See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #201
   On January 18th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, xler8bmw said:

   #193 I gave a complete explanation of how to change the constitution. Also, without a convention it takes up to 7 yrs for the change to take place if in fact it is done by congress when they put term limits on the change. 2/3rds of the states must ratify it first.

2. #202
   On January 18th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, xler8bmw said:

   #193 not to drag out the point. Just remember I wouldn’t take anyone in the congress to seriously about the constitution. reid din’t even know about the 17th amendment regarding Burris! Nor did Biden in the campaign about the responsibilities of the VP. She’s obviously and idiot!

3. #203
   On January 18th, 2009 at 2:55 pm, FamilyMan said:

   xler8bmw said:
   Just remember I wouldn’t take anyone in the congress to seriously about the constitution

   That IS the problem isn’t it?

4. #204
   On January 18th, 2009 at 3:02 pm, duff65 said:

   How did we get into this mess? Oh yeah, we nominated McCain (or the MSM did). Any of the other “serious” candidates would have cleaned Obama’s clock. And all he gets is worship from the media.

5. #205
   On January 18th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, xler8bmw said:

   #203 yes, yes it is!

6. #206
   On January 18th, 2009 at 4:19 pm, MtsEdge said:

   happyscrapper re definition of abomination:

   Don’t forget Proverbs 6:16-19

   Sound like anyone we know??

7. #207
   On January 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, happyscrapper said:

   On January 18th, 2009 at 4:19 pm, MtsEdge said:
   happyscrapper re definition of abomination:

   Don’t forget Proverbs 6:16-19

   Sound like anyone we know??

   Oh yes, indeed! Lots of wisdom in that Book!

8. #208
   On January 18th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, rambler said:

   Pelosi the twit wants to be for Barack what Tip O’Neil was to Jimmy Carter. The fallout might be amusing.

9. #209
   On January 18th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, happyscrapper said:

   On January 18th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, rambler said:
   Pelosi the twit wants to be for Barack what Tip O’Neil was to Jimmy Carter. The fallout might be amusing.

   Pelosi has an inflated view of her importance and intelligence. She is a total moron. Look at it another way…Congress approval, under 15%, Obama approval, over 75%. Who do you think wins in a stuation like that? Obama has a lot of corrupt political machinery behind him. She has no idea who she is dealing with. I would love to see her get squashed.

10. #210
    On January 18th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, MtsEdge said:

    approval, under 15%, Obama approval, over 75%. Who do you think wins in a stuation like that?

    I also think that Obama is not the “typical” politician, in that he is not listening to polls. He is doing what he seems programmed to do–convert the US to a socialist/Marxist state. He definitely won’t be intimidated by the likes of Pelosi and Reid. They are about to get played.

11. #211
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:50 pm, By Choice said:

    So let me get this straight: As to the Constitution President elect Soetero says ” the Constitution is a list of negative values that do not define what the country should do for its citizens”; in Baltimore he States “we need a new declaration of independence” and then desicrates the flag with his own image and there is no verifiable proof that he is an American citizen. Are any of these impeachable offences??

    just asking……….

12. #212
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    A bit off topic…but I just heard that HBO has bought the rights to all the entertainment and activities that have been going on out in Washington…Bruce Springsteen, U2, etc. In other words, unless you have the money to get to Washington DC, you won’t be able to see the inaugural entertainnment, etc. I am not that interested in the inauguration itself, but the musical acts, etc. would be fun to see. Am I wrong to think those things should be open to everyone? Doesn’t this whole thing belong to the American people? And whose tax dollars are paying for a huge chunk of this? I wonder who was responsible for selling the rights to HBO. Anybody know?

13. #213
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:47 pm, purealchemy said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, MtsEdge said:

    I also think that Obama is not the “typical” politician, in that he is not listening to polls. He is doing what he seems programmed to do–convert the US to a socialist/Marxist state. He definitely won’t be intimidated by the likes of Pelosi and Reid. They are about to get played

    I feel like the person who wrote earlier, “I don’t have a good feeling about this.”

14. #214
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, rambler said:
    Pelosi the twit wants to be for Barack what Tip O’Neil was to Jimmy Carter. The fallout might be amusing.

    Pelosi has an inflated view of her importance and intelligence. She is a total moron. Look at it another way…Congress approval, under 15%, Obama approval, over 75%. Who do you think wins in a stuation like that? Obama has a lot of corrupt political machinery behind him. She has no idea who she is dealing with. I would love to see her get squashed.

    give him a few months he’ll whittle away at the high approval rating…wait for the buyers remorse to set in with his raising taxes, putting a hefty tax on gas and whatever else he’s got up his dirty sleeve…and Congress, well they’ll keep there rating at about 15% or less if they keep on their stupid path….the trouble is Americans keep on re-electing the same idiots that have kept us in the problems we have and sinking deeper…insanity is repeating the same and expecting a different result…

15. #215
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:57 pm, happyscrapper said:

    the trouble is Americans keep on re-electing the same idiots that have kept us in the problems we have and sinking deeper…insanity is repeating the same and expecting a different result…

    The reason everyone keeps voting these traitors back in is that most voters don’t have a clue what is really going on, they don’t care, or they are too stupid to care. So they just vote for the “best looking”, best orator, the one who promises the most, or just because mommy and daddy voted for that party. There are a lot of people who voted for Obama who don’t even know who his running mate is!! Our right to vote should be accompanied by an aptitude test before a person is allowed in the voting booth. People have desecrated the sacred priviledge to vote by their apathy. And of course, you have ACORN, an organization that seems to be getting away with voter fraud…and that will continue.

16. #216
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:03 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:47 pm, purealchemy said:

    Ditto here.

17. #217
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:59 pm, ArmywifeArmymom said:

    When our soldiers die defending our freedom it surely isn’t in that disgrace of a flag that their coffins are wrapped in.

18. #218
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:01 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Obama Nation:
    Using Racism In Order To Form A More Socialist Union

    Commentary (I first posted on March 19, 2008)
    on the remarks of Senator Barack Obama:
    ‘A More Perfect Union‘
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

19. #219
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:05 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Why aren’t his supporters waving a flag like this?

20. #220
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:17 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    See the 9th Commandment of the Obamassiah:

    The Book of The Obamassiah
    Chapter II

    The Commandments of the Obamassiah are nine but this is a living document and changes are made as needed.

    I. Thou shalt not speak the middle name of the Obamassiah. To do so exposes thine as a racist and it shall not be tolerated.

    II. Thou shalt not mention past associations of the Obamassiah. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For despite any recent or current friendship his holiness may have with them, he was only a child when they ran afoul of the law. Or he missed that sermon.

    III. Thou shalt not mention praise of the Obamassiah by murderers and tyrants. To do so exposes thine as a racist, it is a sign that thine has truly lost one’s bearings.

    IV. Thou shalt not mention the schooling of the Obamassiah at any point in his existence. To do so exposes thine as a racist.

    V. Thou shalt not question the Obamassiah more than eight times. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For the time of his holiness is of a value beyond your own.

    VI. Thou shalt not question the past of the Obamassiah family arrival or his birth. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For events in time matter not if they occur differently than his holiness speaks of them. It matters only that you believe.

    VII. Thou shalt not question the words of the Obamassiah’s spouse. For if her words mirror those of the past associations of his holiness then thine is a racist twice over for the mention of them. (see II)

    VIII. The purveyors of words to the people shall cast only praise on the Obamassiah. To turn from this exposes thine as a racist and a soldier of the unbeliever and thine should be cast out and lose any source of livelihood.

    IX. Thou shalt not question the patriotism of the Obamassiah. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For by not displaying any outward love for his land only proves his love for his land.

    Herendeththelesson

    rihar on May 9, 2008 at 5:35 PM

21. #221
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:41 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Who is “Inspired” to “Bring an Empire to its Knees”?

22. #222
    On January 19th, 2009 at 9:53 am, RedDog said:

    Most of these people are ignorant, and some quite stupid. Unless they are wilfully ignorant, I don’t get particularly steamed. It’s simply who they are, and their actions stem from that. These are people who constantly stew in a hothouse of entitlement and anti-American gas.

23. #223
    On January 19th, 2009 at 11:48 am, Kokonut said:

    Take a look at this YouTube video and skip it to about 1:52 and watch the rest. Deaf people are now going to incorporate the signed letters “O” and “b” in “Ob”ama where the letter “b” becomes into a flag.

    Oooh, how patriotic. The video includes English subtitle.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67V8qWQd_EM&eurl=http://gnarlydorkette.blogspot.com/2009/01/for-president-obama-your-name-sign-from.html

    Not quite descecrating the U.S. flag but it’s funny for people to try and make him into the most “patriotic” of all presidents, even attempting to surpass Abe Lincoln. The problem is that Lincoln’s the honest one.

24. #224
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:16 pm, Kokonut said:

    Here’s appropriate sign language name for Obama.

25. #225
    On January 20th, 2009 at 9:40 am, wayiwalk said:

    The 57 stars are for the new states created by splitting up and redistricting existing states so that they can continue to monopolize the senate!