See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. “Gay Rage” has a voice at the Whitehouse « Mark Epstein
2. Economy Collapses: Baby Killers Hardest Hit « Jane Q. Republican
3. Planned Parenthood Lays Off Staff « The Salty Pundit
4. Baby Killers lays off 20% of its staff! Too bad, so sad byebye. | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
5. ButAsForMe! » Silver lining: Planned Parenthood lays off 20 percent of staff
6. BAM Stimulus: Liberal Overreach? « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
7. Brutally Honest
8. Shall We Pass the Hat? « The American Catholic: Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective
9. Planned Parenthood Takes a Hit « The Reformed Pastor
10. One Industry We’re Not Crying About… « Memoirs From a Young Conservative
11. Madoff debacle hurts Planned Parenthood — Cranach: The Blog of Veith
12. Steynian 307 « Free Canuckistan!

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #587865
   On January 9th, 2009 at 7:51 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

   Cry me a river….

2. #587866
   On January 9th, 2009 at 7:51 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

   Woo hoo!

   Guess PP didn’t plan ahead

3. #587867
   On January 9th, 2009 at 7:52 pm, Omu said:

   I don’t understand why you think you have the authority to force women to go through with unplanned pregnancies, Michelle, I really don’t.

4. #587868
   On January 9th, 2009 at 7:53 pm, Omu said:

   *unwanted pregnancies, I meant

5. #587871
   On January 9th, 2009 at 8:03 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

   Shananana, shananana, hey, hey, hey, goodbye!

6. #587873
   On January 9th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, b-cat said:

   On January 9th, 2009 at 7:52 pm, Omu said:
   I don’t understand why you think you have the authority to force women to go through with unplanned pregnancies, Michelle, I really don’t.

   I can’t find where she claims any authority in the matter at all. She does seem to believe as I do that killing a human embryo is killing a human.

7. #587875
   On January 9th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, Omu said:

   I can’t find where she claims any authority in the matter at all. She does seem to believe as I do that killing a human embryo is killing a human.

   Malkin tries to undermine abortion’s legality all the time and I have no doubt that she would favour criminalising women who don’t want to go through with unwanted pregnancies. If you believe abortion is murder, that’s fine; don’t have an abortion. But don’t force YOUR decision on other people.

8. #587876
   On January 9th, 2009 at 8:16 pm, mattymatt10 said:

   On January 9th, 2009 at 7:52 pm, Omu said:
   I don’t understand why you think you have the authority to force women to go through with unplanned pregnancies, Michelle, I really don’t.

   Golly! I didn’t realize MM had the authority to do so. You would think she’d have posted something about having the power to outlaw abortion. In fact, if the story said that PP had laid off 100% of staff, then your post might not be so ridiculous. But, alas, back here in reality, people are still capable of ending inconvenient “unwanted” pregnancies.

9. #587878
   On January 9th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, b-cat said:

   But don’t force YOUR decision on other people.

   I am not forcing my decision on anyone. That said, I would not shed a tear if Roe were overturned, giving the authority to the states where it belongs.

10. #587879
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, ctmom said:

    But don’t force YOUR decision on other people.

    Planned Parenthood uses abortion for birth control. Since taxpayers are funding it, I’d say we have the right to have an opinion on it.

11. #587883
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:30 pm, Omu said:

    Planned Parenthood uses abortion for birth control. Since taxpayers are funding it, I’d say we have the right to have an opinion on it.

    The majority of Americans support abortion, and especially the majority of women support abortion.

12. #587885
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:34 pm, b-cat said:

    The majority of Americans support abortion, and especially the majority of women support abortion.

    Then you would have no problem putting it up to a vote?

13. #587886
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, flenser said:

    If you believe abortion is murder, that’s fine; don’t have an abortion. But don’t force YOUR decision on other people.

    If you believe abortion is muder then you should do everything you can to stp murder. Surely this is obvious even to a lefty?

    Or would you say “I know you think that lynching black men is muder, but don’t try to force YOUR decision on other people”?

14. #587887
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, tiefelj said:

    Now–close 20% of the clinic (aka–death mills, death camp (oops wrong century, but same results))

    Jake

15. #587888
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, pianotchr said:

    Well, Omu, count me as one woman who does NOT support the culture of death!

16. #587890
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, flenser said:

    Then you would have no problem putting it up to a vote?

    I suspect that’s a big negative.

17. #587891
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, ctmom said:

    The majority of Americans support abortion, and especially the majority of women support abortion.

    Where in the world do you get your stats? Alot of women who’ve HAD abortions, no longer support abortion. Especially if used as birth control. How many abortions have you had, Umo?

18. #587892
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:49 pm, Omu said:

    Then you would have no problem putting it up to a vote?

    Unlike conservatives, I don’t think we should put rights and freedoms up for a vote. Even though the majority of Americans want gay people to remain as second class citizens in their country, that doesn’t make it right. It didn’t make slavery right, and it didn’t make segregation right either. It’s funny that conservatives only ever want to put rights they disagree with up for a vote. I don’t see too many conservatives recomending that we put gun control or even a ban on guns up for the vote in New England, New York, Illinois or California!

    As a matter of principle, I wouldn’t support putting it to a vote, but it would pass if it was put to a vote.

19. #587893
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:49 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Alot of women who’ve HAD abortions, no longer support abortion.

    Even Roe from Roe v Wade no longer supports abortion after decades of supporting it…

    The “Roe” of the landmark Roe v. Wade (search) Supreme Court decision is asking the nation’s highest court to overturn its 1973 ruling that made abortion legal throughout the United States.

    On the 33rd anniversary of her initial lawsuit, which resulted in the high court’s historic ruling three years later, Norma McCorvey (search) announced Tuesday she will petition the court to reopen the original case, based on changes in law and technology over the last 30 years.

    “I’m sorry that I signed that affidavit,” McCorvey said during the press conference Tuesday, referring to when she became the plaintiff in the original case.

    She said the court case “brought the holocaust of abortion” but that with her legal action Tuesday, “I feel good about myself, I really do. I feel like the weight of the world has really been lifted off my shoulders.”

    McCorvey made the announcement at the Ferris Plaza Park in Dallas, just blocks from the Earl Cabell Federal Building, where the original lawsuit was entered.

    “I long for the day that justice will be done and the guilt from all of these deaths will be removed from my shoulders,” McCorvey said in a statement announcing the intent of the motion. “I want to do everything in my power to help women and their children.

    “The issue is justice for the unborn…”

20. #587895
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:52 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    but it would pass if it was put to a vote.

    I’ll take that bet. I’d bet real good money Roe would be overturned in a national vote. After seeing the black and hispanic community follow through on their morals in California on gay marriage I am confident they and many others would follow through on stopping the murder of unborn children.

21. #587896
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:53 pm, Omu said:

    Where in the world do you get your stats?

    
    Here.

22. #587897
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:53 pm, b-cat said:

    I don’t see too many conservatives recomending that we put gun control or even a ban on guns up for the vote in New England, New York, Illinois or California!

    Already put to a vote by the Continental Congress when including it in the Bill of Rights. Then voted on again when ratified by the thirteen original colonies. Finally, voted on as each new state petitioned for entry into the Union.

23. #587898
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:59 pm, flenser said:

    It’s funny that conservatives only ever want to put rights they disagree with up for a vote.

    Abortion is not a “right”. You saying otherwise does not magically make it so.

    This is as opposed to gun rights, which really and truely ARE rights, again whether sub-literate morons like you like it or not.

    Are you going to defend the “right” to murder any other groups? Blacks? Jews? Mormons? Gays? I notice you dodged this question earlier.

24. #587899
    On January 9th, 2009 at 8:59 pm, ctmom said:

    Omu, you’re kind of dopey. Since you are such a supporter of rights and freedoms, why don’t you use your energy to stop the genital mutilation of young girls rather than the killing of innocent life?

25. #587900
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:00 pm, ctmom said:

    and your link doesn’t work.

26. #587901
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:00 pm, madchef said:

    OMU said.

    If you believe abortion is murder, that’s fine; don’t have an abortion. But don’t force YOUR decision on other people.

    So by your reasoning one could take it a step further “if you don’t believe in murder, that’s fine; don’t murder. But don’t force YOUR decision on ether people.”

    Is this what you believe?

27. #587902
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:01 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    The $1 billion foundation (Picower Foundation) was one of the few major funders of reproductive rights issues.

    Well good I guess, but how many innocents blood is on their hands?

28. #587903
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:02 pm, flenser said:

    I don’t understand why you think you have the authority to force women to go through with unplanned pregnancies

    She’s a citizen in a representative democracy. That gives her the right to try to enact laws.

    I know you types are really pining for us to become a socialist dictatorship. The USSR had wonderful “right to chose” laws. But we’re not there quite yet.

    Feel free to ask any further questions about the many things which puzzle you. We’re here to help you learn.

29. #587904
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:03 pm, zorro said:

    As a practicing Maronite Catholic, I am Pro Life and against abortion. I always have been, always will be.

    Pray for the repose of the Souls of all the millions of babies denied the right to life.

30. #587906
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:04 pm, PatriotRider said:

    Omu said:
    The majority of Americans support abortion, and especially the majority of women support abortion.

    BZZZZZZZZZZ! I’m sorry that is incorrect. But thank you for playing.

    BTW since when did murder become a “right”?

31. #587907
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:06 pm, PatriotRider said:

    And to the 20% canned by the murdering scum I say good riddance. But to the 80% left behind I say “A pox on you and SHAME!”

32. #587910
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:08 pm, Omu said:

    Are you going to defend the “right” to murder any other groups? Blacks? Jews? Mormons? Gays? I notice you dodged this question earlier.

    I did not “dodge” this question. It’s ludricrous. I’m sure if I thought like Sarah Palin and her hideously stupid followers, I’d want the right to kill gay people, but I don’t think like her and I don’t want that right. A fetus is a fetus, not a human being. Sorry about that scientific fact – reality does clash with social conservatism an awful lot …

33. #587911
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:11 pm, ctmom said:

    They don’t teach Rights and Responsibilities in school anymore do they? How about this Umo? Sure, you have the RIGHT, the freedom, to have sex. With that comes the RESPONSIBILITY to have protected sex. If you become pregnant anyway, OOPS! You lose! You now have the RESPONSIBILITY of a new human being. Actions have consequences, grownups deal with them, they don’t kill them and they sure don’t expect others to pay for it.

34. #587912
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:12 pm, b-cat said:

    I don’t recall S. Palin advocating the murder of anyone. I don’t remember her hideously stupid followers doing that either.

    A fetus is a fetus, not a human being.

    What about fetuses that would grow up to be gay, should they be spared?

35. #587913
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:12 pm, nlebou said:

    So you think Palin wants to kill gay people?

    Prove to me that a fetus is not a human.

36. #587914
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:14 pm, Omu said:

    and your link doesn’t work.

    Apologies. Here are the statistics.

37. #587917
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:21 pm, Omu said:

    What about fetuses that would grow up to be gay, should they be spared?

    You haven’t done your social conservative homework; gay people aren’t “born” gay, they make a consious decision and “choose” to lead a “lifestyle” of homosexuality. That’s how social conservatives justify their grotesque treatment of gay people. You need to study more, I think!

    So you think Palin wants to kill gay people?

    Of course not. That was cheap shot. But I do believe she would put gay people in prison if she could.

    Prove to me that a fetus is not a human.

    It depends on it’s natural carrier for survival, therefore it is not a human being yet, but rather the potential to be a human.

38. #587919
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:23 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    I’m sure if I thought like Sarah Palin and her hideously stupid followers, I’d want the right to kill gay people

    Now dear Omu you are now telling what we call a LIE. I am sure you heard it from someone who heard it from someone but you are still telling a LIE.

39. #587921
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:24 pm, b-cat said:

    It depends on it’s natural carrier for survival, therefore it is not a human being yet, but rather the potential to be a human.

    Does not an infant not depend on its natural carrier for survival? Logically then, it also is not human.

40. #587926
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:39 pm, jangar said:

    I don’t get it…what does a homosexual such as the omu care about reproduction?

41. #587927
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:40 pm, rowsdower said:

    I’m sure if I thought like Sarah Palin and her hideously stupid followers, I’d want the right to kill gay people

    Great way to change minds and win friends, Omu-Dale Carnegie would be proud.

42. #587929
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:42 pm, ChicagoRobb said:

    Omu,

    You are a hateful person. I’m sure you will say because I’m male I don’t know anything.I was born premature and illegitimate, Thankfully my birth mother, who I never knew, put me up for adoption. I was adopted by two wonderful people who loved me.
    The majority of abortions are for birth control reasons. The rape/incest “red herring” is a very,very small percentage. Why couldn’t these women use the pill, the sponge, an IUD, the patch or spermicidal foam? Why couldn’t they have their partner use a condom? Are all of these abortions due to broken rubbers?
    Sarah Palin did not say “kill or imprison all the Gay people”, but you have said, “it’s ok to kill the defenseless”.
    The founder of PP, Margaret Sanger was a Eugenicist. Are you saying we should kill all you find undesirable?

43. #587932
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:53 pm, Omu said:

    Great way to change minds and win friends, Omu-Dale Carnegie would be proud.

    People who like and defend Sarah Palin are a lost cause completely. There is no reasoning with them. We (reasonable, decent people) must instead fight them and we must win. I love America and what it stands for far too much to let Sarah Palin, or anyone who thinks like her, destroy it.

    Thankfully my birth mother, who I never knew, put me up for adoption.

    I’m happy that adoption worked out for you, but it’s absurd to say that it is a legitimate alternative. Besides, social conservatives do all they can to stifle adoption; a ban on unmarried couples adopting passed in Arkansas last year and despite the fact that there are thousands (perhaps millions) of loving same sex couples who want nothing more than to raise a child, social cons try successfully to stop adoptions by these couples.

44. #587933
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:56 pm, Omu said:

    Does not an infant not depend on its natural carrier for survival? Logically then, it also is not human.

    An infant depends upon it’s parents for food and protection. A fetus can not breath without being in the womb. Absolutely, I agree that there should be a limit on abortions, but up until that limit, abortion should be available on demand.

45. #587934
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:56 pm, ctmom said:

    Umo reminds me of members of my own family who would risk their lives to save a pregnant dog and her unborn puppies, but has no compassion for the unborn human. Its bizarre.

46. #587935
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:56 pm, cubbiegal said:

    Chicago Robb
    I was planned and born pre-Roe but I was born a month early.
    I have Asperger’s Syndrome-as did my late father and probably my son the future US Marine.
    Am I against abortion?
    You betcha.

47. #587936
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:57 pm, b-cat said:

    I love America and what it stands for far too much to let Sarah Palin, or anyone who thinks like her, destroy it.

    America stands for abortion and gay sex? Since when?

    No wonder the muslims hate us so much.

48. #587938
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:59 pm, b-cat said:

    Absolutely, I agree that there should be a limit on abortions, but up until that limit, abortion should be available on demand.

    So where is the limit? At what point to you interfere with a woman’s rights?

49. #587939
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:59 pm, rowsdower said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:53 pm, Omu said: “We (reasonable, decent people) must instead fight them …”

    Name calling and insults does not indicate a “reasonable, decent” person.

50. #587940
    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:59 pm, ctmom said:

    I love America and what it stands for far too much to let Sarah Palin, or anyone who thinks like her, destroy it.

    Obviously a product of liberal public school education.

51. #587941
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:00 pm, Omu said:

    America stands for abortion and gay sex? Since when?

    You and you ilk sure do like to mis-characterize things, don’t you?

52. #587942
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:00 pm, jangar said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:59 pm, ctmom said:

    Obviously a militant liberal hack with no sense of morality.

53. #587944
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:01 pm, Omu said:

    America stands for abortion and gay sex? Since when?

    America stands for not getting in people’s faces and telling them they cannot do those things.

54. #587945
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:03 pm, jangar said:

    America stands for not getting in people’s faces and telling them they cannot do those things.

    Like support Sarah Palin, cherish life, etc.

55. #587946
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:03 pm, b-cat said:

    You and you ilk sure do like to mis-characterize things, don’t you?

    I’m just asking. I’m not sure who my ilk is, but, please, do continue.

56. #587947
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:05 pm, tamarah180 said:

    Fetus is Latin for BABY.

    Try again Omu.

    And I am a practicing Jewish Woman.

57. #587948
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:05 pm, b-cat said:

    America stands for not getting in people’s faces and telling them they cannot do those things.

    What things?

58. #587949
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:07 pm, Socky said:

    Thanks for the tip, MM.

    And putting Omu’s rancid panties into a wad was a delightful bonus.

    It’s Miller Time.

59. #587950
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:07 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 9:53 pm, Omu said:

    People who like and defend Sarah Palin are a lost cause completely. There is no reasoning with them. We (reasonable, decent people) must instead fight them

    If you who defend the murder of 50 million children are reasonable and decent, then apparently so were Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Hitler, because not one of them was responsible for anywhere near as many deaths as you leftist filth.

60. #587952
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:08 pm, jangar said:

    It’s Miller Time.

    ’bout time you showed up to the party!

61. #587953
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:09 pm, ctmom said:

    America stands for not getting in people’s faces and telling them they cannot do those things.

    Wrong. America stands for personal responsibility.

62. #587954
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:10 pm, jangar said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:07 pm, txvet2 said:

    TOUCHDOWN!

63. #587955
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:13 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Boy that is really justice served. Corrupt financier Madoff causing problem for a bunch of baby killers.
    You got to love it.

64. #587956
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:13 pm, ChicagoRobb said:

    CubbieGal,

    From your previous posts, I remember you moved to Aurora. Hey , hopefully there will be cutbacks at Planned Parenthood’s Infanticide’s “Super Clinic” out there.

65. #587958
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:19 pm, Socky said:

    Hey , hopefully there will be cutbacks at Planned Parenthood’s Infanticide’s “Super Clinic” out there.

    Auschwitz on the Prairie.

66. #587959
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:19 pm, Omu said:

    Fetus is Latin for BABY.

    Try again Omu.

    But we’re not speaking Latin, are we? We’re speaking English and that’s not what “fetus” means in English.

67. #587960
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    I still believe that we should be able to abort liberals at any age. Just liberals. Maybe independents as well.

    Practice what you preach, liberals.

68. #587961
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:22 pm, Socky said:

    What if we stopped referring to them as “Unborn babies” and started calling them “womb kittens?” Would the left be so callous about exterminating them?

69. #587963
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, b-cat said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:22 pm, Socky said:
    “womb kittens?”

    What more can be said after that?

70. #587964
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, Omu said:

    Social conservatives pretend that they are “pro-life”, but really, you’re not. Just look at how you treat the living. You tell your gay fellow human beings that they are disgusting and unwelcome. You try to stop welfare to help out the less fortunate among your fellow living human beings. You try to stop universal healthcare to help you fellow humans when they are sick or in pain. You’re not really pro-life, not at all.

71. #587965
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    I still believe that we should be able to abort liberals at any age

    I’d support drawing and quartering abortionists, just so they’d get some idea of what the babies had gone through.

72. #587966
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Malkin tries to undermine abortion’s legality all the time and I have no doubt that she would favour criminalising women who don’t want to go through with unwanted pregnancies. If you believe abortion is murder, that’s fine; don’t have an abortion. But don’t force YOUR decision on
    other people.

    Amorality at its finest.

    1850s version- if you think Negroes are people and shouldn’t be slaves, don’t own one. But don’t force your decision on the good people of the South.

73. #587967
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:26 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, Omu said:

    You tell your gay fellow human beings that they are disgusting and unwelcome. You try to stop welfare to help out the less fortunate among your fellow living human beings. You try to stop universal healthcare to help you fellow humans when they are sick or in pain.

    Not one statement of which is accurate, nor do they have anything to do with killing.

74. #587968
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:28 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I have nothing against my fellow citizens who are gay, as long as they don’t demand special rights or push their lifestyle in public.

    Link is to a ZombieTime report on a gay street festival in Nancy Pelosi’s district, open to the public, including children. Not for the squeamish.

75. #587969
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:28 pm, jangar said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    2-point conversion is good! Time out on the field.

76. #587970
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:30 pm, Socky said:

    Why doesn’t the left ever apply their abortion philosophy to the Second Amendment? If you don’t like guns, don’t own one.

77. #587972
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:32 pm, Divapalooza said:

    After everything that I have seen take place at the Planned Parenthood clinics in Indiana this year, I am not shedding a tear over this one either.

78. #587973
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:32 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:22 pm, Socky said:

    You have a knack that is unparalled when it comes to dealing with trolls. Keep on keeping on!

79. #587974
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:34 pm, b-cat said:

    Omu only comes out when the conversation is about abortion or homosexuality. It’s like s/he has some kind of spider-sense or something. I’ll bet MM could post a story about homosexual abortion practices in New Guinea at 3 am and Omu would be there.

80. #587975
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:41 pm, ChicagoRobb said:

    Omu,

    Good job projecting. How many gangs of Sarah Palin supporters vandalized gay hangouts? None.
    On a personal note, How many people who you disagree are you friends with? You mistake a heartfelt disagreement as hate. Where is your tolerance?

81. #587977
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:44 pm, FamilyMan said:

    HEY Omu
    This is why we call abortion MURDER.
    http://www.idude.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/abortion2.jpg

82. #587978
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:46 pm, Socky said:

    Trolls are easy to swat down. Their arguments are limited to a fairly small number of left-wing talking points. Once you know the set, countering them is easy. Lefties have trouble thinking outside the box.

83. #587979
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:47 pm, Socky said:

    But thank you, 30, (I should have said).

84. #587980
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:48 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Think Omu is coming back? I haven’t heard “Bush Lied, People Died” all day.

85. #587981
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:49 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    They wouldn’t have had to do the layoffs if they had been aborted 20-30 years ago.

86. #587982
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:49 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Socky-I pretty much stopped reading or writing comments on MM’s site…sooo many commenters now…however…
    after reading some of your comments…I’m going to glance at the MM comment sections again…
    ‘womb kittens’ was great!

    C-CS
    LALFL

87. #587984
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:49 pm, jangar said:

    Omu (the buzzard) went feeding elsewhere.

88. #587987
    On January 9th, 2009 at 10:55 pm, garydt said:

    OMU,, how you can accuse conservatives of not caring for the living. This is like rather hate speeech isn’t it? Would you favor POST BIRTH ABORTION lke say up to two years after the birth? This would give the mother more choices incase she was offered a great job and her baby would be in the way. What do you think of that. Further more the Lord refers to prebirth babies as having souls and He knows them personally. I would hate to be in your place on Judgement Day.

89. #587989
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:02 pm, Omu said:

    Further more the Lord refers to prebirth babies as having souls and He knows them personally. I would hate to be in your place on Judgement Day.

    Don’t use religion to justify anything. If you want to believe in something illogical and for which there is no proof, so be it. Don’t make laws based on that nonsense, though.

90. #587990
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:03 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Social conservatives pretend that they are “pro-life”, but really, you’re not.”

    You are doing what most liberals do; redefining what something means in order to support your agenda/worldview. Pathetic.

    “Just look at how you treat the living.”

    I treat everyone as equals. Every last one of us have the ability to succeed/fail in life.

    “You tell your gay fellow human beings that they are disgusting and unwelcome.”

    I don’t have a problem with homosexuals. My brother is homosexual. He spent Thanksgiving at my house with his friend, whom we welcomed into our home with arms wide open.

    “You try to stop welfare to help out the less fortunate among your fellow living human beings.”

    Welfare is just another form of slavery; only difference is that the “massa” is the government and it’ll only cost you your self worth, and lifetime voting Democrat.

    “You try to stop universal healthcare to help you fellow humans when they are sick or in pain.”

    For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “If a man will not work, he shall not eat.” 2 Thessalonians 3:10

    WILL not work, not CANNOT work. Big difference. This too can be applied to healthcare.

    “You’re not really pro-life, not at all.”

    By that same token you’re not really tolerant or inclusive.

91. #587991
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:03 pm, tamarah180 said:

    Fetus is Latin – no matter what crap your liberal teachers taught. The meaning of the word did not change.

    That YOU used a word whose meaning you choose to IGNORE, well, just shows how uneducated YOU really are.

    BOTTOM LINE, because abortion ends the LIFE of a FETUS, (Latin for BABY) mean it is murder.

92. #587992
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:03 pm, tamarah180 said:

    Fetus is Latin – no matter what crap your liberal teachers taught. The meaning of the word did not change.

    That YOU used a word whose meaning you choose to IGNORE, well, just shows how uneducated YOU really are.

    BOTTOM LINE, because abortion ends the LIFE of a FETUS, (Latin for BABY) mean it is murder.

93. #587995
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:04 pm, Madam President said:

    Omu said, “..Even though the majority of Americans want gay people to remain as second class citizens in their country, that doesn’t make it right…

    How are homosexuals “second class citizens” if they can vote, own property, attend whatever college they want, shop in the same stores as everyone else, and use the same facilities and water fountains as everyone else?

94. #587996
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:04 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Heads Up –just heard from one of my board members – LALFL- that PP is asking for a grant (bailout?) from our government…Have not checked it out but-it wouldn’t surprise me….
    C-CS

95. #587997
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:04 pm, Socky said:

    Thank you, Christian Soldier. Between that and my comment about EagleHasLanded this morning, I think this has been one of my more clever days.

96. #588000
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:06 pm, tamarah180 said:

    UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM is based on not just the BIBLE, but TALMUDIC LAW.

    Torts, manslaughter v. murder, bankruptcy laws – ALL based on BIBLICAL LAW.

    Get over your stupidity already, Omu.

97. #588004
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:09 pm, jangar said:

    Don’t use religion to justify anything. If you want to believe in something illogical and for which there is no proof, so be it. Don’t make laws based on that nonsense, though.

    This explains from where the omu is coming from, and why it reasons the way it does. How sad.

98. #588006
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:13 pm, b-cat said:

    This explains from where the omu is coming from, and why it reasons the way it does. How sad.

    It doesn’t reason, it justifies its behavior. It wants unrestrained sexual escapades with no consequences. Any unfortunate natural consequences should be taken care of by a great medical staff, paid for by you.

99. #588007
    On January 9th, 2009 at 11:14 pm, garydt said:

    OMU, What do you hate the Lord so much? Remember you are dead lot longer then your short life. Are you going to take that gamble and march through eternity like a bull in a china closet and then find out you are wrong,,, whoah, that takes guts. Further more what about the post birth babies, you want to get rid of them too?