George W. Bush’s political epitaph

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 16, 2008 06:05 PM

“I’ve abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system.”

George W. Bush

Stop me before I hurl a shoe.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Quote Of The Day: Worthless President Edition
  2. ButAsForMe! » George W. Bush’s political epitaph
  3. Did the Iraqi Journalist’s Shoe REALLY Hit George W. Bush in the Head? | FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
  4. Sealing George Bush’s Legacy With A Soundbite « Jane Q. Republican
  5. Bush: I Had to Abandon Free-Market Principles to Save the Free Market | The American Pundit
  6. The TIW Blog » Blog Archive » GW’s STUNNING ADMISSION OF BETRAYAL
  7. southchild » Blog Archive » “The Onion” Couldn’t Write This.
  8. The Rude News » Blog Archive » Obushma
  9. I have no credibility… « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  10. The Other McCain: 'Stop me before I hurl a shoe'
  11. George W. Bush’s political epitaph « Top Daily Digest Reading
  12. Federal gummint looks to double in size under Obama. Valerie Jarrett most powerful staffer after Emanuel. « Goodtimepolitics
  13. Caffeinated Thoughts | Say No to the Auto Bailout
  14. Putin’s Idea of “Free Speech” « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  15. RedBlueChristian » Blog Archive » Say No to the Auto Bailout
  16. Links of the day « The Rational Actor
  17. House of Eratosthenes
  18. Webloggin » Didn’t Sell His Soul To Be A Popular Guy
  19. Tel-Chai Nation
  20. Michelle Malkin » George Bailout Bush drives the final nail in his coffin
  21. Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » George Bailout Bush Drives The Final Nail In His Coffin
  22. The Enlightened Redneck » The Photoshop Stop
  23. IS BERNARD MADOFF RUNNING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? By Cliff Kincaid « ~THE “G” BLOG - Gunny G Online~
  24. Social Security and Medicare - $90 TRILLION Dollar Ponzi Scheme : The Liberty Tree Lantern
  25. Bush (41) and Bush (43) Sit Down With Brit | Without Objection
  26. Michelle Malkin » Bush the pre-socializer: “I readily concede I chucked aside my free-market principles”
  27. Michelle Malkin » Middle of the night bailout for Bank of America; TARP investigation of BoA and Citigroup/Jesse Jackson event requested
  28. Progressivism is totalitarian | Orange Juice! Politics For The Rest Of Us.
  29. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » George W. Bush – “There is no (conservative) movement.” Me – “We’re back!”

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #573222
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:07 pm, JHSII said:

    :roll:

  2. #573225
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, jencab said:

    OY!
    President Bush, please. Do I need to cite examples of how your methods have hindered democracies and free-market?
    Cuba, Venezuela, Europe, etc?

    For goodness sake, China and Russia are following free-market principles!!!! I feel like I’m in the Twilight Zone!

  3. #573228
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:11 pm, gandolphxx said:

    GWB legacy is now insured, he will go down as worse than Carter – who would have thunk it.

  4. #573229
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:13 pm, tarpon said:

    Damn fool.

  5. #573231
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:14 pm, thirteen28 said:

    In other words, he destroyed the village to save it.

    Of course, the “save it” part is still questionable.

  6. #573236
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:19 pm, steveegg said:

    Why would I want to stop that? I’ll donate a steel-toed boot to the cause.

  7. #573241
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    So can we all agree that Bush was never a conservative? Can we really try to make sure we are not duped again by politicians who know the talking points but not the reasons? History will not be kind to George Bush – conservatives are looking at a long journey through the desert.

  8. #573244
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:27 pm, TXGator said:

    gandolphxx said:
    GWB legacy is now insured, he will go down as worse than Carter – who would have thunk it.

    Damn….that’s harsh.

    The “C” word?

  9. #573245
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:28 pm, guitarguy said:

    Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!!!!

    This guy can’t leave fast enough for me…..

    I really don’t enjoy making it personal….but this guy is a complete dope.

  10. #573248
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Stop me before I hurl a shoe.

    You’ve been eating shoes?

    Worse than Carter? Despite everything I think “things” were worse under Carter, but I’m not giving W a better grade or anything. Please George, get out now.

  11. #573250
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:32 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    I’m wondering how it would have been different if McCain had beaten Bush in the primary way back when.

  12. #573251
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    Come on, George! Let Cheney be Prez for a month.

  13. #573253
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:34 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    I’m wondering how it would have been different if McCain had beaten Bush in the primary way back when.

    Exactly the same except we would also be “fighting” global warming.

  14. #573255
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:34 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Reminiscent of that famous quoute from the Vietnam War, “We had to destroy the village to save it.”

  15. #573256
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:36 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Let Cheney be Prez for a month

    Honestly, Cheney has probably been president for 8 years. Bush is just the (really, really, really bad) spokesmouth.

  16. #573258
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, Flyoverman said:

    oooops. Didn’t mean to plagarize thiteen28, but the idea is the same.

  17. #573260
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:38 pm, Valiant said:

    Fool. He has paved the way for massive socialization of whole industries when the Dems take over. Only Nixon could go to China and only a Bush could turn us into Mao-era China.

  18. #573268
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:44 pm, single stack said:

    As I’ve been saying for 8 years, anyone who thinks Bush is conservative hasn’t been paying attention.
    He’s a closet socialist who’s stepping out into the open now that he’s about to leave office after destroying the conservative movement in America.

  19. #573274
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, WrathOfKhan said:

    “I killed the Constitution in the illusion of faith and security.”

  20. #573277
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:49 pm, CyberCipher said:

    Is it just me, or does this remind anyone else of:

    “I love America. That’s why it has to be destroyed” — Michael Moore in An American Carol

    My collie says:

    Jimmy Carter will be SO happy, maybe he’ll let W. sit next to him at the next Democratic Convention.

  21. #573279
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:51 pm, frontierguy said:

    I’m beginning to think this is all on purpose now. It would not surprise me if in a year or two we are told that the dollar is unsalvageable and we must start a new monetary system to save us. Hello Amero, with our new partners Canada and Mehico!!

  22. #573284
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Hello Amero, with our new partners Canada and Mehico!!

    The whole pander to Mexico thing makes so little sense you swear mexico has asuitcase nuke somewhere in DC and forces all of our politicians to do a puppet dance.

  23. #573285
    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:59 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    That is the dumbest effing thing I have ever heard. Go home already, George.

    Stop me before I hurl a shoe.

    FTFY

  24. #573287
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:02 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I used to worry about the next four years. Now I’m just worried about the next month.

  25. #573288
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:02 pm, Madam President said:

    ….

  26. #573289
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:03 pm, islandman78 said:

    Bush, did you eat paint chips?

    Why do we have turds floating to the top of our elected offices?

    Bush, I shake my head in disgust at how you have squandered a grand opportunity to reform our entitlement programs while we had all branches of government.

  27. #573295
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, seveneleventy said:

    President Bush needs to go on vacation, and stay there!

  28. #573296
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, TXGator said:

    Spot on, islandman.
    We had the window and our beloved cowards in DC just slammed it on our fingers.

  29. #573304
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:15 pm, npphotog said:

    Just let “the one” take over, Bush is rapidly fading into his likeness, or is taking orders from him. This is so sad for the country. Bush has allowed himself to be defeated on almost every level.

  30. #573318
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:27 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    I want to like Mr. Bush, but with statements like this, and I know he truly believes it too, that scares me to see the road that has been paved for the BIG O’ SOCIALIST.

    CAN WE JUST START OVER?

  31. #573321
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:29 pm, purplepeep said:

    TXGator said:

    gandolphxx said:
    GWB legacy is now insured, he will go down as worse than Carter – who would have thunk it.

    Damn….that’s harsh.
    The “C” word?

    Actually the Bush “legacy” is just the opposite of Jimmy’s; Bush kept America safe these last 7 years from those whom Carter enabled.

    However on this Bush failed to allow failure to take it’s natural, self-correcting course. It’s a good thing bailout wasn’t the operative norm in years past or we’ed have been stuck with propping up the buggy whip manufacturing companies.

  32. #573322
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:30 pm, FamilyMan said:

    JHSII said:

    Me too!

  33. #573329
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:40 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    GWB is not a conservative. I applaud that he kept us safe, but he has let us down on many other issues. He is about 30% conservative, 50% moderate, and 20% liberal. I don’t believe he is worse than Carter, but he isn’t much better.

  34. #573340
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:50 pm, Dave the Libertarian said:

    Okay, I’ll pile on…

    Bush is no conservative. Neither was his father. I think his legacy will be VERY so-so. He was sort of strong on defense of our country with the following disclaimer: Afghanistan was necessary, but Iraq was not, in my opinion, soft on securing our border, soft on fiscal responsibility, and too evangelical. Not to mention he sounds like a freaking buffoon when he talks.

    Bush isn’t nearly as bad as Carter…Carter was a complete, total, flaming idiot.

  35. #573342
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:53 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    too evangelical

    Huh?

  36. #573344
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:54 pm, Dave the Libertarian said:

    Oh, to append my remarks….as Islandman said, one of my biggest pet peeves was how the government freaking GREW HUGE under Bush. Totally mind-boggling.

  37. #573345
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:55 pm, zorro said:

    How disappointing.

  38. #573347
    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:57 pm, Hangfire said:

    Thank yew, George W. ‘En now, right here on our stage, Topo Gigio….”

  39. #573350
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:02 pm, Dave the Libertarian said:

    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:53 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    too evangelical

    Huh?

    Just an opinion of mine, probably not shared by a lot of folks here. It’s not something I can quantify, it’s just a feeling I get.

    I won’t bore everyone with why I used to be a hard-core Republican, but really feel more Libertarian, and how I’m very much a fiscal conservative, and really hands-off when it comes to government getting involved in our private lives.

  40. #573356
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, TMoney said:

    If Bush is a free-market advocate, where did he go? He’s telling us he will submit to socialism in order to un-socialize?

    Maybe he is trying to ease us into the nObamafia shackles, so it won’t be so evident.

  41. #573362
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:22 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Bush has sold out responsible Americans and Congressional Republicans, and does indeed seem clueless about running this country properly. I am not sure Obama will be much worse.

    We need to form a new union, far more perfect, that the one we are stuck in now.

  42. #573367
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:28 pm, normsrevenge said:

    Some legacy.

  43. #573374
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:45 pm, Marc said:

    Recall that President Bush made his reputation in Texas as “owner” of the Texas Rangers baseball club. Actually he had a relatively small stake in the team but the bigger point is that when he led the drive for a new baseball stadium for the Rangers, the stadium was built with mostly public money. The taxpayers paid the bill but as usual the taxpayers have no access to luxury boxes or the best seats in the stadium or the best parking spaces. The taxpayer foot the bill but only get the right to sit in the upper deck at inflated ticket prices, to shell out $15.00 for a measly parking space and no right to go to the private dining places in the stadium. The taxpayers are just the patsys that team owners treat like dolts. For a bit or irony, consider that it was the voters of Seattle that repeatedly rejected buying a new basketball arena for the billionaire owner of the NBA fanchise there. And the taxpayers of Seattle kept rejecting wasting money on a new baseball stadium that the city bigwigs simply ignored the wishes of the people and took the people’s money and built the stadium anyway. Liberal as Seattle is on social issues, when it comes to corporate welfare, the people said no.

  44. #573375
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, txvet2 said:

    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:36 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Let Cheney be Prez for a month

    Honestly, Cheney has probably been president for 8 years. Bush is just the (really, really, really bad) spokesmouth.

    Don’t be stupid.

  45. #573376
    On December 16th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, huggybear said:

    You are all giving the man way too much credit. He just says things because someone asked him a question and he is required to respond. That’s really it. There is no grand scheme at play here. He’s been winging it for 8 years, and we will all pay the price for many, many more years than that.

  46. #573377
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:05 pm, Gwillie said:

    Is that like having sex to save your virginity?

  47. #573382
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:11 pm, right_on said:

    In the face of all the disapproval from Ordinary Joe’s, like myself, it makes me wonder what he knows that we don’t? I have a hard time understanding why he would callously sell us down a hole. Could it possibly be that he is relying on the same kind of “advice” that assured him of the stockpiles of Iraqi WMD?

  48. #573383
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:12 pm, bjc said:

    What principles?; The historians will not be kind; He either abandoned or never possessed any conservative principles over the last 8 years; Seven years after 9/11/2001 and he’s still okay with open borders and 20 million illegal aliens destroying our country from within like a cancer; Next he will say “I’ve abandoned defending our borders and protecting our citizens from enemies foreign and domestic to save Mexico and other third world countries”.

  49. #573384
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, love2rumba said:

    Is that like having sex to save your virginity?

    Why yes it is!

  50. #573386
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:16 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    Sometimes, I wonder, when W says these kinds of things … is it really him and his thoughts or has he been coached/fed a bunch of stupid sh*t.

  51. #573387
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:18 pm, love2rumba said:

    Stop me before I hurl a shoe

    Michelle, you may hurl a shoe whenever you are ready.

  52. #573388
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:18 pm, love2rumba said:

    NO MORE RINOS

  53. #573389
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:22 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:34 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    I’m wondering how it would have been different if McCain had beaten Bush in the primary way back when.

    Exactly the same except we would also be “fighting” global warming.

    …and a bigger number of newly legal “citizens”.

  54. #573390
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:26 pm, robert537 said:

    Just wail until Jeb runs in 2012. He could tap Colin Powell for veep.

  55. #573391
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    Personally, I think we should be arranging a shoe-hurling trip to DC.

    I have a Ford van – room for lots of friends and their shoes.

  56. #573394
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:30 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    NO MORE RINOS

    Mark Sanford 2012

  57. #573398
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:37 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, love2rumba said:

    Is that like having sex to save your virginity?

    Why yes it is!

    More like getting screwed whether you want to or not.

  58. #573399
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:39 pm, TXGator said:

    The writing is on the wall, too bad we didn’t build one. If you’ve seen any large urban setting, you’ve been given a glimpse of what’s coming for the rest of America. I’ve lived in Denver, LA, Atlanta, and now Houston. The ‘government saves’ crowd outnumbers the rest of us, and if they can manage to turn off the MTV and vote, we’ll never win another election. Especially after the upcoming amnesty, we’ve crossed the Rubicon. After that, no matter how hard we try, we won’t be able to put America back together again.
    I’m a real optimist, huh???

  59. #573405
    On December 16th, 2008 at 9:53 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    The easiest and best revolution is for the producers (taxpayers) to slow or stop their production (creating wealth & jobs) so the consumers (government supported folks a.k.a. those sucking of the government teat) will have less from the government trough.

    No sense in making it, if they are going to take it away in taxes.

  60. #573406
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:02 pm, TXGator said:

    Exactly, FoundingFather,
    Why give anything to them? I’m prepared to stash my income away, make less money, find new write-offs. I will relinquish as little as possible to these criminals.

  61. #573408
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:04 pm, Donut44 said:

    I am not sure which is funnier, the thought of Bush giving up free market principles to save the free market or the thought that Bush was ever a free market guy in the first place.

    It is similar to our leaders wanting to raise taxes to save the economy.

  62. #573423
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:25 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The worst part of Bush 43 is that people THINK he is a conservative and that conservative principles failed. In fact Bush 43 was no more conservative than his daddy and besides a single marginal tax rate reduction did NOTHING CONSERVATIVE in his 8 years in office.

    And all his big spending lunacy will legitimize more lunatic spending by Obama.

    The feds have pumped 5 trillion down this rat whole and Obama will spend trillions more in the next 4 years. We could easily double the national debt between now and January 2013! And we could destroy the economy and our liberties while doing so.

    This will go down in history as a dark time for America.

  63. #573424
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:26 pm, beenthere said:

    I wonder if Bush’s Oogidy-Boogidy economics isn’t indicative of larger mental health issues. I am really starting to worry about the man. Compassionate conservatism is one thing; kookoo-bats conservatism quite another. The image that keeps coming to mind is Mickey Mouse in the Sorcerer’s Apprentice summoning trillions with his endless army of bail-out brooms — which he is utterly unable to control. Consider his giving the Medal of Freedom to Donna Shalala — that’s not so far removed Caligula appointing his horse to the Senate.

    I really wish someone would orer him (e.g. Laura) to a mental examination. Fast. Normally, I would have said Chaney but I don’t believe Bush is aware of much of the rest of the world these days, other than his immediate family. Beyond that, he has gone bye-bye into a fantasy world of unlimited power where everyone loves him. In other words, he has ended up where Obama is starting. This is the kind of stuff that turns atheists into on-their-knees Bible readers.

  64. #573426
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    This may be the most accurate and scariest post here in a long time.

    I really wish someone would orer him (e.g. Laura) to a mental examination. Fast. Normally, I would have said Chaney but I don’t believe Bush is aware of much of the rest of the world these days, other than his immediate family. Beyond that, he has gone bye-bye into a fantasy world of unlimited power where everyone loves him. In other words, he has ended up where Obama is starting. This is the kind of stuff that turns atheists into on-their-knees Bible readers.

  65. #573430
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:34 pm, Blackstone said:

    Love this line from the article:

    Bush’s comments reflect an extraordinary departure from his longtime advocacy for an unfettered free market

    When did this “longtime advocacy” take place, exactly? When he was pushing federal downpayment assistance for minority homeowners?

  66. #573431
    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:36 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Yeah, I think it happened on June 8th, 2003 between noon and one o’clock.

    Kind of snortworthy if you ask me…

    On December 16th, 2008 at 10:34 pm, Blackstone said:
    Love this line from the article:

    Bush’s comments reflect an extraordinary departure from his longtime advocacy for an unfettered free market

    When did this “longtime advocacy” take place, exactly? When he was pushing federal downpayment assistance for minority homeowners?

  67. #573443
    On December 16th, 2008 at 11:19 pm, torabora said:

    retch

    I USED to stick up for this guy.

    bile

  68. #573444
    On December 16th, 2008 at 11:21 pm, jlibertarian said:

    The problem with Bush’s statement is that the U.S. economy hasn’t followed free market principles for decades, so what has he really abandoned? The U.S. economy is totally Socialistic. In fact, it’s almost the opposite of a free market: centralized banking, fiat money (no gold backing), high taxes, entitlements, unlimited centralized government. And Obama idiotically wants to spend a trillion on “infrastructure” projects, as if tax-and-spend ever “jump-started” anything. Let’s keep on recycling those failed ideas! But he “means well”.

  69. #573449
    On December 16th, 2008 at 11:42 pm, RockyR said:

    COMPLETELY OT (and maybe not true), but check this:

    http://www.suntimes.com/news/sneed/1333057,CST-NWS-SNEED16.article

    Sneed hears rumbles President-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is reportedly on 21 different taped conversations by the feds — dealing with his boss’ vacant Senate seat!

    A lot of chit-chat?
    » Click to enlarge image
    Michael Sneed

    Hot air?

    Or trouble?

    • • To date: Rahm’s been mum. Stay tuned.

  70. #573453
    On December 16th, 2008 at 11:49 pm, Flyoverman said:

    RockyR,

    Just read the article from link on Drudge. 21 calls.

    No doubt the Feds are taking those calls and comparing the nature and topids of the calls before and after Obama’s meetigs with Blago on 11/5 nd 11/12. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

    Barry saying he had no contact was a HUGE gaff. Note how the press is consumed with shoe throwing. They are hell bent on ignoring the stench in the room.

  71. #573455
    On December 16th, 2008 at 11:54 pm, Dasher said:

    On December 16th, 2008 at 6:32 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    I’m wondering how it would have been different if McCain had beaten Bush in the primary way back when.

    I am afraid it would have been much worse. McCain was less of a danger than Obama, but much worse than any other Republican of prominence. I voted for Sarah Palin. (That McCain guy was also on mentioned on the ballot, same line I think.)

  72. #573456
    On December 16th, 2008 at 11:58 pm, normsrevenge said:

    Created a Education Department
    NCLB
    Prescription drugs
    Comprehensive Immigration Reform w/
    Amnesty
    Signed the McCain Feingold CFR legislation

    What did you expect from such a solid advocate for reining in the powers of Gubamint and its spending ways?

    He may deserve credit for no new attacks on the Homeland , freeing 50 million people in the Middle East, making a stab at entitlement program reforms but also handing the keys to the castle to the dems after the 2006 election debacle on CIR.

    Time will be the best Judge of what comes out in the wash. Time rolls on as the costs pile-up for 8 years of a muddled administration policy-wise that couldn’t get its ducks in a row when it had the upper hand and now must be resigned to getting the back of a hand for its failings in its last few months in power.

  73. #573460
    On December 17th, 2008 at 12:11 am, love2rumba said:

    For a bit or irony, consider that it was the voters of Seattle that repeatedly rejected buying a new basketball arena for the billionaire owner of the NBA fanchise there. And the taxpayers of Seattle kept rejecting wasting money on a new baseball stadium that the city bigwigs simply ignored the wishes of the people and took the people’s money and built the stadium anyway.

    …And as you may recall, Marc, the Seattle Supersonics moved to Oklahoma City, OK for all the tax money poured out the window…

  74. #573463
    On December 17th, 2008 at 12:26 am, vatodio said:

    Obama was right after all when he said MaCain is for the third term of George Bush.

    Both idiots are RINO, with no core principles.

    Bush has a big hand in distroying our economy. He slept at the wheels while the crooks at the wall street and in the mortgage industry literally stole billions.

    Democrats are known for spending money we don’t have. But with the national debt doubling on Bush’s watch, how can Republicans say with straight face that the party is for smaller government and fiscal restrainst?

    I am glad we did not give McCain an opportunity to further malign the Republican brand.

  75. #573467
    On December 17th, 2008 at 12:40 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    “I feel a sense of obligation to my successor to make sure there is not a, you know, a huge economic crisis. Look, we’re in a crisis now. I mean, this is — we’re in a huge recession, but I don’t want to make it even worse.”

    Too effin’ late.

    Sense of obligation to his successor??????

    WTF are we??? How about a sense of obligation to the people of this country. Stop effing up our economy dammit!

  76. #573474
    On December 17th, 2008 at 1:23 am, Send_Me said:

    So at what point will “conservatives” abandon the Republican party? Reagan, the ever-lauded icon of the Republicans, was the exception, not the rule for the party. Besides Reagan, who else in the 20th century was worth a bean for the Republicans? Eisenhower and T. Roosevelt are about the only ones that come to mind. Mediocrity, a shallow intellect, and moral weakness define the majority of the party. There are a few current exceptions, such as DeMint, Poe, and Pence, but the majority are no different than their supposed opposition. At this point, really, what have “conservatives” to lose?
    “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties… This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” ~John Adams

  77. #573477
    On December 17th, 2008 at 1:41 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On December 17th, 2008 at 1:23 am, Send_Me said:

    So at what point will “conservatives” abandon the Republican party?

    I forget who coined this, but I must say that it speaks for me: “I am not abandoning the Republican party, the Republican party has abandoned me. “

  78. #573478
    On December 17th, 2008 at 1:43 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    I wonder how soon the United States’ “Let them eat cake” moment shall arive.

  79. #573486
    On December 17th, 2008 at 3:08 am, Mark Jaquith said:

    Bush:

    Bombing for peace. Torturing for freedom. Imposing governments for democracy. Spying for security. Socializing industries for capitalism.

    Bush has one principle: that he is on the side of good, and that nothing he does in its name, no matter how evil, can possibly be wrong.

  80. #573505
    On December 17th, 2008 at 5:58 am, graysonret said:

    Bush out, Obama in. Government continues the same course: socialism and total control.

  81. #573508
    On December 17th, 2008 at 6:37 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

  82. #573509
    On December 17th, 2008 at 6:49 am, ctmom said:

    Wow, who knew Bush was an economist?

  83. #573513
    On December 17th, 2008 at 7:02 am, FamilyMan said:

    I was wondering if we could force politicians to have a lobotomy before they take office? Their decisions would probably be better.

  84. #573515
    On December 17th, 2008 at 7:17 am, 57fender said:

    Why is it so easy to find true liberals and so difficult to find a true conservative? We need a Conservative Party with a conservative platform.

  85. #573520
    On December 17th, 2008 at 7:33 am, FamilyMan said:

    57fender said:
    Why is it so easy to find true liberals and so difficult to find a true conservative? We need a Conservative Party with a conservative platform.

    We should have a national dating service questionnaire for politicians like eHarmony.
    Never mind. Somehow the courts would rule against it as they did with eHarmoney being forced to advertise for gays.

  86. #573522
    On December 17th, 2008 at 7:52 am, purplepeep said:

    Dave the Libertarian said:

    On December 16th, 2008 at 7:53 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    “Too evangelical”
    Huh?

    Just an opinion of mine, probably not shared by a lot of folks here. It’s not something I can quantify, it’s just a feeling I get.

    Dave, I don’t think you can quantify it because “too evangelical” is a totally meanlingless phrase. Makes me scratch the ol’ noggin and go “Huh?”, too, on that account.

  87. #573524
    On December 17th, 2008 at 7:56 am, Bhishma said:

    On December 17th, 2008 at 3:08 am, Mark Jaquith said:

    Bush has one principle: that he is on the side of good, and that nothing he does in its name, no matter how evil, can possibly be wrong.

    Am surprised that Americans still can’t see Bush’s priorities. Take a close look and you will find that all Bush has done is to pay-back his wahhabbi masters in Riyadh (by eliminating Saddam, Saudi Arabia’s nightmare) and his campaign financers (by leaving the Mexican border open).
    Rest was all lies. Bush actively shielded his terrorist ‘family and friends’ from Saudi Arabia, never intended to hunt for Osama and never intended to do anything about illegal immigration.
    Ofcourse, if Americans had looked at Bush’s record of failed businesses, going AWOL and being a Saudi puppet, Americans would not vote for him. But guess what? Americans voted him in TWICE(and rejected a true patriot Tom Tancredo).
    As they say, in a democracy, people get the government they deserve.
    To salvage some self-respect, still not too late to impeach Bush: http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=73KIpzrUXI8

  88. #573526
    On December 17th, 2008 at 8:01 am, purplepeep said:

    57fender said:
    Why is it so easy to find true liberals and so difficult to find a true conservative?

    Because being a liberal is the easiest thing in the world, Fender. Folks tend to like things where they can slide, like liberalism, and so they’ll subscribe to anything that comes down that particular pike.

    True conservatives are “the few, the proud” who take the less trodden path and who think for themselves. Liberalism require no thinking or questioning – in fact, both are discouraged by liberalism wherein Big Brother does the thinking for the true believers.

  89. #573528
    On December 17th, 2008 at 8:13 am, coffee said:

    Is that what a Harvard MBA yields? No thanks, what a waste of money.

  90. #573529
    On December 17th, 2008 at 8:22 am, McCloud9 said:

    You all may think that I am over the edge on this, but just stand back and look at the Entire Picture… The Illegal Invasion,The Bailouts,The Goverment Intervention…
    The ONLY WAY that We the People can Save America from the Socialist/Communist Agenda (which is well underway), is to Contact your STATE LEGISLATURE, and Gather enough support for a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION.
    We need to go back, before we can go forward.

You must be logged in to post a comment.




HotAir GreenRoom