Hey, who’s bitter, clingy, and racist now?

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 31, 2008 01:24 PM

You all remember that Barack Obama made his famous comments about bitter, clingy, racist rural Americans at a posh fund-raiser in the Bay Area — America’s role model of tolerance and understanding.

Well, look who’s bitter, clingy, and racist now (hat tip – JWF):

As more and more black renters began moving into this mostly white San Francisco Bay Area suburb a few years ago, neighbors started complaining about loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

In 2006, as the influx reached its peak, the police department formed a special crime-fighting unit to deal with the complaints, and authorities began cracking down on tenants in federally subsidized housing.

Now that police unit is the focus of lawsuits by black families who allege the city of 100,000 is orchestrating a campaign to drive them out.

“A lot of people are moving out here looking for a better place to live,” said Karen Coleman, a mother of three who came here five years ago from a blighted neighborhood in nearby Pittsburg. “We are trying to raise our kids like everyone else. But they don’t want us here.”
City officials deny the allegations in the lawsuits, which were filed last spring and seek unspecified damages.

Across the country, similar tensions have simmered when federally subsidized renters escaped run-down housing projects and violent neighborhoods by moving to nicer communities in suburban Washington, Chicago and Los Angeles.

But the friction in Antioch is “hotter than elsewhere,” said U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development spokesman Larry Bush.

Posted in: Race relations

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. “Israel has come out into the open and declared war on Obama,” Martin says. « Goodtimepolitics
  2. LIBERAL (in)TOLERANCE: San Fran Doesn’t Want The Neighborhood To Go Dark | Right Voices
  3. Uppity Liberals and Section 8 Crybabies « Mark Epstein
  4. ButAsForMe! » Hey, who’s bitter, clingy, and racist now?
  5. Comedienne Roseanne Barr called Israel a “NAZI state” « Goodtimepolitics
  6. CFLs, or, those horrible curly bulbs | A Nutter's Prattle
  7. Should Republicans Block Burris from the Senate? « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  8. San Francisco Gets A Little Racist « Beltway Snark
  9. Hey, who’s bitter, clingy, and racist now? « Top Daily Digest Reading

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #580395
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:28 pm, feebiebabe said:

    George Carlin said it best with his famous schtick “Not-In-My-Backyard”.

  2. #580396
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:29 pm, wighttrasch said:

    But the friction in Antioch is “hotter than elsewhere,”

    Not that I believe this for one minute, but why would it be ‘hotter’ there, hmmmmm?

  3. #580397
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:29 pm, sonofdy said:

    You let a whole bunch of gangsta thugs into your nieghborhood and they act like gangstas???? Who would have thunk it?

  4. #580398
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:30 pm, wighttrasch said:

    It’s not about race–it’s about fashion sense!

  5. #580401
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:31 pm, bayou22 said:

    They’re just doing the “thug thizzle” that regular SF Bay Area residents won’t do.

  6. #580402
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:31 pm, simcoe said:

    As more and more black renters began moving into this mostly white San Francisco Bay Area suburb a few years ago, neighbors started complaining about loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

    In 2006, as the influx reached its peak, the police department formed a special crime-fighting unit to deal with the complaints, and authorities began cracking down on tenants in federally subsidized housing.

    Now that police unit is the focus of lawsuits by black families who allege the city of 100,000 is orchestrating a campaign to drive them out.

    So what does that tell you about the black subculture?

    But, its still ‘not my fault’, its those white people.

  7. #580404
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Yeah, this is “NIMBY” plain and simple. Leftists LOVE to sit around their all-white neighborhoods and discuss how backward southerners discriminate against minorities.

    If leftists didn’t have double standards they would have no standards at all.

  8. #580410
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:35 pm, b-cat said:

    Once again, libs not wanting to live with the results of their policies but too thick skulled to admit they were wrong.

    I’ve lived in neighborhoods like what they describe in the article, and through work, diligence, and changes in personal habits and lifestyle I haved moved up. I intend to keep going.

  9. #580412
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:36 pm, Radiojoe1470 said:

    I wondered how long it would take to see this here. It’s always amusing to see hypocrisy exposed.

    My opinion, though, is that although there’s obviously a racial component to issues such as this, race is a distraction that keeps us from solving the underlying problem. People without self-respect will not respect anyone or anything, and you can’t give someone self-respect in their welfare check or rent subsidy.

  10. #580413
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:37 pm, tre said:

    But in San FranSICKO, people aren’t allowed to have guns to which they can cling.

    Thus, gang-bangers can move out to their neighborhoods and run amok.

  11. #580415
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:38 pm, chep said:

    loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren

    Government subsidized movement of the ghetto to anywhere the ghetto wants to be. They now have a right to bring their crime into your neighborhood. Another side effect of government mandated equality and opportunity which proves it’s failure.

  12. #580417
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:39 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    As more and more black renters began moving into this mostly white San Francisco Bay Area suburb a few years ago, neighbors started complaining

    It’s so amazing because these people look for ‘racism’ in such small things they can’t see it in the big things. This article specifically says that black people ‘all’ have

    loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

    This has always been my point. It would be OK if they called the the ‘N word’ (they wouldn’t, but it would be less racist than this). This is specific discrimination based on stereotypes and skin color. This is what racism looks like. Racism doesn’t look like someone saying the ‘n word’. Racism looks like people demonizing an entire race to drive them out of an area.

    These are the people who look down on the south that actually has to deal with race issues regularly and daily. We don’t really even have ‘white areas’ and ‘black areas’ where I live. We all live together. There are loud and obnoxious neighbors of all colors and creeds. . . of course in SF all they care about is the terrible black neighbors.

    When chastising the South for Jim Crow laws it wasn’t an issue they had to deal with (they didn’t have many blacks). I expect SF to adopt Jim Crow laws and claim them to be ‘progressive’ because of this episode.

  13. #580418
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:40 pm, Boomer said:

    Just goes to show you can take the thug out of the ghetto, but you can’t take the ghetto out of the thug. Another failure result for liberal social engineering. Looks like Oakland will soon lose its distinction as one of the most dangerous and worst cities in the Bay Area to live in. San Fransicko and Bezerkly are battling hard to see who can be the most outrageous and out of touch with reality city to live in. ;)

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  14. #580420
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:42 pm, TXGator said:

    Liberals sure do love diversity, don’t they? I remember having a hard time in organic chemistry during college. But, then I saw a black kid in the room, and it helped me understand the course better. Diversity cures all! Soak it in, liberals!
    No one loves minorities than a rich kid from Vermont.
    Hey, look at the bright side. While they are living for free (some of my neighbors in LA only paid $5/month rent in $2000/month houses), at least they will win a lawsuit paid out with more taxpayer funds!

  15. #580421
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:46 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    the police department formed a special crime-fighting unit to deal with the complaints, and authorities began cracking down on tenants in federally subsidized housing.

    Now that police unit is the focus of lawsuits by black families

    …beacuse, as you know, we can’t have the police cracking down on the “muggings of schoolchildren”.

  16. #580422
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:47 pm, Two Dogs said:

    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development spokesman Larry Bush

    Eeeeeek! He’s a Bush, he’s Hitler, he’s a racist Palestinian hater Nazi-Jew!1111!!!!!!

  17. #580423
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:47 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Oakland will soon lose its distinction as one of the most dangerous and worst cities in the Bay Area to live in.

    Oakland’s “crime” is pretty centralized (not to minimize it, but you can avoid bad areas). Most parts of Oakland are fairly safe. (No, I’m not joking).

    Antioch, CA, Pittsburgh, CA (shares a city line with Antioch) and Richmond, CA’s bad area’s are pretty hard to avoid. I work in Oakland, downtown. I feel safer walking around here than I would in Pittsburgh and Richmond…hands down.

    Some of the Contra Costa County Suburbs have a very disturbing gang problem, which get’s over-shadowed by “Oakland”’s reputation.

  18. #580425
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:48 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Wait.. you mean that these blacks aren’t up to Biden’s standards????

    I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” he said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.

  19. #580426
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:49 pm, Chief RZ said:

    Because they are a special protected minority.

  20. #580428
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:56 pm, Boomer said:

    feebiebabe #17 when I left Travis AFB in 1998 Fairfield and Vallejo were becoming pretty dangerous too. Last visit to the Bay Area was back in 2004 and I noticed several other areas looking pretty rough too. Reason number 21,456 we are relieved we did not return to the People’s Republic of Kalifornia when retiring from the Air Force.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  21. #580432
    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:57 pm, huggybear said:

    Scoop of the year: Wealthy white suburbanites are racist, don’t want poor people living in their community. Footage at 11.

  22. #580435
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:01 pm, reine.de.tout said:

    Double heh.

    I saw this in my local newspaper this morning. The part I really liked was at the very end of the article, this paragraph:

    “Tensions like those afflicting Antioch have drawn scholars and law enforcement officials to debate whether crime follows subsidized renters out of the tenements to the suburbs”.

    A couple of real gems in that paragraph:
    1. They have to “debate” this when the evidence seems to be really clear that crime increases where these folks are?
    2. Notice how “crime follows” the renters . . . nowhere is there any indication that perhaps, just perhaps, crime isn’t some sort of unknown force that “follows” the renters, but is something actually perpetrated by at least some of the renters.

  23. #580437
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:04 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    “A lot of people are moving out here looking for a better place to live,” said Karen Coleman, a mother of three who came here five years ago from a blighted neighborhood in nearby Pittsburg. “We are trying to raise our kids like everyone else. But they don’t want us here.”

    The problem Ms. Coleman, is that when people leave the blighted areas too many decide to bring the blight with them. Unfortunately for those who live in the neightborhood they aren’t used to the blight and don’t want it.

    I wonder how many of these folks voted for the idiots who promote the entitlement mentality and are now facing the reality of what they actually voted to enact. We get the government we deserve.

    Well the Demoralcrats have the control for at least the next two years, do you think they will see the error of their ways and fix it? I’m not holding my breath, I’m betting it gets much worse.

  24. #580438
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:05 pm, b-cat said:

    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:57 pm, huggybear said:
    Scoop of the year: Wealthy white suburbanites are racist, don’t want poor people living in their community. Footage at 11.

    Now I’m confused. I thought it was poor, ignorant white southerners that were racists. Now its rich west coast hoity toities!!!

  25. #580439
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:10 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    You can take the gangsta outta the ghetto (or barrio), but you can’t take the ghetto (or barrio) outta the gangsta. Maybe if one of the “original” residents of Antioch told the “gangstas” to “get off my lawn” with an M1 Garand, someone might get the idea.

    ECS

  26. #580442
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:11 pm, sdillard said:

    I live here in the Bay Area. We have been told for decades that if we just “integrated”, everything would be peachy. The sad truth is that there are some ethnic groups who will NOT assimilate into the mainstream, and therefore are not welcome by the mainstream when they are relocated into our communities.

    There are lots of people of every ethnic group in my town, which is in Contra Costa county, but not near Antioch. We all live here and get along, or at least live side by side, with really no problems.

    Antioch used to be a working class Delta town. About 10 years ago, all these new houses went up and it became a major bedroom community for SF commuters. I know a couple of cops that live there.

    But the Contra Costa Housing Authority began issuing Sect 8 vouchers to families in the housing projects in Richmond. Those families got subsidies big enough to rent $600,000 houses in Antioch.

    How do YOU think YOU would like it if you had just bought one of those houses for your family, only to have the Richmond ghetto brought to you!

    That’s what happening in Antioch now.

    Grossly anti-social behavior by these transplanted blacks is the problem. It’s not “racism”.

  27. #580445
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:15 pm, Mister P said:

    I suggest people look up block busting. It was a common practice of Daley (the First) – yes it was a conspiracy. Realtors went into white neighborhoods (a block at a time) and made low ball offers. Then the insurance companies would cancel the property insurance. Then the realtors would return with even lower offers. They would get a few bites, then sell the houses at higher prices to blacks. Daley and his gang got quite rich from such schemes.

    Then they went to building Human Filing Cabinets, called Urban Housing. These quickly turned into ghettos and incubators for more gangs (that Daley learned to control).

    Eventually Urban Housing has “evolved” into subprime housing. And now we are bankrupt because of it.

  28. #580448
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:18 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Just wait until the illegals getting Section 8 start moving in! :-D

  29. #580449
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:19 pm, Mister P said:
  30. #580451
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:19 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Boomer – yup. Those areas (along with some in believe it or not Sacramento) are pretty bad.

    I should complete my point here. The demographics of the inland SF suburbs mentioned have large majority of White and Hispanic residents (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS) – oh, sorry, undocumented workers :roll:

    Methlabs in these areas have been on the rise as well. Ho-hum.

  31. #580453
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:21 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    nowhere is there any indication that perhaps, just perhaps, crime isn’t some sort of unknown force that “follows” the renters, but is something actually perpetrated by at least some of the renters.

    That’s it exactly.

    Karen Coleman, a mother of three who came here five years ago from a blighted neighborhood in nearby Pittsburg. “We are trying to raise our kids like everyone else.

    So, possibly one or two of her kids actually like the gang lifestyle and have brought the blight with them, along with other families with like-minded kids, to the new neighborhoods.

  32. #580455
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:25 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Clint Eastwood is a genius. “Gran Torino” is supposedly about this sort of issue. Haven’t seen it though, but the man is timely.

  33. #580456
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:25 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Huggybutt – Antioch is not a wealthy suburb in the Bay Area, it never has been. But as explained by a poster above, it WAS a working class town until goverment subsidized and subprime housing came in.

    Yes, blacks did move in. So did other ethnicities who took advantage of the housing prices.

    sdillard, good post.

  34. #580457
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:26 pm, zorro said:

    I laughed out loud when reading that article! Typical democrap hypocrites.

  35. #580458
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:26 pm, flutepilot said:

    Years ago, I had a black family move in next to me in a neighborhood that was just beginning to ‘tip’. Within a month, my garden lost its morning sun as they put up a six foot privacy fence and I was told “we do what we want”. Then came the parties until 4 A.M., and it was I who “don’t understand the culture”. I am totally empethetic to the people in this article.

  36. #580459
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:27 pm, right_on said:

    neighbors started complaining about loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

    Boy, this sounds just like my suburban white neighborhood…wait…NO, it doesn’t!

    authorities began cracking down on tenants in federally subsidized housing.

    Now that they have it, and paid for by US, they start biting the hand that feeds them! History has shown that this is PAR for the course.

    the city of 100,000 is orchestrating a campaign to drive them out.

    Yes, and why not? But, but, WE are just trying to raise our kids…blah, blah, blah…Where is the personal responsibility? Uh, there is none!

    “A lot of people are moving out here looking for a better place to live.” “We are trying to raise our kids like everyone else. But they don’t want us here.”

    An interpretation is needed here…”looking for a better place to live…” translates to a greener field to pilfer. My past experience with the “welfare types” (most, not all) is that once they trash their current federal housing, it’s easier to just move to a new “better” place, rather than maintain, or clean up their current abode. Again, par for the course.

    The phrase, “raise our kids like everyone else” shows this parent’s blind eye to the problem. I know of no responsible parent who raised their kids to have loud parties, raise mean fighting dogs (regardless of the breed), play loud music that disturbs the neighbors, engage in prostitution, deal or buy drugs, or mug others. This is NOT normal, responsible, Golden Rule behavior!

    But, if it must go on, I’m happy that it’s happening in the cesspool of California…the bastion of liberalism…the capital of carnal dysfunction…the teapot of tolerance.

    They made this bed, now they can sleep in it.

  37. #580463
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:31 pm, granite said:

    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:04 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    I wonder how many of these folks voted for the idiots who promote the entitlement mentality and are now facing the reality of what they actually voted to enact. We get the government we deserve.

    Well the Demoralcrats have the control for at least the next two years, do you think they will see the error of their ways and fix it? I’m not holding my breath, I’m betting it gets much worse.

    We get the government we deserve.

    Well, not all of us deserve it.

    We all end up with the government that the clowns who make up the majority of voters, in the instance of our most recent election, have voted in.

    So, not all of us deserve it; but, all of us have to live with it and endure it.

    Well the Demoralcrats

    Demoralcrats socialists

    have the control for at least the next two years,….

    There…fixed it.

    …do you think they will see the error of their ways and fix it?

    That’s gotta be a rhetorical joke question.

    I’m not holding my breath,….

    Me neither…smart move.

    …I’m betting it gets much worse.

    That’s a sucker bet.
    Absolutely it will get much worse.

    A fire usually does get much worse when gasoline is poured on it by the clowns (socialists) who started it in the first place.

  38. #580462
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:31 pm, Boomer said:

    feebiebabe I grew up in Rancho Cordova from 1967 when my father retired from the Air Force leaving in 1975 when I joined up for a single tour of duty with the same outfit to only leave 25 years later. California has changed a lot for the worse since those very happy days I remember from my youth. My brother in the nicer suburbs of West Sacramento has kept me up to date on how bad it is getting there. I feel for you!

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  39. #580464
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:32 pm, garyganu said:

    Call me a racist, but why is it that blacks are attracting police attention with illegally loud music, illegal drug dealing, mugging school children and and mean pit-bulls. Is it possible that they are getting arrested for committing crimes and not just because they are black?

    Liberals are always calling for equal outcomes regardless of individual actions. If more blacks commit crimes than any other race, and THEY DO, then more Blacks should be arrested, convicted and impriosoned, and they are.It sounds perfectly fair to me.

    The only other alternative is to give blacks a pass, and not enforce criminal laws because of their race, while holding other races to a stricter standard.

    Oh, wait a minute. Wouldn’t that be racist? I’m confused.

  40. #580465
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:33 pm, DagneyT said:

    We’ve known those on the left were the racists, which is why after 20 years as a senator voting against civil rights, it was poetic justice that public insistence on it made LBJ sign it into law. Of course, his creation of ADC was what broke up the black family, and as he said, “will tie the blacks to us for the next 50 years”…except “blacks” was not the word he used. On that score, he was correct.

    Did your school teach you that LBJ was against civil rights? Nope. I had to research it for myself when I was in my 30’s! So much for public school educations, and most college educations.

  41. #580466
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:39 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    But the friction in Antioch is “hotter than elsewhere,”

    Finally! A real example of man made warming! Paging Al Gore!
    (aka ManBearPig)

  42. #580472
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:44 pm, John Deaux said:

    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:01 pm, reine.de.tout said:
    Notice how “crime follows” the renters . . . nowhere is there any indication that perhaps, just perhaps, crime isn’t some sort of unknown force that “follows” the renters, but is something actually perpetrated by at least some of the renters.

    Exactly! It’s not that they’re black or from a bad neighborhood. It’s all because they’re renters. With home ownership comes pride. We need to make mortgages affordable for these middle class people. Let’s lower the qualification standards and maybe even hand out money for down payments. There’s no way that could ever lead to anything bad.

  43. #580473
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:45 pm, rightisright said:

    neighbors started complaining about loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

    Looks like the problem is not being considerate and law bidding of ones neighborhood, nothing to do with races…jeeeez. I’m so tired of these whiny a$$ people of any color.
    Course there are lawsuits in the courts, just sayin’ Affirmative action, civil rights violations my butt.
    I feel for the hard working, dedicated, families of minorities that have to carry the cross these gangstas and anti-social racists have placed on their backs. Makes their lives untold times harder.

  44. #580474
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:50 pm, puhiawa said:

    Hey its their culture. Who are we to judge?/

  45. #580475
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On December 31st, 2008 at 1:31 pm, simcoe said:

    …Now that police unit is the focus of lawsuits by black families who allege the city of 100,000 is orchestrating a campaign to drive them out.

    So what does that tell you about the black subculture?

    But, its still ‘not my fault’, its those white people.

    Yes. The black subculture is the problem, not blacks themselves. God loves them just as much as whites or any race, yet they (those who buy into the black subculture) refuse to believe it. Deep in their gut, they believe white man is superior to them. It’s taught to them from birth by their own parents. They want to be successful, but to them, the color of success is white. Since they can never be white, they can never be successful. Therefore they sabotage their own success and label blacks that are truly successful as sell-outs, Uncle Toms, grey-meat, etc… They mimic white man as a caricature: wearing pants down around their rear-ends, sideways baseball caps, gaudy jewelry, clothes, and cars, warped “music”, and overall uncivilized behavior. That’s as close as they can come to being successful (in their minds) without losing their sub-cultural identity. Because of their self-imposed exile to successful living, they are angry …very angry. They are frustrated because they know they can never enjoy the higher living standard of whites. I think this causes some of their belligerence and attitude of entitlement. Their thinking goes: I can never legitimately attain what white man has; white man put me in this situation through slavery; white man owes me; therefore I’m justified in taking from white man and to blame my problems on him; I am white mans’ victim.

    Since they believe this at their core, they’ll never get ahead. Practicing the black subculture means never taking responsibility for one’s decisions but instead blaming circumstances and others for their sins and failures.

    They are the antithesis of Chris Gardner.

    Note that everyone has feelings of entitlement and don’t like to take responsibility for failures. That is due to the fallen state of humanity. God is working to mature each of us in these and other areas. The problem begins when a person blocks out God, and bad attitudes and thinking distortions begin to define the person’s life. Herein lies the real danger of the black subculture: it has become a multi-generational framework of solidarity to the entitlement and victimhood movement. It’s like a family or religion in a lot of ways, which is why it is so hard for a black person to escape it. I thank God for those that do escape. I am happy for them individually and because they set such a great example. If the others could only begin to see that the color of success isn’t white; it’s green (so to speak).

  46. #580476
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:54 pm, JT said:

    Move ‘em to eaglehaslanded’s neighborhood. His immense capability for tolerance transcend ghetto issues like these.

  47. #580477
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Well life is tough for those who are evaluated by their conduct and character rather than the color of their skin.

    This country is filled with decent, friendly, moral, law abiding, honorable, families that are a blessing and valued members of their communities, who just happen to be of black origin.

    When these low-lifes attempt to wrap themselves up in a race flag and scream RAAAAAACIST as an excuse for their conduct, they are an affront to all law-abiding citizens.

  48. #580481
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:58 pm, TXRose said:

    It is a fact that Blacks achieved more when the Jim Crow Laws were in effect than
    they have achieved (hopey change not included) since LBJ’s Great Society and
    Affirmative Action went into effect. Now, they are all owed everything. You have
    kids, no problem, get on welfare. Don’t want to work for your rent, no problem,
    government will pay it…ad nauseum. Now it’s illegals along with them. There was a man, illgal, no English, at the mission, Christmas Day, explaining to others
    how to work the system. All of us who speak Spanish took turns listening to him. He and his wife and their six children, plus the new little anchor baby due
    any minute, have it all figured out. They sign up for and show up for every hand
    out going on and pretend to not be married so she can get even more handouts.
    Made me sick because we had to turn away so many who legitimately needed
    help.

  49. #580482
    On December 31st, 2008 at 2:59 pm, TXRose said:

    meant illegal not illgal

  50. #580483
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:00 pm, torabora said:

    Boomer, Cordova High grad? Me ‘71

  51. #580486
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:06 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    I have lived on my neighborhood for 20 years. When I moved in it was about 65% white and 35% black It is now about 80% black and 20% white. My black neighbors whom I have known for 20 years are angry with some of the new black neighbors, because they have multiple families move in and out, and cars are being parked in the front yard, etc. Some of them have moved out.

    My one neighbor was abosolutely livid when she heard some the government help the new neighbors were getting to buy these homes and remarked how she and her late husband had to scrimp and save for the down payment to buy hers. She is a big Democrat and I explained to her about her chosen elected official did this, but she still votes Democrat(okay socialist).

  52. #580487
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:12 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    Yes granite it was rhetorical and you make some great points.

    Political Correctness and Multiculturalism is chocking the life out of our freedom and this country.

  53. #580488
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:14 pm, Boomer said:

    Torabora it is indeed a small world! :lol: Class of 75!

  54. #580489
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:14 pm, max said:

    The phrase, “raise our kids like everyone else” shows this parent’s blind eye to the problem. I know of no responsible parent who raised their kids to have loud parties, raise mean fighting dogs (regardless of the breed), play loud music that disturbs the neighbors, engage in prostitution, deal or buy drugs, or mug others. This is NOT normal, responsible, Golden Rule behavior!

    unless I’m mistaken, these activities are all outside the law… why not just enforce the laws on the books? Oh, right, it’s Cally…. never mind.

  55. #580496
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:23 pm, wrcnossen said:

    With all of the crap that assaults this country comming from San Francisco, I am amazed that they have the stones to complain about what anyone in thier community does. The rest of us have to put up with the Gay parades, Illegal alien protecting, homeless rights, Environitwits, and the rest of the assorted fruits and nuts. I hope the pitbulls bark all night and they are too tired to attend the next “No ROTC” ralley.

  56. #580500
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:29 pm, bradley said:

    Maybe the new section 8 residents of Antioch, California can do like the residents of public housing here in south Georgia: have illegal Mexicans keep the places all nice, tidy, lawns mowed, bushes trimmed, places painted, all at government expense too. The local public housing web site declares that dope dealing is the ONLY reason you can be turned down for free housing. You CANNOT be turned down if (1) you don’t have a job, (2) you aren’t looking for a job, or (3) you aren’t going to job training of any kind. In other words, free government handouts for life, no strings attached beyond color. Now that public housing is moving to the burbs, people there will get to enjoy its benefits too. BTW, most blacks live in Oakland, etc, because San Francisco costs too much and they moved across the Bay years ago.

  57. #580508
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:41 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Jet Jaguar. Excellent post!!!

  58. #580512
    On December 31st, 2008 at 3:56 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Look, if you’re going to parade around naked at the Folsome Street Fair, the last thing you need is a mean pit bull hanging around…

  59. #580517
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:05 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    These cartoon characters move to the Bay for a better life and brings their pit bulls and parties with them. Well Ain’t That Sweet-Kiss My Feet. OK Liberal, Tolerant, Touchy Feely Bay Area people–suck it up punks. Build some MORE subsidized housing, that will surely help.

    Too bad you can not shoot back punks-California gun control and all. When seconds count the police are only minutes away.

    Subsidized Housing in the Bay: would that be like windmills off Marthas Vineyard? :evil: Oh just sing Kum ba yah, my Lord, Kum ba yah! Oh Lord! Kum ba yah! Hear me crying, Lord, Kum ba yah! Hear me crying, Lord, Kum ba yah! Hear me crying, Lord, Kum ba yah! …

  60. #580519
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:12 pm, RTater said:

    I like to think that the title of this column/thread is read by the ghost of James Cagney.

    Happy New Year.

    And, and I hope I’m not being rude, but could everyone please drop the discussions of protection from zombies? The manual has already been written on that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Zombie_Survival_Guide

  61. #580524
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:18 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    I wonder how many of these folks voted for the idiots who promote the entitlement mentality and are now facing the reality of what they actually voted to enact?

    She is a big Democrat and I explained to her about her chosen elected official did this, but she still votes Democrat(okay socialist).

    Bingo! And double-Bingo! The idiots in CA continue to vote for the democrats (socialists) and they keep getting results like this. What is the definition of crazy? Doing the exact same thing over and over, and expecting different results. Like voting liberals into office.

    On a similar note…

    A family member (big liberal) works in SF and during the hotel workers strike, saw a line of picketers outside a hotel, making lots of noise at about 7am. A guest (african-american) stuck his head out the window and yelled for them to be quiet; he had gotten in late and wanted to sleep. One of the strikers yelled back, “Shut up, you f’ing ni&&er!”

    From the liberal socialist democrat union workers in San Francisco!

    But don’t you dare call them racist!

  62. #580526
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:20 pm, 4 Borders Pundit said:

    I wrote a dKos diary on this, anticipating some strong denial/hate from the Liberal/Democrat/Progressive bloc, but didn’t get anymore more than it’s a “class, not a race” problem in Antioch.

    Nonetheless, I liked my post! It’s funny how when liberal tolerance-for-all meets economic reality, attitudes move to the right. They say there are no atheists in a foxhole; and I guess there are no kumbayah liberals in a crime-ridden town.

    The post is here; hold your breath, conservatives, dive into dKOS!

  63. #580528
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:23 pm, jt3151 said:

    I once did maintenance work in an expensive apartment building in Highland Park, IL that had a few section 8 units. I didn’t know about it until I entered an apartment to investigate a leak and found a 20 something black guy asleep on a mattress in the living room in the middle of a weekday afternoon. I am a CPA now and understand that the owner got some kind of HUD financing that required this, but WTF is the point of moving some slacker into a buiding with people who are paying market prices?

    I’ll guarantee you that he wasn’t improving race relations.

  64. #580529
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:25 pm, jt3151 said:

    I wrote a dKos diary on this, anticipating some strong denial/hate from the Liberal/Democrat/Progressive bloc, but didn’t get anymore more than it’s a “class, not a race” problem in Antioch.

    Class/income, not race has been the standard answer for a long time.

  65. #580530
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:29 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    …it’s a “class, not a race” problem…

    When liberals show their racism, it’s blown off as a “class” problem. When a conservative utters something that only an idiot would interpret as racist, it becomes “the true nature and thoughts of all conservatives.” And the media shove it down our throats for months.

    This is why liberals are hypocrites.

  66. #580533
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:41 pm, fulldroolcup said:

    Hey, you guys talking about Rancho Cordova are making me soggy with nostalgia. I lived on Mather AFB back in 1954-55 when my dad was training as a B47 navigator.. My school bus used to drive past the entrance to R.C. every day on our way into Sacramento.

    No freeway then, just a liesurely drive past eucalyptus trees, a winery, fields of hops…

    Back then, though, California was….California!!!! Beautiful place, not yet ruined by leftism run amok.

    Sigh.

  67. #580534
    On December 31st, 2008 at 4:42 pm, Dandapani said:

    It’s the Katrina Effect.

  68. #580540
    On December 31st, 2008 at 5:09 pm, vickisoup said:

    This article and this blog makes me sad. My brother and his wife bought their first home in 1990 out in the new development in Antioch. The schools were new, the stores were new, everything was brand new in this “master-planned community”. Every homeowner had Mello-Roos tax to pay to finance the communities infrastructure. The sprawl continued, it became the bedroom community mentioned here by several posters, and the property values soared. In 12 years, the homes were valued at 3x the original purchase price, and many like my family members sold and moved closer to the East Bay Area. Their houses were purchased by lovely African-American families who were indeed looking for a better life for their kids. Whatever assistance these families received as first-time homebuyers, their hearts were right and their hopes were high.
    Unfortunately for many, their kids brought their disadvantaged friends with them, the houses became overflowing with gangsta youth, parties, etc. Crime skyrocketed, the town had to impose a 9pm curfew and it was practically a war zone. Those houses are now worth less than their price in 1990, and the early residents are broke.
    If you don’t embrace the need for and benefits of assimilation, you cannot hope for the better life you seek. This is true for immigrants, both foreign and domestic.
    It’s not about the color of their skin; it’s about the cultural divide and the entitlement mentality. No race has the market cornered on this.

  69. #580545
    On December 31st, 2008 at 5:18 pm, dan708 said:

    You can take the boyz outta the hood, but you can’t take the hood outta the boyz. Those people are just making harder on themselves; if they can’t act with a modicum of civility, why should they expect a warmer welcome?

  70. #580554
    On December 31st, 2008 at 5:41 pm, sdillard said:

    I work for the welfare department of a large Bay Area county. A few years ago I was working in a program that was building low income housing. It was contracted by a non-profit and the housing was for “homeless” families. They spend months building the place, and then the families moved in.

    Within three months, the place was trashed. Electrical wires ripped out, light fixtures smashed, hallways covered with graffitti, elevator doors jammed, shopping carts left in the halls, etc.

    Within 90 days.

  71. #580555
    On December 31st, 2008 at 5:41 pm, dan_bujok said:

    Growing up in Antioch in the mid 80’s, I can say that the town used to be low to middle class (the rich ones lived in the city) and we stayed out of Pittsburg. I can remember that the people of the town may not have had the most money (some called us simple white trash), but we did have a LOT of pride in our little Delta town. Have not been back there in about 15 years, but it is sad to hear.

  72. #580562
    On December 31st, 2008 at 6:14 pm, TXRose said:

    You are so right, sdillard. I have a dear friend that works for HUD and one of
    her jobs is to inspect the living quarters of a lot of people in government housing. She can tell horror stories about what happens to these places. After
    Katrina, a lot of repossessed property wound up being used to hire Katrina
    refugees and they trashed every bit of it and then screamed that they were being housed in substandard living conditions. She said that she was called
    names she did not know existed when she tried to inspect the properties and
    had to have the law with her to get into half of them, even though they agreed to the inspections before moving in.

  73. #580563
    On December 31st, 2008 at 6:15 pm, TXRose said:

    Gotta preview…being used to house not hire. sheesh!

  74. #580585
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:13 pm, Thomas B. said:

    When I first saw the story I laughed out loud. Typical bourgeoisie white liberals. I live in the Seattle area and it’s the same way up here.

    Bainbridge Island, a rich ultra-liberal bastion, celebrates diversity day religiously and with fevor, but if you look at the statistics of the Island, it’s 95% white, and if you exclude the northern tip of the island that is reservation property, then it’s 98% white. That’s some diversity. I guess the uptight liberal white folk don’t like minorities messing up their neighborhoods.

    Another example of liberal hypocrisy is when their lily white kids will lose out due to affirmative action, then they talk about “the Post-Racial world” to rationalize why they should select the son or daughter of a rich white liberal over a disadvantaged minority for a scholarship or internship or job. Ha! Liberals are such idiots.

    I absolutely hate it when some white liberal kid starts talking about racism. Maybe he should look at himself first before pointing the finger.

  75. #580589
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:17 pm, FamilyMan said:

    OK OK I’ll say it.
    Everyone on this blog is a RACIST.

  76. #580591
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:19 pm, TXGator said:

    Indeed, racists one and all. I can’t believe I am reading this racist tripe! It’s not their fault, it’s not their fault, it’s not their fault.
    Something that happened four hundred years ago is to blame!

  77. #580592
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:20 pm, thefoundingfathers said:

    Conflicting Tales in D.C. Girl’s Death
    Mother Admitted Stabbing, Then Blamed Intruder, Officials Say
    By Keith L. Alexander
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Wednesday, December 31, 2008;

    The Congress Heights woman charged with killing her 7-year-old daughter last week told police that she stabbed the girl and set the family home on fire but later said that an unknown intruder had attacked them both, according to D.C. Superior Court records filed yesterday.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/30/AR2008123002386.html

    This woman was in the Section 8 program.

  78. #580596
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:23 pm, TXGator said:

    If the government weren’t so racist, this poor mother would not have had to stab her daughter! Because of the economic apartheid imposed on her by the racist capitalist system, she HAD to stab her child.

    Again, not her fault. We had a front row seat to witness the death of shame and responsibility.

  79. #580602
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:40 pm, RetFireman said:

    Boomer and Tora: Jesuit.

    As more and more renters began moving into this San Francisco Bay Area suburb a few years ago, neighbors started complaining about loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

    Ok, I changed the paragraph to read without any mention of race from either end.

    Read it, and then you tell me exactly who you thought of that was perpetrating these things. Tell me who it is that first went into your head when “loud music” and “Pitbulls”, “Drug dealing”, “Prostitution” and the rest was mentioned as becoming an issue in the neighborhood.

    Can you honestly claim that the first thing that popped into their heads was, “Damn…something needs to be done about all these white folks and their ‘trailer-trash’ ways,”?

    No. You didn’t. Yes, all the things mentioned in this article are all stereo-types. But where is it that stereotypes come from? Are they made-up out of the blue? No. All anyone need do is to go into the “bad” neighborhoods and what you will see is exactly what they mentioned in this article.

    Had this article stated, “Neighbors began complaining about the multiple cars in various states of working condition and cider-blocked parking, unkempt lawns and couches on the front lawn, along with the rise in Methamphetamine problems,” THEN what would you have thought? Would you have thought, “Boy, those blacks and Mexicans…”. No, you wouldn’t.

    But what are these people ultimately asking for these offenders to do? Why, they are asking them to “sell out”. They are telling them that if they want to live in their neighborhoods, then they have to give up their ethnicity, they must give over to the ways of “Whitey” and all his evilness. After all, that is what they say about anyone who does not speak in “Ebonics” (the term being invented in the Bay Area), who wears normal clothing tht fits properly, who wears a hat forward on their head, who has a regular car with regular stereo listened at regular levels, who does not advertise and endorse smoking marijuana like they were $1 a pack cigarrettes, who do not refer to women as “B*****s” and “Ho’s” and actually treats women with the respect they deserve, etc. They call them, “Sell-outs” and “Uncle Tom’s” (which, if you actually read “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” does not make sense) amongst other things.

    So don’t blame the people who are complaining about these issues. Blame those who promote them as a right, as a matter of ethnicity, as something to be emmulated and celebrated as a racial identity.

    And yes, those that do the above identification and celebrations are, most likely, the very ones complaining about it now that it is in their neighborhoods, but as long as people like “Scoop Doggy Poop” or whatever his name is, and the rest of the “Gangsta” Rap culture, Hip Hop culture and the rest are held up as heroes and people to be worshipped and idolized instead of Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, Will Smith and other regular people who have turned their backs on promoting the stereotypes that then get pissed off about, there will be no changes and the people who suffered and died during the 50’s and 60’s and all the decades before to bring about the racial changes and make MLK’s “dream” a reality have all suffered and died in vain.

  80. #580603
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:42 pm, starlightwoman said:

    I don’t like to hear this happen to any neighborhood, but it just seems so fitting for San Francisco. It’s almost enjoyable. After all, they brought it upon themselves.

  81. #580606
    On December 31st, 2008 at 7:46 pm, FamilyMan said:

    If we were really people with compassion, the welfare system would be dismantled so men would not feel emasculated and would be compelled to support their families. Women may also understand the need for chastity.

  82. #580616
    On December 31st, 2008 at 8:00 pm, Ken M. said:

    feebiebabe,

    Re your post #17 — Refreshing to hear about the still good parts of Oakland. And that is probably true of many other cities as well.

    But curious now: how is the Piedmont sect (of Oakland) these days?
    Many years since I was there.

    Very much enjoy reading / lurking the regular commentators here.

    Happy Holidays to All,

    –Ken

    email
    kmyting -at- cox -dot- net

  83. #580630
    On December 31st, 2008 at 8:27 pm, Aggie95 said:
  84. #580648
    On December 31st, 2008 at 9:23 pm, DanGrantTx said:

    Try living in Texas, where we have daily murders along the border thanks to Mexican drug cartels. The southern part of Texas (”the valley”) is now so dangerous that my employer will no longer send our colleagues to the area.

  85. #580672
    On December 31st, 2008 at 10:29 pm, Chief RZ said:

    The Truth. The enemy is evil. It must be confronted and eliminated. We must not excuse this evil.

  86. #580673
    On December 31st, 2008 at 10:35 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Aggie95: Great Link. Thanks for posting.

  87. #580702
    On January 1st, 2009 at 12:17 am, nlebou said:

    Women may also understand the need for chastity.

    Right, because men don’t understand the need for it.

  88. #580748
    On January 1st, 2009 at 2:24 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 12:17 am, nlebou said:

    Women may also understand the need for chastity.

    Right, because men don’t understand the need for it.

    A man-hater, eh?

  89. #580772
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:34 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On December 31st, 2008 at 9:23 pm, DanGrantTx said:

    Try living in Texas, where we have daily murders along the border thanks to Mexican drug cartels. The southern part of Texas (”the valley”) is now so dangerous that my employer will no longer send our colleagues to the area.

    We have just this problem here in Arizona. Complain about it and Juan Hernandez McCain and assorted air heads will call you a racist.Oh do I just LOVE being called a Racist by some pampered puss. My family is much more likely to be a victim of the Mexican Gangs than others. But I am just a sell out. Yes, all the cars at my house actually run.

  90. #580826
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am, Buy Danish said:

    These people are not “renters”, they are Section 8 housing welfare recipients. They contribute a pittance toward their rent but the government gives them a huge subsidy to cover the rest.

    A lot of speculators are buying up homes and renting them out as Section 8. It’s a great deal for the speculator as the government guarantees the “rent” and they even come in later and rehab the house for you after the deadbeat tenants have wrecked it.

    Section 8 is an unmitigated disaster for everyone but those who benefit from the taxpayer’s very generous largess.

  91. #580843
    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:29 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 2:24 am, Jet Jaguar said:
    On January 1st, 2009 at 12:17 am, nlebou said:

    Women may also understand the need for chastity.

    Right, because men don’t understand the need for it.

    A man-hater, eh?

    My opinion…You don’t have to be a man-hater to expect a man to take some responsibility for sex and not blame all the problems on the woman. To say that women should understand the need for chastity and not mention the role of the man in that scenario is sexist and one-sided. That is not man-hating, that is fairness.

  92. #580846
    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:51 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:29 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 2:24 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 12:17 am, nlebou said:

    Women may also understand the need for chastity.

    Right, because men don’t understand the need for it.

    A man-hater, eh?

    My opinion…You don’t have to be a man-hater to expect a man to take some responsibility for sex and not blame all the problems on the woman. To say that women should understand the need for chastity and not mention the role of the man in that scenario is sexist and one-sided. That is not man-hating, that is fairness.

    happy,
    I agree with you, but the same could be said if you had interchanged the genders in your statement, but this has nothing to do with nlebou’s statement.
    nlebou said, “men”. She (I presume) didn’t say “a man”. nlebou is the one not being fair. She makes a blanket statement against all men, that none of us men understand the need for chastity. I, at least, do understand it, therefore she is wrong.

  93. #580863
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:37 am, nlebou said:

    Happy, you are correct. That was exactly my point.

  94. #580866
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:42 am, nlebou said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 2:24 am, Jet Jaguar said:
    On January 1st, 2009 at 12:17 am, nlebou said:

    Women may also understand the need for chastity.

    Right, because men don’t understand the need for it.

    A man-hater, eh?

    Absolutely not. I Love men very much! :smile:

    I was merely trying to point out the fact that FamilyMan neglected to include men in his statement. Happy was correct in his assesment.

  95. #581070
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:39 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Happy was correct in his assesment.

    I guess there is a first time for everything! Happy New Year!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Diversity engineers at the Naval Academy

November 11, 2009 06:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Race-based discipline in Tucson schools

September 21, 2009 02:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

80 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Meet the FCC Diversity Czar

August 7, 2009 01:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 33 Trackbacks

Beer Summit: The final summary

July 31, 2009 11:40 AM by Doug Powers

73 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

“Daaa profilers!”

E-mails of the day

July 28, 2009 12:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

234 Comments | 18 Trackbacks

HORE.


Categories: Race relations



Mudville Gazette

» War costs money (2)

Green Room

» Going Un-Framed?

Mudville Gazette

» Surrender, he whispered
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook