<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nancy Pelosi: Back to the good old days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; The First Plank in a New Contract with America</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-623168</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; The First Plank in a New Contract with America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-623168</guid>
		<description>[...] power, making it difficult for the minority to contribute. At the start of the current Congress, Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s Democrats rewrote House Rules, reversing Republican reforms and returning to old runs which made it all but impossible for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] power, making it difficult for the minority to contribute. At the start of the current Congress, Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s Democrats rewrote House Rules, reversing Republican reforms and returning to old runs which made it all but impossible for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarTip</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-584927</link>
		<dc:creator>WarTip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-584927</guid>
		<description>Constitution? We don&#039;t need no stinking constitution! 

The politics of division partying at the expense of we the people. 

Politics as usual with a liberal twist eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constitution? We don&#8217;t need no stinking constitution! </p>
<p>The politics of division partying at the expense of we the people. </p>
<p>Politics as usual with a liberal twist eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Are The &#8220;Great Dividers&#8221; Now Ms. Pelosi? &#171; OutOfTheBlu</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-584924</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Are The &#8220;Great Dividers&#8221; Now Ms. Pelosi? &#171; OutOfTheBlu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-584924</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Great Dividers&#8221; Now Ms.&#160;Pelosi?  6 01 2009   From Human Events: After decades of Democrat control of the House of Representatives, gross abuses to the legislative process and several high-profile scandals contributed to an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Great Dividers&#8221; Now Ms.&nbsp;Pelosi?  6 01 2009   From Human Events: After decades of Democrat control of the House of Representatives, gross abuses to the legislative process and several high-profile scandals contributed to an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Anyone Actually Believe that the Dems would be Fair? &#124; Pirates! Man Your Women!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583976</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Anyone Actually Believe that the Dems would be Fair? &#124; Pirates! Man Your Women!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583976</guid>
		<description>[...] on Michelle Malkin.          (No Ratings Yet)  &#160;Loading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Michelle Malkin.          (No Ratings Yet)  &nbsp;Loading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s About Making Babies! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Prediction: President Pelosi.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583955</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s About Making Babies! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Prediction: President Pelosi.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583955</guid>
		<description>[...] could see Joe Biden fumble, but we could actually see President Pelosi sworn in before 2010. 2010 is important - because without whipping-boy President Bush, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could see Joe Biden fumble, but we could actually see President Pelosi sworn in before 2010. 2010 is important &#8211; because without whipping-boy President Bush, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583896</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583896</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 5th, 2009 at 10:05 pm, Wellsy said:

This is nothing less than a power grab by Pelosi. It’s going beyond “to the victor go the spoils” and it ought to strike anyone as dangerous that a party with already comfortable majorities would seek to further undermine or destroy any potential minority influence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Makes the Republicans power sharing agreement in the Senate recently look pretty d@mn stupid doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 5th, 2009 at 10:05 pm, Wellsy said:</p>
<p>This is nothing less than a power grab by Pelosi. It’s going beyond “to the victor go the spoils” and it ought to strike anyone as dangerous that a party with already comfortable majorities would seek to further undermine or destroy any potential minority influence.</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes the Republicans power sharing agreement in the Senate recently look pretty d@mn stupid doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583894</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583894</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 5th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, MTNEER said:

Speaker Pelosi is not reinventing the wheel. She is merely returning to the good old days of Democrat domination of the House of Representatives. Can any of us who have been around for a while recall any meaningful debate in the House prior to the Republican take over in ‘94?
Like her predecessor Tip O’Neil, Pelosi does not intend to allow the Republicans any platform to affect public policy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I certainly remember it, and remember a story about a surrendercrat Congresscreature from Texas that ordered a Republican out of a committee meeting, even though the Republican was a member of the committee.

The House is turning into a Good Idea Club.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 5th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, MTNEER said:</p>
<p>Speaker Pelosi is not reinventing the wheel. She is merely returning to the good old days of Democrat domination of the House of Representatives. Can any of us who have been around for a while recall any meaningful debate in the House prior to the Republican take over in ‘94?<br />
Like her predecessor Tip O’Neil, Pelosi does not intend to allow the Republicans any platform to affect public policy.</p></blockquote>
<p>I certainly remember it, and remember a story about a surrendercrat Congresscreature from Texas that ordered a Republican out of a committee meeting, even though the Republican was a member of the committee.</p>
<p>The House is turning into a Good Idea Club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583893</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583893</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 5th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, Storm Chaser said:

If Republicans were frozen out, what would happen if they switched en mass to the Democratic party?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh...not many would notice?

Do I win?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 5th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, Storm Chaser said:</p>
<p>If Republicans were frozen out, what would happen if they switched en mass to the Democratic party?</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh&#8230;not many would notice?</p>
<p>Do I win?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583891</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583891</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 5th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, bayou22 said:

How in the hell is this even possible? Aren’t there rules on process that are supposed to guarantee that the processes are fair and considerate of all representatives? This stinks of a Constitutional challenge, procedural at best!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You certainly do not remember the House pre-1994, or the days of Tip Oneil.

Back then Republicans were not even allowed in committee meetings, and if they were, they were not allowed to even speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 5th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, bayou22 said:</p>
<p>How in the hell is this even possible? Aren’t there rules on process that are supposed to guarantee that the processes are fair and considerate of all representatives? This stinks of a Constitutional challenge, procedural at best!</p></blockquote>
<p>You certainly do not remember the House pre-1994, or the days of Tip Oneil.</p>
<p>Back then Republicans were not even allowed in committee meetings, and if they were, they were not allowed to even speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldbuckaroo</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583890</link>
		<dc:creator>oldbuckaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583890</guid>
		<description>&quot;Vee haf vays to silence anyvone who dares to challench our authority, and vill stifle dos who do not goose-step in unison to our party agenda.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vee haf vays to silence anyvone who dares to challench our authority, and vill stifle dos who do not goose-step in unison to our party agenda.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583889</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583889</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 5th, 2009 at 1:45 pm, RedDog said:

Party on. This lil’ chippie will soon find out what scorched earth political warfare really is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh....sorry RD, from who? Nobody in the GOP has the bag to conduct a wedgie let alone warfare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 5th, 2009 at 1:45 pm, RedDog said:</p>
<p>Party on. This lil’ chippie will soon find out what scorched earth political warfare really is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh&#8230;.sorry RD, from who? Nobody in the GOP has the bag to conduct a wedgie let alone warfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583885</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583885</guid>
		<description>Gee, THANKS RNC! Here&#039;s hoping you run some more RINO&#039;s in the next election!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, THANKS RNC! Here&#8217;s hoping you run some more RINO&#8217;s in the next election!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaterBoyz</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583866</link>
		<dc:creator>WaterBoyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583866</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 5th, 2009 at 8:06 pm, karenhasfreedom said:

I think the only pair of balls we had in Congress left when Newt Gingrich left the House. What is wrong with these people?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That&#039;s easy.
Remember all of those events where a GOP said some off the cuff remark or had a waaaaaay out there contact that was not appropriate and all of the D&#039;s screamed&lt;strong&gt; in unison&lt;/strong&gt; (something the GOP never does) that he should step down?  And the Bush admin forced them all to exit stage left without a fight?
That is what is wrong.
Taking the high road will only make your nose bleed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 5th, 2009 at 8:06 pm, karenhasfreedom said:</p>
<p>I think the only pair of balls we had in Congress left when Newt Gingrich left the House. What is wrong with these people?
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s easy.<br />
Remember all of those events where a GOP said some off the cuff remark or had a waaaaaay out there contact that was not appropriate and all of the D&#8217;s screamed<strong> in unison</strong> (something the GOP never does) that he should step down?  And the Bush admin forced them all to exit stage left without a fight?<br />
That is what is wrong.<br />
Taking the high road will only make your nose bleed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellsy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583850</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583850</guid>
		<description>This is nothing less than a &lt;a href=&quot;http://wellsy.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pelosi-to-rewrite-house-rules-in-power-grab/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;power grab by Pelosi.&lt;/a&gt; It&#039;s going beyond &quot;to the victor go the spoils&quot; and it ought to strike anyone as dangerous that a party with already comfortable majorities would seek to further undermine or destroy any potential minority influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing less than a <a href="http://wellsy.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pelosi-to-rewrite-house-rules-in-power-grab/" rel="nofollow">power grab by Pelosi.</a> It&#8217;s going beyond &#8220;to the victor go the spoils&#8221; and it ought to strike anyone as dangerous that a party with already comfortable majorities would seek to further undermine or destroy any potential minority influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelosi to rewrite House rules in power grab &#171; Wellsy&#8217;s World</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/05/nancy-pelosi-back-to-the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-583849</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelosi to rewrite House rules in power grab &#171; Wellsy&#8217;s World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20947#comment-583849</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin sarcastically calls this &#8220;a return to the good old days.&#8221; What it truly is can be termed a power grab. There is some truth to the term in politics that to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin sarcastically calls this &#8220;a return to the good old days.&#8221; What it truly is can be termed a power grab. There is some truth to the term in politics that to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
