George Bailout Bush drives the final nail in his coffin

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 19, 2008 09:13 AM

He already wrote his epitaph.

The $17.4 billion bailout he just announced drives the final nail in his coffin. Stuart Varney calls it “a punt with conditions.”

The conditions are non-binding.

It’s an expensive joke on taxpayers.

Hurling my shoe.

***

Disloyalopp at Twitter writes: “Kabuki Bailout Th. Act III – ‘Deranged Warlord, grasping at straws to salvage a legacy, falls on his own sword repeatedly.’”

***
What part of “It’s illegal” doesn’t Bush understand?

***

UAW Local 602 president: “It’s premature to speculate about wage cuts or if one will even occur.”

Have you seen the Three Little Piggies?

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Subprime crisis

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:16 am, ChrisFromGermany said:

    R.I.P. Fiscal Conservatism

  2. #2
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:22 am, Craig said:

    The conditions are non-binding.

    And Dubya calls himself a free market guy? No Dubya, you are a socialism guy.

  3. #3
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:23 am, sonofdy said:

    Its just 17.4 billion to be written off in the bankruptcy. After 8.5 trillion this is peanuts. Bush knows that.

  4. #4
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:24 am, jjmurphy said:

    “If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers,” Bush said at the White House, in remarks carried live by the national broadcast networks.

    “Such a collapse would deal an unacceptable blow to Americans far beyond the auto industry. … It could send our suffering economy into a deeper and longer recession.”

    He has no concept of how the free market really works, does he? The whole “creative destruction” thing? Never mind.

  5. #5
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:26 am, teachem2 said:

    I heard Sen. Corker on the radio this morning before the announcement and his first word, without telling us the details, was “unfortunately”. I knew we were headed for something very bad. He might as well have come out an announced that the taxpayers are being ordered to bend over and grab our ankles AGAIN.

    Oh wait, ….

  6. #6
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:41 am, dfern said:

    Until we bust up the UAW and the schoolteachers’ unions, this country will continue to circle the drain.

  7. #7
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:43 am, sonofdy said:

    Continue to? We are about out of water. I estimate less than 2 years before national bankruptcy. Less with obamas planed spending.

  8. #8
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:45 am, symrian said:

    So you get your bailout after all. Congradulations, I won’t be buying an American car again until these fools get their act together.

    I can’t stop your bailout, Bush. But I can poke my finger in your socialist eye, however small a gesture it is.

  9. #9
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:51 am, paulrtaylor said:

    This is still against the law as Michelle pointed out earlier. Someone needs to file charges. I don’t know who that is but I am asking my senators who voted against the measure last week

  10. #10
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:52 am, pueblo1032 said:

    We have GWB going around CONGRESS in an unprecedented move… We have B. HUSSEIN already talking 850 BILLION more for his PORTION of the CRAP SANDWICH… With only a handful of REPUBLICANS with BALLS enough to say anything against this MADNESS… GEEZ, it’s going to be a ROUGH 4 years…

  11. #11
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:53 am, Mister P said:

    Bush is the socialist meant to make the new marxist president look like a centrist.

  12. #12
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:54 am, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Nope, no union made anything for me, if I can help it. Socialism is now here. The revolution must begin. Where are the Sons of Liberty -2008 version?

  13. #13
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:55 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    You can’t fix stupid.

    Can we put GM and Chrysler on the clock to see how long it takes them to request their next bailout?

  14. #14
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:56 am, RightWing said:

    I heard this on the way to work this morning and I still can’t believe it. GB has completely given up. Another no strings attached loan. Why not just flush the money down the toilet. That money will be gone in no time and BHO won’t think twice about funding his union buddies. Bush had a chance to reshape the auto industry and he fell on his face… again!!!

  15. #15
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:58 am, orlandocajun said:

    Lending taxpayer’s grandchildren’s money to companies that are already bankrupt…what a great idea. This is what happens when liberals govern. It’s going to get worse before it gets better.

    I expect a pardon for Bin Laden next and then extended sentences for Campeon and Ramos.

    I agree with paulrtaylor…someone needs to file charges, but I think that it should be against the entire Congress and Bush.

  16. #16
    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:58 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    No UAW made cars for me… ever again.

    I’m fine with the UAW workers making money. If the free market economics of the card industry supported their cost… then fine. But it doesn’t.

    The problem is the UAW is bilking the Auto makers (who are complicit in this) and then because of that and other financial forces, coming to us for the money they claim they are entitled to.

    Sorry boys… that’s NOT how it works.

    I wonder if the UAW realizes how many people will never ever touch a GM, Ford or Chrysler again as a result of this work-fare they demand?

    The sad part is that there are probably individuals in the union that WOULD support a cut to an economically viable wage and benefits plan. But their voices are squashed. Much like in NYC’s Transit Workers union.

    Oh well.. they just committed themselves to their own demise.

  17. #17
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:02 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    “If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers,” Bush said at the White House, in remarks carried live by the national broadcast networks.

    “Such a collapse would deal an unacceptable blow to Americans far beyond the auto industry. … It could send our suffering economy into a deeper and longer recession.”

    Michelle.. this talk reminds of the scene from Ice Age… with the Do-Do Birds..

    Doom on you! Doom on You! Just slap UAW T-shirts on Bush and the Do-Do’s and we’ve got our current situation.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BONgAIBlb4A

  18. #18
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:03 am, Paul Revere said:

    Way to encourage bad behaviour senor Bush.

  19. #19
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:05 am, jjmurphy said:

    Bush is the socialist meant to make the new marxist president look like a centrist.

    Good one, MisterP. It does seem that way at times.

  20. #20
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:06 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    Why worry? By the end of January all Obambi’s Ivy League elitist will be on the job working hard for the common man and woman.

    Who knows better how to spend our money and how important it is to raise our taxes? Plus we get to surrender the war.

  21. #21
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:08 am, 57fender said:

    Final nail? We can only hope.

  22. #22
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:08 am, WaterBoyz said:

    Chrysler will merge into GM.

    The UAW gave up almost nothing. Yea sure they are supposed to drop the pool of people that are laid off and draw the salaries doing nothing. But that program was getting so much heat that it was being phased out anyway.

    Wonder if the union leadership are gonna get a bonus for winning the fight?

    Why is there so few Repubs speaking out about this?

    We thought we were screwed in 2008. Just wait for 2009.

  23. #23
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:08 am, ajmontana said:

    ha! just listened to fox news and Cheryl Zamboni (or something like that) speaking about the economy if the autos failed and the trickle down effect said G.M. was one of the biggest users of VYagra. What are they doing? Humping the cars? :shock:

  24. #24
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:10 am, cheapseat said:

    let’s see, california owes 48b and wants to raise taxes 11b and cut spending 7b, but that leaves 30b still to be covered mr bush. and new york city and state will need another 20b to cover their entrenched beaurocracy. great news!

  25. #25
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:12 am, steveegg said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 9:55 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    You can’t fix stupid.

    Can we put GM and Chrysler on the clock to see how long it takes them to request their next bailout?

    I’ve got 4:05 pm EST 1/20/2009.

  26. #26
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:16 am, FilmLadd said:

    Last year I bought a hand dolly from Home Depot. Two wheeler with inflatable tires. Had a big sticker on it saying “Proudly made with Union Labor.”

    I winced at the sticker, but I bought it anyway.

    Both damn tires went flat after two weeks of use.

  27. #27
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:20 am, madmonkphotog said:

    So this means I get a free car, right?

    At $73/hour wages, the UAW must be happy, which is why I’ll never buy another American-made car.

  28. #28
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:26 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Senator Demint recently stated that these bail-outs using taxpayers money are illegal and unfair. Its the unfair part thats gonna start a revolt in this country. Who sets the standard on who gets it and not. As for the taxpayers we are fuming mad. Obama actually said something yesterday that I agree with. Authority and oversight have been asleep at the wheel. How can the sub prime mess, then the Madoff scam go unnoticed…cuz no one was looking. And Paulson has the moronic statement yesterday that everything is under control. Wait till the auction ARMs and the Alt-As increase rates. Its gonna be a bailout equal to the sub prime mess. No accountability. We as citizens demand accountability. Both Dems And GOPs are to blame and they owe us…the taxpayer. Its massive discrimination by our own government. Bush , well he fell off the wagon with me when he wanted shamesty! TAX REVOLT NOW !

  29. #29
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:26 am, lgm said:

    This is self destructive absolutism. Look at the bright side:

    * The bailout was half the $35B people were talking about

    * It requires the autos to seek bankruptcy protection and reorganize.

    * It pressures the autos to pressure the UAW for deep concessions. This is one of the main things this blog was hoping for.

    Despite the flack on this blog, Bush is still conservative. I think a strong motivation for some bailout comes from the troubled US (and worldwide) debt markets. These are in far worse shape than stock and real estate, which have gone down “only” 40%. Adding huge defaults from the autos would take away any chance of a quick recovery from the debt markets. That would mean no loans to small business, etc.

  30. #30
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:27 am, bruins90210 said:

    Bush is just kicking the can down the road so that Obambi and his trolls can deal with it. 17.4B is chump change in Washington. He did the right thing. If scores of auto industry dependent businesses began declaring bankruptcy in Q1 09, Obambi and his thugs would authorize another 2 Trillion in new spending to salvage everything. I wouldn’t mind all of the new spending if Dodd, Frank, Meeks, Waters, Raines, Johnson, Gorelik, and anyone else involved in this mess were thrown in jail. What is happening now is nothing compared to what’s going to happen w/Social Security. The sad thing is, I doubt McCain/Palin would not have handled any of this any better.

  31. #31
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:27 am, Mister P said:

    I bought my first Japanese car 30 years ago and never bought an American car again. It has been nice buying cars you expect to run flawlessly and last 12 years before you decide to trade it in.

  32. #32
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:28 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Whats happens when no one buys a BIG 3 vehicle? LIke now? Just prolonging the pain!

  33. #33
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:28 am, Mister P said:

    If scores of auto industry dependent businesses began declaring bankruptcy in Q1 09, Obambi and his thugs would authorize another 2 Trillion in new spending to salvage everything.

    I have heard of spin, but this takes the cake.

  34. #34
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am, Mister P said:

    Whats happens when no one buys a BIG 3 vehicle? LIke now? Just prolonging the pain!

    Nobody ever asks the question: What do we do with all the cars that nobody wants?

  35. #35
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:31 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Everything is falling perfectly into nationalization just in time for the commies to take over. Perfect set up!

  36. #36
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:33 am, ThackerAgency said:

    It will be funny when the oil companies demand a bail out with oil trading below 10 dollars a barrel.

    Our government is nothing more than a den of thieves now. They do nothing but spend money – our money, and borrowed money on our behalf.

    Some American some day is going to have to pay for all of this. . . but Congress and DC don’t care as long as they get elected again. Our kids and their kids are going to have to pay for the ‘sins of the fathers’.

  37. #37
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:34 am, FilmLadd said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am, Mister P said:

    Nobody ever asks the question: What do we do with all the cars that nobody wants?

    Give them all to me for free, I’ll figure out how to make some money off them.

  38. #38
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:34 am, Barry F. said:

    So, who’s going to bailout the U.S., when our government goes bankrupt trying to bailout everyone else? *sigh*

  39. #39
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:37 am, right4life said:

    I would advise you all to start buying euros…or gold…the dollar is going to be worthless in a few years..

    zimbabwe here we come..

  40. #40
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:47 am, pianoman said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:08 am, 57fender said:

    Final nail? We can only hope.

    He still has a little less than a month left…

  41. #41
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:48 am, steveegg said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:37 am, right4life said:

    I would advise you all to start buying euros…or gold…the dollar is going to be worthless in a few years..

    zimbabwe here we come..

    Remember, while those who have the gold make the rules, those who have the ammo will have the gold sooner or later.

    I wouldn’t put anything in the Euro; if anything, Europe’s economy is even more screwed up than America’s.

  42. #42
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:51 am, madchef said:

    The Constitution no longer means anything. We are no longer governed we are ruled. Our elected officials ( by way of voter fraud ) are bankrupting our grandchildren. We no longer have any say in what our government does. The nation is run by tyrants who take their orders from unions, wall street, enviromental groups, ect. The time has come for those of us who still believe in liberty to take our nation back. Over a million Americans have fought and died to keep this country free. We must insure that they did not die in vein.

    DON’T TREAD ON ME!!!

  43. #43
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:52 am, steveegg said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:26 am, lgm said:

    This is self destructive absolutism. Look at the bright side:

    * The bailout was half the $35B people were talking about

    Only because the cash is only running until the end of February. The $35 billion included long-term loans.

    * It requires the autos to seek bankruptcy protection and reorganize.

    No, it doesn’t. Indeed, this $17.4 billion bailot was specifically constructed to avoid that scenario.

    * It pressures the autos to pressure the UAW for deep concessions. This is one of the main things this blog was hoping for.

    But it does not make those concessions a requirement of receiving either the initial $14 billion or the follow-on $4 billion.

    Despite the flack on this blog, Bush is still conservative….

    I call Bravo Sierra on that.

    I think a strong motivation for some bailout comes from the troubled US (and worldwide) debt markets. These are in far worse shape than stock and real estate, which have gone down “only” 40%. Adding huge defaults from the autos would take away any chance of a quick recovery from the debt markets. That would mean no loans to small business, etc.

    And shifting that to an already-broke federal government will fix that how?

  44. #44
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:06 am, cheapseat said:

    steveegg; right on point! our compassionate commander in chief hasn’t yet learned that keynsian economics has never worked, just as socialism has never worked. you can’t encourage laziness and inefficiency, because that is man’s normal state. you must punish our base states, and reward our better behaviors. any damn fool can sit on their ass and vegetate watching oprah.

  45. #45
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:10 am, Bill Grant said:

    You have been sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go! -Oliver Cromwell to Parliament, 1653

    Too bad Obama is even down hill from Bush.

    Meanwhile

  46. #46
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:14 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    I knew Bush was going to be a wash early on in his first term. Fortunately we didnt have to deal with Gore at the time BUT….

    Early on in 2001, when Bush went down to Mexico to meet with their President who was a former Coke-Cola exec, I knew the cards were stacked against us and the fix was in.

    9/11 was the only thing that saved Bush. He would have been a one term failure if the Trade Center hadnt been hit. Why should he care about his legacy… its not there any way. !@##$!@$ and I even liked him

  47. #47
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:23 am, tomshup said:

    Wagoner thanks everyone but the taxpayers in his ongoing press conference.

    Bush has sold taxpayers down the river and if you watched him deliver the message, you could see he knew it was the wrong decision. He did it anyway, because he really is a dem at heart.

    Our country is in deep trouble and the messiah will speed up the prcocess of decline. And I’m an eternal optimist!

  48. #48
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:28 am, Mommaofmany said:

    I am sick to my stomach about this. The only saving grace is knowing that ultimately, Jesus Christ is in control of all of it and just lining things up the way He wants them. The USA isn’t mentioned in Revelation, and I’m getting a clearer picture of why. Maranatha!

  49. #49
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:34 am, rightisright said:

    Bush running neck and neck with Carter and Wilson and god forbid FDR as the worst president in the last 100 years.
    Let’s see he’s appointed 2 good Supreme Court Judges, cut taxes and, and…hmmmm. Now you notice I hesitant giving him credit for securing the country from terrorism. I question how secure we really are with open boarders along with it being known mooslimbs are working with the mexican drug cartel, smuggling the anti-american illegal arabs into the country. Need to wait on the security issue…not to mention the increase in visa’s handed out to arab counties, who does Bush think the enemy is? Surely not his pals in the royal family supporting the madrases around the world, teaching down with America.
    The bailouts are the last damage he can do with a pen, gads we’re in trouble.
    I personally will never buy another American car as long as the union is stealing from the incompetently operated auto manufactures and the tax payers of America.
    Bush has been one crappy president, sorry to say, the opposition was so bad I voted for him twice. What does that tell you about the lack of honest, valued, principled individuals willing to be politicians?

    Be prepared folks it’s going to get ugly, very ugly.

  50. #50
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:37 am, Room 237 said:

    I for one welcome our new socialist overlords.

  51. #51
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:39 am, dan708 said:

    Welcome to the United States of Socialist Republics (USSR). Enjoy your stay, Comrades! And please don’t think – our government never does.

  52. #52
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:45 am, Madam President said:

    Christ, and to think I used to admire this guy when I was younger!

  53. #53
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:46 am, Mister P said:

    Bush running neck and neck with Carter and Wilson and god forbid FDR as the worst president in the last 100 years.

    Along with Richard(take us off of the gold standard) Nixon and Lyndon Johnson. In my lifetime we have had 2 decent Presidents (Eisenhour and Reagan).

  54. #54
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:47 am, right4life said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:37 am, Room 237 said:
    I for one welcome our new socialist overlords.

    meet the new boss, same as the old boss :roll:

  55. #55
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:49 am, Mister P said:

    Everything is falling perfectly into nationalization just in time for the commies to take over. Perfect set up!

    Too late, done already.

  56. #56
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:52 am, rightisright said:

    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:46 am, Mister P said:

    Mr. P, no doubt I wasn’t being critical enough, I do agree…most of the presidents are crap when you boil it down to what they’ve actually done. Along with most of Congress over the years.

  57. #57
    On December 19th, 2008 at 11:55 am, katablog said:

    Another no strings attached loan.

    Oh did you miss the “strings”? If they can’t prove viability in 100 days, the US government gets all its money back! HA HA HA!!!!

  58. #58
    On December 19th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Bush and Pelosi racing head long for single digit approval ratings.

    Most exciting race of the year.

  59. #59
    On December 19th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Just like McCain-Feingold he didn’t think it was a good idea but signed it anyway! What a putz! Spare me all these metro-sexuals with spines of jelly!

  60. #60
    On December 19th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, drfredc said:

    Amongst the non-bailout options that could have been done, one occurred to me the other day that doesn’t get much mention:

    Eliminate taxation on bank account interest. This would encourage savings, and solvency for banks.

    I suppose if one must push the bailout button, match the first $XXXX deposited in a year long account with ‘bail out’ dollars.

    The idea is to gets money to the grass roots folks who’ve actually got (or want to develop) good savings habits at the banks of the people’s (not politicians) choice.

    Reward good behavior and you’ll get more of it. Tax good behavior and you’ll get less of it. Throw good money after bad and the sucking sound only gets louder…

  61. #61
    On December 19th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

    While the latest Bush bailout will probably do nothing positive or productive for either the auto industry or the country, I thought it would be interesting to see how the money could have been used in different ways:

    If you figure a bailout price of 17.4 Billion, you could have bought:

    497,142 Ford F150′s – retail price of $35,000
    or
    621,428 Chevy Malibu’s – retail price of $28,000
    or
    621,428 Chrysler Town and Country’s – retail price of $28,000
    or
    10,545,454,545 gallons of gas @$1.65/gal.or
    Between 2 and 3, One thousand Megawatt Nuclear Power Plants, between 5 and 7 Billion each
    or
    696 miles of brand new interstate (25 Million per mile)
    or
    54,375,000 Wii game systems @$320/game
    or
    92,679 New Border Patrol Agents – Total cost of $187,744 per agent total (including training and equipment) according to US Customs and Protection
    or
    40,092,165 Smith and Wesson 66′s (357 Magnum @$434 per gun)

    Feel free to add to the list.

  62. #62
    On December 19th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, Freddy said:

    Do not underestimate the amount of corruption that is possible under an Obama administration!

    With a firmly entrenched plan for taking money from the federal government and placing it into the hands of private individuals, like the 2 billion Chrysler is funneling to their investors, the corruption comming will make all these absurd give aways seem ‘like the good old days’!

  63. #63
    On December 19th, 2008 at 2:01 pm, RobM1981 said:

    NJ Aviator,

    Precisely. Bush seems to believe that the market demand for those Chryslers and Chevy’s will just evaporate if/when they go into Chapter 11. He has no concept of how that demand is the engine that will revitalize the economy – particularly when it’s aimed at a GM and Chrysler that isn’t saddled with an insane wage structure.

    Bush’s ignorance is breathtaking, but his cowardice moreso. You really get the idea that these last 6 months have been all about defense, for Bush. Unbelieveable.

    Obama’s showing the same kind of cowardice, btw. Now that he’s the guy who has to carry the results on his shoulder, see how he equivocates?

    People forget just how brave Reagan was. Probably the last brave president, in this age of mamby-pambies and second-guessers.

  64. #64
    On December 19th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, deusexmachina said:

    It is obvious that Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama answer to higher powers than the people. And unless and until the people start to behave as though they are really angry, this type of conduct will continue. Bush is a great disappointment. Obama will be…bank on it!

  65. #65
    On December 19th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Papa Louie said:

    “W” is desperately trying to save his legacy but, instead, he’s destroying it. At the same time, he’s handing the Democrats all the ammunition they need to blame him for every problem the Obama administration encounters. Believe me, they will blame him for everything. They will use his handling of the bailout against him even though they encouraged him to act this way.

    President Bush is on his way to becoming the next Hoover, and given how he has “abandoned free market principles,” how will anyone defend him against the blame the democrats will heap upon him for the next 8 years?

  66. #66
    On December 19th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, JonB said:

    I disagree with those of you who are saying that Bush is being stupid, or that he’s ignorant, etc. He’s not. He knows exactly what he is doing. There are no “morons” in DC, only people who are professionals at looking out for their own self interests, and no-one elses. Bush has no responsibility to the public at all now, so he’s doing what ever he thinks is best for him, and likely going with the highest bidder when it comes to decisions.

  67. #67
    On December 19th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Dear Harvard Business School,

    Today one of your graduates has embarrassed you beyond words. Sadly, if you do not speak up in favor of the free market, I will take you off my list of top schools. Oh I know, it’s only my own mental list, but you and I will both know where you rank. And that is enough.

    AlohaGuy

    PS – Aloha also means “goodbye”.

  68. #68
    On December 19th, 2008 at 3:38 pm, Patrick Britton said:

    You think Bush cares if it’s legal or not?

  69. #69
    On December 19th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, dadinseattle said:

    How much debt should our children inherit?

  70. #70
    On December 19th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, Southpaw said:

    All this means is I’ll have to wait a few more months to buy a Toyota Mustang V8 or a Nissan Corvette. Sexy.

    UAW get a clue.

  71. #71
    On December 19th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, mojack420 said:

    I am looking at buying a new ford truck now and investing into the company . I might lose on the stocks but at least im giving them my money because i chose to not because it was taken by force.

    you want a real stimulus package enact the fair tax .

  72. #72
    On December 19th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, maisy said:

    It’s time for a full scale country wide TAX Boycott!!

  73. #73
    On December 19th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    MrVIBEMAN: YIKES ! $187744 per Border Agent? That’s SHOCK & HORROR; over $90 per hour…Yet people say the UAW is overpaid?

    Just saying…

  74. #74
    On December 19th, 2008 at 7:05 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    How many of you want to get rid of the ridiculous overpaid Border Patrol? Or, is the $73 per hour figure for the UAW overblown? Let’s hire the UAW to control our borders and save money…

    Just saying…

  75. #75
    On December 19th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Besides, the UAW membership LIKES guns.

  76. #76
    On December 19th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    I have a Smith & Wesson 38/357 revolver hand gun.. concealable…. an old Remington 870 Wingmaster 12 gauge…. my K-Bar…. and my intellect… sad but if I’m challenged… please bring it on.

  77. #77
    On December 19th, 2008 at 8:39 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Bush is the socialist meant to make the new marxist president look like a centrist.

    This has got to be one of the most outrageous stunts I’ve seen in a long time. It makes me sick to think I’ve been trying to defend this man for the past 8 years, only to have him kick me and my children (and future grandchildren) in the teeth on his way out the door. At the very least, he could have done NOTHING for the next couple of months like any self-respecting lame duck, then let Obama handle it…but NOOOOO, he has to try to “fix” our economy by RUINING IT. GOOD RIDDANCE, MR. BUSH!! You can’t get out fast enough. (I never thought I’d say that.)

    One must wonder if Bush is “in on” the scheme to soften up Obama’s image…just sayin’

  78. #78
    On December 19th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, MtsEdge said:

    let Obama the next administration handle it

    fixed it

  79. #79
    On December 19th, 2008 at 10:22 pm, single stack said:

    Despite the flack on this blog, Bush is still conservative.

    Bush has NEVER been conservative, EVER. He is, and has always been, an internationalist.
    He’s as much a conservative as Juan McAmnesty, which is to say, not at all.
    Just because he calls himself one doesn’t make him one.

  80. #80
    On December 20th, 2008 at 9:09 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    They can call this Operation Nash-Rambler thank you George Romney. But President Bush has just raised you one. American Motors caved into the UAW and signed a contract that pretty much depended on a 2% growth forever to pay for it. The other three automakers felt compelled to match it it has been a downhill slide ever since. It is called the agreement that drove Studebaker to Canada.

    Every economic downturn we see brings on crisis such as this.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


The Bank of (Democratic Party) America

January 18, 2012 09:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments

Bailing out the world

November 30, 2011 09:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments

Breaking: Barney Frank will not seek re-election

November 28, 2011 09:54 AM by Michelle Malkin

168 Comments

Here are your 1 percent-ers: Obama’s bundlers

October 17, 2011 03:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

79 Comments

Who’s Up For Another Fannie Mae Bailout?

May 9, 2011 11:20 AM by Doug Powers

67 Comments


Categories: Subprime crisis

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook