<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheeky: Porn industry wants a bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next In Line In The Bailout Aisle: Public TV And Radio &#171; Jane Q. Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-589037</link>
		<dc:creator>Next In Line In The Bailout Aisle: Public TV And Radio &#171; Jane Q. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-589037</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin - At least the porn industry was sort of kidding about their bailout bid. Public radio and public television — already funded with your money to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin - At least the porn industry was sort of kidding about their bailout bid. Public radio and public television — already funded with your money to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Crikey: Public Radio and Public TV want a $550 million bailout</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-588349</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Crikey: Public Radio and Public TV want a $550 million bailout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-588349</guid>
		<description>[...] least the porn industry was sort of kidding about their bailout bid. Public radio and public television &#8212; already funded with your money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] least the porn industry was sort of kidding about their bailout bid. Public radio and public television &#8212; already funded with your money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Depth of Obama’s Mess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-588283</link>
		<dc:creator>ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Depth of Obama’s Mess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-588283</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Porn need a bailout? (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.)] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Porn need a bailout? (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.)] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Depth of Obama’s Mess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-588282</link>
		<dc:creator>ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Depth of Obama’s Mess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-588282</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Porn need a bailout? (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.)] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Porn need a bailout? (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.)] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Depth of Obama&#8217;s Mess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-588269</link>
		<dc:creator>The Depth of Obama&#8217;s Mess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-588269</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Porn need a bailout? (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.)] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Porn need a bailout? (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.)] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightmarish - MissWisabus.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-587167</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightmarish - MissWisabus.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-587167</guid>
		<description>[...] other nightmarish news, the porn industry wants a bailout (okay, so that one is sort of a joke), TV thinks they deserve one, too, and some Pro-Hamas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other nightmarish news, the porn industry wants a bailout (okay, so that one is sort of a joke), TV thinks they deserve one, too, and some Pro-Hamas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-587060</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-587060</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Larry Flint inadvertently saves America...&lt;/strong&gt;

I don&#8217;t know about you but given how hysterical the coverage of our current economic condition has become, I was at a loss for words as to how we could effective counter the nanny-staters in a way that the public could easily rally around. It......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Larry Flint inadvertently saves America&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you but given how hysterical the coverage of our current economic condition has become, I was at a loss for words as to how we could effective counter the nanny-staters in a way that the public could easily rally around. It&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fun With Headlines Below the Belt &#171; Countenance Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586875</link>
		<dc:creator>Fun With Headlines Below the Belt &#171; Countenance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586875</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin:  Cheeky: Porn industry wants a bailout [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin:  Cheeky: Porn industry wants a bailout [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyRich</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586823</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586823</guid>
		<description>Housewife #104...
Good one, LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Housewife #104&#8230;<br />
Good one, LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next In Line In The Bailout Aisle: Digital TV Industry &#171; Jane Q. Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586814</link>
		<dc:creator>Next In Line In The Bailout Aisle: Digital TV Industry &#171; Jane Q. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586814</guid>
		<description>[...] the tongue-in-cheek porn bailout, the Boob Tube bailout is happening here and now. Pricetag: $250 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the tongue-in-cheek porn bailout, the Boob Tube bailout is happening here and now. Pricetag: $250 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; And now: The Boob Tube bailout</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586773</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; And now: The Boob Tube bailout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586773</guid>
		<description>[...] the tongue-in-cheek porn bailout, the Boob Tube bailout is happening here and now. Pricetag: $250 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the tongue-in-cheek porn bailout, the Boob Tube bailout is happening here and now. Pricetag: $250 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CO of Fort Housewife</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586625</link>
		<dc:creator>CO of Fort Housewife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586625</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Congress, but this portion of the crap sandwich would be way too hard to swallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Congress, but this portion of the crap sandwich would be way too hard to swallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frostrt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586615</link>
		<dc:creator>frostrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586615</guid>
		<description>On January 8th, 2009 at 1:33 pm, StandardDeviation said: 
My favorite is “no discrimination based on appearance or weight”. How do you suppose that’ll go over? Think porn sales would IMPROVE?
I don’t know, but I bet licensing of Queen’s “Fat-Bottomed Girls” will significantly increase, so it has to be good for someone.

---------------------------------------

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 8th, 2009 at 1:33 pm, StandardDeviation said:<br />
My favorite is “no discrimination based on appearance or weight”. How do you suppose that’ll go over? Think porn sales would IMPROVE?<br />
I don’t know, but I bet licensing of Queen’s “Fat-Bottomed Girls” will significantly increase, so it has to be good for someone.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StandardDeviation</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586587</link>
		<dc:creator>StandardDeviation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586587</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My favorite is “no discrimination based on appearance or weight”. How do you suppose that’ll go over? Think porn sales would IMPROVE?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know, but I bet licensing of Queen&#039;s &quot;Fat-Bottomed Girls&quot; will significantly increase, so it has to be good for someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My favorite is “no discrimination based on appearance or weight”. How do you suppose that’ll go over? Think porn sales would IMPROVE?</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, but I bet licensing of Queen&#8217;s &#8220;Fat-Bottomed Girls&#8221; will significantly increase, so it has to be good for someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frostrt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/porn-industry-wants-a-bailout/comment-page-2/#comment-586448</link>
		<dc:creator>frostrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21074#comment-586448</guid>
		<description>On January 8th, 2009 at 11:24 am, StandardDeviation said: 
Of course just imagine the changes that will be in place if the government gets itself a piece of the porn biz.

Government mandates of racial preferences to hiring performers. No discrimination based on appearance, weight, or sexual orientation will be allowed.

---------------------------------------

My favorite is &quot;no discrimination based on appearance or weight&quot;.  How do you suppose that&#039;ll go over?  Think porn sales would IMPROVE?

Or maybe the people who watch it have an &quot;I&#039;ll take whatever I can get&quot; attitude . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 8th, 2009 at 11:24 am, StandardDeviation said:<br />
Of course just imagine the changes that will be in place if the government gets itself a piece of the porn biz.</p>
<p>Government mandates of racial preferences to hiring performers. No discrimination based on appearance, weight, or sexual orientation will be allowed.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>My favorite is &#8220;no discrimination based on appearance or weight&#8221;.  How do you suppose that&#8217;ll go over?  Think porn sales would IMPROVE?</p>
<p>Or maybe the people who watch it have an &#8220;I&#8217;ll take whatever I can get&#8221; attitude . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

