<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s your jihadi recidivism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indefinite Detention: Obama&#8217;s Problem with Gitmo Terrorists &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-740956</link>
		<dc:creator>Indefinite Detention: Obama&#8217;s Problem with Gitmo Terrorists &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-740956</guid>
		<description>[...] recidivists thumb their noses in new video and The John Murtha Jihadi Correctional Facility and Here&#8217;s your jihadi recidivism and One Pennsylvanian&#8217;s response to John Murtha and &#8220;&#8230;they worried that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recidivists thumb their noses in new video and The John Murtha Jihadi Correctional Facility and Here&#8217;s your jihadi recidivism and One Pennsylvanian&#8217;s response to John Murtha and &#8220;&#8230;they worried that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Paradiso Guantánamo&#8221; and Beauty Queens&#8230; Much More Than Meets the Eye &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-722353</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Paradiso Guantánamo&#8221; and Beauty Queens&#8230; Much More Than Meets the Eye &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-722353</guid>
		<description>[...] recidivists thumb their noses in new video and The John Murtha Jihadi Correctional Facility and Here&#8217;s your jihadi recidivism and One Pennsylvanian&#8217;s response to John Murtha and &#8220;&#8230;they worried that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recidivists thumb their noses in new video and The John Murtha Jihadi Correctional Facility and Here&#8217;s your jihadi recidivism and One Pennsylvanian&#8217;s response to John Murtha and &#8220;&#8230;they worried that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Jihadi recidivism: Not just a Bush thang</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-704621</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Jihadi recidivism: Not just a Bush thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-704621</guid>
		<description>[...] the terror battlefield. &#8220;Security experts&#8221; scoffed. When I talked about the problem in January, the sneering hate mail poured [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the terror battlefield. &#8220;Security experts&#8221; scoffed. When I talked about the problem in January, the sneering hate mail poured [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There's My Two Cents</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-604043</link>
		<dc:creator>There's My Two Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-604043</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jihadi Recidivism...&lt;/strong&gt;

Barack the Obamessiah signed several executive orders earlier this week, one of which was a directive to close Gitmo within 1 year, fulfilling a campaign promise to his Bush-hating, terrorist-loving kook Left base. Of course, this brings a whole new .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jihadi Recidivism&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Barack the Obamessiah signed several executive orders earlier this week, one of which was a directive to close Gitmo within 1 year, fulfilling a campaign promise to his Bush-hating, terrorist-loving kook Left base. Of course, this brings a whole new &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nobama Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-601304</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nobama Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-601304</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;7 Years Work Wiped Out in 5 Minutes...&lt;/strong&gt;

In 5 minutes, Obama has undone the hard work of George Bush in the past 7 years, which unarguably has kept us safe from terrorism in our country since 9/11.  Even the NY Times can see the utter stupidity (although they phrase it quite differently, of c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>7 Years Work Wiped Out in 5 Minutes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In 5 minutes, Obama has undone the hard work of George Bush in the past 7 years, which unarguably has kept us safe from terrorism in our country since 9/11.  Even the NY Times can see the utter stupidity (although they phrase it quite differently, of c&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RabbidSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-601104</link>
		<dc:creator>RabbidSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-601104</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Untold Environmental Destruction!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OMG!!!! The Turbaned Mountain Desert Rat is threatened! It needs to be put on the Endangered Species List and protected from harm!

W H E R E I S G R E E N P E A C E ? ? ? ? E C A E P N E E R G S I E R E H W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Untold Environmental Destruction!</p></blockquote>
<p>OMG!!!! The Turbaned Mountain Desert Rat is threatened! It needs to be put on the Endangered Species List and protected from harm!</p>
<p>W H E R E I S G R E E N P E A C E ? ? ? ? E C A E P N E E R G S I E R E H W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b-cat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600720</link>
		<dc:creator>b-cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600720</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 23rd, 2009 at 12:37 pm, right4life said:&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

And in Pakistan, too! An ally! It&#039;s not like Pakistan attacked the World Trade Center! He is a war criminal! What about international law? What about the Geneva Convention? Probably hurt some kind of rare desert thorn bush, too! Untold Environmental Destruction! IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!!

Who&#039;s next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 23rd, 2009 at 12:37 pm, right4life said:</p></blockquote>
<p>And in Pakistan, too! An ally! It&#8217;s not like Pakistan attacked the World Trade Center! He is a war criminal! What about international law? What about the Geneva Convention? Probably hurt some kind of rare desert thorn bush, too! Untold Environmental Destruction! IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!!</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600700</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600700</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 23rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, lgm said: 
And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

what do you think of OBAMA &lt;strong&gt;MURDERING &lt;/strong&gt;those poor muslims in Pakistan today?? 

there was no trial, just a missile...those poor guys were just minding their own business when a predator missile strike MURDERS THEM!!

he&#039;s a war criminal!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 23rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, lgm said:<br />
And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.
</p></blockquote>
<p>what do you think of OBAMA <strong>MURDERING </strong>those poor muslims in Pakistan today?? </p>
<p>there was no trial, just a missile&#8230;those poor guys were just minding their own business when a predator missile strike MURDERS THEM!!</p>
<p>he&#8217;s a war criminal!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArizonaNeanderthal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600689</link>
		<dc:creator>ArizonaNeanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600689</guid>
		<description>We are not to fear our military? Before or after the purge? Clinton elevated some real buffoons to senior rank. There was a time I did not fear the FBI nor the BATF&amp;E but I sure do now. Would our military fire on us? Bull Run?

Kent State? Well actually the Ohio National Guard did not intend to fire on the students so they did something really stupid: they fired over the crowds head and ended up killing four non protesters.

Warning shots in an urban setting is always is always wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not to fear our military? Before or after the purge? Clinton elevated some real buffoons to senior rank. There was a time I did not fear the FBI nor the BATF&amp;E but I sure do now. Would our military fire on us? Bull Run?</p>
<p>Kent State? Well actually the Ohio National Guard did not intend to fire on the students so they did something really stupid: they fired over the crowds head and ended up killing four non protesters.</p>
<p>Warning shots in an urban setting is always is always wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corkie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600681</link>
		<dc:creator>corkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600681</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 23rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, lgm said:

And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

lgm, it&#039;s pretty obvious that you only thought through this statement halfway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 23rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, lgm said:</p>
<p>And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.</p></blockquote>
<p>lgm, it&#8217;s pretty obvious that you only thought through this statement halfway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600666</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600666</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 23rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, lgm said:

And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please enlighten us as to how this is a law enforcement issue.  Whose law?

The mindset that the military is a police force is a dangerous one.


&lt;blockquote&gt;
and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can just imagine your vision of how soldiers would act on the battlefield given your requirements.  As they&#039;re busy getting all CSI on the scene to fulfill the liberal standard of &quot;proper&quot; evidence to prove terrorism, the terrorists would be launching RPGs and fire AKs in their direction.

No, thank you.

These are not US citizens who have broken the law in a civilized society.  Some of these men in Gitmo are terrorists that will break any rule or law (natural or otherwise) to kill you for no better reason than not sharing their faith.

It&#039;s nice to pat ourselves on the back for being the more civilized, but these thoughts would not comfort you if these men were at your throat.

The situation is a lot more complicated than your belief our &lt;em&gt;civilian&lt;/em&gt; justice system.  (One does wonder how such a system would find a jury of a terrorist&#039;s peers)

The left has been crying for the release of the prisoners at Gitmo and it seems they&#039;re getting it.  We shall soon see what the consequences of this will be.  We&#039;ve already seen the consequence of releasing just one of them here.

So, if you must continue to plug your ears and chant loudly to block out this point, bear this in mind:  In this case, the government did what the left wanted by releasing a prisoner, and that man has gone on to commit more terrorism.

...and you&#039;re here telling us that by doing what the left wanted, the government made an error because it didn&#039;t play out as expected.

Damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t.

It&#039;s easy to criticize, lgm.  How about a real and achievable solution rather than your pithy anti-Bush comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 23rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, lgm said:</p>
<p>And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is,
</p></blockquote>
<p>Please enlighten us as to how this is a law enforcement issue.  Whose law?</p>
<p>The mindset that the military is a police force is a dangerous one.</p>
<blockquote><p>
and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I can just imagine your vision of how soldiers would act on the battlefield given your requirements.  As they&#8217;re busy getting all CSI on the scene to fulfill the liberal standard of &#8220;proper&#8221; evidence to prove terrorism, the terrorists would be launching RPGs and fire AKs in their direction.</p>
<p>No, thank you.</p>
<p>These are not US citizens who have broken the law in a civilized society.  Some of these men in Gitmo are terrorists that will break any rule or law (natural or otherwise) to kill you for no better reason than not sharing their faith.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to pat ourselves on the back for being the more civilized, but these thoughts would not comfort you if these men were at your throat.</p>
<p>The situation is a lot more complicated than your belief our <em>civilian</em> justice system.  (One does wonder how such a system would find a jury of a terrorist&#8217;s peers)</p>
<p>The left has been crying for the release of the prisoners at Gitmo and it seems they&#8217;re getting it.  We shall soon see what the consequences of this will be.  We&#8217;ve already seen the consequence of releasing just one of them here.</p>
<p>So, if you must continue to plug your ears and chant loudly to block out this point, bear this in mind:  In this case, the government did what the left wanted by releasing a prisoner, and that man has gone on to commit more terrorism.</p>
<p>&#8230;and you&#8217;re here telling us that by doing what the left wanted, the government made an error because it didn&#8217;t play out as expected.</p>
<p>Damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to criticize, lgm.  How about a real and achievable solution rather than your pithy anti-Bush comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b-cat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600664</link>
		<dc:creator>b-cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600664</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nearly 43,000 cars were torched in France over the whole of 2007 — an average of almost 118 per day.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Had a friend that drove a Renault in the 80s. Burst into flame one day. Just sayin&#039;. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nearly 43,000 cars were torched in France over the whole of 2007 — an average of almost 118 per day.</p></blockquote>
<p>Had a friend that drove a Renault in the 80s. Burst into flame one day. Just sayin&#8217;. <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonofdy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600651</link>
		<dc:creator>sonofdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600651</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.&lt;/blockquote&gt; So war is a law enforcement issue to you?

I am sorry put this post proved you to be an idiot. Stick to math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.</p></blockquote>
<p> So war is a law enforcement issue to you?</p>
<p>I am sorry put this post proved you to be an idiot. Stick to math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wighttrasch</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600643</link>
		<dc:creator>wighttrasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600643</guid>
		<description>whiskey tango foxtrot, &lt;strong&gt;lgm&lt;/strong&gt;?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whiskey tango foxtrot, <strong>lgm</strong>?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/heres-your-jihadi-recidivism/comment-page-2/#comment-600636</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=21972#comment-600636</guid>
		<description>And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if Bush had treated it as a law enforcement issue, which it is, and if the guy had had due process as he should, and if there was evidence against him, which there was, he would still be in custody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

