Hillmas shopping spree

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 23, 2008 11:04 AM

Abe Greenwald looks at Hillary’s moves at the State Department: Here come the Clinton years.

Cue the background music: It’s beginning to look a lot like Hillmas.

Posted in: Hillary Clinton

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. ButAsForMe! » Hillmas shopping spree
  2. Hillmas shopping spree | Fire Andrea Mitchell!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #576506
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 am, Mercy4Me said:

    BIGGER government! WTF.

    I must say though, she may be the only one with balls in the new administration.

  2. #576510
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 11:12 am, wighttrasch said:

    Where will she plaster her day-glo Che posters?

  3. #576513
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 11:22 am, walterc said:

    So instead of a strong leader in the Whitehouse to try and keep us from being attacked, we are going to have a power struggle/empire building contest between the Whitehouse, State and Treasury.

    Note to self: load more (non-traceable) ammo. It’s going to get rough.

    I’ve noticed of late, that the media and Congress are already turning on The One and he hasn’t even been sworn in yet. So the honeymoon’s over already?

  4. #576514
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 11:22 am, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Everyone has to give Hill the attention she feeds on. This will drive PEBO absolutly nuts!

  5. #576538
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 11:55 am, backwoods conservative said:

    I thought maybe Hillary was one of Santa Obama’s elves.

  6. #576544
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 12:04 pm, right_on said:

    Her State Department…bigger names, and bigger budgets? And here I have always been under the impression that purpose of “National Service” was to give back, NOT to enrich oneself.

    Increasing the budget of the diplomatic corps means paying the top level schmoozers more money, not increasing the ranks of those who actually do the work in the diplomatic corps.

    It’s like adding to a police budget…the Chief hires more administration staff to make his job easier, rather than putting the money where it is actually needed, for more street officers. Adding administrators has never reduced crime…ever!

    Adding political buddies to Uncle Samantha’s teats will not, and has not ever made this country safer.

    Like everything surrounding the party of Democrats and progressives, nothing is added, save window dressing (and deficit spending)…it’s always about appearance…“We’ve lost respect in the eyes of our former allies, blah, blah, blah…”

  7. #576563
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    If she is going to play Santa Claus at the State Department, how is she going to get her fat arse down the chimney?
    Ooh! Did I ask that out loud? Well, I guess the can reject me for the Diplomat Corp.

  8. #576564
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, rocketman said:

    Hillary’s Christmas Gift commercial list of last year was SMALL POTATOES compared to what the O’Bummer and his congressional minions are putting on their shopping list. And we are getting stuck with their credit card bills!
    ***
    John Bibb

  9. #576579
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 12:44 pm, right_on said:

    Another Depression Era concept for, and by the Democrats…long lines for the Soup Kitchens, except now they are standing in line for their handouts.

    Which entities are clamoring for bailout money? States with Democrat Majorities in their state houses; businesses with large labor unions; financial institutions run into the ground by Democrat administrators; school districts in every state (teachers unions).

    Which of the above entities have been on the receiving end of federal funds since federal assistance was made available? ALL OF THEM! Which of the aforementioned entities have been accused of mismanagement? ALL OF THEM!

    Finally, who screams the loudest about inequity, ad nauseaum? One guess…..

  10. #576603
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 1:04 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    This is actually amusing in a way. Neither in office, but both empire building as fast as possible.

  11. #576612
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 1:09 pm, Voice of Reason said:

    On December 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    +1

  12. #576614
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 1:10 pm, docflash said:

    They are setting up the biggest theft of money in the history of the world.Change,we are getting the same Clinton bunch back for their 2nd dip at the well.This time they will do it right and get it all.Who says history doesn’t repeat,just like that we are back 16 years.If you live in a major city it is time to move or stay and wait for the bomb to go off.

  13. #576691
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 2:27 pm, md1964 said:

    We know now after the Clintons took everything that wasn’t nailed down in the Whitehouse, that there are rules on the gifts and items the President can take after leaving office… but is there any such rule for the Secretary of State??? Would hate in two years after she resigns to run for president, we find out that they pulled up moving fans in the dark of night and cleaned that place out too..

  14. #577954
    On December 26th, 2008 at 6:31 pm, Vntnrse said:

    Should we have the Bush people steal all of the B’s and O’s off the computer keyboards the way the Clintons had all of the W’s stolen?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why is Hillary laughing?

April 9, 2009 03:02 PM by Doug Powers

98 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

North Korea to put American journalists on trial

March 30, 2009 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“Botchmen”

March 10, 2009 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Global cooling moment of the day

January 20, 2009 06:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Chilly.

A bittersweet Hillary/Jawn Kerry moment Updated

January 13, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Oh, what might have been.

Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued

January 13, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 14 Trackbacks


Categories: Hillary Clinton



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook