On January 8th, 2009 at 7:29 pm, brad_sk said:

You are a lot more tolerant than I am then. Even at 1K into a town of 10K would most likely lead to: 1) higher crime 2)many new “affordable housing” projects since most will probably be unskilled and don’t speak English while living on welfare 3) most are muslim so hello to new mosques 4) property values will most likely decline as most people will not voluntarily choose to move with the above issues prevalent etc….. I assume this because there has been several reports about this same scenario in Tennessee (if I remember correctly) where Somali refugees were put. But same could be said of Detroit (high muslim population). Culture clashes always follow. I may be wrong but ther eis the risk I am right. So why take that risk when there is nothing to gain for my family from it.

But as for “practical” scenario, I would like you to respond to my question above. Reposted here for convenience.

brad_sk wrote

..So even on any aggressive estimate of US becoming 1B by the end of century we are still in much better shape.

I asked:

What you say is true. But the real question is, will be better off than we are TODAY? If not, then why do it? If so how?

And drug dealers deal.
Damn Mr. Bush. Damn John McCain.

On January 8th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, Solo said:

How woudl you like 50K Somali’s moved into your 10K resident community, courtesy of Uncle Sam?

I am fine with that if my community can provide space/utilities for so much. I know that my community can easily sustain 1K Soamlis which I am definitely fine with. Please don’t just throw some straw man arguments…Argue with real practical numbers.

“I do not lift my voice against the great and glorious Government guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution, but against those corrupt administrators who trample the Constitution and just laws under their feet.”

That wonderful piece of wisdom courtesy of 19th-century LDS Church leader Brigham Young. It’s as relevant today in this struggle as it was for he and his followers then.

NIMBY is an absolutely correct portraiture of these fools. Forget “Day without a Mexican.” I’ll take “Life Without an Illegal.” You’re welcome to come to MY country if you follow the rules to get here. You’re welcome to legislate in MY country if you follow the laws that are on the books now.

Unfortunately, this country is full of people who do neither.

On January 8th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, Solo said:

Yep!!! Most of the open borders crowd (at least those with no vested interest in cheap labor or ethnic greivance groups) are the classic NIMBY folks (NOT IN MY BACK YARD). “Build the low income housing in Joe’s neighborhood, not mine”. “Ah, we must help those poor Somali refugees with assylum here. But don’t move them to my community. Put them in that powerless rural community over there.” I am sick of the hypocracy from all libs frankly.

How woudl you like 50K Somali’s moved into your 10K resident community, courtesy of Uncle Sam?

Good question, good luck getting an honest answer from the PC crowd.

I would love it if the press would ask Bush, McClandslide, Obama, and the rest of the pc crowd two questions.

Do you support legislation to create a path to citizenship for people living here illegally?

If so, would you still support said legislation if that path led MS-13 and other 3rd world criminals to your front door?

I know it will never happen but I can dream, can’t I?

If the guy walked on water, it would still be obscene with what’s going on in this economy. Why does Bush have the authority to pass out our money like it was candy?

Conservativism is the answer, not the problem. Take the money out of DC, and the rats would leave.

check out the DRUDGE caption….
.New World Order..then start sneering as Bush fulfills that very agenda

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com