First hate mail of 2009

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 1, 2009 12:04 PM

from Texx Smith texx@texxsmith.com
reply-to texx@texxsmith.com
to writemalkin@gmail.com
date Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 8:26 AM
subject I couldn’t not write you…

Someone told me about your blog today (michellemalkin.com). I find it hard to believe that someone other than a rich white dude or an old gullible white dude would write the crap that you are. What’s wrong with you?

It’s an old guy who told me about your site. He said ” There’s this stupid niXXXr biXXh going around saying we treat niXXers and women the way we used to, like niXXers and women!” He got a huge kick out of it! He thinks your man is making you serve him by writing this. He wonders aloud about the other things he may make you do. He also wonders aloud about the things he would make his “half-nigger half-chink whore” do.

Do you really think racism and sexism is ok? Look at you!

It’s like watching that skit that David Chappel did about the blind man in the KKK who didn’t realize he was black.

You know the audience you are pandering to wants to take away womens rights and non-whites right, just like it was “in the good old days” right? It’s called conservative, look up the definition, it means resistant to change or wanting to rollback change, like women being allowed to vote or wear pants. Do you really want things rolled back? Are you really a conservative? Do you really want to be “owned” by a white man?

You may actually be a” . . . a Philly-born, South Jersey-raised alumna of Holy Spirit HS and Oberlin College. . . . “ But to your audience you’re a stupid niXXer biXXh. Are you ok with that?

If not I can help you escape whomever is enslaving you. America is cool like that still. We’ve almost lost everything and slavery is making a comeback here, thanks to the people making you write this crap. But we can still easily rescue a slave on American soil. We have courts here, they can even punish your Masters.

Texx Smith
YIM: texxsmith
http://blog.texxsmith.com

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Other McCain: Still more safe predictions for 2009
  2. Anti-Israel Group Pickets Barack Obama Residence « Goodtimepolitics
  3. ButAsForMe! » First hate mail of 2009
  4. Expect to see more of this as the next four years drag on… | Political Byline
  5. Hate Mail from the Left - My personal experiance: « Riggword Weblog
  6. The Skepticrats » Don’t stop R.S. McCain, he’s on a roll . . .
  7. Happy New Year, You Brainwashed Slave! : The Sundries Shack
  8. Reviewing the 2008 Weblog Awards Finalists: “Best Conservative Blog” Category | The Skepticrats
  9. The Greenroom » Forum Archive » NYT: Political considerations, life experience only good if we like the results

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #581033
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm, rcool487 said:

    Wow, this is just so sad. Strong women can be conservatives! Maybe this guy ate the lead tinsel off of his Christmas Holiday tree.

  2. #581034
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:28 pm, Cans said:

    This guy is a joke:

    “ I AM the famous Texx Smith. I own a small web development company. I love to work with internet technologies, fishing for snook in my kayak or a friends boat. Business wise, I’m looking for the next big thing to throw myself into. ”

  3. #581035
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:30 pm, RetFireman said:

    That was absolutely AMAZING! It is totally impossible to even claim that was written as a poor attempt at humor. You cannot imagine in your darkest hour people like this.

    This person epitomizes everything that the Liberal fringe only talk about amongst themselves or wen they think no one is listening. And he did it so well.

    I was not aware that the Filipino people were a mix between blacks and Asians, but it is a new year and why waste any time in learning something new.

    WOW! I mean, just, WOW!

    And were this person to be standing right in front of me, spewing this hate filled, racist filth, I seriously doubt I would be able to do anything but stand there, mouth agape, wondering just how hard he hit his head when he was dropped as an infant by the same parents that gave him the fetal-alcohol syndrome.

    Seriously, I cannot say enough about this guy and his backwoods, hillbilly views on women, and ethnic minorities in general…and his personal belief that it is he and his good friend that are the tolerant, non-racist, non-bigoted ones.

    I have another definition for him to look up. Window-licker…as he most certainly fits that definition.

    Yeah…on further thought, people like him are best stomped into the pavement.

  4. #581037
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:32 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Very nice of Michelle to boost this gentleman’s web traffic for him. I wonder what his thank you e-mail will say. Now I’m considering the creation of my own blog and bellowing venomous bile at her in an e-mail to reap the rewards of fiscal conservatism while I can.

    Ahh, can’t do it. I actually like and respect her, since she acts in accordance with My People’s commands. I guess I’ll have to think of something else.

    A non-neocon uses the n-word in a hateful context? Will wonders never cease. So much for hoange — or chope, if you prefer.

    I guess he couldn’t make it to Times Square to witness the dropping of the balloons with the uplifting message of jope — or hoy, if you prefer — printed on them (Fox n Friends showed them this morning). Those O’s looked goshdarned familiar…

  5. #581039
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:35 pm, RetFireman said:

    If, indeed, that above person is this racist, backwoods, country bumpkin, (and I mean NO disrespect to anyone who is from the backwoods…take that statement in the exact manner it was meant) then THIS is how you can contact him and “ask him questions” and apparently quote him.

  6. #581040
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:36 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Disturbing.

    I just don’t get it.

  7. #581042
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:46 pm, palani said:

    I just visited the texxsmith.com website and I think both Michelle and “Texx” are being scammed. The hate email is so poorly written and conceived that it just doesn’t fit the web designer “Texx”. Perhaps the letter is from a misguided and disgruntled former client of the site owner who is simply trying to fill his mailbox with angry responses from Michelle’s noble defenders.

    That aside, the email does a good job of exposing the reactionary liberal-left mindset. It feeds the stereotypical disgruntled and ignorant minority lemming image.

  8. #581043
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:50 pm, WilliamRyan said:

    Well, looking through his Flash section, he talks about his new employer Results Driven Marketing They must be really proud

  9. #581044
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:52 pm, RetFireman said:

    That’s just it. that letter is written in such a way that it could not possibly be made up. That there is the inner workings of a very disturbed little mind.

    Man…and I can even hear the accent as I read it, too. Something like a cross between Boomhouwer and the guy who plays the gay, dog riding hairstylist on “American Dad”.

  10. #581045
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:56 pm, dkeppner said:

    Link troll, plain and simple.

    Please don’t feed the trolls.

  11. #581046
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:57 pm, right_on said:

    Obviously, America has been very good to Texx…I suspect, however, in reading his rantings, that he has numerous skeletons in his closets, the most obvious being self hatred.

    Truly, a liberal American striving to help America be great by eliminating stereotypes, encouraging hope for hope’s sake, changing minds through thoughtful discourse, and of course, all the while standing for personal responsibility in words, actions, and deeds. If not for federal assistance, he would have nothing for which to look forward.

  12. #581047
    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:58 pm, BuckeyeSam said:

    If not[,] I can help you escape whomever whoever is enslaving you. America is cool like that still. We’ve almost lost everything[,] and slavery is making a comeback here, thanks to the people making you write this crap. But we can still easily rescue a slave on American soil. We have courts here,[;] they can even punish your Masters.

    This moron had a particularly difficult time composing his last paragraph. It must be a symptom of Michelle Derangement Syndrome.

    Regardless of what this meathead writes, I say God bless Michelle. To paraphrase the words of Col. Nathan Jessup (Jack Nicholson’s character) in A Few Good Men:

    “We want you on that wall. We need you on that wall.”

  13. #581048
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:06 pm, marty0378 said:

    Has anyone else sent the link to his company email address?

  14. #581050
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:26 pm, dan708 said:

    Wow! It’s been said many times before, “Texx Smith”; better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt!

  15. #581053
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:42 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    Despite at least one commenter questioning the source of the email, it was really written by Texx Smith. See this page. If you then scan down to the bottom, you find the link to St Petersburg Web Design.

    I suspect that Texx Smith (on the right) makes a living off a few online sites and the letter to Michelle was to drum up business from liberals. The clues of that are his sites primarily contain nature related photographs yet here and here he interjected two obviously political pics. He also added the following text on his ‘War Veterans Memorial Park‘ page:

    It also has a couple monuments to the unlucky bastards who became pawns in our wars. Some wars were unavoidable Like WWI and WWII. There were other ware, like the current one where a great many of our soldiers lives and live of foreigners were sacrificed so that some rich and powerful people could become more rich and powerful. The cuurent war is a perfect example. But this isn’t the place for discussion about war.

    I bolded the words within that quote that may or may have once linked to a political discussion page.

    Michelle posting his letter and links isn’t his 15 minutes of fame, Texx Smith was fishing for business during a downturn in the economy.

    Like they say, always follow the money.

  16. #581054
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:42 pm, rocketman said:

    Tex Smith (if this is a real name) really needs to go in for some strong medical and social adjustment help–quick!
    ***
    Some people in this country have never learned good civic or Christian values. We can selectively dislike certain people for their actions and positions–but never for their basic skin color, racial background, country of origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, etc. God expects better of us.
    ***
    America should become a better place. Get some help quick, Tex.
    ***
    John Bibb

  17. #581055
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:45 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    Despite at least one commenter questioning the source of the email, it was really written by Texx Smith. See this page. If you then scan down to the bottom, you find the link to St Petersburg Web Design.

    I suspect that Texx Smith (on the right) makes a living off a few online sites and the letter to Michelle was to drum up business from liberals. The clues of that are his sites primarily contain nature related photographs yet he interjected two obviously political pics among those photos. He also added the following text on his ‘War Veterans Memorial Park‘ page:

    It also has a couple monuments to the unlucky bastards who became pawns in our wars. Some wars were unavoidable Like WWI and WWII. There were other ware, like the current one where a great many of our soldiers lives and live of foreigners were sacrificed so that some rich and powerful people could become more rich and powerful. The cuurent war is a perfect example. But this isn’t the place for discussion about war.

    I bolded the words within that quote that may or may have once linked to a political discussion page.

    Michelle posting his letter and links isn’t his 15 minutes of fame, Texx Smith was fishing for business during a downturn in the economy.

    Like they say, always follow the money.

  18. #581056
    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:47 pm, Fat Jolly Penguin said:

    That was almost entirely incomprehensible.

  19. #581058
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:12 pm, jwm said:

    Tempting as it was to check out this site, I caught myself in time. I think he just wants people to go to his site. he might even be writing nasty e-mails to liberal sites for the same reason.

  20. #581059
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:13 pm, Conservatives R Us said:

    Note to bloggers and the media–don’t even give them air time or write about it. They will always be there, we are too smart to even talk to them.

  21. #581062
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:20 pm, Buy Danish said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:46 pm, palani said:
    I just visited the texxsmith.com website and I think both Michelle and “Texx” are being scammed.

    You may be right. I did find it a bit odd that he went so out of his way to leave his name, business website info, etc.

  22. #581065
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm, w301549 said:

    No, it is him. He just answered my email with another wild diatribe.

  23. #581066
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm, ctmom said:

    I’m part of your audience and I don’t think you are a stupid niXXer biXXh Michelle.

    Happy New Year, good grief.

  24. #581068
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:32 pm, FireBlogger said:

    You know the audience you are pandering to wants to take away womens rights and non-whites right,

    O’le TexxSmith is a clueless hump aint he?

  25. #581072
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:41 pm, underjl said:

    I don’t see hate mail here; I see a pathetic little guy who may have viewed Michelle’s website and gotten slapped in the face with facts and solid logic that destroyed his simplistic world view. Why argue the facts if you know you’ll lose; just resort to slander. It worked for the Democrats during the election cycle, and since it doesn’t take any intelligence, it’s perfect for a guy who seems to have serious problems in that area.

    I can’t believe he actually posted a link to his blog. I took a look at it, and then I really wondered why. Overlooking his writing “style”, it appears to me that he has a bit of a problem with “Christian ‘conservatives’” because they want put some limitations on the Internet and movies in order to protect children from exposure to objectionable material. It’s a sad day indeed when parents want to protect children. And it’s just terrible when they expect others to refrain from making the job that much harder. Texx, if you happen to read this, it’s very simple. No one has absolute freedom of either word or action. And no one in his/her right mind would argue that there should be no limitation, although one look at your letter makes it obvious that you may not have a clue yet. What we do and say affect other people, especially children. No doubt you knew that, and that’s why you crafted this particular email. Most people, who don’t live in total isolation, make an attempt to limit what they do and say so as not to cause harm to others and consequently to society in general. Unfortunately, there really are some big, bad people out there who simply don’t care, and with the advent of television and the Internet, they have the ability to do a lot more damage.

    And, Texx, don’t worry about that slippery slope. It really doesn’t exist. Twenty years ago, you would have been very limited as to what you could say on television. The slippery slope concept dictates that television would be much more restrictive today. But it never happened. You can say all sorts of things today that would have gotten you banned from television before. You can even call a woman a female dog. You can call a man a son of a female dog. Interesting isn’t it that the slur still goes back to the woman. We’ve come a long way.

    It’s time to grow up, become a conservative and stop abusing women who dare to think independently. Actually, I just re-read this guy’s email. Forget about the becoming a conservative part and growing up. We don’t need morons as conservatives. I do, however, think we have a right to expect the female abuse to stop.

  26. #581077
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:03 pm, terristeelmagnolia said:

    Wow.. what a dumb arse

  27. #581080
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:10 pm, Thomas B. said:

    What an idiot!!! Does this guy get out the house any? Seriously, it scares me that there are people like this in the world.

    This guy needs to wake up and realize that liberals are more racist, sexist, hateful than any conservative. One only needs to look at the daily kos to realize that liberals are hatemongers and mentally unstable people. The only thing a conservative wants is freedom. Liberals want power to lord over the ignorant minions.

  28. #581081
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:10 pm, mholland1 said:

    Boy, that didn’t take long.

    Just waitin’ for the “good old days”.

  29. #581083
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:22 pm, Dianah111 said:

    When I read craziness like this I think I must be living in a parallel universe. Where have all these crazy people come from????

  30. #581084
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:23 pm, mojoe said:

    Damn, He’s on to us!

    Assume formation delta. Set your nasal implants to 103.7 mhz and for God’s sake don’t panic!

  31. #581086
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:27 pm, starlightwoman said:

    What I noticed was a complete lack of intelligence. Not only does he not know how to debate. He obviously does not know grammar. When reading the email and the insert from post #109 I find that both are full of errors.

    Noting of course that I am not the grammar queen, I would think that when one sends an email or letter that represents my blog and or company I would want it to look its best.

  32. #581087
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:27 pm, starlightwoman said:

    What I noticed was a complete lack of intelligence. Not only does he not know how to debate. He obviously does not know grammar. When reading the email and the insert from post #109 I find that both are full of errors.

    Noting of course that I am not the grammar queen, I would think that when one sends an email or letter that represents my blog and or company I would want it to look its best.

  33. #581088
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:30 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm, w301549 said:

    No, it is him. He just answered my email with another wild diatribe.

    That wasn’t a very wise thing to do. Now that he’s got YOUR email address, who knows what he’ll do with it.

    It’s best to simply let the dead-in-the-head simply be, because he’s an imbecile. You aren’t going to change that fact by telling him what’s wrong with his “point of view.” He is what he is, and he’s going to die that way. It does no one any good by giving him the time of day. Just let him be.

  34. #581089
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:31 pm, purealchemy said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm, w301549 said:
    No, it is him. He just answered my email with another wild diatribe

    Would you share that diatribe with us?

  35. #581091
    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:37 pm, purealchemy said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 6:30 pm, yohannbiimu said:
    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm, w301549 said:

    No, it is him. He just answered my email with another wild diatribe.
    That wasn’t a very wise thing to do. Now that he’s got YOUR email address, who knows what he’ll do with it.

    That’s probably right but I’m glad somebody did it.

  36. #581096
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:03 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    You can’t “win” a “debate” with this kind of person. First, they aren’t rational. Secondly, they don’t understand what a debate is. Thirdly, they always resort to personal insults when they have clearly lost and then just launch into insulting posts.

    Their lunatic behavior is just that – lunacy.

  37. #581097
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:05 pm, Hunter1262 said:

    Michelle, I don’t comment here often, but I follow your blog pretty much on a daily basis. Thanks for all you do, Happy New Year to you and your family. The good guys here outnumber the malcontents. Keep up the good fight.

  38. #581099
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:07 pm, Marc said:

    It is actually a little scary that there are people out there who are as insane and irrational as “Texx” whoever he may be. Before the ACLU made it impossible to put anyone in a mental facility, people like Texx would go there and maybe even get better. The ACLU did nobody any favors when they made it impossible for anybody, no matter how crazy or delusional, to be put in a facility where they could get the help that they so need. And Tex could use alot, alot of help.

  39. #581103
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:16 pm, feebiebabe said:

    What a wing-nut!

  40. #581106
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:23 pm, JohnnyAngel said:

    Texx Smith clearly speaks fluent retardese.

  41. #581107
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:23 pm, NC BLUE said:

    This guy must have had too much cough syrup with a glue chaser for New Year’s eve.
    Michelle—What you do is a god send and you spend many hours keeping us informed. Thank you for that and may 2009 be a Blessed year for you and your family.

  42. #581112
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:36 pm, Bruce said:

    I took another tack and emailed Results Driven Marketing. It bounced. Immediately.

    Something is not right here.

    Other than this clowns brain synapses, that is.

  43. #581114
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:38 pm, locomotivebreath1901 said:

    Krykee.

    Texx Smith – ‘race pimp bigot’ extraordinaire.

  44. #581116
    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:40 pm, w301549 said:

    I will try and paste a copy of our email conversation here:
    texx@texxsmith.com: Um try a dictionary, not an article about a pseudo-philosophy that’s edited by any wacko pseudo-conservative that wants to edit it. Did you even read it? It’s describing “Modern Conservatism” which is just some made up crap. It tries to say conservatives are against abortions (abortions were legal before they were illegal, thus being anti-choice is a liberal stance

    Dictionary.com:

    con⋅serv⋅a⋅tive

       /kənˈsɜrvətɪv/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv] Show IPA Pronunciation

    –adjective

    1.
    disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.

    Seriously, what is wrong with you? If you follow your own untrue definition, you are saying your own rights taken away from you and all people like you. You really want laws about many social ills, like slavery and segregation, rolled back?

    Did you even read the message? I didn’t generalize about you, I made a personal appeal to you. Maybe you should give up whatever the bad guys are giving you and re-join the humans.

    No matter how much name calling you do, you can’t change the bad that you are doing. I dare you to tell your Mom you are helping to further the agenda of people won’t want women to not have the same rights as men, like voting and driving (women voting is a very liberal idea). Tell her you think that the market should decide who gets medical care. Tell her you think that war is good. See what she says. I dare you.

    Texx

    From: clara
    Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 12:17 PM
    To: texx@texxsmith.com
    Cc: writemalkin@gmail.com
    Subject: Michelle Malkin

    Boy, talk about stereotyping!

    conservative:

    Cultural conservatism is a philosophy that supports preservation of the heritage of a nation or culture.

    Conservatism in the United States includes a variety of political ideologies including fiscal conservatism, supply-side economics, social conservatism,[30] libertarian conservatism, bioconservatism and religious conservatism,[31] as well as support for a strong military,[32]. Modern American conservatism was largely born out of alliance between classical liberals and social conservatives in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

    In the US, social conservatives emphasize traditional views of social units such as the family, church, or locale. Social conservatives would typically define family in terms of local histories and tastes. Social conservatism may entail restricting marriage to relationships between a man and a woman (thereby banning same-sex marriage) and laws placing restrictions on abortion. While many religious conservatives believe that government should have a role in promoting their values, libertarian conservatives such as Barry Goldwater advocated a hands-off government where social values were concerned.

    Sorry, your definition is not even close! But you meet the definition of racist bigot!

  45. #581121
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:00 pm, palani said:

    From Buy Danish, post #113

    On January 1st, 2009 at 3:46 pm, palani said:
    I just visited the texxsmith.com website and I think both Michelle and “Texx” are being scammed.

    You may be right. I did find it a bit odd that he went so out of his way to leave his name, business website info, etc.

    I suspect this is bogus because he left his business name and email. Most hate mailers don’t have the guts to withstand the bright light of day.

    Curiously, “Texx” has a blog. Here’s a rather interesting comment on it, without a response from “Texx” just yet.

    #2 Jae Says:
    January 1st, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    Hey, your post on Michelle Malkin’s blog made a lot of sense. And, in typical conservative fashion, she’s going to “flip” it. The problem is, she doesn’t have a leg to stand on. She is catering to an audience that sees her as inferior to themselves, kind of a pet. The whole dirty, day to day, up and down of real racial relations escapes her because of her context. There’s a small minority of African Americans (but don’t call them that to their faces) who hate the Afam community – Clarence Thomas, Shelby Steele, Walt Williams, Shelby Steele (maybe the alliterative names drive them nuts). She’s got a hatred for the black community and couches her “reasoned” arguments in that hate. She’s a nut case.

  46. #581126
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:08 pm, Helene said:

    This guy must not value his job. When his employers find out about the poorly-written, hate mail this guy put out, he may not have a job anymore.

    Jeepers.

  47. #581128
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:09 pm, palani said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:40 pm, w301549 said #136:

    Clara, it appears I am wrong if the email response you received is legit. “Texx” is an actual reactionary nut case, but he is pathetically funny in his ignorant rant!

  48. #581129
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:14 pm, Helene said:

    Maybe this is a new form of on-line dating. Send an ugly e-mail with links to your job site, your website, etc. Maybe someone will answer.

  49. #581132
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:32 pm, powerpro said:

    So…to clarify…he’s suggesting real goal of conservatism is to reinstate slavery and force women to wear skirts again.

    Uh…okay.

    Congrats Michelle on your first Hate Mail of the year!

  50. #581134
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:50 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    She is catering to an audience that sees her as inferior to themselves…

    Yeah, right. I’m pretty smart and I do all right with the things that interest me, but I am in awe of the intellect and capabilities of Michelle Malkin. She is not inferior to anyone I’ve ever known.

  51. #581135
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:55 pm, Republicanvet said:

    What a lunatic.

    An interesting collection of “clients” who likely would not want to be associated with such a racist, bigot:

    http://texxsmith.com/latest-web-site-design.htm

    leading to his “about me” page:

    http://texxsmith.com/aboutMe.htm

    where he says he is really James Smith, which seems to bear out since the domain lookup returns:

    Registrant:
    James Smith
    1126 21st Ave N #3
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33704
    United States

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
    Domain Name: TEXXSMITH.COM
    Created on: 24-Nov-04
    Expires on: 24-Nov-09
    Last Updated on: 23-Sep-08

    Administrative Contact:
    Smith, James texxsmith@yahoo.com
    1126 21st Ave N #3
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33704
    United States
    7277763162 Fax —

    Technical Contact:
    Smith, James texxsmith@yahoo.com
    1126 21st Ave N #3
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33704
    United States
    7277763162 Fax —

    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS40.ANYSERVERS.COM
    NS41.ANYSERVERS.COM

  52. #581136
    On January 1st, 2009 at 8:56 pm, Lamontyoubigdummy said:

    Hee hee… I left this on his “web design” site:

    Dear Douchebag,
    At first I marveled at the weapons-grade stupidity necessary to send a poorly written, grammatically challenged email to Michelle Malkin (a woman who buys ink by the barrel) that included the insults, “Nigger Bitch & Chink Whore”…and then leave a link back to your business website that (LMAO) has a link to “My Clients.” Then I realized you passed stupid and collected $200 dollars a while back. You are full on, fu@#ing retarded. Priceless. Everyone of your “Clients” will be sent your “Nigger Bitch/Chink Whore” email. If some poor prospective customer so much as Googles your site, guess what will pop up first? I hope this “web design” turd you have here isn’t your day job. If so, you’re gonna need a bailout by about Tuesday.

  53. #581137
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:00 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    “Texx” is a pseudonym of Al Franken. He must be bored filling in all those ballots by hand…

  54. #581140
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:06 pm, Tom Blogical said:

    Well, these moonbats got all the bases covered in the letter and the comment section of that blog. Michelle’s a mindless “racist slave” of her husband and her “superior” readers who view her as a “kind of pet”. And of course, the incorrect racial epithets and the word “whore” thrown in for good measure.

    They could at least get their racial insults right, couldn’t they? Talk about hitting bottom and digging.

  55. #581143
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:13 pm, rowsdower said:

    Texx: your views intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  56. #581144
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:16 pm, Tantor said:

    You’re making the right enemies, Michelle. If people like this admired you, then you would have cause to worry. And what a fine example of progressive politics is this hate-monger. He wouldn’t feel compelled to respond if you weren’t making a difference.

  57. #581151
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:42 pm, DesertLover said:

    Liberalism is an addiction … as such. just like alcoholism and drug abuse the first step to getting help is to admit that it is a problem …

    Since any such admission is not within the realm of possibility in a liberal’s fantasy world there are not many cases on record of successful treatment …

    Individuals like “texx” putting forth such uneducated prattle is confirmation that artificially induced intelligence is no match for natural stupidity …

    Once they become too open-minded their brains fall out … so don’t worry too much about what unhinged liberals think because they don’t do it very often …

  58. #581153
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:48 pm, vsatt said:

    The guy’s website says he’s the best in the area. Ha! I looked at his portfolio and all I can say is there must not be a lot of competition, or as he calls it “completion,” in the area. Maybe I should start going after website business in St. Pete’s.

  59. #581154
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:53 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    As Pancho Barnes (The Right Stuff) would say:

    What a pudknocker.

    CW4

  60. #581156
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:54 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Considering his threatening behaviour; Is anyone willing to stand tall to protect Freedom of Speech? Michelle, I stand as a defender of our rights…Let’s defend our fortress of sanity…hell of a New Years Resolution…Eh?

  61. #581158
    On January 1st, 2009 at 9:57 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    The rights to Life, liberty, and pursuit of Happiness shall NOT be infringed…We have your back, MM

  62. #581160
    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:05 pm, happy2behere said:

    Mean little minds make up this nonsnense for their own twisted fun. Like that writer Andrew something who blogged about Palin’s child being her daughter’s.

    It should at least be entertaining if you are going to write such things, Texx. Otherwise it’s just plain ol’ weird.

  63. #581166
    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:33 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    You all do know that all of these posts are exactly the kind of thing that rewards folks like this clown don’t you?

  64. #581170
    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:50 pm, BuckeyeSam said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:33 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:
    You all do know that all of these posts are exactly the kind of thing that rewards folks like this clown don’t you?

    Not when you e-mail one of the clients that he mentions in one of his recent blog posts and provides the client with a link to Michelle’s entry. I just received an e-mail from one such client, and he didn’t even mention Michelle’s entry. He seemed pretty angry that Mr. Texx Smith embellished the story about what his firm did for the client’s business.

    I am very confident that Mr. Texx Smith will be hearing from this client–for one reason or another–in the very near future.

  65. #581171
    On January 1st, 2009 at 10:53 pm, revGDright said:

    I checked out his flickr photos on his website. Sure hope he doesn’t kiss that baby with that mean mouth of his.

  66. #581174
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:08 pm, fighterDC said:

    I have contacted one of Texx Smith’s web design clients, National Immigration Law Group PLC to notify of the behavior of its vendor.

    Maybe we should “boycott” all associations that Mr. Smith has the way the Prop 8 group did to the churches and individuals who contributed.

  67. #581176
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:14 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    palani quoted a poster to Texx Smith’s blog:

    #2 Jae Says:
    January 1st, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    Hey, your post on Michelle Malkin’s blog made a lot of sense. And, in typical conservative fashion, she’s going to “flip” it. The problem is, she doesn’t have a leg to stand on. She is catering to an audience that sees her as inferior to themselves, kind of a pet. The whole dirty, day to day, up and down of real racial relations escapes her because of her context. There’s a small minority of African Americans (but don’t call them that to their faces) who hate the Afam community – Clarence Thomas, Shelby Steele, Walt Williams, Shelby Steele (maybe the alliterative names drive them nuts). [Nahhh, it's the repeating of names that drives me nuts. -- LNS] She’s got a hatred for the black community and couches her “reasoned” arguments in that hate. She’s a nut case.

    “Texx” and “Jae” and whoever the “old dude” is don’t really know principled people with conservative views like Michelle and myself, both racial minorities who reject racial quotas, poverty pimping, and guilt-tripping of white people who have not done us any harm. If they ever could have a discussion with people like Justice Thomas, Professors Steele and Williams, (and most of all, Ward Connerly), they would discover that we don’t “hate the Afam [sic] community” — we love it enough to want to force it to grow up 142 years after Emancipation, 44 years after the Civil Rights Act, and now that a half-black man has been elected President.

    This is something I wrote about in my excoriation of novelist Toni Morrison in my 1997 essay, “Toni Morrison: Nobel Prize Whiner.” I concluded thusly:

    You still think we can’t rise above our backgrounds (presuming, as the likes of you do, that we are all born poor and abused and have a defeatist attitude). You don’t think of your own people as having future potential, you think of us as having unremovable shackles perpetually preventing us from being seen as anything but homo sapiens’ also-rans. You can’t think in terms of equality that is earned — only that which is granted to the lowly by the high and mighty at the threat of violent revolution. You worship Clinton-types because they kowtow to curry your favor and get your vote, not because they view you as equals. You hate blacks like Ward Connerly, Clarence Thomas and Alan Keyes because they want to compete before the playing field is “leveled” the way that many Asian and European peoples who have ventured to America have; your type wants to be fed at the breast of white America, never satisfied that the time for weaning has arrived, yet wailing that it will never come.

    In short [Ms. Morrison], despite your fame, talent, wealth, and accomplishments, you are not an example of the solution. You are part of the problem.

    I just checked out Texx Smith’s Flickr page. It has some very nice photos of him in a Florida park with two young people who perhaps are his children — one boy, one girl — who are very obviously darker than the pasty white Mr. Smith. One wonders what he would say to someone who called his lovely daughter (or whoever she is) a “half-nigger whore” to his (or her) face, and how he would reconcile his likely reaction to such an insult with his agreement with the “old dude” who called Michelle a “niXXer biXXh.”

    Liberals like Texx and Jae typically bristle when people suggest they are not patriotic because they are always criticizing their own country, but when when someone like myself is critical of the dominant culture and defeatist attitudes in my own “community” that drags it down like an anchor, I am tarred as “Uncle Tom”, “self-hating” or “sellout.” That says more about them than it says about me, because they think I should accept what George W. Bush aptly called “the soft bigotry of low expectations.”

    It is they that see blacks and other minorities as inferior, as “pets” treated differently than white people. IMHO, that’s why Jae cited Dave Chappelle as a reference point — she doesn’t see him as this black man sees him: As a well-compensated minstrel act like the first black millionaire in American show business: Stepin Fetchit.

  68. #581182
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:25 pm, Jean said:

    Wow.

    Reading this and currently reading Michelle’s ‘Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild’ <— Amazing Book… One of the best Ive read… Ive come to the conclusion that liberals are nuts. Members of family is left leaning and I tell you that Im harrassed and singled out. I get harassed at work… pretty much everywhere except The Fire Station, which thankfully are full of Conservatives :) .

    I cant believe how far politics goes to where your having difficulty in school, work and with family members.

    Its amazing that even though liberals won the election… they wont stop attacking Republicans and Conservatives What will it take for them to cease their attack on The Right… will we have to be removed from The US… or even the world for them to stop?

    Well one things for sure. Me and My Carbine aint going anywhere.

    And as in the words of a visionary… “From My Cold Dead Hands”

    - Charlton Heston

  69. #581183
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:26 pm, Paul Revere said:

    They have to lie to themselves over and over about who conservatives are.

  70. #581186
    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:37 pm, Jean said:

    Yeah Im called racist all the time, because I believe in opposing illegal immigration and having all immigrants learn English. Gee what a evil man am I.

    I was even called a nazi… even though Im married to a jewish woman lol.

  71. #581188
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 12:06 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    Hey, Texx, where’s the love? Oh, I forgot, you’re a lib..

  72. #581189
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 12:13 am, happy2behere said:

    You shouldn’t go to his site though, you might catch something.

  73. #581190
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 12:15 am, travlinman said:

    Texx Smith = Moron. Which is demeaning as hell to morons.

    Nuff said.

  74. #581193
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 12:24 am, yohannbiimu said:

    Its amazing that even though liberals won the election… they wont stop attacking Republicans and Conservatives What will it take for them to cease their attack on The Right… will we have to be removed from The US… or even the world for them to stop?

    As long as you and I are breathing, they won’t stop. And even should liberals finally take care of THAT PROBLEM, they’ll find others to attack and destroy. That is the nature of those who are controlled by hate.

  75. #581200
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 1:20 am, yohannbiimu said:

    Smith’s use of defining “conservative:”

    1.
    disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.

    Seriously, what is wrong with you? If you follow your own untrue definition, you are saying your own rights taken away from you and all people like you. You really want laws about many social ills, like slavery and segregation, rolled back?”

    WOW, how this idiot jumps to such conclusions is utterly amazing. It boggles the imagination that he can read that single dictionary definition, and come to THAT conclusion.

    He keeps insisting that slavery and segregation are things that conservatives want “rolled back,” when it was conservatism that DEFEATED those institutions. If it had not been for the Republican party in the 50’s and 60’s and their insistence these institutions could not coexist within a land that was supposedly founded upon the ideals of FREEDOM AND LIBERTY, then the United States would have disintegrated a century ago.

    As liberalism has been on the march since FDR (really, it started during Woodrow Wilson’s administration), Americans have more and more been made to act in accordance to the state’s dictates, so you can say that slavery was re-instituted by them. What aspect of our lives are not controlled and managed by the Federal government? How many people cast their vote in accordance to what they think will be done “for” them? Is this not exactly what a slave mentality makes such people to behave like, rather than making important adult decisions for THEMSELVES?

    Liberalism creates slave, almost child-like enclaves within society which are incapable of advancing. They are constantly in need, regardless of how much is doled out to them. When a conservative suggests that public education is creating indoctrinated morons, and that vouchers would allow parents to send their children to REAL schools (which most African-Americans actually want), liberals fight such proposals in order to insure that large segments of the population are kept stupid.

    The sort of preservation of “existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change” that this Smith person is talking about is precisely the liberalism that was wrought by the “New Deal” and “Great Society” which needs changing, but liberals cling to with religious fervor. As the slavery they impose upon us continues to drag America down and makes life worse, they insist that conservatism is the real problem, and that liberals haven’t been allowed to do enough.

    Everything in the liberal world is bass-ackward. They enslave, while declaring that liberty and freedom are evil. They uphold degradation and perversion, and attack the institutions of marriage and family as being degrading and perverse. They celebrate crime and misogyny, while attacking conservatives as wanting to go back to a time before women’s suffrage.

    Really, it is a form of insanity, because nothing with regard to liberalism makes any rational sense. It is all convoluted idiocy. There is nothing within its history that shows it improves anyone’s lot in life, but rather the data shows inconclusively that everything that is destroying America is caused by anti-Constitutional policies proposed and enacted by liberals (from both parties).

    There is one problem that is the cause of ALL of our current ills, and it is LIBERALISM. It stifles and punishes achievement and productivity, while rewarding mediocrity and waste. It destroys initiative and creativity, while encouraging poverty and cultural degradation. It takes any power that can be welded by the citizenry and bestows ALL of it to a small feudal class in Washington, DC.

    Really, modern liberalism is simply new-fangled feudalism. How’s THAT for Texx Smith’s definition of “conservative?”

  76. #581202
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 1:26 am, Elm Creek Smith said:

    I would like to make it very clear that Texx is no relation of mine. Smith ain’t the name I was born with. It is an alias I use for SASS.

    If he were a relation, I’d horsewhip him. Men don’t abuse womenfolk.

    ECS

  77. #581216
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 2:20 am, BipolarNation dot Com said:

    Putting that much racism in an email and then calling you a racist makes me wonder…are these people even for real? Like, they’re joking, right?

  78. #581242
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 4:46 am, psionickender said:

    Wow, I love when people pretend to know definitions of political words like fascist and conservative. While conservative can mean resistant to change, conservative in the American political sense also means in favor of a small central government.

    What an ignorant person!

  79. #581295
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 7:30 am, misterbee241 said:

    Well… I am… disturbed and troubled… because this is disturbing and troubling. Here we have a racist, sexist liberal denouncing racism and sexism. I’ve believed liberals have no sense of humor, it’s pretty plain they have no sense of irony either.

  80. #581298
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 7:35 am, misterbee241 said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 4:42 pm, rocketman said:
    Tex Smith (if this is a real name) really needs to go in for some strong medical and social adjustment help–quick!

    He also needs English Grammar And Composition for Dummies too.

  81. #581300
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 7:41 am, misterbee241 said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 5:41 pm, underjl said:
    I don’t see hate mail here; I see a pathetic little guy who may have viewed Michelle’s website and gotten slapped in the face with facts and solid logic that destroyed his simplistic world view. Why argue the facts if you know you’ll lose; just resort to slander. It worked for the Democrats during the election cycle, and since it doesn’t take any intelligence, it’s perfect for a guy who seems to have serious problems in that area.

    In my experience when debating, when your opponent resorts to slurs and personal name calling, you can consider the debate over and you have won. Your opponent is out of ammunition and is verbally bankrupt, so he resorts to personal attacks.

  82. #581341
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 9:21 am, GraniteMan said:

    As an old white guy I am outraqed at this stero typing of old white guys! I’m calling my local chapter of AARP and bring a harrassment suit against this race baiter. Doesn’t he know his leader has decreed peace and love to people of all races, creeds, national origins, sexual orientations and old white guys?

  83. #581349
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 9:26 am, BKennedy said:

    What I find most amusing is that he “x”s out the expletives in two places but forgets to do so in the middle.

    My three word response to this clown would be:

    Robert Byrd (D-WV).

  84. #581360
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 9:46 am, Savage24 said:

    The scary part is, that they walk among us and they vote too.

  85. #581379
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 10:14 am, drivingjack said:

    If someone had written that about Obama they would be slapped with a hate crime. Now that it’s in public domain why haven’t the P.C. Thought Police strung this Putz up by his pencil-neck?

  86. #581391
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 10:36 am, GaryG said:

    Texx = jealous.

    Signs his name TeXX, ha ha! what a small mind and intelligence to boot.

  87. #581398
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 10:43 am, joeyb1955 said:

    I’m still looking for my decoder ring so I can figure out what this guy is actually saying.

  88. #581413
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 11:04 am, w301549 said:

    Well, I received another email from James N. Smith today. This is real weird:

    texx@texxsmith.com :

    http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=24404&title=frontline-clayton-bigsby,-pt-2

    Remember the message was in response to one of her readers, and it was one of ya’ll that said these things. I just let her know.

  89. #581541
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 1:08 pm, BuckeyeSam said:

    Last night, Mr. Texx Smith had a recent entry on his blog lauding his firm’s efforts on behalf of a client. Mysteriously, that entry is no longer present.

    Hmmmm. Wagon fixed?

  90. #581553
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 1:24 pm, feebiebabe said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 11:14 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    Wow, thanks for posting.

  91. #581599
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 2:15 pm, MajorKen said:

    Sick stuff from Mr. Texx and I suspect the writer is for real whether or not he or she is really Mr. Texx…

    No doubt an angry liberal!

  92. #581603
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 2:19 pm, frostrt said:

    A politically-conscious, clear on her own opinion woman . . . who thinks we should go back to the days when women couldn’t vote? Uh, right. A woman of Phillipine descent who advocates racism? Right. A strong woman who thinks what her husband wants her to think and writes what he wants her to write? Sure.

    MM, your New Years resolution should be to continue to provoke know-nothings like this letter writer. You’re still catching flack; stay on that target!

    :)

  93. #581696
    On January 2nd, 2009 at 4:56 pm, Patrick Britton said:

    The average liberal cannot stand Michelle and it’s clear why. She’s beautiful, articulate, a patriot and worse of all she is a conservative. They can’t wrap their minds around it.

    What they don’t understand is how anyone could think for themselves. “She’s not a rich white guy that owns an oil company so I don’t understand how she isn’t one of us!” Stereotypes, of course, do nothing but make these people look like asinine fools.

    The angrier you make them Michelle, the better you are doing your job. Keep up the good work.

  94. #582540
    On January 4th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, Politicalguano said:

    Dear Michelle:
    First a belated Merry Christmas & Happy New Year. I hope this email finds you and your family well.
    The letter form the messed up Tex is typical for a wife-beating coward liberal – like Sean Penn! Maybe Sean was afraid to use his real name? LOL!
    What I have seen over the last 20 years is that the liberal crowd: is neither truly compassionate nor merciful – they boast how they never forgive those who stray from their Stalinist path; they are filled with darkness – angry, atheistic, azzholes in general; they are generous with other people’s $$$ and take credit for the generosity; they are phony and cowardly. I don’t like any of them and don’t want them as neighbors. They don’t seem to mind a bit endangering the lives of other people- like Jack-hole Murtha and the media types that print the addresses and photos of conservatives along with outrageous and inflammatory lies. They seem to like the idea of releasing dangerous criminals from prison, taking guns away from honest citizens, and making the police ineffective. They act as if conservatives have no right to privacy, religion, political freedom, freedom of speech. It is fair to say that I think liberal are enemies of democracy and a threat to the lives and liberties of free people everywhere. Hypocrisy is their life blood – as in Tex/Sean using racist language to label you a racist and, or in the resistance to improving public education for children by allowing freedom to choose good schools while sending their own children to elite schools.
    I suspect that Sodom and Gomorrah were very PROGRESSIVE cities, filled with angry liberals, teaching their children hatred while telling them how wonderful they all were.
    Nothing can make a liberal happy except the death or suffering of their chosen foes – look at Pelosi. She is worth over $100 million and spends her time in the House to do what? Certainly not to practice charity and forgiveness.
    Thank God for wonderful and obviously happy people such as yourself who also have real courage to oppose the liberal hate machine.

  95. #582629
    On January 4th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Peet said:

    On January 1st, 2009 at 7:36 pm, Bruce said:

    I took another tack and emailed Results Driven Marketing. It bounced. Immediately.

    Something is not right here.

    Other than this clowns brain synapses, that is.

    RDMI whois (edited for brevity):

    Domain Name: RDMI.NET

    Administrative Contact:
    Miller, Rainy rmiller@izondesign.com
    3734 131st Ave N
    Ste. # 6
    Clearwater, FL 33762
    US
    727-230-1846

    Technical Contact:
    of DomainNames, Administrator rmiller@izondesigns.com
    PO Box 340953
    Tama, FL 33694
    US
    727.230.1846

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The more offensive Newsweek photo of Sarah Palin

November 17, 2009 06:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Friday open thread

November 6, 2009 04:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 1 Trackback

What’s on your teacher’s reading list?

November 2, 2009 05:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Happy Halloween open thread

October 31, 2009 09:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

October 24, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Nobel Peace Prize winner now increases tension in Louisiana

October 15, 2009 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Divider.

Big Nanny Alert: The War on Hamburgers

October 13, 2009 02:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

139 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Food police.


Categories: Uncategorized



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook