Photoshop of the day: Queen Caroline

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 23, 2008 09:53 AM

Our wonderful friend and photoshopper Tennyson Hayes is back. Nothing more needs to be said about Caroline Kennedy’s Senate bid than Tennyson’s photo-commentary:

***

Nobility cannot be bothered with the rules and customs of the little people:

If she were applying to be, say, an undersecretary of education in Barack Obama’s new administration, Caroline Kennedy would have to fill out a 63-item confidential questionnaire disclosing potentially embarrassing text messages and diary entries, the immigration status of her household staff, even copies of every résumé she used in the last 10 years.

If she were running for election to the Senate, Kennedy would have to file a 10-part, publicly available report disclosing her financial assets, credit card debts, mortgages, book deals and the sources of any payments greater than $5,000 in the last three years.

But Kennedy, who has asked Governor David Paterson to appoint her to succeed Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — and who helped oversee the vetting process for Obama’s possible running mates — is declining to provide a variety of basic data, including companies she has a stake in and whether she has ever been charged with a crime.

Kennedy declined on Monday to reply to those and other questions posed by The New York Times about any potential ethical, legal and financial entanglements. Through a spokesman, she said she would not disclose that kind of information unless and until she becomes a senator.

VDH: Desperately seeking Caroline.

Posted in: Democrats

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Public Secrets
  2. Magic Negro World
  3. Andrea Mitchell: I Think People Would Be Very Surprised | BigMouthFrog
  4. Profiles in Courage « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  5. ButAsForMe! » Photoshop of the morning: Queen Caroline
  6. Caroline Kennedy Votes ‘Present’ On Democracy, Hocks Loogie At New Yorkers « The Forum
  7. Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » Queen Caroline
  8. Queen Caroline | Keith Wayland
  9. UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » Sick and Tired of Our Permanent Elitist Political Ruling Class?
  10. Geraldine Ferraro Hates Fairy Tales « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  11. The Wheels Come Off Camelot v2.0 « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  12. El sorprendente caso de Caroline Kennedy (I) « Sarah Palin en Español
  13. Michelle Malkin » Caroline Kennedy sinks
  14. Michelle Malkin » Culture of Corruption: Czars of the Obama Underworld
  15. Michelle Malkin: Going After Obama’s Organized Crime Culture Of Corruption–Videos « Pronk Palisades
  16. Obama’s Opague Oppression–Collectivist Czars Or Commissars–Terminate Tyrants Tea Parties–Join The Second American Revolution « Pronk Palisades

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #576903
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 6:33 pm, Leatherneck said:

    She looks pretty good. But, this is how things are done when the few rule the many for money, and power.

    Keep your weapons clean, and BZO’ed.

  2. #576908
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 6:42 pm, jdubya said:

    She most likely will get the position. The deft-leftards always bitch, whine, and moan until they get their way.

    It is always comfortable to know that this inept libtard will eventually get in a situation where her miniscule intellect will fail and the problem will explode in her face like several of her other cronies.

    I will keep a bottle of the good stuff ready for that entertainment hour.

  3. #576910
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 6:47 pm, right_on said:

    One cannot have civil discourse with liberals. Nor can one ever expect to change a liberal’s mind. There is no point in having a discussion with persons with small, closed minds.

    Liberals are the first:

    To point fingers.
    To make ridiculous assertions.
    To jump to conclusions.
    To ridicule another person’s POV.
    To cast dispersions.
    To claim victim hood.
    To blame guns for murder.
    To throw money at a problem.
    To repeat failed ideas.
    To worship idols.
    To break promises.
    To issue threats, taunts, insults,
    objections, and obscenities.
    To state that “image” is more
    important than action.
    In line for handouts.

    And yet, we tolerate them. Not the other way around.

  4. #576917
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 6:56 pm, graysonret said:

    It just shows that the Senate is now becoming the old House of Lords of England. It doesn’t matter who you are, just that you are titled, like a Kennedy. We’re having an aristocacy after all. They are even looking down at us, peasants.

  5. #576919
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 6:59 pm, Bill Grant said:

    The hypocrisy that it takes for the same people who trashed Sarah Palin (an elected governor with 80-90% approval ratings) for being “inexperienced” to be advocating for this person who has done absolutely nothing, ever, in her entire life… It just makes me sick.

    “y’all are terrified of Ms. Kennedy.”

    Only if she gets behind the wheel or tries to fly an airplane.

  6. #576922
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 7:04 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Every time someone on the left gets mocked or criticized, all we have to do is bring her up and it’s game over.

    C Kennedy says that having raised a family qualifies her to be Senator – Palin actually had Executive experience.

    You’re right – game over.

  7. #576923
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 7:06 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Every time someone on the left gets … criticized…

    CK’s Uncle left a woman to drown and went to bed without calling for help except from his lawyers. Palin never did.

    Game over.

  8. #576924
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 7:08 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Every time someone on the left gets mocked or criticized…

    Bill Clinton got caught boffing a plump intern, and lost his law license after being impeached. Sarah Palin doesn’t have those issues.

    Game over.

  9. #576945
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 8:23 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On December 23rd, 2008 at 4:05 pm, eaglehaslanded said:
    Palin’s a trump card.

    Looks like you brought a deck of cards to a battle of wits. You’re outgunned.

  10. #576969
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 9:57 pm, Wellsy said:

    It’ll be a joke if the thin-resumed Caroline Kennedy gets a Senate seat based solely on her lineage. However, it won’t be as big a joke as a D-list celebrity cheating his way into the Senate.

    Don’t worry. If Franken does win, his awful potty humor and short temper will soon make him an embarassment to the Democratic party. Be careful what you wish for, Dems.

  11. #576978
    On December 23rd, 2008 at 10:51 pm, TheCityTroll said:
  12. #576988
    On December 24th, 2008 at 12:00 am, limmo said:

    Wait, it’s ok for Caroline Kennedy with little if any political experience to be a senator because…of what, family connections and, no doubt because she is a Democrat, but Sarah Palin is excoriated for not being experienced enough for National office, even though she was mayor, on a state commission, and the Governor of a state, and for being too Republican. Dems are such hyocrites.

  13. #576994
    On December 24th, 2008 at 12:20 am, Micheleeroo said:

    What limmo said.

  14. #576998
    On December 24th, 2008 at 12:41 am, Alan K. Henderson said:

    I would care about the Caroline Kennedy saga if I thought that there was a chance that a responsible person might become New York’s next junior senator.

  15. #576999
    On December 24th, 2008 at 12:53 am, winemkr said:

    Caroline presented her bonifides to us when she emerged from her cocoon and told us to vote for the black man from Chicago who had never done anything in his entire life that would make him a worthy presidential candidate.

    Now we are supposed to reward her with a seat in the US Senate for being a Kennedy.

    I’ll withhold judgement until I hear what senator franken has to say about all of this.

    Excuse me but I have to go puke.

  16. #584054
    On January 6th, 2009 at 9:47 am, rplatt said:

    Excuse me but I have to go puke.

    Wait . . . I and all of my friends and acquaintances will join you.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom