Parting shot

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 20, 2009 11:00 PM

And they lecture us about showing more respect?

Wonder how many of the people booing at the ceremony or singing “Hey, hey, goodbye” as Executive One lifted off were carrying media credentials.

BDS never dies.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Bush presidency: a retrospective « Wellsy’s World
  2. Parting shot Join This Heated Debate...
  3. Left Abused Bush Demand Love Obama « FactReal
  4. Left Abused Bush, Now Demands Love for Obama « FactReal
  5. The Cult of Obama; Didn’t I say something about this cult-like worship before? « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  6. The Inaugural Linkfest « The Pugnacious Irishman
  7. The inauguration of Obama - a brief reflection « Wellsy’s World
  8. Knee Deep in the Hooah! //
  9. Obama Officials Confirm He Will Fund Foreign Abortions Starting Wednesday « Goodtimepolitics
  10. Classless Losers Jeer President Bush Upon His Departure « Jane Q. Republican
  11. The Cult of Personality | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  12. But As For Me » Parting shot
  13. Obama should have chosen nicer words « Boondoggle
  14. The Nobama Blog

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #598299
    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:28 am, James Felix said:

    You accuse liberals of BDS because they boo Bush.

    No. We accuse them of being classless boors because they boo Bush. Frankly I don’t see how you can refute such a charge with a straight face.

    What gets them accused of BDS is the completely irrational way they’ve made Bush out to be the font of all evil in the world. They ascribe to him the most malign possible motives in every action he takes, even when doing so contrdicts what they said about him the day before. And we’re not talking about a few deranged individuals here, we’re talking about mainstream Democratic opinion.

    That’s BDS. There is no comparable syndrome attached to Obama because our differences with him are all based on policy and ideals. Those are rational disagreements.

  2. #598307
    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:36 am, jangar said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:27 am, lgm said:

    Scrambled eggs for brains.

  3. #598319
    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:47 am, James Felix said:

    Want respect, show respect. Where’s your love for Carter?

    “Respect” and “love” aren’t the same thing. Carter isn’t booed by Conservatives in public and there isn’t a thriving cottage industry selling products that call him evil, wish him dead etc.

    As a reminder, some of his accomplishments:
    * Brokered an Israel/Arab treaty, something no Republican President has managed to do.

    That explains why it’s so peaceful over there. Oh, wait…

    * Began the “tough love” policy — Volker — that finally conquered stagflation.

    Yeah, Carter was an economic genius. That explains why everyone did so well under his admin… oh, wait…

    * The first President to make human rights a foreign policy principle.

    LOL how so? Only in the Bizzaro World you inhabit could a man who champions Castro, Arafat and Chavez be considered an advocate of human rights.

    Carter’s other “accomplishment”, idly standing by while the modern Islamist terror movement was born, is notably absent from your list.

    But all that is beside the point. No one here is suggesting that all Presidents are equally deserving of admiration or renown. What we’re saying is that the Office is due a level of respect, and at the bare minimum you’d think that includes not booing the outgoing President at an official state function.

  4. #598333
    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:55 am, ex-expat said:

    2009 at 10:23 am, jangar said:
    The only media outlet that reported on Bush’s homecoming was FNC. It was conviently ignored by ABC, CBS, NBC, MSMBC and CNN.
    How could they peel away and report that when their noses were lodged where they were lodged?

    Actually, CSPAN carried it too, though not live.

  5. #598335
    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:57 am, corkie said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:27 am, lgm said:

    Want respect, show respect. Where’s your love for Carter? As a reminder, some of his accomplishments:

    Oh, I see. The crowd acted completely classless towards Bush because we occasionally poke fun at Carter.

    Makes perfect sense to me.

  6. #598337
    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:58 am, Salt said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:27 am, lgm said:

    Want respect, show respect.

    You see no irony in starting a comment with this, do you?

    No matter what example (back in full tu quoque form) you cite after that, you prove that you are not following your own advice.

    No one expects liberals to like Pres. Bush, but the office deserved more respect than that.

  7. #598338
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:00 am, Salt said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:57 am, corkie said:

    Oh, I see. The crowd acted completely classless towards Bush because we occasionally poke fun at Carter.

    Makes perfect sense to me.

    This also explains why the Clinton staff took all the W keys from the keyboards, too.

    You see, liberal elites really are a classy people. So long as you are a liberal elite that understands them.

  8. #598359
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:16 am, frostrt said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:14 am, James Felix said:
    But posters here routinely wish and I might add on occasion say they pray for death to the Obamas. So tell me, which is worse?
    First of all that’s not even an exaggeration, it’s a flat out lie. I’m on this site regularly and I can’t recall seeing any calls for Obama’s death, much less “routine” postings like that.

    But even if you were right, and let’s say a dozen commenters here routinely wished the Obamas dead, that couldn’t begin to compare to the truly routine, truly nauseating and deeply sincere wishes for Bush, McCain, Palin, Cheney etc. to die. Michelle has an entire category here titled “assassination chic”, you should check it out sometime.

    ————————————-

    I might add, it was still a crime when last I checked to threaten the life of a sitting President (or other gvt official). We can debate whether some of the examples of “Bush Assassination Chic” should have been taken as literal threats.

    But if our lovely hostess “routinely” allowed threats against the lives of the Obamas to be posted on her site, methinks she and all those posters would be in deep-you-know-what.

  9. #598363
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:18 am, sonofdy said:

    Want respect, show respect. Where’s your love for Carter?

    Absent.

  10. #598367
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:21 am, frostrt said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:18 am, sonofdy said:
    Want respect, show respect. Where’s your love for Carter?
    Absent.

    ————————————–

    That goes double for me.

  11. #598368
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:21 am, backwoods conservative said:

    …I can’t recall seeing any calls for Obama’s death, much less “routine” postings like that.

    Neither can I. I suspect somebody was getting their knowledge of this site from left wing commentary rather than actual examination.

  12. #598371
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:22 am, bengals9 said:

    BDS is a permanent fixture in American political life now. It will never stop…much like the Left continues to kick Nixon in the teeth again and again and again!

  13. #598378
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:28 am, DBNinKY said:

    Want respect, show respect.

    LGM, no offense, but you’re a complete hypocrite. I mean, to post something like the above quote after the ludicrous charges and exhortations you have made over the past year against President Bush, VP Cheney, Sarah Palin and even Donald Rumsfeld (a great man, btw) is hard to understand.

    Besides, turn about is fair play, my man! Now that Obama is the nation’s political leader, the roles around here have reversed: It is we conservatives who get to go on offense against the administrations’ plans and actions while you liberals have the unenviable task of defending the indefensible – the B. Hussein Obama administration!

  14. #598403
    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:55 am, John Deaux said:

    Where’s your love for Carter?

    I thank Jimmy Carter for making me a conservative.

    I was 13 when the hostages were taken and my world view expanded exponentially. I couldn’t fathom how anyone could let those people wallow in bondage when we had the ability to carpet bomb their entire country until they released them.

    Ronald Reagan was a Godsend.

  15. #598430
    On January 21st, 2009 at 12:14 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    Want respect, show respect.

    Once again lgm comes here and makes a jackass out of himself. You’d think that he’d realize that he’s doing it, but then again he’s a liberal, and liberals do not realize anything other than what’s he’s been indoctrinated.

    Jimmy Carter was a horrible president by any standard. He’s a horrible ex-president by any standard. He was the first ex-president to undermine sitting presidents through “foreign diplomacy.” The man is in many ways a pariah to both parties, and few people with seats in office want to have ANYTHING to do with the man.

    If Jimmy wants respect (or “love” as you put it), he ought to stop being such a bitter, angry, petty little man and show respect for sitting presidents and stop trying so hard to undermine their policies. He should stop showing such disregard for Israel in supporting violent terrorist organizations bent upon destroying that nation.

    Jimmy Carter has indeed earned our ire and enmity by his utter lack for respect towards those who do not agree with him. Where have you seen presidents such as Reagan or Bush-41 behave so jaundiced as bitterly towards other men’s policies as Carter has? Jimmy Carter is indeed the sort of man who feels he deserves everyone’s respect, yet he himself has NONE to give to others.

    Jimmy Carter was president of the United States, and such should be respected; however, I will NOT sit back and be cowed when he behaves so much like a little child and resists proper presidential decorum. And you, lgm ought to be able to tell the difference between our disdain for Carter’s pettiness and liberals utter partisan hatred towards a sitting president.

  16. #598454
    On January 21st, 2009 at 12:27 pm, les said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 10:14 am, James Felix said:
    First of all that’s not even an exaggeration, it’s a flat out lie. I’m on this site regularly and I can’t recall seeing any calls for Obama’s death, much less “routine” postings like that.

    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:16 am, frostrt said:
    But if our lovely hostess “routinely” allowed threats against the lives of the Obamas to be posted on her site, methinks she and all those posters would be in deep-you-know-what.

    On January 21st, 2009 at 11:21 am, backwoods conservative said:
    Neither can I. I suspect somebody was getting their knowledge of this site from left wing commentary rather than actual examination.

    I guess you guys don’t read all the posts on this site that carefully. I won’t spend my day going through all the germane threads, as is often said here; I have to work so I can pay my share of the debt George W Bush left the country in. But two gems that come to mind that you can research if you’d like are:

    1. I think it was die hippie die who wrote something to the effect that he was burning a candle in hopes of Michelle Obama’s death.

    2. And just a week or so ago there was a thread about the Barack Obama’s smoking habit. A commentator whose name I don’t recall said something along the lines that she and her mother were hoping that his smoking would do some good and cause him to develop lung cancer. Sounds like a lovely mother – daughter relationship, don’t you think.

    These are but two examples. I called hippie on the first, and as I recall there was only one other poster who after my comments took him to task. I think that was see dubya. There was silence from the rest.

    And I guess routine is up to one’s personal definition. I bet if you have the time, you can find at least a few such posts in any given week. And frostrt, reread my comments, I never said there were outright threats. I don’t even think the posters here are that mindless that they would post direct threats to President Obama.

  17. #598471
    On January 21st, 2009 at 12:37 pm, swmntman said:

    lgm: Please, please, please keep linking Jimmy Carter to Obama! Your arguements rarely have an affect on this site but using Jimmy Carter in any arguement linked to Obama supports Conservative principles and ideals 100 fold. We fully expect Obama to govern just like Jimmy Carter – opens the door for another Reagan (how about that Palin chick, huh lgm?)….

  18. #598473
    On January 21st, 2009 at 12:39 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    BDS never dies.

    TELL ME ABOUT IT

  19. #598499
    On January 21st, 2009 at 1:06 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 12:27 pm, les said:

    …These are but two examples. I called hippie on the first, and as I recall there was only one other poster who after my comments took him to task. I think that was see dubya. There was silence from the rest.

    And I guess routine is up to one’s personal definition. I bet if you have the time, you can find at least a few such posts in any given week. And frostrt, reread my comments, I never said there were outright threats. I don’t even think the posters here are that mindless that they would post direct threats to President Obama.

    les, are you actually trying to equate what some have posted here about how they hope that ill befalls Obama and the loathing and vitriol that is so widespread among his detractors. I work for a security office, and I saw it in our office–even to the point where my immediate supervisor posted a photo from the local newspaper of Islamists in the Gaza strip burning Bush in effigy. I took that picture down, and felt I needed to explain to this man that as security officers we couldn’t have such anti-American propaganda posted in our office, and that if our superiors were to see it, that they might think we supported it.

    I do not think that my supervisor supports Islamist anti-America terrorists. He simply displayed his political bias, and enjoyed ANY images that portrayed Bush-43 in a bad light, so much so that he did not think about who it was who displayed their disdain towards our president.

    les, what some say here and what is displayed so widespread, openly, and so ACCEPTEDLY by Bush-haters is comparing apples and oranges. Look at the link that On-my-soap-box posted–an AP photo of a urinal in the shape of Bush, and tell me were anyone has done anything like that with regard to Obama, and the Associated Press has given it the light of day. There is no comparison.

  20. #598501
    On January 21st, 2009 at 1:08 pm, white said:

    USA RIP

  21. #598506
    On January 21st, 2009 at 1:17 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On January 21st, 2009 at 12:27 pm, les said:

    2. And just a week or so ago there was a thread about the Barack Obama’s smoking habit. A commentator whose name I don’t recall said something along the lines that she and her mother were hoping that his smoking would do some good and cause him to develop lung cancer.

    Are you talking about these posts? Because I cant find anything else from this year remotely close to Obama getting lung cancer from smoking that is related to a mother/daughter hoping for it

    #126
    Lets see… die of Emphysema/heart disease at 65 or cancer/degenerative diseases at 80. Which is cheaper?

    #149
    My grandmother was in her 80s and my mother was in her 50’s when they both died within a month of each other. My grandmother died of Emphysema and my mom of cancer.

  22. #598509
    On January 21st, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Vince Lombardi once said about football, “To play this game you have to have a fire within you, and nothing stokes a fire like hate.”

    Liberals have learned from history (Hitler, Stalin, etc.) that using hate to turn an opponent or someone in your way into a villain or an enemy is the most effective way to motivate your followers and nullify the effectiveness of your adversary’s message.

    BDS, PDS, and ?DS are necessary, because The Left have no ideas that are palatable to the majority of the electorate. You debate the issues Progressives are dead meat. If they cannot play on emotion, they are toast. They have to change course of the conversation. Within 48 hours Democrats and their media buddies accomplished that with Sarah Palin. They had to trash her personality, dress, background, family, pregnancy choices, career choices, children, and qualifications (laughable considering Obama’s). Criticism of her positions was unimportant; they needed to vilify her and do it quickly. More meat for the wolf pack.

    Republican candidates need to fight back two ways; first challenge the Democrat candidate to repudiate all of the DS related rhetoric. If they do not, pound them mercilessly for it. The second has been discussed ad nauseum. Stop trying to be a better Democrat than the Democrat.

    Liberals today are like a religious cult. They are intolerant and “reaching out” to them is futile, because they do not want bipartisanship; only power. They must be viewed as an adversary and defeated. I hope someday sanity will return to the Democrat party, but until then, it is a war; pure and simple.

  23. #598519
    On January 21st, 2009 at 1:44 pm, James Felix said:

    And I guess routine is up to one’s personal definition.

    From dictionary.com

    Routine
    1. a customary or regular course of procedure.

    3. regular, unvarying, habitual, unimaginative, or rote procedure.
    4. an unvarying and constantly repeated formula, as of speech or action;

    If the conduct you cite was truly routine then your post wouldn’t be so full of weasel words like “I can’t recall”, “I think”, and “along the lines of..”. If wishes for Obama’s death were commonplace on this site you wouldn’t have to do a lot of research, you could pluck an example from almost any thread you randomly picked.

    For example, the following things are routine around here:

    - expressions of pro-life / anti-abortion sentiment
    - citation of Judeo-Christian religious values to support a position
    - reservations about Obama rooted in his Marxist beliefs or associations with an assortment of racists and domestic terrorists
    - a generalized distrust in the ability of the Federal Government to solve problems
    - someone calling LGM a moron

    I’d bet my next month’s pay that you could find at least one of those things in the comments of 90% of the posts on this blog. That’s routine.

    What you’re trying to do here is take what is at worst the rare outbursts of some isolated posters and equating them with the truly routine, truly widespread and truly vile disrespect and personal animus directed at G.W. Bush from the American Left.

    In a way though that’s good. Your attempt to play the “well look what your side does!” game shows that in your heart you know that the treatment shown Bush and his administration is despicable and indefensable.

  24. #598526
    On January 21st, 2009 at 1:56 pm, frostrt said:

    Just an interesting sidenote for you all: Some defaced a statue of Former President Bush SENIOR!

    I’m guessing it was someone so feverish with BDS that they couldn’t tell the defference between George W. and George H.W. :

    Vandal defaces Houston monument to elder Bush
    Suspect may be a homeless man
    By JENNIFER LEAHY
    Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle
    Jan. 20, 2009, 8:47PM

    Steve Ueckert Chronicle
    Four years before a vandal struck, the monument to former President George H.W. Bush was celebrated in Sesquicentennial Park.

    Share Print Email Del.icio.usDiggTechnoratiYahoo! BuzzA man believed to be homeless may be responsible for defacing a Houston monument to former President George H.W. Bush Tuesday, writing “No more Bush it” with yellow paint, authorities said.

  25. #598531
    On January 21st, 2009 at 2:06 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Forgive les and lgm and omu – they know not what they do. I mean seriously. They don’t.

    I’m not kidding. Inventing death threats out of thin air just to feel superior to the regular member of this board yet ignoring their own parties unending litany of death threats and plots against President George W. Bush? That’s rational?

    My favorite is when the left makes up their own history to assuage their guilt over being associated with the KKK Democratic Party.

    … not knowing Frederick Douglass and Dr. Martin Luther King were proud Republicans – still cracks me up. :)

  26. #598673
    On January 21st, 2009 at 4:18 pm, ArmywifeArmymom said:

    “As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.”
    -Barak Obama 1/20/09

    Hm, that’s an interesting quote. You do realize that the terrorists think the EXACT same way, right? Of course their ideals mean bloodshed until we all submit to Islam, so they could give a crap about their own safety (unless they sit at the top of the dung heap they manage to rule.)

    Al-Qaeda Charter: “There Will Be Continuing Enmity Until Everyone Believes In Allah. We Will Not Meet [The Enemy] Halfway And There Will Be No Room For Dialogue With Them.” (Al Qaeda Charter, Released By The White House Press Office, 9/5/06)

    Yeah. I am sure that Obama’s rhetoric has them trembling in their turbans. They still hold that same fervent hate. It has nothing to do with Bush or Obama. It has everything to do with them wanting to kill us and submit us to their own brand of slavery.

    Maybe serving them tea and cakes at the White House will help them see the error of their ways. :)

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Charlie Sheen demands meeting with Obama on ‘9/11 cover-up’

September 9, 2009 03:37 PM by Doug Powers

89 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Wild thing

Selective outrage of the MSM

August 13, 2009 07:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments | 36 Trackbacks

How quickly they forget

August 4, 2009 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 35 Trackbacks

Diagnosis: Advanced stage of BDS

March 16, 2009 10:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“Patriot or crackpot?”

Post-traumatic BDS syndrome

February 2, 2009 05:16 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Missing W.

Iraqi shoe-thrower seeks asylum in Switzerland

January 19, 2009 11:40 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Give me your poor, your tired, your Bush-deranged.

AP’s final dig at President Bush

January 15, 2009 09:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 18 Trackbacks


Categories: Bush Derangement Syndrome



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom