Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 13, 2009 09:33 AM

Scroll for updates…nomination hearing liveblogging…12noon…not one tough GOP question about her ethics problems…Fla. Dem. Sen. Bill Nelson says her ties to Bill Clinton’s global foundation (and, by extension, his donors) only enhances her “credibility”…Lugar’s duh of the day: Bill shouldn’t accept any more money from foreign governments…Hillary mum…

I linked to a taste of Hillary Clinton’s pay-for-play problems last week.

Timed to her first SecofState nomination hearing today, the AP spills the beans of at least a half-dozen cases of Hill intervening on behalf of Bill’s donors.

When it rains, it pours:

Secretary of State appointee Hillary Rodham Clinton intervened at least six times in government issues directly affecting companies and others that later contributed to her husband’s foundation, an Associated Press review of her official correspondence found.

The overlap of names on former President Bill Clinton’s foundation donor list and business interests whose issues she championed raises new questions about potential ethics conflicts between her official actions and her husband’s fundraising. The AP obtained three of the senator’s government letters under the Freedom of Information Act.

Clinton was to begin her confirmation hearing Tuesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Under an agreement with President-elect Barack Obama, Bill Clinton recently released the names of donors to his foundation, a nonprofit that has raised at least $492 million — including millions from foreign governments — to fund his library in Little Rock, Ark., and charitable efforts worldwide on such issues as AIDS, poverty and climate change.

The letters and donations involve pharmaceutical companies and telecommunications and energy interests. An aide to the senator said she made no secret of her involvement in many of the issues. Bill Clinton’s foundation declined to say when it received the donations or precisely how much was contributed.

Pharma companies aren’t such greedy, evil corporate demons when they’re pouring money into hubby’s coffers, eh, Hill?

Pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. is also a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, company spokeswoman Amy Rose said. Merck joined CGI in 2006, when dues were $15,000, and also was a member in 2007 and in 2008, when membership dues rose to $20,000. As part of its commitment to CGI, Merck sponsors public health initiatives around the world, Rose said. Merck joined CGI on its own initiative, she said.

Sen. Clinton wrote a November 2005 letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt urging approval of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Merck applied in December 2005 for approval of its HPV vaccine, Gardasil, and the vaccine was approved for use in females ages 9 to 26. Merck is still seeking approval for use in older women, Rose said.

Rose said Merck’s participation in the Clinton Global Initiative was unrelated to Sen. Clinton’s letter. Merck didn’t communicate with Clinton or her office about its HPV vaccine and was unaware of her letter before it was sent, Rose said.

Another letter involved an issue important to Barr Laboratories. Sens. Clinton and Patty Murray, D-Wash., wrote to Leavitt in August 2005 urging that “science, not politics” guide the agency and “that a decision be brought swiftly on Plan B’s application.” Leavitt’s office described the Clinton letter as pertaining to Barr’s application for Plan B, the emergency contraceptive also called the morning-after pill.

Barr Laboratories gave $10,001 to $25,000 to Clinton foundation, the charity’s donor list shows. Barr joined the Clinton Global Initiative in April 2007, spokeswoman Carol Cox said. Cox didn’t comment on Clinton’s letter.

Commenter Flyoverman wonders if feckless Republicans will be hands-off with John McCain’s good friend: “My fear is no Republican is going to call her out on these kinds of things at the confirmation hearings. Republicans ‘do the dance’ when confronted with these issues. Conversely, Democrats have no problem ‘Borking’ conservative nominees whenever they can. It makes blood shoot out of my eyes Republicans are such wimps. The truth is the truth and it should not be swept under a rug in the name of bipartisanship.”

***

Update: Hillary’s giving her statement on how she’ll fix the world. Can’t help thinking of her classic mocking of Obama. Remember?

“The sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing and everyone will know we should do the right thing and the world will be perfect.”

***

Update: Scenes from the nomination hearing…

*Barbara Boxer praises Hillary for “setting aside her ego” and “helping her greatest rival” for “the good of the country.”

Boxer adds: “And I mean that sincerely.”

*Crybaby George Voinovich is blubbering effusively about Hillary’s “Smart Power.”

*Lugar’s duh of the day: Bill shouldn’t accept any more money from foreign governments…Hillary mum.

*Fla. Dem. Sen. Bill Nelson says her ties to Bill Clinton’s global foundation (and, by extension, his donors) only enhances her “credibility.” GOP senators sit by and do and say nothing.

Posted in: Hillary Clinton

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. GOP + BAM = BFF? « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  2. Hillary Clinon WHORES Herself for Bill Clinton’s Donors As The U.S. Senate Sits On Its Hands | FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
  3. Sister Toldjah
  4. ButAsForMe! » Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued
  5. ButAsForMe! » Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued
  6. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Pay for play: More Hillary work for donors exposed
  7. CDS Personified, Fake Pay to Play Concern, Questionable Donations, & the Biased Bloggers « Probably my worst quality…..
  8. Clinton Inc. Still in Business and Taking Money « Rantings of mine
  9. Hillary’s Pay to Play problems continue! Geithner faces question of immigration status of former housekeeper and taxes! | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  10. Hillary Acted At Least 6 Times to Help Husband’s Donors « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity
  11. Liberty Pundit
  12. Israel fights for life-Inauguration Extravaganza in 6 Days « Riggword Weblog
  13. Tom Daschle’s Back! « Riggword Weblog
  14. Patterico’s Pontifications » Obama appointees: Plenty of empty seats, Plenty of thrones

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #589657
    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:40 am, Flyoverman said:

    My fear is no Republican is going to call her out on these kinds of things at the confirmation hearings. Republicans “do the dance” when confronted with these issues.

    Conversely, Democrats have no problem “Borking” conservative nominees whenever they can.

    It makes blood shoot out of my eyes Republicans are such wimps. The truth is the truth and it should not be swept under a rug in the name of bipartisanship.

  2. #589659
    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:41 am, SeniorD said:

    Hillary Clinton learned her political skills at the feet of Chicago’s Saul Alinsky. Bill Clinton learned his from the Hillbilly Mafia surrounding Little Rock. Together, they are the ‘Perfect Storm’ of corrupt politicians (an oxymoron if ever there were) with the scheming Socialist and the ‘Aww Shucks’ rogueishness of the Oxford educated Hillbilly.

  3. #589660
    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:42 am, jjmurphy said:

    Prediction: Nothing will come of this. Doesn’t matter since she is a dem. Move along, people. Nothing to see here.

  4. #589661
    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:45 am, Mister P said:

    Pay for play is a euphemism. It is graft.

  5. #589666
    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:46 am, KB said:

    Hillary’s confirmation hearings is on now. Why is John Kerry giving a speech and talking up global warming initiatives? Wow, he goes on and on.

  6. #589679
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:01 am, RedDog said:

    Where this would be death to a Republican nomination, Hillary will probably skate by with minimal problems. The only caveat would be lefty enemies who may want to finish her off. My theory is that the Clintons still have an influential power base that will be tough to dislodge.

  7. #589682
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:03 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    It was the Democrats promising to clean up Washington. As I recall Nancy and Harry were promising the most open and honest government EVER!

  8. #589683
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:05 am, RedDog said:

    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:41 am, SeniorD said:
    Hillary Clinton learned her political skills at the feet of Chicago’s Saul Alinsky. Bill Clinton learned his from the Hillbilly Mafia surrounding Little Rock. Together, they are the ‘Perfect Storm’ of corrupt politicians (an oxymoron if ever there were) with the scheming Socialist and the ‘Aww Shucks’ rogueishness of the Oxford educated Hillbilly.

    “Corrupt politician” is not an oxymoron. Also, Bill did little or no studying at Oxford. He partied and networked. My apologies for being a school marm on these points.

  9. #589684
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:05 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    I must agree with Flyoverman.

    Republicans, in particular the 12 weak RINO senators that just voted with Dems, will not speak a word of these issues with Clinton.

    The rule of law in our government has become old hat. Ethics is a complete joke.

    There would have to be video of Hillary Clinton plunging a knife into Mother Theresa’s chest for her not to be confirmed.

  10. #589696
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:14 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Where’s an apparition like the Ghost of Christmas Past (Vince Foster?) to point to Hillary in condemnation, when you need one?

  11. #589699
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:17 am, LOBOMAN said:

    I think a big reason that there will be no “grilling” of the She Wolf has to do with “pay-back”. There is no one in congress that is clean enough to point a finger at anyone and stand up to any scrutinity of anything they have done.
    It’s the “cover your back” game…..

  12. #589704
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:19 am, jjmurphy said:

    There is no one in congress that is clean enough to point a finger at anyone and stand up to any scrutinity of anything they have done.

    LOBOMAN – Good one! In my book, they ARE all thieves and cheats.

  13. #589713
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:26 am, mngirl said:

    Interesting, she doesn’t even have the defense on the Merck story of doing it “for her constituents”, Merck is a NJ headquartered company.

    Unfortunately this will go no where, the Republicans on this committee are too wimpy to go after one of their own; which Hillary Clinton now is, since they all are more interested in being “Senators” than being “Conservatives”.

  14. #589715
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:30 am, bradley said:

    The very IDEA that this woman can even be THOUGHT OF as Secretary of State is sickening. She’s a totally corrupt as her W.C. Fields-nosed husband. Always has been, always will be. It’s all about HER.
    And THEM. They’re the “guests that wouldn’t leave”.

  15. #589720
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:33 am, thegreatbeast said:

    Apparently the poobahs running the Senate have allotted all of one day for hearings into the appropriateness of Ms. Clinton to head up the State Dept. I’m so relieved by their thoroughness.

  16. #589723
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:36 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Clinton Global Initiative certainly needs a looking into-but with Harry Reid and the Democratic control of the Senate I doubt it will happen. But WE need to hold any Republicans accountable who do not at least try. ‘Borking’ is a nasty weapon but it IS the weapon of choice for the Democrats and we dare not NOT use it.

  17. #589725
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:38 am, JHSII said:

    I wonder if the “maverick” McCain will create a new “Gang of 14″ to help Clinton be confirmed? :roll:

  18. #589732
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:43 am, SeniorD said:

    Reddog,

    Given the source and scope of ‘Billary’s’ political machine, the ever widening of Democrat Party scandals, a Congress that lards special interest projects into each and every piece of legislation, Congressional representatives being caught in illicit or highly suspect activity (think Jefferson, Murtha, Cisneros, Richardson, Studds, Spitzer, Cunningham, etc.) or even only the second Presidential Impeachment in American history, one can easily conclude the level of corruptness in politics.

    Graft, corruption and borderline behavior is common at all levels of politics. The Democrat Party seems to revel in such behavior.

  19. #589736
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:47 am, Insomniac said:

    corrupt politicians (an oxymoron if ever there were)

    I think you mean a redundancy, not an oxymoron. An honest politician, now…

  20. #589737
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:47 am, ajmontana said:

    Update: Hillary’s giving her statement on how she’ll fix the world.

    Shrill and Obingy are going to save the world?

    A twofer I can live without! :shock:

  21. #589738
    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:48 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Expert textpert choking smokers,
    Don’t you think the joker laughs at you?
    See how they smile like pigs in a sty,
    See how they snied.
    I’m crying.

    (From: I am the walrus)

  22. #589751
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:02 am, Lan Astaslem said:

    …raises new questions about potential ethics conflicts…

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! haaaa…. *sigh* whatever. jjmurphy said it. Move along. Nothing to see here.

  23. #589765
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:12 am, rocketman said:

    The Democratic controlled Senate confirmation process is a real joke. All the liberal hacks will be asked a few puffball questions and confirmed. Lack of skill, qualification for the position, basic dishonesty, bad associations will be ignored for them.
    ***
    The Senate record in the past stinks–very well qualified conservative candidates with good track records and excellent qualifications were trashed. John Bolton was a prime example–he did an excellent job for the U.S.A. there. He worked for our country–not for the U.N. anti-American agenda.
    ***
    Hillary Clinton and her disgraced husband “B.J.” started out as poor politicians in Arkansas. They are now worth over $100 million due to their influence peddling and questionable financial dealings. No Democrat Senators care about this. A very qualified Secretary of State–Condi Rice–will be replaced by an unqualified political hack–Hillary.
    ***
    The American people will pay bigtime for electing the corruptocrats and corrupticans in the Senate and House. We are going to get what we deserve soon. There is very little integrity or love for country in Congress–only the desire to get rich at our expense.
    ***
    John Bibb

  24. #589789
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:31 am, JDinTX said:

    The Republicans don’t have what it takes to put any pressure on these hearings. And even if they did ask a few pointed questions, they are going to roll over and play dead when the Dems start browbeating them on Obama’s appointments. I’m not sure we have anybody willing to stand up for what is right.

  25. #589790
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:31 am, jjmurphy said:

    The American people will pay bigtime for electing the corruptocrats and corrupticans in the Senate and House. We are going to get what we deserve soon.

    You’re right John Bibb. We have a new ruling class in the USA, as closed and inbred as the worst of the European monarchies of old. They are a self-perpetuating lot of the worst this country has to offer. They do not care about this country or its Constitution. They only care about power, and keeping that power.

  26. #589795
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:37 am, FamilyMan said:

    I watch some the Hillary conformation hearings and now I feel totally depressed. Why can’t we have politicians with the courage of George Washington, the eloquence of Jefferson and the integrity of John Adams?

  27. #589799
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:39 am, DBNinKY said:

    Barbara Boxer praises Hillary for “setting aside her ego” and “helping her greatest rival” for “the good of the country.”

    Boxer adds: “And I mean that sincerely.”

    Further proof that Hillary Clinton’s (and Bill’s) worst political enemies lie in the Democrat not Republican party.

  28. #589805
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:41 am, GraniteMan said:

    “The sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing and everyone will know we should do the right thing and the world will be perfect.”

    What a prophet our gal Hill is becoming.

  29. #589807
    On January 13th, 2009 at 11:42 am, FamilyMan said:

    “setting aside her ego”

    Does that mean she is practicing Zen?

  30. #589828
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, Mister P said:

    Hillary: “US committed to ending the war in Iraq.” Democrats just can’t say Win the damn war, can they. What cowards.

  31. #589845
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:16 pm, traveler49 said:

    The rebublicans can’t call her out on the pay/play because they are all on the same payroll as the Billandhill team. Each one has been bought and paid for by the same players that Hillary is working for and now their hands are tied. Don’t want to stop that money flow ya know.

  32. #589850
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, scituate_tgr said:

    “The AP obtained three of the senator’s government letters under the Freedom of Information Act.”

    The “appearance” that AP is actually searching for information to relay facts to the masses is quite refreshing.

  33. #589867
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, John Deaux said:

    On January 13th, 2009 at 10:05 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    There would have to be video of Hillary Clinton plunging a knife into Mother Theresa’s chest for her not to be confirmed.

    They’d just say it was photoshopped by Karl Rove.

  34. #589878
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, RobM1981 said:

    And you people say she was a “do nothing” senator, with no track record. You don’t call this a track record?

    OK, so she’s no Obama, but she’s learning. Give her some time under Yoda to learn “The Chicago Way.”

  35. #589901
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:48 pm, beachmom said:

    The dems don’t care about this stuff….when it involves fellow dems. They’ll make some lame excuse, not caring whether anyone buys it or not and confirm her.
    There isn’t a Republican with any spine in the Senate so none will bring any of this up or complain about it. They are a bunch of jellyfish. They are a disappointment, a terrible example to young and old alike and weak kneed.

  36. #589907
    On January 13th, 2009 at 12:50 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    Ethics? Conflicts of interest?

    With the Clintons, this is a dog bites man story.

    If these 2 were ever involved in something that didn’t stink to high heaven, now that would be newsworthy.

    Don’t expect the Republicans in Congress to provide any hurdles for Democrats to have to jump over for anything they want to do. The “Ds” own the whole show now. They will be limited only by the level of their creativity. Republicans exist only as window dressing.

  37. #589930
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:08 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    We all KNOW the Senate is full of limp-wristed, corrupt, ethically challenged RINOs who won’t call out Clinton on anything. We all know if they did the MSM would ignore it or brand them racist, sexist homophobes who hate “strong women.” And we all know that Democrats cannot be questioned on ethics and conflict of interests.

    I have said it before but can you imagine what would have been done to Condi Rice if she appeared before the same committee with the same kind of background? In fact, she would have been BORKED by the MSM and the Senate BEFORE she ever appeared!

    If the leftists didn’t have double standards they would have no standards at all. Welcome to “Hope & Change LLC.”

  38. #589948
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:18 pm, Marc said:

    Will anyone have the guts to remind Hillary of her infamous kiss on both cheeks with Suha Arafat? Will anyone ask Hillary why she was so silent when Suha accused Israel of poisoning Palestinian children? Will anyone ask: “Hillary, why did you let Suha get away with it and why did you smooch with her afterward?”
    The infamous photo is still on the web. I don’t know if there is video of the sickening event.

  39. #589953
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:20 pm, DagneyT said:

    It makes blood shoot out of my eyes Republicans are such wimps. The truth is the truth and it should not be swept under a rug in the name of bipartisanship.”

    I’ve long maintained that as GOP folks arrive in DC, they are given a spinectomy, which is then transplanted into the likes of Dirty Harry Reid and Puff Daschle!

  40. #589957
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, nuss said:

    Since Reagan’s last term as POTUS, there has been an ever-increasing “do-nothing, see-nothing, know-nothing” attitude in government. Politicians have gradually evolved toward the “pay-for-play”, “quid pro quo”, “scratch-my-back” mentality and away from high moral standards and country first attitudes. Unfortunately, politicos have learned that there is no penalty for this behavior because most voters vote for name recognition, glitter, and star power rather than substance. The corruptocrats and the sheeple are a marriage made in hell.

  41. #589962
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, sambo said:

    I would like to see someone play the tape of Obama making fun of her foreign policy experience…and then ask her how she got this job!

  42. #589964
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Floyd R. Turbo said:

    BARF. Brings to mind something I read on the blogs last week to the effect that someone has often referred to Bill and Hillary as the “Bonnie and Clyde” of politics. So very true. And as Rush said last Friday, “…we are SO screwed…”. Double BARF. Gonna be a LONG road…and “We the people” asked for it. There’s a whole flock of “chickens” circling in the sky, waiting to come home to “roost”, and boy when they do…

    Yeah, I know, but speaking metaphorically, of course chickens don’t “fly”, but you get my drift, I think. Or, the “piper’s” bill is gonna be huge when it comes due.

  43. #589967
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, DagneyT said:

    OK, so she’s no Obama, but she’s learning. Give her some time under Yoda to learn “The Chicago Way.”

    RobM, she was born in raised in Chicago, she’s a pro at ChiTown Politics!

  44. #590030
    On January 13th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, rambler said:

    She almost ran for the Senate in IL, but the Chicago machine didn’t want her.

  45. #590037
    On January 13th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, DagneyT said:

    I’m not sure we have anybody willing to stand up for what is right.

    JDinTX, No one even brought up what the future Labor Sec said when asked if she was in favor of the “something” check (senior moment) which would allow open votes in any company to unionize. She answered that she would not discuss it “in public”!

  46. #590059
    On January 13th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, sonofdy said:

    What is so wrong with a sec. of state who’s husband is gettting millions from different countries???

    Oh wait…

  47. #590148
    On January 13th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Republican Senators sit politely. Meanwhile, you have Harry Reid, who says of fellow Senator John McCain, “I can’t stand him.”

    These Rinos all have “Kick Me” signs on their rumps.

    The first Republican Senator that the Democrats openly hate will get my full admiration and support.

  48. #590558
    On January 13th, 2009 at 9:53 pm, JHSII said:

    Flyoverman – that would be Senator Joseph McCarthy.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why is Hillary laughing?

April 9, 2009 03:02 PM by Doug Powers

98 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

North Korea to put American journalists on trial

March 30, 2009 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“Botchmen”

March 10, 2009 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Global cooling moment of the day

January 20, 2009 06:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Chilly.

A bittersweet Hillary/Jawn Kerry moment Updated

January 13, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Oh, what might have been.


Categories: Hillary Clinton



JustOneMinute

» Stay Classy, Ezra!

HotAir GreenRoom