Not all conservatives are singing O-Kumbaya

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 18, 2009 11:12 AM

I respect the historic tradition of inauguration day, not the cult of personality driving the schlock festivities now taking place.

Pomp and circumstance have been replaced with pimp and self-aggrandizement — all topped with a heapful of double standards.

I’m not the only one who thinks so. Politico’s Daniel Libit has a piece this morning quoting several conservatives willing to dissent from the Beltway O-Kumbaya. The intro:

With Barack Obama’s approval ratings in the 70s and his visage plastered on every shop window and Metro card in Washington, it’s hard to remember that 58 million Americans voted for the other guy.

Even President Bush — who presumably counts himself among that group — said last week that Obama’s inauguration is “a moment of hope and pride.”

That’s not exactly how Michelle Malkin describes it.

“Jan. 20 has turned into a schlock inauguration, (where) every last moocher has come to cash in on Obama,” says the conservative blogger and pundit. “There are some of us who want to bang our heads against the wall.”

While most Republicans now in office are saying all the right things about Tuesday’s proceedings — roll tape on “peaceful transfer of power” and “historic moment for the country” sound bites — some conservatives can’t quite get themselves in the “We Are One” mood.

Not even for a day.

On his radio show last week, Rush Limbaugh railed against “people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, ‘Well, I hope he succeeds. We have to give him a chance.’”

“Why?” Limbaugh demanded. “They didn’t give Bush a chance in 2000. Before he was inaugurated, the search-and-destroy mission had begun. I’m not talking about search-and-destroy, but I’ve been listening to Barack Obama for a year and a half. I know what his politics are. I know what his plans are, as he has stated them. I don’t want them to succeed.”

I do not pledge allegiance to The Obama States of America.

Getting ready for the countdown.

3, 2, 1…RAAAAAAAACIST!

***

Sister Toldjah notes that the AP has finally acknowledged the Obama-fest’s pricey pricetag in a dicey economy. ST points out Baghdad Jim McDermott’s disingenuous green defense of Obama-fest and skewers the hypocrisy:

The only thing more pathetic than McDermott’s hypocrisy is the fact that so many Obama worshippers who continue to descend on the Capitol in advance of PEBO’s inauguration are the same types who slammed John McCain as an out-of-touch rich guy living off his wife’s mega-wealth, so out of touch that he couldn’t remember how many houses they owned, and also criticizing Gov. Palin for spending decisions on her’s and her family’s wardrobes that she did not make, while at the same they painted Barack Obama as a humble guy who “gets the common man.” How many of these same people (including those in the mainstream press) would be looking the other way if it had been McCain/Palin holding this big, expensive Lincolnesque inaugural ceremony in the middle of this bleak economy?

The numbers would be in the single digits, I suspect.

***

The schlock inauguration continues: Obama tattoos. Ew.

***

The all-star video lives up (or down) to expectations. Allah’s got it.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Barack Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #201
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, William Amos said:

    Oh really?

    So in your little fantasy world

    1 blog comment = Hanks, Lefties and gays threatening economic doom on anyone who voted for prop 8 and protests and marches on those of faith for freely expressing their beliefs ?

    Yeah I can see how on the left that is equal

    /eyeroll

  2. #202
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, usa_usa said:

    The sarcasm flew right over your head, huh?

    Jindal has spent his entire life in the United States. Speaking a second language makes him exotic?

    His real name is not bobby either. It is some exotic foreign word ( It sounds like peesh )

  3. #203
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    The difference is, Obama could have proved his eternal worthiness for a 20 dollar money order. Why would a supposedly, intelligent, cool guy like him refuse?

  4. #204
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, JamieD said:

    Don’t worry, Mookie just can’t get it (or refuses to). I think its the latter.

  5. #205
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:15 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I would have covered the cost for him. Just, trying to be helpful. McCain would have been shredded for the same issue.

  6. #206
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    No, Bobby is the American sounding name he adopted for himself, because he considers himself an American.

    Like JTP’s first name not being Joe, in a sense.

    His given name is Piyush. He was raised Hindu, but found Christ as a teenager.

  7. #207
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, Southpaw said:

    I’m having a good laugh at the sore losers winners here. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Don’t y’all have some flags to decorate desecrate?

  8. #208
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Thanks for the pronounciation lesson. Was his birth in the U.S. in question?

  9. #209
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:17 pm, usa_usa said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, Jeff2161 said:
    The difference is, Obama could have proved his eternal worthiness for a 20 dollar money order. Why would a supposedly, intelligent, cool guy like him refuse?

    Only reason he wont do it is because he his hiding something. And what could he be hiding ?

    I wonder why wont someone in Honolulu health dept leak the real details ? Isn’t there one real american working in that office ..

  10. #210
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:18 pm, Jeff2161 said:
  11. #211
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:19 pm, Mookie said:

    So in your little fantasy world

    1 blog comment = Hanks, Lefties and gays threatening economic doom on anyone who voted for prop 8 and protests and marches on those of faith for freely expressing their beliefs ?

    Yeah I can see how on the left that is equal

    /eyeroll

    William, your comments are always intelligent and thoughtful so please don’t sell yourself short here. You know perfectly well there are thousands of people who feel the was the person who made that comment feels. Go over to Free Republic and look at the hundreds of threads that talk about Obama not being the president of “real Americans”. They’re legion. There are lists being created of companies that sponsored any of the inaugural events so that they can be boycotted. Same with celebrities who appear at the events or who donated to him. Boycotts against Krispy Kreme, Pepsi, Coke, HBO, Disney and countless others are being organized. I’m not saying either side is right. What I’m saying is that it’s disingenuous to think that this kind of behavior is exclusive to one side.

  12. #212
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:19 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    usa_usa: Remember Vince Foster ?

  13. #213
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:21 pm, usa_usa said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    No, Bobby is the American sounding name he adopted for himself, because he considers himself an American.

    Like JTP’s first name not being Joe, in a sense.

    His given name is Piyush. He was raised Hindu, but found Christ as a teenager.

    I understand your support for him. But after seeing his speech to his native community, I completely soured on him. Maybe he was just being dishonest at that time. But he really seemed to be emphasizing his asian roots over American values.

  14. #214
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:21 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I’m surprised Blago is still breathing. No conservatives are threatening him.

  15. #215
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:24 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I’m not advocating anyone yet. No one on the horizon is willing to stand tall for what they believe. I want a candidate that believes the Constitution means something.

  16. #216
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:25 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Where is the sec. of state in line of succession…Just wondering. sarc

  17. #217
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:26 pm, rplatt said:

    Don’t be overwhelmed by this side show; It’s all staged by the left and their enablers in the media. There are indeed at least 58 million people that are less than impressed by this charade but they are being made invisible by the media propaganda machines.

  18. #218
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:26 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Bobby Jindal Wiki

    I might discover a position/ideological issue that’ll turn me off Jindal, but excluding the minor candidates (like Duncan Hunter, the GOP candidate I sent money to) he was as good or better than any major GOP candidates in 2008.

  19. #219
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:26 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Jeff2161 said:: Remember Vince Foster ?

    Suicide?
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA when pigs fly.

  20. #220
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:27 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    After all, We would not want to upset the ( reference to female dog, deleted )

  21. #221
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:28 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Well, maybe assisted suicide…That’s PC, isn’t it ?

  22. #222
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:29 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    FamilyMan: I thinkyou see the direction I’m coming from…

  23. #223
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:30 pm, usa_usa said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:24 pm, Jeff2161 said:
    I’m not advocating anyone yet. No one on the horizon is willing to stand tall for what they believe. I want a candidate that believes the Constitution means something.

    Republicans are damaged beyond repair. They are trying to be more and more like democrats to win more votes from idiots. Palin is the best hope right now.

  24. #224
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:30 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    I’m seeing a trend here last few months. When MM blogs about media bias, immigration, Prop 8, JTP, military heroes, etc., response is tepid. When she blogs about BHO, the trolls come out in force. Cult of personality?

    Is his experience and policy so soft that he cannot suffer criticism?

  25. #225
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:30 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    G.W. Bush had NO suicides in his administration…Top That, Obama-philes.

  26. #226
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm, Mookie said:

    I understand your support for him. But after seeing his speech to his native community, I completely soured on him. Maybe he was just being dishonest at that time. But he really seemed to be emphasizing his asian roots over American values.

    But don’t all politicians pander like that? Remember when Romney went to Miami wearing a guayabera and bungled that quote in Spanish about liberty and freedom?

  27. #227
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    For SecState to be POTUS, The Anointed One, Sloe Joe, Stretch Pelosi and whoever replaces the Klansman would all have to die/be permanantly disabled.

    Not impossible, considering it is Her Thighness

  28. #228
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Let’s ignore, hunting with Cheney.

  29. #229
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm, William Amos said:

    William, your comments are always intelligent and thoughtful so please don’t sell yourself short here. You know perfectly well there are thousands of people who feel the was the person who made that comment feels. Go over to Free Republic and look at the hundreds of threads that talk about Obama not being the president of “real Americans”.

    That wasnt the issue here. Of course there are those on the right and left who dont like the outcome of elections.

    The difference is that the left actively tries to overcome an election via some mechanism while the right simply grumbles and goes on blogs and ultimately takes little action.

    Yes is some call for action but I dont see where Michelle posting a thread about not agreeing with Obama on issues is the same as calling for an election result to be overturned because some disagree with the outcome (See Prop 8)

    Yes some will say that Obama shouldnt be president but isnt vast movement to overturn the election results.

  30. #230
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:32 pm, Mookie said:

    When MM blogs about media bias, immigration, Prop 8, JTP, military heroes, etc., response is tepid.

    You think the Prop. 8 threads are tepid? They average about 500 posts. :lol:

  31. #231
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:32 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Not all that unbelievble…Although, Pelosi would have to pass from her earthly rewards…

  32. #232
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, desertdweller said:

    Obama is an arrogant, dangerous ignoramus with a self-appointed halo. How’s that for Kumbaya?

  33. #233
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, Joy said:

    Mookie – How many conservatives formed mobs, threatened Obamabots or forced people from their jobs because they voted for b. hussein? How many b. hussein voters have been attacked by angry mobs of conservatives??

    There is NO moral equivalence between the Prop 8 mobs trying to overturn a lawful election, that ammended the Ca Constitution after having already voted for a law first… only to have it overturned, and conservatives trying to get b. hussein to show his freaking Birth Certificate?

    You draw the most insane moral equivalences.

  34. #234
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:38 pm, usa_usa said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:26 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Bobby Jindal Wiki

    I might discover a position/ideological issue that’ll turn me off Jindal, but excluding the minor candidates (like Duncan Hunter, the GOP candidate I sent money to) he was as good or better than any major GOP candidates in 2008.

    for one thing he has his hand out for federal assistance like dem governors. That shows you how much he believes in fiscal responsibility.

  35. #235
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:38 pm, Mookie said:

    Yes is some call for action but I dont see where Michelle posting a thread about not agreeing with Obama on issues is the same as calling for an election result to be overturned because some disagree with the outcome

    No, I agree that Michelle isn’t posting a call for action to get Obama out of office. I think what I was trying to get at is that anyone who has a serious interest in politics, as everyone here does, has some built in sore loser in them. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. It keeps you on your toes. There’s a great book about college basketball called “To Hate Like This Is To Be Happy Forever” about the Duke/North Carolina rivalry. In a way, that applies to politics as well. We’re all guilty of it at some point/points.

    Thank God for the internet, though. Can you imagine what our family and friends would think of us if we didn’t have a place to vent? :lol:

  36. #236
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:40 pm, Mookie said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, Joy said:

    Mookie – How many conservatives formed mobs, threatened Obamabots or forced people from their jobs because they voted for b. hussein? How many b. hussein voters have been attacked by angry mobs of conservatives??

    There is NO moral equivalence between the Prop 8 mobs trying to overturn a lawful election, that ammended the Ca Constitution after having already voted for a law first… only to have it overturned, and conservatives trying to get b. hussein to show his freaking Birth Certificate?

    You draw the most insane moral equivalences.

    You’re entitled to think that. But you’ve missed my point entirely.

  37. #237
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:42 pm, usa_usa said:

    But don’t all politicians pander like that? Remember when Romney went to Miami wearing a guayabera and bungled that quote in Spanish about liberty and freedom?

    Romney is the masterful panderer. That is why he got thumped by even Huckabee in red states. He/his associates tried to slime Palin after election. He would never get my vote.

  38. #238
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:47 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    Mookie said: You think the Prop. 8 threads are tepid? They average about 500 posts.

    Not lately, Hanks was almost 500 but most of the others were <100. Nice try.

    The troll will not abide any criticism of BHO.

  39. #239
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:48 pm, right_on said:

    The difference is, Obama could have proved his eternal worthiness for a 20 dollar money order.

    Why would he do that? It seems he needs all the money he can get his hands on to pay for his coronation.

    He proclaimed his administration would be very accessible, and he’s proving it. He’s selling his access to anyone able to pay (except N. Korea…that wouldn’t look right). Upwards of $150 million so far for his big event. How many college educations could that money pay for?

  40. #240
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:49 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    The troll = did not mean Mookie personally. My apologies, meant trolls in general.

  41. #241
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:56 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Jeff2161 said:
    FamilyMan: I thinkyou see the direction I’m coming from…

    YES

  42. #242
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, Southpaw said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:18 pm, Jeff2161 said:
    Southpaw: Obamanista’s beat us sore-losers to it.
    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/17/the-official-flag-of-the-obama-states-of-america/

    Yea, I posted a few comments on the first page of that thread. Sums up the differences between liberals and conservatives in a nutshell. I just don’t see conservatives desecrating the American flag to make a point. When someone like Bill Ayers tramples on the the American flag, he loses all credibilty with me and I have no interest in anything he has to say.

  43. #243
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    From the land of foregone conclusions…

  44. #244
    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:59 pm, right_on said:

    I think what I was trying to get at is that anyone who has a serious interest in politics, as everyone here does, has some built in sore loser in them.

    That may be true with the liberals who post here, but I believe that most of the strong conservatives who post here just want the Democrats to play by the same set of rules that they impose on others.

    For decades, the Democrat Party, and the twisted minds that control it’s direction, have found it impossible to accept a defeat. In their minds, the only way conservatism can win elections is by cheating the system.

  45. #245
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:04 pm, FamilyMan said:

    right_on said:but I believe that most of the strong conservatives who post here just want the Democrats to play by the same set of rules that they impose on others.

    I’m not a bitter loser. I just what the politicians to adhere to our Constitution.

  46. #246
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:06 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    FamilyMan: You are right.

  47. #247
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:09 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    Obama did not win if you count the votes of real americans. He won because america haters voted for him in droves. See any county where real americans live, Obama lost all of them.

    Wow. That’s the dumbest thing I’ve seen here in a long time, and based on the number of conservatards here, that’s saying something.

    It’s over. The USA you grew up on is OVER. Demographically, economically, spiritually, scientifically, intellectually, politically – OVER. We can’t go back. The world has changed. We have changed. CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE. Don’t you get it?

    Adapt and evolve. The time is now. YES WE CAN.

  48. #248
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:14 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Let’s ignore, hunting with Cheney.

    Good grief, the man shoots ONE lawyer and people get upset-geesh. Come on dude, it is not like there is a shortage of lawyers. It is perfectly safe to go hunting with VP Cheney–just hang back a touch.

  49. #249
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:14 pm, right4life said:

    It’s over. The USA you grew up on is OVER

    absolutely TRUE!! now its the USSA a socialist hell-hole, I’m sure you’ll be happy..

    go defend your country, cause I won’t, and my kids sure as hell won’t!

  50. #250
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, JamieD said:

    It’s over. The USA you grew up on is OVER

    Hence the problem is revealed.

    Did you forget that virtually half of the country did not vote for Obama? This proves that it is not over; just the election (duhh)

  51. #251
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:16 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    True enough AZ: It’s not like they are an endangered species…LOL

  52. #252
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:16 pm, right_on said:

    I just what the politicians to adhere to our Constitution.

    That is also my feeling. All too often, they break the rules, and if caught, hire legal shape-shifters to mold an interpretation of the law, far beyond what was intended, to absolve them of any wrong-doing.

    Absent absolution, they meekly claim that it was “an honest mistake” or “an oversight” or whatever happens to be the phrase du jour. Take “Chris Dodd” or “Charlie Rangel” for recent examples. They will NOT be held to answer for their feigned ignorance of the law…and these guys still have Chairmanships!

  53. #253
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Tyoical comment…protect us, while we insult, disparage you.

  54. #254
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:19 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Re: the IMF, How many normal people get a check to pay their taxes? Bull-Spit

  55. #255
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:21 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:09 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    It’s over. The USA you grew up on is OVER. Demographically, economically, spiritually, scientifically, intellectually, politically – OVER. We can’t go back. The world has changed. We have changed. CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE. Don’t you get it?

    The point of Obama’s Nuremberg-style inaugural pageantry – and your presence here – is to bolster allies and demoralize the opposition.

    That works for a while. But then you start getting Operation Valkyries.

    You really think that 50% of the country is going to put up with collectivism?

    Before you know it, your ilk will be in the history bin too.

    Change works both ways.

    auf wiedersehen

  56. #256
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:22 pm, Southpaw said:

    We can’t go back. The world has changed. We have changed. CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE. Don’t you get it?

    Adapt and evolve. The time is now. YES WE CAN.

    Two things that have changed very little over the past 2000 years: politics and human nature.

    Don’t set yourself up for too big of a disappointment.

  57. #257
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:22 pm, nlebou said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Just a coincidence…

    Tuesday is a national day of penance, mourning and prayer for American Catholics.

    That was last year.
    National Day of Penance is Thurday the 22nd.

  58. #258
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:28 pm, right_on said:

    eaglehaslanded

    That’s the dumbest thing I’ve seen here in a long time, and based on the number of conservatards here…

    The all-embracing, diversity adherent gets hoisted by his own petard! Brilliant!

  59. #259
    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:43 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    What idiot already in field goal range, no time outs, under 10 seconds, dumps a short pass over the middle?

  60. #260
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:00 pm, Southpaw said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 8:43 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    What idiot already in field goal range, no time outs, under 10 seconds, dumps a short pass over the middle?

    Well, at least Roethlisberger has a first half QB rating in double digits. Ouch.

  61. #261
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:01 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    It’s not your father’s country anymore:

    http://www.esquire.com/features/data/how-obama-won-0209?click=main_sr

  62. #262
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:12 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Obama won on the back of a worshipful main stream media and an 8 to 1 margin in money. Many, even most, Obama voters did not vote for a man mentored by Communists like Frank Marshall Davis’ American hating anti-Semites like Edward Said and Rashid Khalidi; and terrorist bombers and their possibly cop killing common law spouses like Ayers and Dohrn. They voted for an intentionally vague “Hope” and “Change”.

    Dems seem to have means and motive for a permanent one party state. They are one vote shy on SCOTUS, we can hope either they won’t actually act to create a one party state, or elections will change things sufficiently before they can ACORNize the vote. 2010 may not be enough time to monkey-wrench the system to guarantee sufficient fraud, but with a compliant media, 2010 may not be enough time for the average voter who has decent morality and belief in self-reliance but was conned into voting Obama to realize that “HOPE” and “CHANGE” were code-words for “MARX” and “LENIN”.

  63. #263
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:14 pm, TK-421 said:

    You know whats funny Eagle, a study was done that shows more people that live in Urban area’s have mental problems. I think I see the connection. Not that it matters, one good war, problem solved. Cities are little more than Targets.

    Anyone notice how Obama’s call for moderation and lax spending for his little party, turned up being a 152 MILLION dollar one? 4 times Bush’s. And there is no getting over it, people like you Eagle are now happy and think as your a Urban Dweller that you are superior, and that us poor dumb country folk should do whats “best” for us.

    What will happen has happend and will happen again. The Republic is dead and a civil war shall happen with in the next few years. Or a breakup as a result of regional conflicts. That or the absorbation of the US by another power. This falling out started in the 1970′s and gained momentum in the 90′s only 9/11 has kept that at bay, and with the short sightedness of the goverment and by proxy the American people that has been forgotton. Obama only one because of a slim popular vote, and a massive “landslid” electorate that reflects the devide of this nation. American isn’t special all nations fall. And a Republic never survives a hard time with out becoming an Empire, something the American people don’t have the stomach for.

  64. #264
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:15 pm, JamieD said:

    It’s not your father’s country anymore:

    Someone has made an extreme assumption, which may shed light on the distorted point of view we are continually bombarded with.

    This is everyone’s country as we have experienced it. I only want change for the better, not to “embrace” change just for the sake of change, and to stop the better aspects from being polluted.

    My father’s country…yes. My country…yes. Our country…yes.

    Socialist country…no, at least not yet.

    We all influence the future. May the best aspects win, but let us not conclude that the best of the country before I was born (Father’s Country?), has disappeared just because Obama won. Please.

  65. #265
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:21 pm, usa_usa said:

    Can USA survive two socialist (OK one socialist followed by a marxist ?)presidents in a row ?

  66. #266
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:27 pm, desertdweller said:

    Good grief, the man shoots ONE lawyer and people get upset-geesh. Come on dude, it is not like there is a shortage of lawyers. It is perfectly safe to go hunting with VP Cheney–just hang back a touch.

    Go back and read the after action stories on that event.

    The lawyer blew it by walking ahead of a hunting party.

    I’d go birding with Cheney any day.

  67. #267
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, right4life said:

    what eagle has forgotten is that the Lord rules the nations and puts on the throne whom HE will….

    and it looks like He doesn’t have good plans for the USA…

    its gonna be a wild ride…but the US must decline, abandon israel…and the european union must rise….so the beast can raise his wounded head…

    all is going according to HIS plan.

  68. #268
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:36 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Bush wasn’t exactly a socialist. He didn’t veto any spending bills the not exactly conservative Republican Congress sent him, and he chose to support the Medicaid drug expansion. That may have been political, to deny the Democrats an issue. Of course, trying to be a slightly less socialist version of a socialist (I think beyond socialist to full bore Marxist) party leads in only a slightly slower trip down the path to socialism.

    Ramos and Campeon have not been pardoned, and Bush seems willing to kick the can on Iran and nuclear weapons to a man who may actually welcome a nuclear Iran as another step toward destroying the supposed hemogeny of the American super-power.

    Does anybody really think Obama would use military force to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons?

  69. #269
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:37 pm, Southpaw said:

    It’s not your father’s country anymore.

    Crime, poverty, hatred, treachery, greed, corruption, sloth, discontent.
    Which of those is some guy from Chicago going to solve?

    Two things that haven’t changed since my fathers’ time: The virtues of self-reliance and self-discipline. Hope and change come from within. No politician with a slick dog and pony show is going to change that.

  70. #270
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:40 pm, usa_usa said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:36 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Bush wasn’t exactly a socialist. He didn’t veto any spending bills the not exactly conservative Republican Congress sent him, and he chose to support the Medicaid drug expansion. That may have been political, to deny the Democrats an issue. Of course, trying to be a slightly less socialist version of a socialist (I think beyond socialist to full bore Marxist) party leads in only a slightly slower trip down the path to socialism.

    Ramos and Campeon have not been pardoned, and Bush seems willing to kick the can on Iran and nuclear weapons to a man who may actually welcome a nuclear Iran as another step toward destroying the supposed hemogeny of the American super-power.

    Does anybody really think Obama would use military force to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons?

    Wow, how did you miss he most recent and the biggest socialist act ? Hint: it involves billions, bailout

  71. #271
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:47 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Re: Hunting with Cheney….Take Pelosi with you.

  72. #272
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:51 pm, right_on said:

    Esquire Magazine exit poll? That’s a reliable source of accurate information…

    Seriously, Obama won for three reasons: 1) money – vast amounts of untraceable campaign contributions; 2) he is a fairly articulate black man, who was supported by guilt-ridden white folks, and white power brokers (who pull the strings); and 3) he was able to take advantage of gullible people who fell for the Democrat’s tried and true message of hope and hyperbole.

    His ascendancy, IMO, is doomed to failure. I think we’ll see that his supporters are the same kinds of morons who sign mortgages without reading the documentation.

    The question is, how long will it take for buyer’s remorse to set in? These savvy voters will quickly buy into the inevitable Republican blame game. Personal responsibility is a term that is foreign to most liberals.

  73. #273
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:54 pm, right_on said:

    Crime, poverty, hatred, treachery, greed, corruption, sloth, discontent.
    Which of those is some guy from Chicago going to solve?

    You left out moral turpitude.

  74. #274
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:55 pm, Southpaw said:

    Wow, how did you miss he most recent and the biggest socialist act ? Hint: it involves billions, bailout.

    Cause and effect do not exist independently. George Bush was not blackmaing banks to give home loans to people with poor or no credit histories.
    Joe Baca and special interest cacauses in Washington were busy doing that.

    The notion that everyone deserves to own a home is a socialist one.

  75. #275
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:57 pm, greysheepdog said:

    Thank God for the playoffs!

  76. #276
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:58 pm, Socky said:

    Brain-dead Maryland legislator sums it up perfectly: “It doesn’t matter that the state of Maryland is broke as long as Barack Obama is President of the United States. This is great.” (Maryland State Sen. Lisa A. Gladden [D-Baltimore]).

    That’s the mentality.

  77. #277
    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:59 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    How did I forget the bailout?

    I must have been in a generous mood.

    But that is the Anglo/French/Swedish Euro-socialism. It produces a slow decline, a permanent unemployed class approaching 10%, and whether cause or effect, is accompanied by a post-Christian view of life and morality, where sexual license is high, but birthrates are so low that obviously disloyal immigrants must be brought in because there are not enough young to fill all the jobs.

    Russia is an interesting compare/contrast example as they slip back towards full blown Stalin flavored Marx, they have high mortality rates, very low birthrates, partly via the most common Russian form of birth control, which is abortion, but they are nationalistic or xenophobic enough not to welcome mass immigration. I think the USSR did a good enough job destroying the practice of Christianity (and persecuting Jews), that an irreligious people who didn’t share in the early gains of the capitalistic experiment have nothing to turn to but heavy drinking and casual sex for comfort.

    We’re halfway there, this country has the birth rate to maintain itself without immigration (although the Ponzi scheme of social security demands faster population growth than native US citizens and their just above replacement birth rates would provide).

    Bush meant well, but his second term did not go well, and my biggest issue of all, he seems content accepting a nuclear armed Iran.

    He is a fool if he thinks Obama would do anything to stop Iran. And Bush is reported to have shot down an Israeli proposal to try to stop Iran’s nukes by refusing to allow Israeli planes to overfly Iraq.

  78. #278
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:00 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The lawyer lived, Mary Jo Kopechne didn’t…

  79. #279
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:08 pm, right_on said:

    O-T…

    Does anyone know how much the entertainers were paid to perform at the “We are One” concert? I’m curious.

  80. #280
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:15 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Off Topic for sure…Cardinals, Steelers Superbowl…

  81. #281
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, Southpaw said:

    Cardinals in the Super Bowl…

    “You’re traveling through another dimension — a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That’s a signpost up ahead: your next stop: the Twilight Zone!”

  82. #282
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:23 pm, Socky said:

    Cardinals in the Super Bowl…

    I hate this news if only for the fact that it might make John McCain happy.

  83. #283
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, e-DigitalCameras said:

    No Kumbaya here… just sort of laughing as we watch the country officially and completely being flushed down the toilet.

    At the same time, nothing is ever on TV so I do have Fox News on in the background most of the time and I’ve heard the annoying clip from Obama’s speech today (I think it was today) where he talks about us being “One”, and then he goes on to list a bunch of races, “straight and gay”, etc. etc. Um, why are you dividing us up in to minority groups… while claiming we’re all the same, equal, and “one”?

    We’ve all seen this before, but this clip is particularly obnoxious… Especially given his race card playing, terrorist befriending, black separatist church attending ways… Oh, did I mention that he’s surrounded by crooks and scandal, and his idea of “change” is appointing unqualified people to important positions (not to mention radical socialists), as well as mountains of Clinton people.

    Kumbay-this, Barry and friends.

  84. #284
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:41 pm, tbear44 said:

    My sister who lives in Seattle reports at the grocery store they now have Obama cookies. I didn’t believe it, but she says it’s true.

  85. #285
    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:46 pm, tamarah180 said:

    I still say San Fran Nan will have Biden done in, encourage SCOTUS to remove Obummer from office for not meeting Constitutional requirements, indict Feinstein for certifying him and have her own Coronation Party before the end of Summer 2009.

  86. #286
    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:10 pm, tamarah180 said:

    Good grief, the man shoots ONE lawyer and people get upset-geesh.

    Wait – I thought that attorney disparaged Cheney’s gay daughter. So, in reality, the Libs should be deifying Cheney since he shot a homophobe. I’m just saying…

    Just trying to set the record straight.
    :-P

  87. #287
    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:10 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Why are my kids out of school tomorrow???? I wish I had this many days off when I was a student!

  88. #288
    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:19 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 10:15 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Off Topic for sure…Cardinals, Steelers Superbowl…

    /offtopic

    I just watched both those games. Is the Universe going to implode now that the Cardinals have made the Super Bowl?

    /doublyofftopic

    Driving earlier today was a nightmare with that P.F. Chang’s marathon.

  89. #289
    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:22 pm, scottthong said:

    I, on the other hand, want Obama to be a successful President… Because in order to do so, he must adopt Conservative principles!

    Why This Conservative Hopes President Obama Will Succeed

  90. #290
    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:37 pm, Southpaw said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:22 pm, scottthong said:
    I, on the other hand, want Obama to be a successful President… Because in order to do so, he must adopt Conservative principles!

    Agree. I have my doubts that he will see the light, but there is always…um…hope that he will change.

  91. #291
    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:41 pm, Send_Me said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 11:17 am, teresafromTexas said:
    I think we should wait to see him in action to be the vocal opposition. Right now if we too hyper-critical it looks like we are yelling at the wind since he hasn’t actually done anything yet.

    1. Freedom of Choice Act
    2. His views of redistribution of wealth socialism and the U.S. Constitution.
    3. His view that “we cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
    4. His $845 billion Global Poverty Act.
    5. His plans to disarm this country.
    6. His appointments of woefully unprepared and, in some cases, dishonest people to key positions of his administrations (i.e. CIA, Sec. of State, Sec. of Treasury, etc.).
    7. His ideas for a $1.2 trillion “stimulus” package. (When will those in D.C. ever learn that Keynesian economics never works?)
    8. His pushing for gays serving openly in the military. (Besides the obvious issues, whenever I have a gay Soldier who shows up late to work, before I punish him I have to prepare myself for the inevitable charge that I’m discriminating against him.)
    9. Biden’s call for support: “And he’s gonna need help [when a crisis hits]. And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you – not financially to help him – we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.” (So, in other words, “don’t think too hard. Just support our guy Obama.” I’ll pass.)
    So, why do I hope Obama fails? Maybe it has something to do with what’s best for the country.

  92. #292
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:24 am, Kevin K. said:

    Jeff2161 said: (#136–I was out having a pleasant dinner with friends, so I’m late for this round of The Game)

    As far as racism goes, I prefer the human race. What say you?

    Yep. I say the same.

  93. #293
    On January 19th, 2009 at 12:43 am, mattm said:

    from watching the MSM you would think this is the first time presidents have changed and that every person who voted voted for 0bama.

  94. #294
    On January 19th, 2009 at 5:29 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    His ascendancy, IMO, is doomed to failure. I think we’ll see that his supporters are the same kinds of morons who sign mortgages without reading the documentation.

    Its just took me parts of 3 days to just read my buyers contract alone. And its a standard statewide contract. (I found several discrepancies that the broker had to fix, that could have easily screwed me over by them filling in the doc at a later date without my approval)

    I havent even gotten to the soil analysis/reports or the HOA or the community or the local mill tax boards or the loan doc itself.

    And car dealers hate me. Before I take delivery I actually read the contracts line by line at their desks while I am in their office. Its usually like nothing they have ever expereinced before in their career.

  95. #295
    On January 19th, 2009 at 6:02 am, graysonret said:

    Watching what is happening in Washington, D.C., makes me wonder if the USSR won the “cold war” after all…“Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!”

  96. #296
    On January 19th, 2009 at 8:54 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 18th, 2009 at 9:27 pm, desertdweller said:

    Good grief, the man shoots ONE lawyer and people get upset-geesh. Come on dude, it is not like there is a shortage of lawyers. It is perfectly safe to go hunting with VP Cheney–just hang back a touch.

    Go back and read the after action stories on that event.

    The lawyer blew it by walking ahead of a hunting party.

    I’d go birding with Cheney any day.

    Me too and yes I did know that: I just could not pass a chance to tell a lawyer joke. ;)

    Lock and Load laddie.

  97. #297
    On January 19th, 2009 at 8:59 am, jangar said:

    If Bush had gotten only 1/4 of the positive stories from the MSM during his 2001 inauguration, he would be in better shape today.

    On the other hand, when Obama succeeds in flushing the constitution, the MSM will sing his praises.

    Some things just don’t make any sense.

  98. #298
    On January 19th, 2009 at 9:05 am, happyscrapper said:

    Speaking of “peaceful transitions”, Karl Rove was on this a.m. and told about when the republicans took office in 2000, and the Clinton dems left the White House. Apparently, the “rumors” of them trashing the place and stealing things was true. Another example of Bush taking the high road and not making a big deal out of it. Rove said his computer had some foul smelling stuff poured on it. The “W”s on the computer keyboards were stolen, and numerous offices were vandalized. Yes, those classy liberals! In sharp contrast, Rove said that the White House and all the offices will be left in perfect condition for the new administration. I am so proud to be on the side of the people who have respect for others, even those we disagree with. That is not to say we can’t call them morons. Because they are. We just wouldn’t vandalize or otherwise harm them.

  99. #299
    On January 19th, 2009 at 9:18 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
  100. #300
    On January 19th, 2009 at 9:27 am, sonofdy said:

    Good grief, the man shoots ONE lawyer and people get upset-geesh

    I think cheneys approval rating went up after that. ;-)

    Its LAWYER session!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs

February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers

50 Comments

Stealth altruism

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

Hiring Spree in NYC

February 1, 2012 02:47 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants

January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama and Jan Brewer Have Words on Airport Tarmac; Update: Brewer Book Sales Skyrocket

January 25, 2012 09:54 PM by Doug Powers

165 Comments

Book-Critic-in-Chief takes issue


Categories: Barack Obama

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook