<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious tolerance in Hollywood? What&#8217;s that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:28:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4USA</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-596359</link>
		<dc:creator>4USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-596359</guid>
		<description>If polygamy is ok, then I feel comfortable suggesting bestiality or pedophilia or incest or...fill in the blank.

You see, once you open the box, it won&#039;t be contained.  The idea that it&#039;s ok for you but not for someone else completely breaks down.  But, somehow, I think you know that already.  

This isn&#039;t about fairness, it&#039;s about debauchery, it&#039;s about being a reprobate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If polygamy is ok, then I feel comfortable suggesting bestiality or pedophilia or incest or&#8230;fill in the blank.</p>
<p>You see, once you open the box, it won&#8217;t be contained.  The idea that it&#8217;s ok for you but not for someone else completely breaks down.  But, somehow, I think you know that already.  </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about fairness, it&#8217;s about debauchery, it&#8217;s about being a reprobate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corkie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-596061</link>
		<dc:creator>corkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-596061</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 15th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, Omu said:

    &lt;blockquote&gt;You’ve stated that you don’t think polygamy should be legal, therefore you, quite obviously, hate them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I haven’t stated polygamy should be legal. Haha, o ye who clutches at straws! Your point is as tired and irrelevant as your Republican party.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reread my statement, Omu.

Again, please tell me why you hate polygamists so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 15th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, Omu said:</p>
<blockquote><p>You’ve stated that you don’t think polygamy should be legal, therefore you, quite obviously, hate them.</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven’t stated polygamy should be legal. Haha, o ye who clutches at straws! Your point is as tired and irrelevant as your Republican party.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reread my statement, Omu.</p>
<p>Again, please tell me why you hate polygamists so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-594300</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-594300</guid>
		<description>And it can’t be a coincidence that the president of the Virginia ACLU was busted for kiddie porn.&lt;blockquote&gt;

I wasn&#039;t aware of that...why am I not surprised!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it can’t be a coincidence that the president of the Virginia ACLU was busted for kiddie porn.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware of that&#8230;why am I not surprised!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socky</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-594142</link>
		<dc:creator>Socky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-594142</guid>
		<description>Funny how the ACLU choose to defend the free speech right to distribute a textbook on how to rape children, but won&#039;t defend the free speech right to protest in front of an abortion clinic.

The idea that the ACLU is some kind of morally neutral force that treats all speech equally is pure bunk. 

And it can&#039;t be a coincidence that the president of the Virginia ACLU was busted for kiddie porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how the ACLU choose to defend the free speech right to distribute a textbook on how to rape children, but won&#8217;t defend the free speech right to protest in front of an abortion clinic.</p>
<p>The idea that the ACLU is some kind of morally neutral force that treats all speech equally is pure bunk. </p>
<p>And it can&#8217;t be a coincidence that the president of the Virginia ACLU was busted for kiddie porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593881</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593881</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 16th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, Jeff2161 said: 
Chap really does not deserve such vitriol for, expressing his thoughts in, a logical manner.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

oh of course, disagreeing with the gay agenda is &#039;vitriol&#039;  orwell would understand you all too well...

&#039;logical&#039;??  uh yeah, you&#039;d never make it as a computer programmer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 16th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, Jeff2161 said:<br />
Chap really does not deserve such vitriol for, expressing his thoughts in, a logical manner.
</p></blockquote>
<p>oh of course, disagreeing with the gay agenda is &#8216;vitriol&#8217;  orwell would understand you all too well&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;logical&#8217;??  uh yeah, you&#8217;d never make it as a computer programmer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff2161</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff2161</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593875</guid>
		<description>But, there are zombie&#039;s out there looking to eat BRAAAIINS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, there are zombie&#8217;s out there looking to eat BRAAAIINS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff2161</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff2161</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593874</guid>
		<description>Chap really does not deserve such vitriol for, expressing his thoughts in, a logical manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chap really does not deserve such vitriol for, expressing his thoughts in, a logical manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 310 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593780</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 310 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593780</guid>
		<description>[...] RELIGIOUS tolerance in Hollywood? What’s that? &#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RELIGIOUS tolerance in Hollywood? What’s that? &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593435</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593435</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t know, but that is not my problem. Maybe they thought it easier politically to get rid of such laws than adjust them upward.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

did you ever think maybe its BECAUSE THEY DIDN&#039;T WANT THE AGE OF CONSENT RAISED...rather LOWERED??? 

just like they said?? 

and can you think why??  hell, even a guvmint lawyer should be able to add 2 and 2...moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t know, but that is not my problem. Maybe they thought it easier politically to get rid of such laws than adjust them upward.</p></blockquote>
<p>did you ever think maybe its BECAUSE THEY DIDN&#8217;T WANT THE AGE OF CONSENT RAISED&#8230;rather LOWERED??? </p>
<p>just like they said?? </p>
<p>and can you think why??  hell, even a guvmint lawyer should be able to add 2 and 2&#8230;moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593432</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593432</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t know, but that is not my problem. Maybe they thought it easier politically to get rid of such laws than adjust them upward.

You are hopeless. I am done with you. I truly hope you don’t homeschool your kids.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

you know whats funny? is that your own article contradicts what you say...and you cannot answer it...instead ducking and covering..too funny!! 

you must be a guvmint lawyer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t know, but that is not my problem. Maybe they thought it easier politically to get rid of such laws than adjust them upward.</p>
<p>You are hopeless. I am done with you. I truly hope you don’t homeschool your kids.
</p></blockquote>
<p>you know whats funny? is that your own article contradicts what you say&#8230;and you cannot answer it&#8230;instead ducking and covering..too funny!! </p>
<p>you must be a guvmint lawyer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593363</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593363</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That Gretchen fool totally missed the point of the “Thou shalt not steal” sign. I can’t help but wonder if she was being intenionally obtuse or really is that stupid.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do believe she is really that stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That Gretchen fool totally missed the point of the “Thou shalt not steal” sign. I can’t help but wonder if she was being intenionally obtuse or really is that stupid.</p></blockquote>
<p>I do believe she is really that stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593361</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593361</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;and why didn’t those gay organizations from YOUR OWN ARTICLE…push for RAISING THE AGE OF CONSENT????? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know, but that is not my problem.  Maybe they thought it easier politically to get rid of such laws than adjust them upward.

You are hopeless.  I am done with you.  I truly hope you don&#039;t homeschool your kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and why didn’t those gay organizations from YOUR OWN ARTICLE…push for RAISING THE AGE OF CONSENT????? </p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, but that is not my problem.  Maybe they thought it easier politically to get rid of such laws than adjust them upward.</p>
<p>You are hopeless.  I am done with you.  I truly hope you don&#8217;t homeschool your kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593360</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593360</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chapoutier:&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;But atheists do bring it on themselves somewhat when we clamor for things like removing “In God We Trust” from money.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, I agree for the most part here. I think the more vocal members of the atheist community bring it on themselves sometimes. However, I can&#039;t say that they are &quot;wrong.&quot;

Afterall, they make a point when they say, &quot;why respect the absurd.&quot;

Of course, you are right though. Choosing one&#039;s battles only makes sense.

That Gretchen fool totally missed the point of the &quot;Thou shalt not steal&quot; sign. I can&#039;t help but wonder if she was being intenionally obtuse or really is that stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chapoutier:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>But atheists do bring it on themselves somewhat when we clamor for things like removing “In God We Trust” from money.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I agree for the most part here. I think the more vocal members of the atheist community bring it on themselves sometimes. However, I can&#8217;t say that they are &#8220;wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>Afterall, they make a point when they say, &#8220;why respect the absurd.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, you are right though. Choosing one&#8217;s battles only makes sense.</p>
<p>That Gretchen fool totally missed the point of the &#8220;Thou shalt not steal&#8221; sign. I can&#8217;t help but wonder if she was being intenionally obtuse or really is that stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593352</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593352</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Just curious, any thoughts on MM’s atheist bashing? Did you check out my links yet?

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah.  One of them.  What she was saying was overall, absurd. But atheists do bring it on themselves somewhat when we clamor for things like removing &quot;In God We Trust&quot; from money.  If those are the battles we choose to pick, we deserve to lose, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Just curious, any thoughts on MM’s atheist bashing? Did you check out my links yet?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah.  One of them.  What she was saying was overall, absurd. But atheists do bring it on themselves somewhat when we clamor for things like removing &#8220;In God We Trust&#8221; from money.  If those are the battles we choose to pick, we deserve to lose, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wighttrasch</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/15/religious-tolerance-in-hollywood-whats-that/comment-page-5/#comment-593350</link>
		<dc:creator>wighttrasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21517#comment-593350</guid>
		<description>If we don&#039;t have the same foundation, one cannot win a debate/argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we don&#8217;t have the same foundation, one cannot win a debate/argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
