On December 11th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
Why is it these people cannot figure out which party it is, that they actually belong?

The sad thing is too many people on both sides of the isle vote for the person based off of the letter after their name and not for what they actual stand for.

On December 11th, 2008 at 5:35 pm, TooMuchTime said:

I know the Iroqouis were not the first, but this kinda proves my point about the idiocy of the whole “we were here first” attitude, doesn’t it?

2. “First” is a pretty subjective term, isn’t it? Far as I know, this country is not called “Five Tribes of the Iroquois Nation.”

The Iroquois were NOT part of the first group of immigrants to this continent. The first immigrants crossed the land bridge between current day Siberia and Alaska. They moved in and spread out.

The second group crossed the bridge thousands of years later. They “displaced” the first immigrants. By “displaced” I mean, enslave, torture, and murder. This second group is what liberals call “native americans” or now, “first americans.” Except they weren’t.

When the Europeans came, they just did what the second group of immigrants did to the first group. We are inundated with the stories about the whites being awful people toward the Indians. Pot, meet kettle. The tribes that lived around the Sioux were very happy to see the Europeans kick @ss on the Sioux because the Sioux were pretty nasty customers.

The fact is, the “second americans” were pretty barbaric. The “third americans” weren’t exactly swell, but at least we had written laws that we did our best to follow. In other words, we brought civilization.

Does our history show we were bad? Sure. So does that of the “second americans.” We’re not perfect, but we do our best.

Remember the direction these clueless morons were allowing themselves to be led come re-election time!

I know there are many capable conservatives, like me out there, who don’t give a whit about the “power” trip serving our nation seems to give these people.

I care about doing the right thing, for the right reason, but I am sick and tired of being over-taxed, over-regulated, demonized, and having the “guilt card” played.

I have given, and given, and given, and it is never enough for liberals. Well, I for one, am rapidly losing my “compassionate” heart for those who take, and give nothing back.

Why has there not been a Welfare to Work Program suggested by anyone, to help build up our infrastructure? It seems to me that would help correct a lot of problems…as long as we keep our Comrade Corruptocrats away from controlling the purse strings.

Two responses:

1. Do you want to test that theory?

2. “First” is a pretty subjective term, isn’t it? Far as I know, this country is not called “Five Tribes of the Iroquois Nation”

Mexifornia already belongs to Mexico.

The native Indians actually have more special rights and entitlements here than do Mexicans or whitey and blackey. That name would be more fitting in that regard.

On December 11th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, chapoutier said:

If over 50% of the population is Mexican, does that make this Mexico?

Two responses:

1. Do you want to test that theory?

2. “First” is a pretty subjective term, isn’t it? Far as I know, this country is not called “Five Tribes of the Iroquois Nation”

1. Wait four years and it will be tested for us.

2. We’re better armed than the Iriquois.

Because he’s from Michigan.

I watched him yesterday and was a bit shocked.
But then I saw/remembered, he’s from Michigan.
Is he doing it for re-election? Then he’s dead wrong.
We need a couple hundred Tancredo’s who will stand up for what’s right, no matter what.

On December 11th, 2008 at 12:38 pm, FamilyMan said:
chap. Being a RINO is like being gay.

Does that mean it’s a birth defect?

If over 50% of the population is Mexican, does that make this Mexico?

Two responses:

1. Do you want to test that theory?

2. “First” is a pretty subjective term, isn’t it? Far as I know, this country is not called “Five Tribes of the Iroquois Nation”