“Whore for the far-right”

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 22, 2009 10:02 AM

The Huffington Post demonstrates its moral superiority and commitment to Obama-esque positivity by breaking out the w-word again. They’re incensed that conservatives on Fox News would dare to express dissenting views of the inaugural festivities.

Dissent no longer equals patriotism. Dissent = RAAAAAAAACISM.

Feel the HuffPo brand of Hope and Change:

Michelle Malkin Doesn’t Care About Black People

To mark the day, Michelle Malkin kept a whimsical inauguration cliché count, supposedly monitoring utterances of the “First black president in American history” and “We are witnessing history.”

Michelle didn’t hide her contempt for all this attention being paid to Obama or for the credit he’s getting for being our first black president. She also made space on her blog to point out that no one in the media was covering how Obama inauguration celebrant Jay-Z often uses the word “nigga.” Then she uploaded a video on her site to prove it and sniffed, “And you wonder why some of us don’t believe MLK’s dream has been completely fulfilled …”

Now, many of you may be wondering why someone who is of Asian decent would be so antagonistic toward Obama and his background. And while Michelle may be a whore for the far-right — and she is certainly being a good one by discounting this momentous event — it still gives us pause. While most whores love to bring joy to people, it seems this one only seeks to spread hate.

Yeah, that’s me. “Whore for the far-right.” All because I refuse to genuflect at the altar of the far-left’s selective, skin-deep diversity and slaver at the feet of Barack Obama. All because I pointed out the hypocrisy of the post-racialists’ obnoxious racialism.

Perhaps if I instead drooled all over Barack Obama’s presidential blanket like giddy Donna Brazile did in this embarrassing Good Morning America video, they’d pat me on my head and consider me a properly-behaved member of my ethnic group, too:

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Huffpo,Race Hustlers

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:08 am, sonofdy said:

    Thats alright, they called me a nazi for suggesting that maybe it might be a good idea to figure out where the money for all this spending is coming from.

  2. #2
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:08 am, get-off-my-lawn said:

    I’d suggest stocking up on the “Dissent is Patriotic” bumper stickers before they change “Patriotic” to “Racist”

  3. #3
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:09 am, frostrt said:

    To paraphrase Rose in Titanic: “I’d rather be the Far-Right’s whore than the Left’s wife”.

    I’m sure you feel the same way, MM.

  4. #4
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:09 am, b-cat said:

    While most whores love to bring joy to people,

    I guess she would know.

    it seems this one only seeks to spread hate.

    Finding fault in race-mongering as a political movement is now hate. When the Germans did it…

  5. #5
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:10 am, granite said:

    …may be a whore for the far-right — and she is certainly being a good one by discounting this momentous event — ….

    *Sigh* – yet another demonstration of what ignorant, nasty, juvenile pigs socialists are.

  6. #6
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:10 am, RTater said:

    He doesn’t get, or deserve, any credit for being black. Now, if you want to talk about the historic first of being the first Kenyan bastard to be POTUS, I’m all ears.

  7. #7
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am, Mister P said:

    When are they going to accept the truth? Obama is the first bi-racial President.

  8. #8
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am, Sergeant Tim said:

    The authors’ of that POS at Ariana “I married way up and for loads of money” Huffington’s blob site reads:

    Joseph Minton Amann is the founder of sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com and a generally snarky fellow. As an underground art dealer, Amann trades primarily in stolen masterworks. He has acquired and sold Edvard Munch’s The Scream on three separate occasions. In his spare time, Amann dabbles in the restoration of both Byzantine icons and Hello Kitty memorabilia.

    Tom Breuer is the co-author, with Joseph Minton Amann, of Sweet Jesus, I Hate Bill O’Reilly, Fair and Balanced, My Ass and The Brotherhood of the Disappearing Pants: A Field Guide to Conservative Sex Scandals. He has lived in Wisconsin most of his life, treading some of the same pathways (ideological and otherwise) as Russ Feingold, William Proxmire, Robert La Follette, and Charlotte Rae, TV’s Mrs. Garrett.

    Joseph is interested in competing on CBS’s The Amazing Race with Tom. If you are a producer of said program, please contact him. Tom has absolutely no interest in participating in CBS’s The Amazing Race, so there will need to be some finagling.

    Er .. ’nuff said. ;-)

  9. #9
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am, rooster said:

    Michelle,
    You are one of the very few that I can watch. I hope the truth comes out about Obama’s citizenship one day and you stand ready to report on the greatest fraud commited in US history.

  10. #10
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am, chapoutier said:

    You know…they can think what they want about your politics and/or whether or not you were unjustly antagonistic toward Obama’s inauguration. Okay fine. Valid opinion.

    What I found truly objectionable was that they also singled out two other people, both men, and said nothing about them approaching the “whore” comment.

    Sickeningly sexist.

  11. #11
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:12 am, cpodug said:

    Obviously, HuffPo is merely acting like a good umpire – you know, “I calls ‘em as I sees ‘em.” Trouble is, it’s hard to call ‘em if you can’t see ‘em. “There are none so blind as those who will not see.”

    You hang in there, Michelle. We’ve got your back.

  12. #12
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:13 am, sonofdy said:

    Yes I also post on huffpo, under sonofdy1. (sonofdy got banned). Questioning the ONE there will get you labeled a hate filled racist.

    Its like a badge of honor anymore.

  13. #13
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:13 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am, chapoutier said:
    You know…they can think what they want about your politics and/or whether or not you were unjustly antagonistic toward Obama’s inauguration. Okay fine. Valid opinion.

    What I found truly objectionable was that they also singled out two other people, both men, and said nothing about them approaching the “whore” comment.

    Sickeningly sexist.

    ————————————–

    Well said. Anyone care to imagine what would happen if a far-left female pundit was referred to or written about as a “whore for the far left”?

    Sexism is sexism; doesn’t matter what the woman’s politics are.

  14. #14
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:14 am, DBNinKY said:

    Like a terrific, level-headed child-psychology professor once told us in class: “Words can only hurt us when they are spoken by people whom we truly respect and/or care about.”

    Don’t give a second thought to what those talentless hacks at Huff-Po spew about you, MM! It’s only because they fear and know you are right, that they respond in such a childish manner.

  15. #15
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:14 am, rplatt said:

    They are scared to death of you, Michelle , don’t give them an inch. When challenged, they panic.

  16. #16
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:15 am, max said:

    “While most whores love to bring joy to people,”

    a bit presumptuous that….

  17. #17
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:15 am, MtsEdge said:

    All because I refuse to genuflect at the altar of the far-left’s selective, skin-deep diversity

    Dang! This is so infuriating…Michelle, don’t you know that you are supposed to think a certain way because of the hue of your skin!! When will you learn??

    /sarc

  18. #18
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:16 am, sonofdy said:

    WWHHHHOOOOAAAA wait a sec. I thought you were black Michelle. Oh never mind, I just read huffpo and I think I got a contact high.

  19. #19
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:16 am, MtsEdge said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:15 am, max said:
    “While most whores love to bring joy to people,”

    a bit presumptuous that….

    of course they would focus on the immediate gratuitous “relationship”, not the harm it brings to all the innocent others who are affected…

  20. #20
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:17 am, englishqueen01 said:

    You know…they can think what they want about your politics and/or whether or not you were unjustly antagonistic toward Obama’s inauguration. Okay fine. Valid opinion.

    What I found truly objectionable was that they also singled out two other people, both men, and said nothing about them approaching the “whore” comment.

    Sickeningly sexist.

    So if they called the men whores too, then you’d be okay with it? And, yeah, that’s kind of tongue in cheek, but to say (or imply) it’d be better if they were equal-opportunity hypocrites is a little sad.

    Dissent, and calling Bush “Chimpy McHitler”, was all well and good for the past 8 years. Dissent was patriotic and our duty.

    Now the message is clear: Do not question Obama or his supporters. Or you WILL be punished.

  21. #21
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:21 am, gippergirl said:

    Where can I get my t-shirt?

  22. #22
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:23 am, FilmLadd said:

    “While most whores love to bring joy to people,”

    This writer must know a lot of whores to generalize so broadly.

  23. #23
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:23 am, Ken M. said:

    Didn’t bother to follow the HuffPo link — I’ll just take Michelle’s excerpt at face value.

    Personally, I don’t recall any spreading of hate on this blog. To the contrary, she occasionally will share hate-filled communications directed to her, for us to judge. Further, she will sometimes show concern for the hate-writer’s welfare, by responding with something like: “.. I hope that was therapeutic for you ..”

    … just sayin’ …

  24. #24
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:26 am, Virginia Patriot said:

    Don’t back down an inch Michelle, someone has to stand up to the left, the party of supplication (GOP) will not.

  25. #25
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:27 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:15 am, MtsEdge said:
    All because I refuse to genuflect at the altar of the far-left’s selective, skin-deep diversity
    Dang! This is so infuriating…Michelle, don’t you know that you are supposed to think a certain way because of the hue of your skin!! When will you learn??

    /sarc

    ————————————–

    Hey, MtsEdge – long time no, er, blog! :)

    You’re right, our hostess just doens’t seem to want to think the way a “minority” is supposed to think; and God bless her for it.

    To continue my previous thought: What would the MSM reaction be if a far-left woman was referred to as a “whore” for her politics?

  26. #26
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:28 am, Swing Shift CEO said:

    The Huffinggas Post strikes again! Did they really write that? Perhaps they left out an apostrophe? (Who’re???) Wouldn’t that make Tom and Joe whores of the far left? I didn’t know two white men could call an Asian lady a whore! This is not the America I knew!

    Oh, and Michelle, you are a decent Asian (word usage check on aisle 5!). If the Huffinggas Post is pissy with you, then you’re probably doing things right. Keep up the good work!

  27. #27
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:28 am, mchristian said:

    Why aren’t two ethnic or gender minority persons writing this column for HuffPo? They can be trained for these kinds of jobs very easily. All the money should not go to white males.

  28. #28
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:28 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    Somebody needs to create a dictionary to redefine what everything means according to the socialist progressives. I can get it started:

    White = racist and/or bad
    Christian = hate and/or bad
    Republican = racist and/or bad

  29. #29
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:29 am, John Deaux said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:13 am, frostrt said:
    Well said. Anyone care to imagine what would happen if a far-left female pundit was referred to or written about as a “whore for the far left”?

    Having seen far left female pundits, I can assure you nobody would ever refer to them as “whores” or any other epithet that might be considered sexual.

    Think Helen Thomas.

  30. #30
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:29 am, Hannibal said:

    Wow, Donna Brazile is like the new Demetrius in the “Robe”. Does she feel that this blanket has mystical powers to heal both the body and the soul? Will she drape this blanket about her shoulders and venture forth into the unwashed disbelievers and when they touch the blanket their sinful bigoted, conservative ways will be dispelled? A new biblical classic is in the making!

  31. #31
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:30 am, kerryb said:

    I knew several whores at one time in my life, and I can honestly say that none of them “love[d] to bring joy to people.” They didn’t care about joy – they cared about cocaine. That’s why they were doing what they did – for drugs. So apparently the writer doesn’t know anything about MM or about whores. Not that it matters too much, but they were all democrats.

  32. #32
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:30 am, wearybookwormis said:

    If someone were to knowingly ignore the excesses and faults of the GOP, then I could understand some respectful criticism. But I have been checking this website regularly for months and Conservatives are not sacred cows here.

    While it may be fruitless, I think such abuses of decency and honesty need to be communicated to the sponsors who advertise on that site. Allowing insults to be made will not advance anyone’s knowledge or change any opinion.

    That sinking ship of respectful debate needs to be plugged up and bailed out (sorry-poor choice of words) by everybody.

  33. #33
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:31 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Now, many of you may be wondering why someone who is of Asian decent would be so antagonistic toward Obama and his background.

    ‘Cause it’s all about race, you know!

    And while Michelle may be a whore for the far-right — and she is certainly being a good one by discounting this momentous event — it still gives us pause.

    So, she speaks for all Liberals. Got it.

    While most whores love to bring joy to people, it seems this one only seeks to spread hate.

    Project much? You know since we are

  34. #34
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:31 am, Dave from Flint said:

    Michelle, do you get a certificate suitable for framing with this award? If so, display it proudly.

  35. #35
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:32 am, jsr said:

    Watching that video gave me the sensation of my brain being sucked out, which I imagine is how it feels if you are overwhelmed by zombies. (That is sort of what has happened to the USA.)

  36. #36
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:33 am, chapoutier said:

    So if they called the men whores too, then you’d be okay with it? And, yeah, that’s kind of tongue in cheek, but to say (or imply) it’d be better if they were equal-opportunity hypocrites is a little sad.

    That is not what I was saying or implying. I was merely pointing out the fact that it is telling of something with these authors that they chose to use such a superfluous term with repsect to Michelle.

  37. #37
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:33 am, cheapseat said:

    well michelle, it’s good to know asians, at least americans of filipino descent, can be recists too. blacks can’t be racist even when they kill whites just for being white, no hate crime there. latinos can’t be racist, even though in every prison and ghetto, black vs latino are the two “kill the other group” champions. but we whites, and now you asians are part of the same racist team. i’ll have to tell my wife she has been branded a racist by the huffblow so finally after 35 years as an american she has achieved parity with white americans.

  38. #38
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:34 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    OK, Im only 34 seconds in, and I cant take it anymore….

    But did she seriously just admit to theft on National TV?????

    Yehhhhhhh, Im a white male so lets run this scenario…… Im at a club with Paris Hilon and she has some cool swag sitting on her chair while she is out on the dance floor. I pilfer it and then go on ABC to tell the world that I have her stuff. “But I’ll give it back if she asks……”

    Whos going to be sitting in jail tonight?

  39. #39
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:34 am, cheapseat said:

    p.s. you looked great this morning on fox. the mountains must agree with you.

  40. #40
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    The problem I see here is that all these racialists are trying to cover up for the lack of content in the character of “the One”. So, we must judge him by the color of his skin.

    The emperor still has no clothes.

    Now, if Obama was a man of substance, had a real track record of achievement in his life, I would give him the benefit of the doubt. But considering his track record of hanging out with ultra left wing nut job wackos like Ayers and his 20 year relationship with Rev. Wright, any normal person can see why we have reservations about this man.

  41. #41
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Whoops. My last post got cut off.

    While most whores love to bring joy to people, it seems this one only seeks to spread hate.

    Project much?

    Fixed.

  42. #42
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, MtsEdge said:

    To continue my previous thought: What would the MSM reaction be if a far-left woman was referred to as a “whore” for her politics?

    I wonder if that would be a compliment. Remember Nina Totenberg re BJ Clinton?? (I won’t go into any more details, for obvious reasons…)

  43. #43
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, sonofdy said:

    I would have to agree with kerryb. 99.5% of whores don’t do it for kicks. I have never personaly meet any female who grew up saying, man I want to be a whore when I grow up although my wife said she knew one such girl, who probably changed her mind.

  44. #44
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am, corkie said:

    Let me get this straight.

    They called Michelle a whore because:

    1. She kept whimsical counts of certain phrases.

    2. She pointed out that no one in the media was covering Jay-Z’s use of the word “nigga” and stated her doubt about it correlating to MLK’s dream.

    Wow. Aren’t they being a bit overprotective of their king?

  45. #45
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:37 am, wighttrasch said:

    How f*%$#ing boring are these demented lefties anymore??
    How predictably inane.

  46. #46
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:39 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    ok I watched the rest..

    “We have a black president, its free….”

    Wow, and who paid for all of these goodies to give to these people anyway?

    Say what you will about the communists, but in other countries, she probably would have just bought herself a ticket to the Gulags

  47. #47
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:39 am, RThomasETC said:

    You know, I don’t post comments here that often but I have to when people attack you like that.

    It is unscrupulous of them to make that characterization. It speaks more of them than you.

    Michelle, I appreciate your blog and your intellect which drives it. Thank you.

  48. #48
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:40 am, MarcoPolo said:

    Until those people evolve enough to stop labeling people, there’s no hope for them.

    We should be telling them “I told you so!” because they’re the people who kept yammering that America was too racist to elect a black person.

  49. #49
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:41 am, DBNinKY said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Missed reading you over the past few days – hope everything’s fine!

  50. #50
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:42 am, Madam President said:

    Whoa, I’m jealous, Mrs.Malkin! I’ve been called a Neo-Con, Nazi, Racist, Small-Minded, but NEVER a “Whore For the Right”!

  51. #51
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:42 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, MtsEdge said:
    To continue my previous thought: What would the MSM reaction be if a far-left woman was referred to as a “whore” for her politics?
    I wonder if that would be a compliment. Remember Nina Totenberg re BJ Clinton?? (I won’t go into any more details, for obvious reasons…)

    ————————————–

    Yes, I remember the quote. She was basically offering to be a LITERAL whore for Clinton in exchange for abortion being legal; and no one thought anything of it. Nasty.

  52. #52
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:43 am, guitarguy said:

    When ‘W’ was elected, caricatures of him as a chimp were all over the internet, and in quite a few cubicles here at work.

    We all know exactly what would happen if similar caricatures of Obama – as a monkey, complete with a banana in his hand – were to appear.

    RAAAAAAAACISM.

    (And Michelle, you looked absolutely DELICIOUS on Glenn Beck’s show yesterday….)

  53. #53
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:44 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    someone who is of Asian decent

    I’m sure Mrs. Malkin is more than decent, but I don’t think the clueless moonbat who wrote this has an editor…

  54. #54
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:45 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I prefer “lap dog” or “imperialist lackey” myself, as an insult.

  55. #55
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:45 am, ajmontana said:

    Gee, I wonder what they think of how I feel when I say “I hope Odopey chokes on a grape” screw Obama, his royal odopeyness.

  56. #56
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 am, englishqueen01 said:

    That is not what I was saying or implying. I was merely pointing out the fact that it is telling of something with these authors that they chose to use such a superfluous term with repsect to Michelle.

    Okay, thanks for clarifying.

    But don’t you see this is the exact same treatment they gave to Sarah Palin and pretty much any other conservative woman? Most liberals treat us with no respect, while reassuring everyone they’re the party that cares about women.

    It’s offensive, not just because of the “w” word, but because liberals somehow think they’re entitled to my vote and my brain and that I’m somehow damaged, brainwashed, oppressed, stupid or otherwise for being a conservative, pro-life Catholic woman.

    And conservative minorities? No racial slur is off-limits when talking about, say, Condoleeza Rice, Thomas Sowell, etc.

    Seriously. I’m willing to bet you $5 that if you could talk directly to the person that wrote the above, they’d tell you calling Michelle – or any conservative woman – a “whore” is justified because we, as conservatives, deserve it and are so much worse.

    For the party of “tolerance” and “diversity” they pretty much demand that everyone think and act like they do or they call their ideological opponents racial/sexist pejoratives.

  57. #57
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 am, MtsEdge said:

    no one thought anything of it

    If anything, she was celebrated by the left for her “audacity” in expressing this juvenile fantasy…and once again, we are told we must celebrate audacity with our new President’s ascension (assumption?) of the throne.

  58. #58
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:47 am, flmom said:

    Huffington’s blob site reads:

    I don’t know if that was a typo, but it sure gave me a chuckle.
    Name calling is no substitute for healthy debate, but when you haven’t any debating skills, the only thing you have left is insults.

  59. #59
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:47 am, Klaatu said:

    I think that all this racial sniping is out of place in our post-racial society. The summit of American civil life is to be the President. Now that we have a true African-American as POTUS, we should recognize and support the post-racial society.

    The first step, in support and celebration, would be to repeal all affirmative action laws and other forms of racial preferences. These have divided us in the past and now is the time to come together as one people, equal under the law.

  60. #60
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:48 am, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:45 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I believe the phrase the butcher Mao used was “imperialist running dogs.”

  61. #61
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:48 am, Flyoverman said:

    Well, life sucks when you get judged not by the color of your skin, but the content of your character and your ideas.

    Deng Tsau Peng (sp?) the former Chinese Premier said it best, “I don’t care if the cat is black or white as long as it catches mice.”

    No passes, just performance. That is the standard. Campaign is over kids. You promised the Hope and Change, so deliver.

    So far the only Change is to move the Gitmo prisoners and Hope once on U.S. soil they don’t escape.

  62. #62
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:48 am, Socky said:

    When Cap This was labeled “a Right-Wing Hate Site” by HuffPo, I took it as a badge of honor, and even made up a little icon to mark the occasion.

  63. #63
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:50 am, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:47 am, Klaatu said:

    I think that all this racial sniping is out of place in our post-racial society. The summit of American civil life is to be the President. Now that we have a true African-American as POTUS, we should recognize and support the post-racial society.

    The first step, in support and celebration, would be to repeal all affirmative action laws and other forms of racial preferences. These have divided us in the past and now is the time to come together as one people, equal under the law.

    You’re writing tongue-in-cheek, right?

  64. #64
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:50 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 am, MtsEdge said:
    no one thought anything of it
    If anything, she was celebrated by the left for her “audacity” in expressing this juvenile fantasy…and once again, we are told we must celebrate audacity with our new President’s ascension (assumption?) of the throne.

    ————————————–
    True enough – I guess, if you publicly offer your, er, favors, to a liberal Decocrat President, THAT is not enough for you to deserve to be called a “whore”.

  65. #65
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:50 am, Reggie Dunlop said:

    Shouldn’t it be descent, not decent? What an illiterate hack.

    Michelle is right, as I keep telling my friends, these people cannot see past President Obama’s skin color. The only color I see is communist red, but I guess that makes me a raaaaacist for pointing that out.

  66. #66
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:51 am, lgm said:

    Just for balance, you should look at the way Ann Coulter refers to women on the left she doesn’t like.

  67. #67
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:52 am, Jay777 said:

    WTH is Donna talking about? We have a black president, so stealing is not a crime now?

  68. #68
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:52 am, ackrite55 said:

    Warren Ballentine is having a cow right now over Rush’s wish for Obama’s failure without any context.

  69. #69
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:53 am, BOB said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:10 am, RTater said:
    He doesn’t get, or deserve, any credit for being black. Now, if you want to talk about the historic first of being the first Kenyan bastard to be POTUS, I’m all ears.

    Great, you now have something in common with Obama.

  70. #70
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:54 am, wighttrasch said:

    Racist! Fascist! Sexist! Whore! Homophobe! I hope I have hit the high points.

    Oh, I really like being called ‘unschooled’ or ‘uneducated’ as well—-this seems to be another approach of the left.

    And the term ‘christian’ used as an epithet.

  71. #71
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:54 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    #65 Reggie Dunlop: see my #53

    A Catholic school education through grade 12 and a BS from The University of Texas at Austin, 2005 National Champions in baseball and football, and 2008-2009 Fiesta Bowl champions, seems to have paid off.

  72. #72
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:54 am, Socky said:

    Has it ever occurred to lgm that “they do it too, all the time” is the kind of whining a six year old does?

  73. #73
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:54 am, chapoutier said:

    But don’t you see this is the exact same treatment they gave to Sarah Palin and pretty much any other conservative woman? Most liberals treat us with no respect, while reassuring everyone they’re the party that cares about women.

    Any woman in politics, conservative or liberal, is treated differently, by pretty much everyone. How many pantsuit jokes were made here (as well as everywhere else) with repsect to HRC?

    It’s offensive, not just because of the “w” word, but because liberals somehow think they’re entitled to my vote and my brain and that I’m somehow damaged, brainwashed, oppressed, stupid or otherwise for being a conservative, pro-life Catholic woman.

    Actually I do agree with this sentiment. It is a pervasive and ugly idea on the left that a minority or a woman mush slavishly be a liberal. But wouldn’t you also agree that it is a pervasive attitude to many conservatives that if you are Christian, you must be a conservative?

  74. #74
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:55 am, Miss_Anthrope said:

    Remember the bumber stick from the Clinton years?

    “Member of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy”

    Maybe we should make this the new bumber sticker for the Obama years:

    “Whore for the Far-Right”

    I like it…

  75. #75
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:55 am, flmom said:

    lgm said:

    Please enlighten us.

  76. #76
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:55 am, chapoutier said:

    Just for balance, you should look at the way Ann Coulter refers to women on the left she doesn’t like.

    I particularly enjoyed her referring to children of a divorced mother as “future strippers.”

  77. #77
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:56 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Socky- do you have a Jack Bauer blog this year now that CTU is no more and we have a kinder, gentler President and Janeane Garafalo is cast as an FBI agent?

  78. #78
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:56 am, wighttrasch said:

    lgm–’balance’ is a term you should not use lightly….

  79. #79
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:57 am, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Seriously. I’m willing to bet you $5 that if you could talk directly to the person that wrote the above, they’d tell you calling Michelle – or any conservative woman – a “whore” is justified because we, as conservatives, deserve it and are so much worse.

    For the party of “tolerance” and “diversity” they pretty much demand that everyone think and act like they do or they call their ideological opponents racial/sexist pejoratives.

    The socialist opposite worldview-holders’ way of “thinking” is such a morass of projection, immaturity, envy, selfishness, fantasy, evil, arrogance, ignorance, heads-I-win-tails-you-lose, (fill in your term/s here); that it should be no surprise what comes out of their mouths, their pens, or their keyboards.

  80. #80
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:58 am, Anton said:

    Hey Michelle,

    You really need to mellow out…

    /ducks

  81. #81
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:58 am, backwoods conservative said:

    If the word “whore” continues to be used to describe Michelle Malkin, then the word will eventually lose its negative connotations and become respectable. Then some other word will have to be used for the purpose “whore” has traditionally served. Language usage evolves and we may be seeing an example of that.

    That said, it’s still disgraceful that people would go to such lengths to denigrate those with whom they disagree.

  82. #82
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:59 am, fourstringfuror said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:51 am, lgm said:
    Just for balance, you should look at the way Ann Coulter refers to women on the left she doesn’t like.

    Right, because this is Coulter’s website?

    Seriously man, are you that dense?

  83. #83
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:59 am, Oink said:

    I wouldn’t think twice what those dip $hits say about you Michelle!

    We’ll worry when they start singing your praises.

    The HuffPo and Daily Kos crowd are completely disgusting. It truly scares me to think that the majority of the people in this country are just flat-out WRONG.

  84. #84
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:00 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:55 am, chapoutier said:
    Just for balance, you should look at the way Ann Coulter refers to women on the left she doesn’t like.
    I particularly enjoyed her referring to children of a divorced mother as “future strippers.”

    ————————————–

    I believe Ms. Coulter was referring to the children of women who choose to raise them without fathers, more so than divorced mothers, and her point was that their futures were relatively bleak compared to children from two-parent homes, which she backed up with various statistics.

  85. #85
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:00 am, J S Ragman said:

    To paraphrase something we used to say about the fighter pilots;

    Better a sister in the whorehouse than a brother who’s a Democrat.

  86. #86
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:01 am, MtsEdge said:

    We’ll worry when they start singing your praises.

    Good point!!

    Michelle, you’re taking flak, you must be over the target…

  87. #87
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:01 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    But wouldn’t you also agree that it is a pervasive attitude to many conservatives that if you are Christian, you must be a conservative?

    I have a hard time seeing how anyone can justify killing an unborn baby, because it would be an inconvenience or a burden on a young woman who chose to have irresponsible sex.

    I’d still disagree with those that would justify abortion for rape or incest, but I could see their point, but I can’t see how a real follower of Jesus would kill a baby because it would be a burden.

    And when you get people that purposely ignore Leviticus and Paul’s letter to the Church at Rome, to say there is nothing un-Christian about gay marriage, or post links to Unitarian web sites like Trop has done, that somehow extrapolates the Greek word for “beloved servant” as automatically meaning a gay servant lover, well, you have your definition of Christianity where the ruler of this world, modern times and whims, define the ever changing morality, and I’ll have my definition of Christianity.

  88. #88
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:02 am, rocketman said:

    The hate filled Huffpo group can not compete with Michelle Malkin on the stage of ideas and discussion. So they must revert to lies and calling her a racist.
    ***
    I have never seen any racism in Michelle’s articles–only truth and clear thinking. Her attacks are against some person’s bad ideas and behavior–not against their race.
    ***
    President Barack Obama is a very strong ABORTION SUPPORTER–he repealed the Born Alive Infant executive order today. Our tax dollars can again now be sent overseas to fund abortions there.
    ***
    A disproportionate number of the babies aborted in our country are Black–our new Prez is O.K. with this. The KKK probably feels the same way.
    ***
    Huffpo calls Michelle a whore for standing up for good Christian and conservative principles. Huffpo and the O’bummer pander to the left wing / socialist / marxist abortion industry. Who is the whore here? We have ideas on one hand, and dead babies and recently born infants on the other side. Hope and change you can believe in.
    ***
    A person is defined by his (her) enemies–keep socking it to them, Michelle.
    ***
    John Bibb

  89. #89
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:02 am, ChicagoRobb said:

    Prediction 1: It will be Obama/Somebody else in 2012. Biden’s mouth will write a check, Obama does not want to cash
    Prediction 2: The Left will push this “Post Racial” idea to the point that it will drive many who voted for Obama. Campaign=Conceptual ideas (Hope/Change etc). Administration=Actual action and behavior

  90. #90
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:03 am, sonofdy said:

    Just for balance, you should look at the way Ann Coulter refers to women on the left she doesn’t like.

    Well since ann coulter is a 20 foot high blonde woman, I can see how you confused her with michelle malkin.

  91. #91
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:04 am, Reggie Dunlop said:

    Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul, I should have read your comment. Austin is a great town. I spent four years hanging out there on the weekends, raging on sixth and fourth. What a great place.

    One thing though. My all time favorite Texas t shirt though is one I saw at A&M’s chili fest. On the front it had “Keep Austin Weird” and on the back it said “Keep College Station Normal.”

  92. #92
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:05 am, MtsEdge said:

    which she backed up with various statistics

    You’re right, this was not a disingenuous comment without substance. Sometimes the truth is ugly.

    As one of 3 who was brought up by a divorced mom, I can testify that it was HARD for her to work full-time and supervise 3 teenagers…we definitely took advantage of the freedom and (necessary) lack of oversight. And she was TRYING to keep it all together…I shudder to think how things would have turned out if she didn’t care.

  93. #93
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:06 am, JT said:

    They should change the name of HuffPo to Truthiness. Nice to throw that Colbertism back at ‘em. I’m sure they’ll be thousands? millions? more chances to use the word.

    Did anyone catch Donna at the end of the clip?

    She was asked about the criminal act of stealing the blanket from the White House.

    Donna: “We have a black President. [holds up blanket] This is free.”

    Jesus, the Obama entitlement attitude is pervasive. Even commentators that pull at six figures, expect handouts.

    I’m gonna go buy another gun.

  94. #94
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am, chapoutier said:

    I believe Ms. Coulter was referring to the children of women who choose to raise them without fathers, more so than divorced mothers, and her point was that their futures were relatively bleak compared to children from two-parent homes, which she backed up with various statistics.

    I wasn’t saying her point was or was not valid. I am saying she made it in a very offensive, sexist way.

  95. #95
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am, Mark La Roi said:

    I’m a Black American and I thought it was pretty hypocritical to celebrate the first black president with a guy hollering “nigga” at every chance he got. This won’t change anything in the Black community except the sense (among SOME) of entitlement.

    I’m not proud of this event because it was still more a vote for BDS than for BHO. Here’s a little something for ya ta chew on: http://thegospelshowonevoice.com/Pieces/?p=1162

  96. #96
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am, bradley said:

    The ONLY reason Donna Brazile is on TV is due to her color. It’s definitely not her intellect OR her successful “experience” in leading the Gore campaign to victory.
    She’s the poster child for affirmative action: color over competence.

  97. #97
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:08 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:05 am, MtsEdge said:
    which she backed up with various statistics
    You’re right, this was not a disingenuous comment without substance. Sometimes the truth is ugly.

    As one of 3 who was brought up by a divorced mom, I can testify that it was HARD for her to work full-time and supervise 3 teenagers…we definitely took advantage of the freedom and (necessary) lack of oversight. And she was TRYING to keep it all together…I shudder to think how things would have turned out if she didn’t care.

    ————————————–

    I like Ann Coulter’s response whenever she is accused of attacking the Left as viciously as she says the Left attacks the Right: “Our insults are true!” :)
    In any case, I cannot recall her ever using the “w-word” to describe another woman. I would most definitely be put off if she had.

    I am very grateful to have been raised in a two-parent home and cannot imagine myself as a single mother.

  98. #98
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:08 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Brazile is, IIRC, a lesbian. She is a twofer.

  99. #99
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:09 am, WarEagle82 said:

    I think the problem is four-fold. First, Michelle is MUCH SMARTER than the idiots on the left.

    Second, Michelle is MORE SUCCESSFUL than the idots on the left.

    Third, Michelle is MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE than the idiots on the left (although I suspect Olbermann THINKS he is prettier).

    And lastly, Michelle got to where she is the old fashioned way. She EARNED it on her own.

    It all boils down to envy.

  100. #100
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:10 am, FamilyMan said:

    “Asian whore”
    Our Dear Michelle.
    It’s a good thing that your husband can’t get hold of that jerk through the computer. If someone called my wife that, they would be DEAD MEAT.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook