<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caroline Kennedy sinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Yorkers Going Sour on Sweet Caroline? &#124; Christopher Howell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-2/#comment-674137</link>
		<dc:creator>New Yorkers Going Sour on Sweet Caroline? &#124; Christopher Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-674137</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin was much more concise, &#8220;Message from voters,&#8221; she wrote, &#8220;No, Miss Thang, you are not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin was much more concise, &#8220;Message from voters,&#8221; she wrote, &#8220;No, Miss Thang, you are not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One down, two to go; Caroline Kennedy, Eric Holder and Timothy Geithner &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-599110</link>
		<dc:creator>One down, two to go; Caroline Kennedy, Eric Holder and Timothy Geithner &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-599110</guid>
		<description>[...] Senate Seat, so it seems that the Democrats aren&#8217;t simply taking what they want. According to a previous article on her personal blog, Malkin reported that public opinion was go against the appointment of JFK&#8217;s daughter. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senate Seat, so it seems that the Democrats aren&#8217;t simply taking what they want. According to a previous article on her personal blog, Malkin reported that public opinion was go against the appointment of JFK&#8217;s daughter. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catching Up: Tuesday Round Up &#171; Jane Q. Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-585071</link>
		<dc:creator>Catching Up: Tuesday Round Up &#171; Jane Q. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-585071</guid>
		<description>[...] Kennedy is not a shoo-in, proving once again that those who believe themselves inevitable inevitably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kennedy is not a shoo-in, proving once again that those who believe themselves inevitable inevitably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBNinKY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-585042</link>
		<dc:creator>DBNinKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-585042</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If that is not the criteria for voting for a LT. Governor than what is?&lt;/blockquote&gt;I agree you, FM, that&#039;s how it should be but isn&#039;t, as we all well know. My comment was mainly in support of the poster with whom Chap took issue, by seeming to insinuate that Patterson (although not specifically named) was &lt;em&gt;elected&lt;/em&gt; under his own merit - I highly doubt it.
&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 6th, 2009 at 11:03 am, chapoutier said:

   &lt;blockquote&gt; The UN-ELECTED Gov of New York, appoints the UN-ELECTED SENATOR for New York… Makes sense to me!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh…the Lietenant Governor is elected for the express purpose of stepping in if the current governor can no longer serve.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Like most states&#039; citizens, I&#039;d say a majority of NY&#039;ers didn&#039;t even know who their Lt gov was let alone his stance on the issues facing NY, until Spitzer&#039;s peccadilloes become public knowledge. Patterson is the beneficiary of being second on Spitzer&#039;s ticket, not because he best represents the ideals or values of a majority of NY voters.

Sorry for the confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If that is not the criteria for voting for a LT. Governor than what is?</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree you, FM, that&#8217;s how it should be but isn&#8217;t, as we all well know. My comment was mainly in support of the poster with whom Chap took issue, by seeming to insinuate that Patterson (although not specifically named) was <em>elected</em> under his own merit &#8211; I highly doubt it.</p>
<blockquote><p> On January 6th, 2009 at 11:03 am, chapoutier said:</p>
<blockquote><p> The UN-ELECTED Gov of New York, appoints the UN-ELECTED SENATOR for New York… Makes sense to me!!!</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh…the Lietenant Governor is elected for the express purpose of stepping in if the current governor can no longer serve.</p></blockquote>
<p>Like most states&#8217; citizens, I&#8217;d say a majority of NY&#8217;ers didn&#8217;t even know who their Lt gov was let alone his stance on the issues facing NY, until Spitzer&#8217;s peccadilloes become public knowledge. Patterson is the beneficiary of being second on Spitzer&#8217;s ticket, not because he best represents the ideals or values of a majority of NY voters.</p>
<p>Sorry for the confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Kennedy, Al Franken, Jeb Bush and the Difference Between Democrats and Republicans &#171; Teh Resistance Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584987</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Kennedy, Al Franken, Jeb Bush and the Difference Between Democrats and Republicans &#171; Teh Resistance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584987</guid>
		<description>[...] and contrast, if you will, to Caroline Kennedy, a woman of no particular accomplishment, but merely a member of the lucky sperm club. While Jeb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and contrast, if you will, to Caroline Kennedy, a woman of no particular accomplishment, but merely a member of the lucky sperm club. While Jeb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twofoot</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584810</link>
		<dc:creator>twofoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584810</guid>
		<description>Hey as long as we&#039;re dreaming of term limits, I&#039;d settle for a constitutional amendment that would put in place a five year sunset clause on every single law passed by congress with the exception of tax cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey as long as we&#8217;re dreaming of term limits, I&#8217;d settle for a constitutional amendment that would put in place a five year sunset clause on every single law passed by congress with the exception of tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rworks</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584639</link>
		<dc:creator>rworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584639</guid>
		<description>ThackerAgency,

&quot;They should give it to someone without a trust fund. I wouldn’t care, but they get a great pension for serving even one day in the senate. They get it for life. I would hope that there would be a more needy and qualified individual than Kennedy for this spot.&quot;


You are mistaken.  Members of Congress are subject to the same retirement system as other Federal employees.  You might want to do some research before commenting next time.

http://www.opm.gov/retire/pre/fers/computation.asp

Basically, a Congresscritter must serve 5 years before getting any benefits under the FERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ThackerAgency,</p>
<p>&#8220;They should give it to someone without a trust fund. I wouldn’t care, but they get a great pension for serving even one day in the senate. They get it for life. I would hope that there would be a more needy and qualified individual than Kennedy for this spot.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are mistaken.  Members of Congress are subject to the same retirement system as other Federal employees.  You might want to do some research before commenting next time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opm.gov/retire/pre/fers/computation.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.opm.gov/retire/pre/fers/computation.asp</a></p>
<p>Basically, a Congresscritter must serve 5 years before getting any benefits under the FERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584544</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584544</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Caroline Kennedy sinks&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No - they all float to the surface at some point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Caroline Kennedy sinks</p></blockquote>
<p>No &#8211; they all float to the surface at some point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooMuchTime</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584513</link>
		<dc:creator>TooMuchTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584513</guid>
		<description>Rocketman, #75.

Good idea. Personally, I think the best way is to have the same term limits for federal, state, and local offices. You get 12 consecutive years. Once the clock starts it doesn&#039;t stop. Period.

As an addendum, once you accept elective office, you can never hold any job that is paid from the public treasury. If you leave early, the limits still apply. Once you are elected, there&#039;s no way out. That&#039;s your choice for being elected.

This way, when the socialists want to increase taxes or add some burdensome regulation, the out-going socialists won&#039;t support them. They still have to find jobs in the private sector since they can&#039;t feed from the public trough to pay their bills.

You can&#039;t be a lobbyist either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rocketman, #75.</p>
<p>Good idea. Personally, I think the best way is to have the same term limits for federal, state, and local offices. You get 12 consecutive years. Once the clock starts it doesn&#8217;t stop. Period.</p>
<p>As an addendum, once you accept elective office, you can never hold any job that is paid from the public treasury. If you leave early, the limits still apply. Once you are elected, there&#8217;s no way out. That&#8217;s your choice for being elected.</p>
<p>This way, when the socialists want to increase taxes or add some burdensome regulation, the out-going socialists won&#8217;t support them. They still have to find jobs in the private sector since they can&#8217;t feed from the public trough to pay their bills.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t be a lobbyist either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sillygatboy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584473</link>
		<dc:creator>sillygatboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584473</guid>
		<description>Tre #7
She is just as qualified as our president select is:    

They both consort with murderers.


Hi Uncle Teddy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tre #7<br />
She is just as qualified as our president select is:    </p>
<p>They both consort with murderers.</p>
<p>Hi Uncle Teddy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584438</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584438</guid>
		<description>How is it Gov. Mr. PatHerA$$ can appoint who he wants, while Gov. Bagof$hit(?) of Ill. can&#039;t...are they both not following the state&#039;s constitutions replacing representatives of the their state? 
Ones black and ones white, that couldn&#039;t matter, could it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it Gov. Mr. PatHerA$$ can appoint who he wants, while Gov. Bagof$hit(?) of Ill. can&#8217;t&#8230;are they both not following the state&#8217;s constitutions replacing representatives of the their state?<br />
Ones black and ones white, that couldn&#8217;t matter, could it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frostrt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584408</link>
		<dc:creator>frostrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584408</guid>
		<description>On January 6th, 2009 at 2:34 pm, npphotog said: 

Well said. Well reasoned. Very articulate. Why isn’t she crowned already? NOT!

-------------------------------------

I second that NOT!  And apparently, so do a lot of other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 6th, 2009 at 2:34 pm, npphotog said: </p>
<p>Well said. Well reasoned. Very articulate. Why isn’t she crowned already? NOT!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I second that NOT!  And apparently, so do a lot of other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: npphotog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584399</link>
		<dc:creator>npphotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584399</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 6th, 2009 at 2:28 pm, frostrt said:

But, you know, her last name is, like, you know, Kennedy, and, you know, she, like, has to carry on her, like, family’s legacy, you know . . . .
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well said. Well reasoned.  Very articulate.  Why isn&#039;t she crowned already?  NOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 6th, 2009 at 2:28 pm, frostrt said:</p>
<p>But, you know, her last name is, like, you know, Kennedy, and, you know, she, like, has to carry on her, like, family’s legacy, you know . . . .
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said. Well reasoned.  Very articulate.  Why isn&#8217;t she crowned already?  NOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frostrt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584393</link>
		<dc:creator>frostrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584393</guid>
		<description>But, you know, her last name is, like, you know, Kennedy, and, you know, she, like, has to carry on her, like, family&#039;s legacy, you know . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, you know, her last name is, like, you know, Kennedy, and, you know, she, like, has to carry on her, like, family&#8217;s legacy, you know . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/06/caroline-kennedy-sinks/comment-page-1/#comment-584355</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=20984#comment-584355</guid>
		<description>The more I think about this, the better I like it.  It would represent the return to a citizen legislature with defacto term limts and end the political class, at least in the legislative branch.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 6th, 2009 at 1:34 pm, Dexter Alarius said: 
Socky,
I had been toying with the same idea for a while. Choose house representatives like we do jurors: from the voter registration lists. They can’t do any worse than the ‘professional politicians’.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about this, the better I like it.  It would represent the return to a citizen legislature with defacto term limts and end the political class, at least in the legislative branch.  </p>
<blockquote><p>On January 6th, 2009 at 1:34 pm, Dexter Alarius said:<br />
Socky,<br />
I had been toying with the same idea for a while. Choose house representatives like we do jurors: from the voter registration lists. They can’t do any worse than the ‘professional politicians’.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

