Fundraiser for Sarah Palin’s church

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 14, 2008 06:28 PM

As I’m sure you’ve heard, a suspicious arson struck Sarah Palin’s home church in Wasilla. There were several women working on crafts to donate to needy families for the holidays. Ed has video here. Reader Pat from Team Sarah sends info about a fundraiser to help the church, which suffered upwards of $1 million in damage:

Due to arson, Sarah’s home church has suffered $1 million in damage.

I have gotten numerous emails asking for how to help and make donations, so here is how we can show the church and Gov. Palin that Team Sarah members are here to support them in their time of need.

1. Please make your check payable to: Wasilla Bible Church

2. Mail your check to:

Wasilla Bible Church
1651 W. Nicola Avenue
Wasilla, Alaska 99654

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Small Town Sarah « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  2. God they must be afraid of her. « DaTechguy’s Blog
  3. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (147 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  4. ButAsForMe! » Fundraiser for Sarah Palin’s church
  5. Sarah Palin’s Church Hit By Possible Arson « Jane Q. Republican
  6. Ordinary Everyday Christian
  7. Arson at Sarah Palin’s Church « The Rational Actor
  8. ‘Cause, According to the Left, There Are Two Types of Christians in the World - at Haemet
  9. Warren Throckmorton » Fundraiser for Sarah Palin’s destroyed church
  10. Wasilla Bible Church Fundraiser « The Salty Pundit
  11. Arsonist Torches Sarah Church, Powell Torches Sarah | BobMaistros.com
  12. LOUNGE DADDY » Gov. Sarah Palin’s church set ablaze (w/ update)
  13. Sister Toldjah
  14. The West African Dust Storm Affect - The Palin Church Burning
  15. Here’s eight cents
  16. Burning Churches and Right Wing Hypocracy « The Valley Progress Report
  17. Thought Cloud For December 20, 2008 — ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #571344
    On December 14th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, bayou22 said:

    Here’s something Obama can do with that leftover campaign cash…

  2. #571355
    On December 14th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, PatriotRider said:

    No, it’s probably a white church so “The One” won’t chip in. Apparently he only supports black churches and their issues (see Rev. Wright’s credo).

    Maybe Biden can let go of some change for the cause. But, alas, I gave more to charity last year than he has in ten years. This without making a tenth of what he does. I know! Tax the dog crap out of the church members to pay for it. I mean, it’s the patriotic thing to do.

  3. #571361
    On December 14th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, Boomer said:

    I have a feeling the locals will be feeding the offenders to the local Kodiak and Polar Bears should they find them. Most folks I met in Alaska the few short times I visited it take to it about as well as we would here, but we would be feeding them to the coyotes and the wolves. At least it would make the animal huggers at PETA happy unless off course the poor critters got a bad case of indigestion. ;)

    You think this would be considered one of those “hate crimes,” but I guess it would only apply if the same type of accidental fire were to happen at an anti-American racist church.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: “Come and Take Them!”

  4. #571362
    On December 14th, 2008 at 7:36 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    I sent a check. I would mark it in VP Bidet’s name if it was for anything but a church.
    I hope there is not too much speculation on just what happened-and by whom. Churches burn. As they are generally unoccupied and unguarded most of the time they are easy targets for vandals-generally just punks.

    One one blog a poster claimed Sara Palin set the fire to get sympathy and another claimed it was a victim of her Right Wing Church. How would they know that?

    Dingbat Wingbats.

  5. #571366
    On December 14th, 2008 at 7:48 pm, zorro said:

    I guess some of the mainstream media decided to hang around Wasilla…

  6. #571373
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:03 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Oh, brother. Here we go. The “Tolerance!” and “Diversity!” showing just how much tolerance they have for those with diverse religious or political thought.

    I might not be able to do anything until the end of the month, but a modest donation is on its way.

    Forgive me, but these b@st@rds are not going to do this to anyone’s church and get away with it so long as I draw breath.

  7. #571375
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:06 pm, Mookie said:

    Forgive me, but these b@st@rds are not going to do this to anyone’s church and get away with it so long as I draw breath.

    What bastards? No one knows how it started.

  8. #571381
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:16 pm, chapoutier said:

    What bastards? No one knows how it started.

    Considering the drug problem that has developed in Wasilla, it could have been just a couple kids high on meth.

  9. #571384
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:21 pm, Mookie said:

    Considering the drug problem that has developed in Wasilla, it could have been just a couple kids high on meth.

    True but I’m guessing the consensus of this place will be an illegal gay Muslim Obama supporter. :lol:

  10. #571391
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:40 pm, garydt said:

    Jesus never thought of diversity such as Rev. Wright and other churches or preachers that do not preach the gospel. Preaching social gospel doesn’t do any good unless the person repents of sin and is being saved. I have not heard all of Rev Wrights sermons but I doubt if he had many alter calls to salvation.

  11. #571392
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, garydt said:

    I forgot to mention that Jesus said He was the only way and at the time no one considred Him intolerant for saying that.

  12. #571394
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:46 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    True but I’m guessing the consensus of this place will be an illegal gay Muslim Obama supporter.

    So far, you’re thwe only one who’s mentioned it.

  13. #571396
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, scottthong said:

    I wonder how long before the Kostards put forward the TOTALY FACTUALZ THEORIEZ that the Wasilla church members torched the building themselves in order to sucker in Palin supporters to donate million$$$ to them so they can build a megamegachurch (and hand Palin a few earmark$$$ under the table).

  14. #571397
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:50 pm, Mookie said:

    So far, you’re thwe only one who’s mentioned it.

    It’s early. :lol:

  15. #571398
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:51 pm, Mookie said:

    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, scottthong said:

    I wonder how long before the Kostards put forward the TOTALY FACTUALZ THEORIEZ that the Wasilla church members torched the building themselves in order to sucker in Palin supporters to donate million$$$ to them so they can build a megamegachurch (and hand Palin a few earmark$$$ under the table).

    Sadly, they went there yesterday.

  16. #571401
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:55 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    True but I’m guessing the consensus of this place will be an illegal gay Muslim Obama supporter. :lol:

    You mean a mookie? Could be.

    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, garydt said:

    I forgot to mention that Jesus said He was the only way and at the time no one considered Him intolerant for saying that.

    Just the Pharisees, Sadducee, money changers and the weak. “It is a hard Lesson, and many left”. There is nothing new under the sun, not since Adam and Eve doubted God.

    But be of Good Cheer garydt, the best is yet to come for the Believers. For the others this is their best. Sad.

  17. #571403
    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:58 pm, Madam President said:

    On December 14th, 2008 at 8:21 pm, Mookie said:
    True, but I’m guessing the consensus of this place will be an illegal gay Muslim Obama supporter.

    Damn it, I KNEW IT!

    (Silly Mookie, there ARE no homosexual Muslims! Just ask Mahmoud A.)

  18. #571407
    On December 14th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, Mookie said:

    (Silly Mookie, there ARE no homosexual Muslims! Just ask Mahmoud A.)

    Shoot, I forgot all about that. Well, there goes that theory!

  19. #571409
    On December 14th, 2008 at 9:06 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Jesus taught us about the holiness of life. So now if you believe this, your place of worship is a target.

  20. #571410
    On December 14th, 2008 at 9:07 pm, garydt said:

    Thanks Arizona for the encouragement, its hard to be positive when you see thing wind down even though you know its going to happen. I just hate to see this Great Nation slide further.

  21. #571413
    On December 14th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, twofoot said:

    (Silly Mookie, there ARE no homosexual Muslims! Just ask Mahmoud A.)

    Yea, uh-huh. Sorry, I have to question the manhood of any culture that is scared to see a female body.

  22. #571418
    On December 14th, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Seabecker said:

    Silly Mookie, there ARE no homosexual Muslims! Just ask Mahmoud A.

    Actually, that statement is not too far from the truth. Homosexuals are executed in Muslim places.

  23. #571428
    On December 14th, 2008 at 9:51 pm, Fineous Reese said:

    Actually, that statement is not too far from the truth. Homosexuals are executed in Muslim places.

    Only because (iirc) Islam changed the definition of homosexual act so that only the catcher gets labeled homosexual.

  24. #571444
    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:22 pm, mjk said:

    I don’t really care who started it. It’s a shame that a place of worship had to be subjected to that.

    For what it’s worth, a church in my hometown was burned to the ground by meth heads so perhaps this is the same thing. I hope so because one of the other ways is just way too pointless to contemplate.

    Sending money tomorrow.

  25. #571451
    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:30 pm, love2rumba said:

    Considering the drug problem that has developed in Wasilla, it could have been just a couple kids high on meth.

    What?! the best and brightest of the Democrat Party were involved in the arson?!..LGM how could this be?! ;-)

  26. #571468
    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    What?! the best and brightest of the Democrat Party were involved in the arson?!..LGM how could this be?! ;-)

    No no. I was drunk on scotch, not high on meth, when I voted for Obama.

  27. #571469
    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    …but it could NEVER have been an over the top Obama supporter. They would never attack anybody. They never gave the Boyscouts a problem – ever. :roll:

    Mookie has been trolling this site all day for this thread in order to throw a fit. I usually like your posts Mookie. Today – not so much.

  28. #571474
    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, chapoutier said:
    No no. I was drunk on scotch, not high on meth, when I voted for Obama.

    You being a self proclaimed liberal, did you sober up and vote again – for Alan Keys as a write in? :lol:

  29. #571486
    On December 14th, 2008 at 11:13 pm, Mookie said:

    Mookie has been trolling this site all day for this thread in order to throw a fit. I usually like your posts Mookie. Today – not so much.

    What fit? It was a joke. Of course there’s a possibility someone with an agenda against Gov. Palin started the fire. But assuming it was someone with an agenda against her personally is foolish.

  30. #571487
    On December 14th, 2008 at 11:15 pm, Mookie said:

    You being a self proclaimed liberal, did you sober up and vote again – for Alan Keys as a write in?

    Speaking of Keyes, has he said anything about Blago?

  31. #571498
    On December 14th, 2008 at 11:42 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On December 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    No no. I was drunk on scotch, not high on meth, when I voted for Obama.

    That explains a lot about the Zogby exit polls too.

  32. #571501
    On December 14th, 2008 at 11:56 pm, Kevin K. said:

    chapoutier said: (#26)

    No no. I was drunk on scotch, not high on meth, when I voted for Obama.

    There is not enough Scotch in the world that could make me vote for Obama. (And to be clear, I did not vote for him.)

    OT, which Scotch, chapoutier?

    —————-
    Mookie said:(#9)

    True but I’m guessing the consensus of this place will be an illegal gay Muslim Obama supporter.

    Well, until your theory of a gay Muslim was ruined, I was going to add “who also admires Marx, Mao, and Lenin.”

  33. #571504
    On December 14th, 2008 at 11:59 pm, chapoutier said:

    You being a self proclaimed liberal, did you sober up and vote again – for Alan Keys as a write in? :lol:

    No, for two reasons.

    1) I didn’t sober up until November 5, after the polls had closed;

    2) my liberal self-hatred took the form of voting against Patrick Kennedy.

  34. #571505
    On December 15th, 2008 at 12:01 am, chapoutier said:

    OT, which Scotch, chapoutier?

    My favorite price-to-quality ratio scotch is Highland Park.

    But normally I drink Chivas.

  35. #571575
    On December 15th, 2008 at 8:30 am, Irish Rose said:

    This church was insured for fire damage, was it not? I’ve not heard otherwise so I’m going to assume that the answer is “yes”.

    I can understand the desire that many people feel to send the church some financial help, and why.

    Sometimes it’s a good thing to jump in and provide some kind of general “help”, but sometimes it’s not. I hate to be a wet blanket, but… are the organizers of this quickly-organized fundraiser really thinking it through? Is this fundraiser really necessary, or is it just being done for show?

    I’m reasonably sure that this church is going to be adequately reimbursed for the cost of rebuilding and repairs through their insurance company, and much of the donated money is going to become surplus.

    I would really hope that the church is dedicated to being transparant about any donated monies that are received over and above the cost of rebuilding, and what those monies are going to be used for.

    Without that information, I’m hesitant to donate.

    It would be inappropriate, IMO, to rebuild the church to it’s original state using insurace monies and use the extra 1 mil from donors to UPGRADE the facility (build a new gymnasium, for instance). Raising funds to improve a facility is usually the sole responsibility of those who actually ATTEND that facility.

    I for one feel that any extra funds raised beyond the cost of repairing and rebuilding through the insurance company should be used to house, feed and cloth the poor in and around Wasilla.

    My two cents.

  36. #571592
    On December 15th, 2008 at 8:57 am, Irish Rose said:

    For those who will automatically suggest that I’m being either too cynical or un-Christian, save it.

    I am a Christian, but I’m not naive. I’ve attended two very large churches in the past, and as part of the administrative team for those churches I’ve also been a part of the church building committees in both of them.

    I’ve seen the carefully veiled glitter of greed and ambition in the eyes of far too many otherwise good Christian folk, when they have a huge unplanned surplus of funds to work with.

    For many church leaders and pastors, ramming their pet “dream projects” through the approval process becomes the order of the day… the whole process goes political, and sometimes it becomes very ugly.

    Doing the right thing (being content with what they already have, and using the surplus for doing good works out in the community) not so much.

    I’m willing to donate, but before I do that I’d like to know what the church in Wasilla has in mind for the inevitible surplus, because there WILL be one.

    That is all.

  37. #571755
    On December 15th, 2008 at 11:19 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Talk about selective outrage.

  38. #571880
    On December 15th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, Juliethejarhead said:

    I don’t make any donations this time of year.

    Everyone has their hand out.

    Sorry, Sarah. Love ya, lady, but that’s all you’re gettin’

  39. #572288
    On December 15th, 2008 at 7:03 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On December 15th, 2008 at 11:19 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Talk about selective outrage.

    I would really LOVE to hear a coherent explanation for this outburst.

    I’m sure if the topic of this post was about the dreadfully written news story you linked to, there would be more than enough outrage to sooth your white guilt ridden nerves, but the topic of this post was about something else.

    Sorry, try again and try to remain “on topic” – it’s an internet thing. You’ll catch on.

  40. #572884
    On December 16th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, mojack420 said:

    thank you Michele , I heard about the fund raiser on Laura Ingraham but didnt get to write down the address. writing a check and mailing it off today.

  41. #572998
    On December 16th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, Jaded said:

    I just donated via check and did so because the outpouring of good that will come from this heinous crime will SHUT DOWN the EVIL that leftards are!

    The good always WINS!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Who’s afraid of conservative American women?

November 16, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Extreme” in a skirt.

Happy 234th Birthday, Marines!

November 10, 2009 09:53 AM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Project Valour-IT update: Team Marines needs you!

November 3, 2009 04:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

11 Comments | 1 Trackback

Please help the troops from Combat Outpost Keating

October 8, 2009 04:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

This is what standing up for freedom looks like

October 8, 2009 12:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

27 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Shall we dance?

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks


Categories: Sarah Palin, Worthy Causes



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook