Comments on: Hillmas shopping spree

By: Vntnrse

Vntnrse — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:31:22 +0000

Should we have the Bush people steal all of the B’s and O’s off the computer keyboards the way the Clintons had all of the W’s stolen?

By: Hillmas shopping spree | Fire Andrea Mitchell!

Hillmas shopping spree | Fire Andrea Mitchell! — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:33:46 +0000

[...] So instead of a strong leader in the Whitehouse to try and keep us from being attacked by terrorists (which according to Joe Biden will happen within the first six months of the Hussein administration), we instead are going to get a power struggle/empire building contest between the Whitehouse, State and Treasury. Read it and weep from the Commentary Magazine: Even before taking office, Hillary Rodham Clinton is seeking to build a more powerful State Department, with a bigger budget, high-profile special envoys to trouble spots and an expanded role in dealing with global economic issues at a time of crisis. [...]

By: md1964

md1964 — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:27:59 +0000

We know now after the Clintons took everything that wasn’t nailed down in the Whitehouse, that there are rules on the gifts and items the President can take after leaving office… but is there any such rule for the Secretary of State??? Would hate in two years after she resigns to run for president, we find out that they pulled up moving fans in the dark of night and cleaned that place out too..

By: ButAsForMe! » Hillmas shopping spree

ButAsForMe! » Hillmas shopping spree — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:05:33 +0000

[...] Hillmas shopping spree Quick Read: [...]

By: docflash

docflash — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:10:34 +0000

They are setting up the biggest theft of money in the history of the world.Change,we are getting the same Clinton bunch back for their 2nd dip at the well.This time they will do it right and get it all.Who says history doesn’t repeat,just like that we are back 16 years.If you live in a major city it is time to move or stay and wait for the bomb to go off.

By: Voice of Reason

Voice of Reason — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:09:47 +0000

On December 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

By: AlohaGuy

AlohaGuy — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:04:03 +0000

This is actually amusing in a way. Neither in office, but both empire building as fast as possible.

By: right_on

right_on — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:44:56 +0000

Another Depression Era concept for, and by the Democrats…long lines for the Soup Kitchens, except now they are standing in line for their handouts.

Which entities are clamoring for bailout money? States with Democrat Majorities in their state houses; businesses with large labor unions; financial institutions run into the ground by Democrat administrators; school districts in every state (teachers unions).

Which of the above entities have been on the receiving end of federal funds since federal assistance was made available? ALL OF THEM! Which of the aforementioned entities have been accused of mismanagement? ALL OF THEM!

Finally, who screams the loudest about inequity, ad nauseaum? One guess…..

By: rocketman

rocketman — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:30:52 +0000

Hillary’s Christmas Gift commercial list of last year was SMALL POTATOES compared to what the O’Bummer and his congressional minions are putting on their shopping list. And we are getting stuck with their credit card bills!
***
John Bibb

By: Rogue Cheddar

Rogue Cheddar — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:30:09 +0000

If she is going to play Santa Claus at the State Department, how is she going to get her fat arse down the chimney?
Ooh! Did I ask that out loud? Well, I guess the can reject me for the Diplomat Corp.

By: right_on

right_on — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:07 +0000

Her State Department...bigger names, and bigger budgets? And here I have always been under the impression that purpose of "National Service" was to give back, NOT to enrich oneself. Increasing the budget of the diplomatic corps means paying the top level schmoozers more money, not increasing the ranks of those who actually do the work in the diplomatic corps. It's like adding to a police budget...the Chief hires more administration staff to make his job easier, rather than putting the money where it is actually needed, for more street officers. Adding administrators has never reduced crime...ever! Adding political buddies to Uncle Samantha's teats will not, and has not ever made this country safer. Like everything surrounding the party of Democrats and progressives, nothing is added, save window dressing (and deficit spending)...it's always about appearance..."We've lost respect in the eyes of our former allies, blah, blah, blah..."

By: backwoods conservative

backwoods conservative — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:55:34 +0000

I thought maybe Hillary was one of Santa Obama’s elves.

By: Milwaukee Mike

Milwaukee Mike — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:22:32 +0000

Everyone has to give Hill the attention she feeds on. This will drive PEBO absolutly nuts!

By: walterc

walterc — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:22:12 +0000

So instead of a strong leader in the Whitehouse to try and keep us from being attacked, we are going to have a power struggle/empire building contest between the Whitehouse, State and Treasury.

Note to self: load more (non-traceable) ammo. It’s going to get rough.

I’ve noticed of late, that the media and Congress are already turning on The One and he hasn’t even been sworn in yet. So the honeymoon’s over already?

By: wighttrasch

wighttrasch — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:12:51 +0000

Where will she plaster her day-glo Che posters?