<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lying Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner = Doomed Pinocchio &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-655409</link>
		<dc:creator>Lying Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner = Doomed Pinocchio &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-655409</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the lowdown-get-ugly update, from Michelle Malkin (video embed of Malkin included): Geithner: Can’t get taxes straight, can’t get dates straight… Previously posted by Malkin in January; great use of her magic crystal ball: Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the lowdown-get-ugly update, from Michelle Malkin (video embed of Malkin included): Geithner: Can’t get taxes straight, can’t get dates straight… Previously posted by Malkin in January; great use of her magic crystal ball: Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: But As For Me &#187; Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-599238</link>
		<dc:creator>But As For Me &#187; Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-599238</guid>
		<description>[...]  Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination Quick Read: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination Quick Read: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-599145</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-599145</guid>
		<description>On January 21st, 2009 at 7:09 pm, chapoutier said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama won by 7.5 million, so probably wouldn’t have mattered.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Probably not. We were out campaigned, out spent, out pandered, out charisma-ed, boned by the press, blamed for the market crash and burnt out from Bush and still we came pretty close to getting the geezer in. What my over-caffeinated rants are about at this point are 2010 and 2012. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
But keep fighting the good fight, Bill. I love reading your posts.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 21st, 2009 at 7:09 pm, chapoutier said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama won by 7.5 million, so probably wouldn’t have mattered.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably not. We were out campaigned, out spent, out pandered, out charisma-ed, boned by the press, blamed for the market crash and burnt out from Bush and still we came pretty close to getting the geezer in. What my over-caffeinated rants are about at this point are 2010 and 2012. </p>
<blockquote><p>
But keep fighting the good fight, Bill. I love reading your posts.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FIslam</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-599127</link>
		<dc:creator>FIslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-599127</guid>
		<description>Geithner&#039;s President is Black.

If I failed to pay my taxes like this Will-o&#039;-the-wisp, I be in da hooskow, even if I said the tax law was to confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geithner&#8217;s President is Black.</p>
<p>If I failed to pay my taxes like this Will-o&#8217;-the-wisp, I be in da hooskow, even if I said the tax law was to confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gr8fl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-599044</link>
		<dc:creator>gr8fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-599044</guid>
		<description>Paulson and Geithner:  Turning Capitalism into &lt;strong&gt;Kaput&lt;/strong&gt;alism since 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulson and Geithner:  Turning Capitalism into <strong>Kaput</strong>alism since 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southpaw</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598924</link>
		<dc:creator>Southpaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598924</guid>
		<description>From the linked article:

&lt;blockquote&gt;3. Possible press conflicts of interest

Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media points out that some press outlets are parts of larger firms with financial stakes in the financial bailout. Example: General Electric, which owns NBC, also owns bailout recipient GE Capital. GE CEO Jeffrey Inmelt is also on the New York Fed’s board.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The finacial inbreeding among our corporate, political and media elites is producing profoundly disturbing mutants. Nice to see The Obama and Joe The Biden are content to continue on this path of social destruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the linked article:</p>
<blockquote><p>3. Possible press conflicts of interest</p>
<p>Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media points out that some press outlets are parts of larger firms with financial stakes in the financial bailout. Example: General Electric, which owns NBC, also owns bailout recipient GE Capital. GE CEO Jeffrey Inmelt is also on the New York Fed’s board.</p></blockquote>
<p>The finacial inbreeding among our corporate, political and media elites is producing profoundly disturbing mutants. Nice to see The Obama and Joe The Biden are content to continue on this path of social destruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598859</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598859</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Over 4 million Bush voters stayed home last 4 November.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Obama won by 7.5 million, so probably wouldn&#039;t have mattered.

But keep fighting the good fight, Bill.  I love reading your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Over 4 million Bush voters stayed home last 4 November.</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama won by 7.5 million, so probably wouldn&#8217;t have mattered.</p>
<p>But keep fighting the good fight, Bill.  I love reading your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598847</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598847</guid>
		<description>On January 21st, 2009 at 6:21 pm, twofeetinhismouth said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Ditto. I’ll type slow, just for you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Good, you can keep an eye on your spelling.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Apparently you missed the part where I said, “never &lt;strong&gt;again&lt;/strong&gt;“&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Apparently you missed the part where I &lt;strike&gt;said&lt;/strike&gt; wrote &quot;crybabies &lt;strong&gt;like&lt;/strong&gt; you.&quot; Over 4 million Bush voters stayed home last 4 November. That&#039;s not including those who flushed their votes on the moonbat and truther parties. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;When conservatives are the exception and not the rule, the party has shown it no longer cares to have my vote. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Run for office. Get elected as a conservative. Be my guest. Could it be that conservatives are the exception and not the rule because they are not winning elections? TRUST ME, I would love it if they were but people have identified &quot;conservative&quot; with &quot;Bush&quot; and therefore &quot;screw-up&quot;. Wouldn&#039;t our best bet be not to elect screw ups? The party makeup is what it is not because the RNC is deciding who should run and who can&#039;t. It is what it is because that is who is winning in their region. Your problem isn&#039;t with the RNC it is with the voters and the people who have helped to shape their opinions. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I will not vote Democrat-lite any longer. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hopefully you wont have to, but if the choice is something less than 100% or Obama? Where are YOU going to draw the line? President Ayres? 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;If you chose to abandon whatever principles brought you to the Repulican[sic] party, that’s your choice.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
My choice was make the best with what I had. My answer was to elect the old fool and try to keep his feet to the fire. To that end I donated time and money and argued til blue and I lost. Now I see the same people who helped bring this mess about, and it will be a mess, setting up a situation that will bring about a bigger, more entrenched mess. Conservatism divorced from the republican party doesn&#039;t stand a chance and the republican party can&#039;t afford to lose conservatives. Splitting 1 from the other will just entrench the democrats. I believe a lot of people who are advocating that are fully aware of the fact too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 21st, 2009 at 6:21 pm, twofeetinhismouth said: </p>
<blockquote><p>Ditto. I’ll type slow, just for you.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good, you can keep an eye on your spelling.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Apparently you missed the part where I said, “never <strong>again</strong>“&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently you missed the part where I <strike>said</strike> wrote &#8220;crybabies <strong>like</strong> you.&#8221; Over 4 million Bush voters stayed home last 4 November. That&#8217;s not including those who flushed their votes on the moonbat and truther parties. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When conservatives are the exception and not the rule, the party has shown it no longer cares to have my vote. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Run for office. Get elected as a conservative. Be my guest. Could it be that conservatives are the exception and not the rule because they are not winning elections? TRUST ME, I would love it if they were but people have identified &#8220;conservative&#8221; with &#8220;Bush&#8221; and therefore &#8220;screw-up&#8221;. Wouldn&#8217;t our best bet be not to elect screw ups? The party makeup is what it is not because the RNC is deciding who should run and who can&#8217;t. It is what it is because that is who is winning in their region. Your problem isn&#8217;t with the RNC it is with the voters and the people who have helped to shape their opinions. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I will not vote Democrat-lite any longer. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hopefully you wont have to, but if the choice is something less than 100% or Obama? Where are YOU going to draw the line? President Ayres? </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you chose to abandon whatever principles brought you to the Repulican[sic] party, that’s your choice.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>My choice was make the best with what I had. My answer was to elect the old fool and try to keep his feet to the fire. To that end I donated time and money and argued til blue and I lost. Now I see the same people who helped bring this mess about, and it will be a mess, setting up a situation that will bring about a bigger, more entrenched mess. Conservatism divorced from the republican party doesn&#8217;t stand a chance and the republican party can&#8217;t afford to lose conservatives. Splitting 1 from the other will just entrench the democrats. I believe a lot of people who are advocating that are fully aware of the fact too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twofoot</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598800</link>
		<dc:creator>twofoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598800</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You don’t know the first thing about ME you moralizing half-wit. I got off my ass and gave money and time to help elect the most conservative candidate through the primaries that I could. When that failed I got behind the last best hope to keep Obama out while crybabies like you stayed home because they were not going to vote for the “lesser of 2 evils”. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ditto.  I&#039;ll type slow, just for you.  Apparently you missed the part where I said, &quot;never &lt;strong&gt;again&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;.  Did I stay home on election day?  Nope, I was actually on the road between Phoenix and L.A. when good old Juan McCain conceded.  Which is why I made certain to cast my vote for Gov Palin when I was home the week before.  So don&#039;t try and act self-rightous.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do we turn our back on the Republican party because it has “RINO”s like Norm Coleman thereby electing creeps like Al Frankin?&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

When conservatives are the exception and not the rule, the party has shown it no longer cares to have my vote.  So why should I oblige them with it?  I will not vote Democrat-lite any longer.  

If you chose to abandon whatever principles brought you to the Repulican party, that&#039;s your choice.  But when the party itself abandons the principles it was founded on then they obviously no longer need me or my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You don’t know the first thing about ME you moralizing half-wit. I got off my ass and gave money and time to help elect the most conservative candidate through the primaries that I could. When that failed I got behind the last best hope to keep Obama out while crybabies like you stayed home because they were not going to vote for the “lesser of 2 evils”. </p></blockquote>
<p>Ditto.  I&#8217;ll type slow, just for you.  Apparently you missed the part where I said, &#8220;never <strong>again</strong>&#8220;.  Did I stay home on election day?  Nope, I was actually on the road between Phoenix and L.A. when good old Juan McCain conceded.  Which is why I made certain to cast my vote for Gov Palin when I was home the week before.  So don&#8217;t try and act self-rightous.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Do we turn our back on the Republican party because it has “RINO”s like Norm Coleman thereby electing creeps like Al Frankin?</p></blockquote>
<p>When conservatives are the exception and not the rule, the party has shown it no longer cares to have my vote.  So why should I oblige them with it?  I will not vote Democrat-lite any longer.  </p>
<p>If you chose to abandon whatever principles brought you to the Repulican party, that&#8217;s your choice.  But when the party itself abandons the principles it was founded on then they obviously no longer need me or my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;New Era of Responsibility&#8221; Lasts One Day &#124; BobMaistros.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598691</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;New Era of Responsibility&#8221; Lasts One Day &#124; BobMaistros.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598691</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin links us to 10 other disturbing aspects of near-certain Geithner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin links us to 10 other disturbing aspects of near-certain Geithner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: changer1701</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598655</link>
		<dc:creator>changer1701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598655</guid>
		<description>Michelle, you&#039;re now part of the right-wing &quot;noise machine&quot;, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blueragemusing.blogspot.com/2009/01/noise-machine-to-republicans-wimps.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this liberal blog&lt;/a&gt; in my area. He&#039;s worried that Republicans will &quot;obstruct&quot; legislation. If only...unfortunately he doesn&#039;t know the beltway GOP as well as he thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, you&#8217;re now part of the right-wing &#8220;noise machine&#8221;, according to <a href="http://blueragemusing.blogspot.com/2009/01/noise-machine-to-republicans-wimps.html" rel="nofollow">this liberal blog</a> in my area. He&#8217;s worried that Republicans will &#8220;obstruct&#8221; legislation. If only&#8230;unfortunately he doesn&#8217;t know the beltway GOP as well as he thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598645</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598645</guid>
		<description>On January 21st, 2009 at 3:01 pm, twofoot said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Sorry Bill, I owe my allegience[sic] to the nation. Not to a political party. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The implication is that I am loyal to the Republicans rather than the USA. If you are so loyal to the United states how could you roll over and let it be handed over to the Obamamessiah? 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The Republican party has for years shown that they no longer care about standing on principle. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
The republican party is made up of people and people are imperfect. Further, someone who shares your world view wouldn&#039;t stand a chance of getting elected in certain areas of the USA. What does that mean Mr.Rocket scientist? Do we turn our back on the Republican party because it has &quot;RINO&quot;s like Norm Coleman thereby electing creeps like Al Frankin? Do we insist on the second coming of Goldwater for every state and if we don&#039;t get it (and we wont) do we hold the entire party responsible because someone in Rhode Island wasn&#039;t conservative enough for you out in wherever? 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;They have been allowed to do this because of people like you who will continue to vote for them just because they have an ‘R’ after their name.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You don&#039;t know the first thing about ME you moralizing half-wit. I got off my ass and gave money and time to help elect the most conservative candidate through the primaries that I could. When that failed I got behind the last best hope to keep Obama out while crybabies like you stayed home because they were not going to vote for the &quot;lesser of 2 evils&quot;. &lt;strong&gt;Congratulations, you got the greater of 2 evils. &lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for that. You can save your lectures about caring for the country any time now. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;As for me, as always, I am an American first. &quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sure, lots of Americans helped to elect Obama. I just happen to think that they aren&#039;t very good Americans. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;If that makes me a moonbat… Well, again I ask, doesn’t it strike anyone else as odd that the only thing a person has to do today to be considered a moonbat is to echo the same words and ideas as the founding fathers?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Which founding father said it was a good idea to let the perfect be the enemy of the good? Which one had the &quot;shoot yourself in the foot by helping people who resent the USA to get elected and stay in office&quot; speech that you are quoting from? 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;By the way, I would say that blind allegience[sic] to a party-any party-is what makes a person a moonbat. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I would say that tossing your vote away on someone who stands no chance what so ever when it might do a little bit of good in preventing someone who is a genuine threat to the USA from taking office makes you a moonbat, and certainly not in a position to be lecturing me or anyone else about your allegiance to the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 21st, 2009 at 3:01 pm, twofoot said: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Sorry Bill, I owe my allegience[sic] to the nation. Not to a political party. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>The implication is that I am loyal to the Republicans rather than the USA. If you are so loyal to the United states how could you roll over and let it be handed over to the Obamamessiah? </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Republican party has for years shown that they no longer care about standing on principle. </p></blockquote>
<p>The republican party is made up of people and people are imperfect. Further, someone who shares your world view wouldn&#8217;t stand a chance of getting elected in certain areas of the USA. What does that mean Mr.Rocket scientist? Do we turn our back on the Republican party because it has &#8220;RINO&#8221;s like Norm Coleman thereby electing creeps like Al Frankin? Do we insist on the second coming of Goldwater for every state and if we don&#8217;t get it (and we wont) do we hold the entire party responsible because someone in Rhode Island wasn&#8217;t conservative enough for you out in wherever? </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;They have been allowed to do this because of people like you who will continue to vote for them just because they have an ‘R’ after their name.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You don&#8217;t know the first thing about ME you moralizing half-wit. I got off my ass and gave money and time to help elect the most conservative candidate through the primaries that I could. When that failed I got behind the last best hope to keep Obama out while crybabies like you stayed home because they were not going to vote for the &#8220;lesser of 2 evils&#8221;. <strong>Congratulations, you got the greater of 2 evils. </strong> Thanks for that. You can save your lectures about caring for the country any time now. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As for me, as always, I am an American first. &#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, lots of Americans helped to elect Obama. I just happen to think that they aren&#8217;t very good Americans. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If that makes me a moonbat… Well, again I ask, doesn’t it strike anyone else as odd that the only thing a person has to do today to be considered a moonbat is to echo the same words and ideas as the founding fathers?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Which founding father said it was a good idea to let the perfect be the enemy of the good? Which one had the &#8220;shoot yourself in the foot by helping people who resent the USA to get elected and stay in office&#8221; speech that you are quoting from? </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;By the way, I would say that blind allegience[sic] to a party-any party-is what makes a person a moonbat. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>I would say that tossing your vote away on someone who stands no chance what so ever when it might do a little bit of good in preventing someone who is a genuine threat to the USA from taking office makes you a moonbat, and certainly not in a position to be lecturing me or anyone else about your allegiance to the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetoysurgeon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598636</link>
		<dc:creator>thetoysurgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598636</guid>
		<description>Total farce ! All these hearings are smoke and mirrors and a waste of time and taxpayers money, but hey what else is new.  Thay are all gonna be place without any problems. What I want to know did Geithner get fined or have to pay a penalty like the rest of us. Be it that we would be in the slammer and all our worldly possession taken by the IRS.  A wolf in sheeps clothing.  Well folks expect now that wrong is right and right is wrong senario.  So much double talk going on I am afraid that the new status quo of wrong is right will ruin this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total farce ! All these hearings are smoke and mirrors and a waste of time and taxpayers money, but hey what else is new.  Thay are all gonna be place without any problems. What I want to know did Geithner get fined or have to pay a penalty like the rest of us. Be it that we would be in the slammer and all our worldly possession taken by the IRS.  A wolf in sheeps clothing.  Well folks expect now that wrong is right and right is wrong senario.  So much double talk going on I am afraid that the new status quo of wrong is right will ruin this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598635</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598635</guid>
		<description>The deduction Geithner took for the summer camp cost as child care expense is EXPRESSLY forbidden in the IRS tax code.  It is out and out tax fraud! 

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p503.pdf

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The cost of sending your child to an overnight camp is not considered a work-related expense.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If an IRS agent was caught using that deduction on their own return they would be summarily FIRED on the spot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deduction Geithner took for the summer camp cost as child care expense is EXPRESSLY forbidden in the IRS tax code.  It is out and out tax fraud! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p503.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p503.pdf</a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The cost of sending your child to an overnight camp is not considered a work-related expense.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>If an IRS agent was caught using that deduction on their own return they would be summarily FIRED on the spot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UPDATED 21 JAN - THE BIG MONEY BEHIND TIMOTHY GEITHNER OBAMAS&#8217; TREASURY SECRETARY &#171; Goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/21/top-10-bad-omens-of-the-geithner-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-598593</link>
		<dc:creator>UPDATED 21 JAN - THE BIG MONEY BEHIND TIMOTHY GEITHNER OBAMAS&#8217; TREASURY SECRETARY &#171; Goodtimepolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21893#comment-598593</guid>
		<description>[...] 18, 2009 &#183; 21 Comments  UPDATE 21 JAN Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination Why is the GOP ignoring the Geithner nomination? Read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 18, 2009 &middot; 21 Comments  UPDATE 21 JAN Top 10 bad omens of the Geithner nomination Why is the GOP ignoring the Geithner nomination? Read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

