Trojan horse really is…

The Trojan Candidate
September 21, 2008 by texasdarlin

At least they’re not naming their children after him…

On December 11th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, Jeddite said:

You seem to be the one with the problem handling multiple issues at once, not Michelle.

Hmmmm…

You seem to be the one who likes to bring up straw men arguments.

No sarcasm or “durr” required.

BTW, since when is this really considered a major newsworthy issue? It is bizarre and worthy of ridicule, but my point was that Michelle is neglecting something far more important while obviously taking up time and computer memory for this story.