Is Gwen young enough to become an Oval Office intern?

She’s too fat even for Bill…

I understood that they relied, at least partly, on funding from the NEA? Could it be that viewer donations have dropped? And could Moyers and his ilk be part of the reason why? Methinks I see a connection . . .

On January 21st, 2009 at 7:26 am, Omu said:

Journalists are also humans and so have political tendancies and favour particular candidates. You cannot fault them for them. What is important is that a journalist is fair when dealing with politics …

Wouldn’t your view of fairness include disclosures of personal and financial interest in the outcome of the election?

This is more than just a journalist with political views. She had a stake in the race. If she were a judge, you would expect her to recuse herself.

Was there really no one else that could have moderated that debate?

On January 20th, 2009 at 9:55 pm, tarpon said:
The error of Obama begins

I couldn’t have said it any better. God help our bleeding country, for Obama certainly won’t.

You gotta have some pity folks, most of these propagandists are probably having a very hard time keeping their semi-legible scrawlings from becoming published in the Penthouse Forum. Then again, how many people do you know that make a living typing one handed?

I heard the other day, I believe on Cavuto, PBS is in financial trouble could it be with such open mined commentators that appeal to a cross section of America like Imfull of it and BS Moyers?

Speaking of PBS/Moyers, anyone else see over at American Thinker they’ve found Moyers’ replacement? They put up a list of quotes — about half from Moyers and half from David Duke — and let readers guess who said which.

And it’s paid (in part) by our tax dollars. Or maybe I should say, by our children’s debt.

On January 20th, 2009 at 10:06 pm, zorro said:

The truth is Ms. Ifill is not a good journalist. She is just another inside-the-beltway slobbering sycophant.

I beg to differ. Being an inside-the-beltway slobbering sycophant is what you have to be if you want to make it in an oligarchy. She doing what she feels she must do as a product of an educational system that poisons the hearts and souls of its students.

As a journalist under an oligarchy, she’s performing well as a propagandist, as all journalists must do under such a form of government. If she understood her duties in a republic founded under the rule of law that protected the freedoms and liberties of its citizens, then I’m sure she’d perform well under those circumstances too.

Standards of “journalism” change according to where you live. Gwen Ifill fits in and exceeds the standards of one who lives in a nation where freedom and liberty have died (essentially because “fairness” now trumps everything else, and it is mutually exclusive to the concepts of freedom and liberty), and justice means punishing growth and progress.

These are truths that must be propagated in accordance to the precepts which Ifill was indoctrinated, and as such she’s actually a very GOOD journalist, in accordance with our current standards and governmental practices. FAIRNESS must be upheld above all, and Gwen Ifill is doing an exceptional job in doing so.

I had to send a note to the school asking that the “social studies” teacher mention that, although the textbook claimed that the Second Amendment protected the “right of the states to have militias,” that the Supreme Court ruled that it protected an individual right. Funny enough, she did.

ECS

Since in the last week I have found out she has never heard of Woodstock, I just asked the daughter some other trivia questions about random recent history…

Now I find out she didnt know anything about Clinton. So I asked her about OJ Simpson…..

“Who’s that? Did he kill someone?”

(I hate her mother……)