“Whore for the far-right”

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 22, 2009 10:02 AM

The Huffington Post demonstrates its moral superiority and commitment to Obama-esque positivity by breaking out the w-word again. They’re incensed that conservatives on Fox News would dare to express dissenting views of the inaugural festivities.

Dissent no longer equals patriotism. Dissent = RAAAAAAAACISM.

Feel the HuffPo brand of Hope and Change:

Michelle Malkin Doesn’t Care About Black People

To mark the day, Michelle Malkin kept a whimsical inauguration cliché count, supposedly monitoring utterances of the “First black president in American history” and “We are witnessing history.”

Michelle didn’t hide her contempt for all this attention being paid to Obama or for the credit he’s getting for being our first black president. She also made space on her blog to point out that no one in the media was covering how Obama inauguration celebrant Jay-Z often uses the word “nigga.” Then she uploaded a video on her site to prove it and sniffed, “And you wonder why some of us don’t believe MLK’s dream has been completely fulfilled …”

Now, many of you may be wondering why someone who is of Asian decent would be so antagonistic toward Obama and his background. And while Michelle may be a whore for the far-right — and she is certainly being a good one by discounting this momentous event — it still gives us pause. While most whores love to bring joy to people, it seems this one only seeks to spread hate.

Yeah, that’s me. “Whore for the far-right.” All because I refuse to genuflect at the altar of the far-left’s selective, skin-deep diversity and slaver at the feet of Barack Obama. All because I pointed out the hypocrisy of the post-racialists’ obnoxious racialism.

Perhaps if I instead drooled all over Barack Obama’s presidential blanket like giddy Donna Brazile did in this embarrassing Good Morning America video, they’d pat me on my head and consider me a properly-behaved member of my ethnic group, too:

Posted in: Huffpo, Race Hustlers

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sarah Palin Sucks « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  2. Battered Op-Ed Syndrome, aka Moonbattery [Dan Collins]
  3. HuffPo’s class is showing: “whores love to bring joy to people” : Pursuing Holiness
  4. The Other McCain: Feel the Hope!
  5. If Michelle is a “whore,” then Huffington is a skeezer! « Mark Epstein
  6. Left Of Center » Blog Archive » A Great Many Things, But Racist Isn’t One Of Them
  7. ScoopThis.Org » I whore for the right, too.
  8. Cold Fury » Is Malkin a racist, a whore, uppity, or just intolerant?
  9. Ed Driscoll.com
  10. See, The problem is this | Political Byline
  11. Riehl World View
  12. The Huffington Post Doesn’t Care About America « American Glob
  13. The left’s hypocrisy knows no bounds | The Lonely Conservative
  14. The Jawa Report
  15. Shut Up Hippy » Blog Archive » “Whore for the far-right”
  16. Michelle Malkin on Robert Reich, Charles Rangel, and the Color-Coded Stimulus | Democrat=Socialist
  17. Douglas Kmiec: Victim « Mary Victrix
  18. Right Wing News

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #599437
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:08 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Brazile is, IIRC, a lesbian. She is a twofer.

  2. #599438
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:09 am, WarEagle82 said:

    I think the problem is four-fold. First, Michelle is MUCH SMARTER than the idiots on the left.

    Second, Michelle is MORE SUCCESSFUL than the idots on the left.

    Third, Michelle is MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE than the idiots on the left (although I suspect Olbermann THINKS he is prettier).

    And lastly, Michelle got to where she is the old fashioned way. She EARNED it on her own.

    It all boils down to envy.

  3. #599441
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:10 am, FamilyMan said:

    “Asian whore”
    Our Dear Michelle.
    It’s a good thing that your husband can’t get hold of that jerk through the computer. If someone called my wife that, they would be DEAD MEAT.

  4. #599442
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am, chapoutier said:
    I believe Ms. Coulter was referring to the children of women who choose to raise them without fathers, more so than divorced mothers, and her point was that their futures were relatively bleak compared to children from two-parent homes, which she backed up with various statistics.
    I wasn’t saying her point was or was not valid. I am saying she made it in a very offensive, sexist way.

    ————————————-

    Your point is taken, but I still would not compare it to calling them “future whores”. I just don’t think that sinks to the level of what was said about our hostess.

  5. #599445
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am, Paul Revere said:

    I love it when The Left brings out the personal insults. Well, they always do. It’s all they have.

  6. #599444
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am, pueblo1032 said:

    Good to see LIBS haven’t changed any… When all else fails in the DEBATE, resort to name calling… MM, you keep on being a whore for the RIGHT… It’s way better than drooling for the DEMS, and being ONE OF THEIR FIELD HANDS…

  7. #599446
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:12 am, DBNinKY said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:51 am, lgm said:

    Just for balance… .

    What – you’re not going to swipe at MM today with a borrowed gag from Bugs Bunny?! BTW, what does anything Ms. Coulter has ever said have to do with MM being called a derogatory name by the keepers of civil decorum at Huff-Po?

    I particularly enjoyed her referring to children of a divorced mother as “future strippers.”

    Deride her all you want, but Ms. Coulter researched the evidence for that statement before she made it.

  8. #599448
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:15 am, DBNinKY said:

    I wasn’t saying her point was or was not valid. I am saying she made it in a very offensive, sexist way.

    Worked didn’t it? It got the attention of both you and LGM, as well as that of liberals around the world -

  9. #599447
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:15 am, MtsEdge said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:08 am, frostrt said:
    I like Ann Coulter’s response whenever she is accused of attacking the Left as viciously as she says the Left attacks the Right: “Our insults are true!”
    In any case, I cannot recall her ever using the “w-word” to describe another woman. I would most definitely be put off if she had.

    Ann has a unique style and extraordinary intellect, much like our gracious hostess. I agree, I’ve never heard her use the w word to describe another woman…she is too busy refuting their flimsy ideas!!

    Glad that Michelle and Ann and other female conservative icons have such thick skin!! The world would be poorer without either of them.

    I am very grateful to have been raised in a two-parent home and cannot imagine myself as a single mother.

    I’m thankful that my children are being brought up in a 2-parent home. Now that I’m a mom, I have an even deeper gratitude for what my mother did for me and my brothers…and how very hard it would be if I didn’t have my husband.

  10. #599450
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:15 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Donna Brazile and that Huffinton broad ARE whores and ugly whores at that. And that Trophy Wife whore Nancy Pelosi is no less a whore for her sugar daddy buying her a House seat.

    We Properly ( as in Correct and to the Right)-behaved members of our ethnic groups do not need the permission of the Whores of the Left as galling as that may be to them. I would say Donna Brazile and that Huffinton broad could kiss something but not mine.

    As I have returned from walking the dog it is time to put some salsa on tres huevos over easy on toast. That is my contribution to the whores of cultural awareness.

    Keep spreading the Hate darlin’, I am doing my part. Lock and load mis amigos (being muti-cultural again-comes with that salsa from New York City).

  11. #599454
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:16 am, RedDog said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:06 am, JT said:

    Did anyone catch Donna at the end of the clip? She was asked about the criminal act of stealing the blanket from the White House.

    Donna: “We have a black President. [holds up blanket] This is free.”

    I’m gonna go buy another gun.

    The Left’s definition of “far right” is anyone more conservative than Lincoln Chaffee. And their definition of a “whore” is any woman who sleeps with a man.

    Miss Donna must believe anything she can lay her thieving hands on is free. As far as entitlement goes, I hope for their sakes they don’t think they’re entitled to any of my property. There will be a rude awakening.

  12. #599457
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:18 am, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am, Mark La Roi said:

    I’m a Black American….

    My grandparents came over from Europe a century ago and became Americans.

    To paraphrase the sign about Joe the Plumber that that (black)guy held up at a campaign rally a couple/few months ago…you and I must be related!

    Welcome to MM.

  13. #599460
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:20 am, BayStateRepublican said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:03 am, sonofdy said:
    Just for balance, you should look at the way Ann Coulter refers to women on the left she doesn’t like.
    Well since ann coulter is a 20 foot high blonde woman, I can see how you confused her with michelle malkin.

    C’mon, he works awfully hard on those non-sequiturs.

  14. #599462
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:20 am, shooter said:

    Hey obama!
    If ever you were to try to act presidential, the time is NOW.

    Before this goes nuclear and permanent you’d better say something. Remember all those flowery speeches and promises? Well?
    Maybe this is what the Black Liberation Theology President wanted all along.

    RACISM is alive and well in RAP, at Huffpo, and now back in the OVAL office for the first time in 50 years.

    Michelle, thanks for speaking up, and we’ve got your 6.

  15. #599465
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:22 am, JT said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:15 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    And that Trophy Wife whore Nancy Pelosi

    I just threw up in mouth. Yuck. I need a mint.

    Think happy thoughts…. think happy thoughts… my wife is pretty… MM is pretty…

    I think I’m OK now. Please don’t type that again.

  16. #599466
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:23 am, Brian72 said:

    This is going to be a long four years. The more you are independent from Obamamania, the more you will be viewed with suspicion and hostile intent by the legions of Obamatons who are looking for examples to use to influence others who are potential future Obamatons.

    I’m starting to think Orwell should have named “1984″ “2009″.

  17. #599467
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:23 am, RedDog said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am, Paul Revere said:
    I love it when The Left brings out the personal insults. Well, they always do. It’s all they have.

    Mockery, derision, vulgarity, and ridicule: MO of the intellectually vacant Left. Aside from this and threats of insurrection, they have nothing to offer America.

  18. #599469
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:24 am, chapoutier said:

    Worked didn’t it? It got the attention of both you and LGM, as well as that of liberals around the world -

    Oh…so saying something patently offensive (and innacurate. What percentage of girls from divorced parents do you think ACTUALLY become strippers?) for shock value is now okay?

    She has also about the assasination of a sitting president, but that is never mentioned in all the assasination chic discussions.

    Whenever Coulter says something offensive, you all excuse it as her making a joke and deride liberals’ lack of humor. However, no such quarter is EVER provided to the left (think Al Franken and his joke about cancer that is constantly brought up here).

  19. #599473
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:26 am, CyberCipher said:

    Say what you will about the communists, but in other countries, she probably would have just bought herself a ticket to the Gulags

    The Obamafascists are only getting started. Before it’s over, it would not surprise me it they have a nice little book burning of Michelle’s books. She just might end up being arrested and imprisoned for being an “unpatriotic whore” — along with her family.

    someone who is of Asian decent

    The mis-spelling is only one of the amusing aspects of this. Most Asians (Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, Vietnamese, etceteras) would NOT identify a Filipina as “Asian”. Filipinos are Pacific Islanders. Genetically, culturally, linguistically, historically — they are distinct from the peoples of mainland Asia. The libtards are SO ignorant, they can’t even correctly identify Michelle’s ethnic group. I’d be willing to bet REAL money that they can NOT locate the Republic of the Philippines on a world map.

  20. #599475
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Michelle, You whore you ! If you are a whore for the far right then I am a pimp. If dissent equals racism then I am a racist. Do I care? Are you niggaz gonna come after me for me being a racist? Bring it. If anyone is a racist, the entire black community is. You have shown your true colors way to many times. You can’t hide it behind a POTUS. It’s your time to shine ! Lets see ya’lls dignity, compassion and honor to America. I can tell how you love America by what the “mall” looked like after the inauguration, completely trashed. So far all I have seen is expressions of racism and hatred. I wanna see how you blacks will do without whitey holding your hand.. Balls in your court, lets see what you do with it. For one, I am not holding my breath.

  21. #599476
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I thought Filipinos were considered Malayo-Polynesian?

  22. #599477
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, Brian72 said:

    Al Franken is a walking, talking joke.

    I can’t wait to see him rush across the senate floor and get in some Republican Senator’s face, start yelling at him and poke him in the chest. What entertainment he will be.

    Senator Stuart Smalley (D-MN).

  23. #599478
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, chapoutier said:

    Your point is taken, but I still would not compare it to calling them “future whores”. I just don’t think that sinks to the level of what was said about our hostess.

    Not quite, but it certainly is in the ball park, never mind the fact Coulter is talking about CHILDREN. At least MM can stick up for herself.

  24. #599479
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:29 am, RedDog said:

    This is why we all must take part in reclaiming our education system and our national culture. Fifty years of radical socialist infiltration of our institutions has produced this result: entitlement slaves with no character or moral foundation. Just the kind of “citizen” our new ruling oligarchy desires in their realm. Donna Brazile could be the poster child for their compliant, model serf.

  25. #599481
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:30 am, corkie said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:24 am, chapoutier said:

    Whatever, chapoutier. Coulter didn’t call anyone a whore or a stripper. You’re discussing some general statement about statistics.

    I think you need a better example. I’m sure you can find one.

  26. #599482
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:30 am, wighttrasch said:

    What does Ann Coulter have to do with this?

  27. #599486
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, Brian72 said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:30 am, wighttrasch said:

    What does Ann Coulter have to do with this?

    She’s a whore for the right too. :smile:

  28. #599487
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, JT said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, Brian72 said:

    Al Franken is a walking, talking joke.

    I can’t wait to see him rush across the senate floor and get in some Republican Senator’s face, start yelling at him and poke him in the chest. What entertainment he will be.

    Senator Stuart Smalley (D-MN).

    Careful, Frankin might challenge you to a wrestling match.

  29. #599488
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, chapoutier said:

    Whatever, chapoutier. Coulter didn’t call anyone a whore or a stripper. You’re discussing some general statement about statistics.

    Anyone specific? No. A whole group of children that have nothing to do with their situation? Yes. Contemptible.

  30. #599493
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:33 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:41 am, DBNinKY said:
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 am, 30 pcs of silver said:
    Missed reading you over the past few days – hope everything’s fine!

    All is well. Thank you for asking.

  31. #599495
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:34 am, PhredE said:

    I take issue with the writer of that piece that erroneously assumes that by not lavishing all sorts of praise and unending fanfare one is necessarily prone to far right/deeply conservative views or unappreciative of the new President. The hit piece characterization above is wrong.

    Dr. King’s words would suggest that Obama be treated just the same as any other President – whatever the color or ethnicity – he should be accepted plainly and ordinarily for the person he is – no more, no less.

    How many times have other presidents been elected in our lifetimes when someone complained or said something critical? Sure, it happens all the time. One can be critical of Obama and not be a racist – yes, members of the left/progressive types, it is true – it’s called diversity of opinion.

    End of story.

  32. #599496
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:34 am, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, Brian72 said:

    Al Franken is a walking, talking joke.

    Except that he wasn’t funny ~35 years ago, and is not funny now.
    Instead, perhaps “lame, has-been, unfunny, wannabe comedian” would be more accurate.

    Senator Stuart Smalley (D-MN).

    So has this fool actually been declared the winner yet?
    A little while earlier this morning I tried to find out conclusively on Google, but without success.

  33. #599497
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:34 am, b-cat said:

    What does Ann Coulter have to do with this?

    Transference. Something concrete to something vague.

  34. #599498
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:35 am, Socky said:

    C’mon, [lgm] works awfully hard on those non-sequiturs.

    No kidding! Do you have any idea how many bong-hits it takes to get to lgm’s level? Cheech Marin looks at lgm and says, “You are really out of it, man.”

  35. #599499
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:35 am, RedDog said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, Brian72 said:
    Al Franken is a walking, talking joke.

    I can’t wait to see him rush across the senate floor and get in some Republican Senator’s face, start yelling at him and poke him in the chest. What entertainment he will be.

    Senator Stuart Smalley (D-MN).

    Stuart Smalley fancies himself a stud athelete and a brawler. However, he should think long and hard before pulling too much crap in the halls of Congress. I believe there are some real life studs in attendance that would easily send him to the hospital with a crushed face.

  36. #599500
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:35 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    The poor, insecure Left. If they had confidence in their Feckless Leader, they wouldn’t whine when someone disagrees with him.

    Really, the media whores and liberal whiners need to grow the hell up. This is America, and we are free to think how we wish.

  37. #599501
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:36 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:20 am, shooter said:
    Hey obama!
    If ever you were to try to act presidential, the time is NOW.

    Before this goes nuclear and permanent you’d better say something.

    That ship has sailed. Obama had the opportunity to step up during his coronation ceremony when Bush was booed by the kool-aid crew. Nada.

  38. #599502
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:36 am, JT said:

    Anyone specific? No. A whole group of children that have nothing to do with their situation? Yes. Contemptible.

    I think this issue is who is responsible for creating the “stripper”. Not the name itself.

    Ann knows controversy sells books.

  39. #599505
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:38 am, chapoutier said:

    What does Ann Coulter have to do with this?

    She is someone that says the exact same type of outlandish, wildly offensive stuff, (John Edwards “faggot” also comes to mind, corkie) that everyone is up in arms over here.

    To MM’s credit, she did take Coulter to task for that, deservedly so. As the HuffPo idiots deserve as well.

  40. #599506
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:38 am, mchristian said:

    wighttrasch said:
    What does Ann Coulter have to do with this?

    Strawman defense. lgm uses it all the time. It’s a good tactic for those with no real argument to present.

  41. #599512
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:40 am, chapoutier said:

    Ann knows controversy sells books.

    And gets web page hits. Does that excuse either?

    Obama had the opportunity to step up during his coronation ceremony when Bush was booed by the kool-aid crew.

    Obama was indoors when Bush was booed. And even if he was outside, what was he supposed to do? Grab the mike and adminish everyone, thus drawing more attention to it?

  42. #599523
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:45 am, CyberCipher said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:28 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I thought Filipinos were considered Malayo-Polynesian?

    Correct. Linguistically (and genetically), Filipinos have more in common with the Indonesians than they have with the peoples of mainland Asia. And yet, because of 300+ years of Spanish rule and 100+ years of U.S. influence, culturally and historically, they are also quite distinct from the Muslims of Indonesia. Filipinos are predominately Catholic, use the Latin alphabet (exclusively), and they begin learning English in the first grade of elementary school.

  43. #599524
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:45 am, backwoods conservative said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:40 am, chapoutier said:

    Obama was indoors when Bush was booed. And even if he was outside, what was he supposed to do? Grab the mike and adminish everyone, thus drawing more attention to it?

    That’s exactly what he should have done. He should have called them on their rude behavior and let them know that kind of thing isn’t right. They should already know that but apparently they don’t.

  44. #599537
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:48 am, chapoutier said:

    That’s exactly what he should have done. He should have called them on their rude behavior and let them know that kind of thing isn’t right. They should already know that but apparently they don’t.

    Except, again, he was inside.

    And Obama and Bush actually I think showed a lot of respect and admiration for eachother through the transition. I think escorting them to the chopper and the kind words and hugs exchanged were classy.

  45. #599539
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:48 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    HAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA

    That video is priceless.

    Theft. Misdemeanor or felony?

    “We have a black President so it’s neither.”

    HAHAHHAHHAAAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAA

    Reminds me of how Slick Clinton made oral sex into “not a sexual act”.

  46. #599545
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:51 am, b-cat said:

    That’s exactly what he should have done. He should have called them on their rude behavior and let them know that kind of thing isn’t right. They should already know that but apparently they don’t.

    I agree. A leader would have taken some action, even if it were addressing it from inside.

    A politician would know the blame would stick to his name, not the crowd.

  47. #599548
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:53 am, wighttrasch said:

    Now that little fit of pique is over, can we get back to our regularly-scheduled ‘whining’ about the thousands of lefties who write, speak, blog and shout insults from the rooftops? And the continued defense of this behaviour?

  48. #599551
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 am, chapoutier said:

    Theft. Misdemeanor or felony?

    “We have a black President so it’s neither.”

    That was funny. And she was trying to be so. You gotta appreciate the dig at her own race.

  49. #599554
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 am, wighttrasch said:

    Grab the mike and adminish everyone, thus drawing more attention to it?

    Yes.

  50. #599556
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:56 am, backwoods conservative said:

    I give credit to both Bush and Obama for the cordial and respectful way they handled the transition.

    I think Obama has an opportunity to impress on his adoring followers what is or is not proper behavior. Example is one way of doing it, but calling people out on rude behavior is effective as well, and that’s a method I don’t think he should neglect. I’ll admit there’s been a time or two when it was used effectively on me.

  51. #599561
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:57 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    Chap,

    I think she was trying to keep it light. Not sure she didn’t mean what she said.

  52. #599565
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:59 am, ALC said:

    I’m not surprise to see so-called journalist on the left calling journalist on the right whores and others names because they do not know any other way to express themselves. They even call their own girlfriends, wives, and mothers whores. They call all white males that don’t go along with them, ‘cracker, whitey, racist’, and other names. They even call blacks that don’t go along with them ‘house n####rs’ and uncle toms’. What I don’t understand is how does the left get away with not being called down as hate speech. If nothing else this has to qualify as such.

  53. #599569
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm, b-cat said:

    I think Obama has an opportunity to impress on his adoring followers what is or is not proper behavior.

    Obama has the bully pulpit, now. He can use it for good or not. If he really wants the mantle of Lincoln or King, well, we’ll see.

    Silence can be construed as not responding to give credence, or tacit approval.

  54. #599571
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    So has this fool actually been declared the winner yet?
    A little while earlier this morning I tried to find out conclusively on Google, but without success.

    Well, according to an article this morning, Harry Reid is trying to seat him without any regard to the laws of MN. Coleman has filed a lawsuit and that needs to be resolved either way before Franken can be officially seated.

    However, as usual, with Democrats and their complete disrespect of the law, is trying to seat Franklen regardless of the outcome.

    As you will all recall, the law only applies to Republicans. Imagine if the tables were turned, there would be outcries, outrage, etc.

    We shall wait and see.

  55. #599576
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:02 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:45 am, backwoods conservative said:

    That’s exactly what he should have done. He should have called them on their rude behavior and let them know that kind of thing isn’t right.

    You beat me to it.
    You are completely correct.

    They should already know that but apparently they don’t.

    You’re kidding, right?

    Perhaps they “should” know, if by “should”, you mean ought to, in the sense of good and bad; in the sense of the right, the appropriate thing to do.

    But, then, we are talking about socialists and their supporters, the situational ethics and moral relativism crowd, to whom the concept of good and bad is virtually, if not actually, meaningless.

    If by “should”, you mean would be expected to, in the sense of having been sensorially conditioned to behave a certain way, then you will also be disappointed; because the socialists have destroyed our public education system, and have coarsened our society and culture over the past 40-45 years; plunging us into a cultural and societal sewer.
    As I said above, we are talking about socialists and their supporters.

    …but apparently they don’t. [know that]

    Correct!
    They have absolutely no conception of what is rude, and what is proper.
    So sad to say, but correct.

  56. #599583
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:04 pm, Simon86 said:

    I read some of the HuffPo comments and the replies to conservative posters were not their usual hate filled diatribes. I guess they are still in a state of euphoria after Tuesday.

  57. #599584
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:05 pm, corkie said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, chapoutier said:

    Anyone specific? No. A whole group of children that have nothing to do with their situation? Yes. Contemptible.

    Whatever, it’s not compatible. Using hyperbole to characterize an already predisposed group isn’t even close to the same thing. Only the extremely sensitive of the group would be offended. Most would assume that it doesn’t applies to them.

    (John Edwards “faggot” also comes to mind, corkie)

    Much better example. Although, she did use a conditional verb tense. So she didn’t actually call him anything.

  58. #599595
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:10 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Silence can be construed as not responding to give credence, or tacit approval.

    Which Obama did often during his campaign. Times change; people don’t.

  59. #599596
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:10 pm, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:04 pm, Simon86 said:
    I read some of the HuffPo comments and the replies to conservative posters were not their usual hate filled diatribes. I guess they are still in a state of euphoria after Tuesday.

    ————————————

    I wouldn’t linger too long; it probably won’t last. ;)

  60. #599606
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:15 pm, JT said:

    And gets web page hits. Does that excuse either?

    I’m not excusing anything. Just stating what is. Every time she drives the left nuts, she cashes a check.

    Although she does tend to back up her attacks with facts.

    I would say left has more of their own Ann Coulter’s. Since the right has less, Ann stands out and rings the cash register.

    Right or wrong, she’s just beating the left at their own name calling in a book game.

    Never apologizing is marketing genius. It drives the left crazy and endears her to many on the right.

    I tend to find her a little over the top, but I like it when she angers liberals. Because only liberals are allowed to label people.

  61. #599631
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:20 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    Maybe Michelle should title her future upcoming media appearance notification posts as “Whore in the world!”

    Or then again, maybe not.

  62. #599636
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Chappy
    Anyone specific? No. A whole group of children that have nothing to do with their situation? Yes. Contemptible.

    Yes you are, but we hold out hope you will turn from the Dark Side someday, yes we do. Repent of your Evil Liberal ways Chappy, repent! Mock a Liberal and be free!

    [this message brought to you by the Friends of Good Looking Right Wing Women of America]

  63. #599643
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Jvette said:

    We know that “oreo” and “house n*****r” are the preferred nicknames for a black who wanders off the plantation.

    What is the term for an Asian woman who rejects her masters? “Whore”

  64. #599646
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:26 pm, right_on said:

    Mrs. Malkin, by your leave.

    Michelle Malkin Doesn’t Care About Black People the color of a person’s skin.

    Look who’s calling the kettle black! I hope these zealots keep spewing. They will allow us to gauge how well our new President is pulling America together…or not.

  65. #599647
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:26 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Now, many of you may be wondering why someone who is of Asian decent would be so antagonistic toward Obama and his background.

    The ignorance in that statement is just staggering.

  66. #599653
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:29 pm, b-cat said:

    What is the term for an Asian woman who rejects her masters?

    It has been my experience that Asians have no masters.

  67. #599660
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:32 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Jvette said:

    We know that “oreo” and “house n*****r” are the preferred nicknames for a black who wanders off the plantation.

    What is the term for an Asian woman who rejects her masters? “Whore”

    I believe I’ve seen the term “Twinkie” used…as far as I rememeber, by socialist/other worldview-holders.

    (No offense meant, Michelle; my southern European heritage has been blessed with a term or two, also.)

  68. #599662
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    So Ms Huffington who married a gay guy for his money is calling people “whores”? Yeah…..

  69. #599668
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Ron said:

    Michelle, didn’t you hear the prayer? Yellow is supposed to be mellow…

  70. #599671
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:39 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    chapoutier said:

    Whenever Coulter says something offensive, you all excuse it as her making a joke and deride liberals’ lack of humor. However, no such quarter is EVER provided to the left (think Al Franken and his joke about cancer that is constantly brought up here).

    I’m not familiar with all the statements she’s made, but I’ve found some of them to be offensive. She may have had a point and the point may have been valid… and… her statement may have been made for the sake of being offensive, but it doesn’t excuse some of the things I’ve heard or read.

    I agree with a lot of the points she makes and I like her. But there are times when I think she went over the edge.

    I don’t think she’s doing conservatives any favors by making some of the statements she’s made. I think it tends to marginalize her in the left’s eyes. But I guess that’s how she rolls.

  71. #599674
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:40 pm, JohnnyD said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am, Sergeant Tim said:
    The authors’ of that POS at Ariana “I married way up and for loads of money” Huffington’s blob site reads:

    Tom Breuer is the co-author, with Joseph Minton Amann, of Sweet Jesus, I Hate Bill O’Reilly, Fair and Balanced, My Ass and The Brotherhood of the Disappearing Pants: A Field Guide to Conservative Sex Scandals. He has lived in Wisconsin most of his life, treading some of the same pathways (ideological and otherwise) as Russ Feingold, William Proxmire, Robert La Follette, and Charlotte Rae, TV’s Mrs. Garrett.

    Sgt. Tim, this all sounds strangely familiar. I’ll bet this isn’t the first time they’ve insulted MM. As to their “commentary”, I say…uh, never mind. I like to still be hear. Getting banned over these 2 “tolerant and benovolent” writers isn’t worth it.

  72. #599675
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Ron said:

    Michelle, didn’t you hear the prayer? Yellow is supposed to be mellow…

    According to Donovan’s song, you are correct!

  73. #599677
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    My Filipina wife doesn’t think she is Asian…

    I can’t stand it when leftist bigots (is that redundant) can’t get their slurs right when insulting strong, independent female conservatives.

  74. #599680
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:43 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I’m not proud of this event because it was still more a vote for BDS than for BHO.

    It’s too bad Mark – electing a black person President is a wonderful milestone – except it’s Obama…ugh.

  75. #599685
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:45 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    My Filipina wife doesn’t think she is Asian…

    Good for her.
    She is herself; and she is your wife.
    And, if she’s naturalized, she is an American.
    Period.

    I can’t stand it when leftist bigots (is that redundant) can’t get their slurs right when insulting strong, independent female conservatives.

    Well said.

  76. #599687
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:46 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I can’t stand it when leftist bigots (is that redundant) can’t get their slurs right when insulting strong, independent female conservatives.

    A lot of them can’t figure out whether she’s Filipina, Black, Latina, or Jewish or some combination. These people really are ignorant.

    And what kind of ugly mind sees an Asian woman and thinks “whore”?

  77. #599694
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Yellow is supposed to be mellow…

    Quite rightly…

  78. #599696
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:50 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Yellow is supposed to be mellow…
    Quite rightly…

    Touche!

  79. #599698
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:50 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    What I get from Ms Brazile is that shameless behavior is completely fine, so long as you are a Black person. It is completely fine to have your hand out if you are Black, and you have a Black president who you perceive will be giving out freebies to you. Affirmative action IN action.

  80. #599700
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I wonder if the giddiness of the media and liberals would be less if Condi Rice were the first black president… and the first woman president?

    My bet is you would not see the same sentiment. So, as I see it, this hysteria is not so much about his skin color, but that he is an ultra-liberal. In fact, maybe more so that he is an ultra-liberal.

  81. #599701
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, b-cat said:

    I don’t know about Mellow Yellow, but I do know that one night in Bangkok is like a year in any other place.

  82. #599702
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:52 pm, StandardDeviation said:

    Dissent was so last week, Michelle. You have to get with the leftist fads.

    As we found out in the nomination process, racism > sexism. Therefore they feel like they can call you a whore with impunity.

  83. #599706
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:54 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Perhaps if I instead drooled all over Barack Obama’s presidential blanket like giddy Donna Brazile did in this embarrassing Good Morning America video, they’d pat me on my head and consider me a properly-behaved member of my ethnic group, too:

    If you did that I wouldn’t pat your head, I’d more accurately apply what’s known in Boston as a “Dope Slap” and use a Sharpie on your head with the cryptic initials LGM or OMU and take away your internet access.

    Having been branded a “Facist Bastard” myself by the left I wear the badge of honor with pride. Shame I had to launder my uniform, otherwise I’d have worn the spit as a ribbon in the war against stupidity for my entire career.

  84. #599707
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:55 pm, rooster said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, chapoutier said: libspeak

    Hey moron…..STFU!

  85. #599711
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:59 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I wonder if the giddiness of the media and liberals would be less if Condi Rice were the first black president… and the first woman president?

    My bet is you would not see the same sentiment. So, as I see it, this hysteria is not so much about his skin color, but that he is an ultra-liberal. In fact, maybe more so that he is an ultra-liberal.

    As we saw with (the majority of) the media’s treatment of the barn animal in the White House who was involved with the “intern”; and as we’ve seen with the caricatures and ridicule of, and comments about Ms. Rice:

    In the socialist/fascist worldview, politics, ideology,… and most of all, power obviously trump both race and gender.

  86. #599714
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:00 pm, chapoutier said:

    Hey moron…..STFU!

    Well, since you put it that way, rooster. I will.

    ………………
    ………………
    ………………

    (Those are chapoutier STFUing vibes, btw)

    ………………
    ………………

    Oh wait. I think I have you confused with someone whose opinion actually matters to me. Yes…yes… now I am sure of it. Sorry. My mistake.

  87. #599721
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:02 pm, wighttrasch said:

    I don’t know about Mellow Yellow, but I do know that one night in Bangkok is like a year in any other place.

    Only because she blinded you with science.

  88. #599743
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:26 pm, harbormaster said:

    Sorry, no time to read all of the comments. My apologies if something of this sort has been posted already.

    Michelle I watched you on F and F this morning. You certainly did not look like a whore.

    In fact, your appearance, demeanor, and articulation were quite respectable and professional.

    If I weren’t married I’d say your entire persona was downright sexy.

  89. #599744
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:29 pm, verogolfer said:

    We on the center, right and far-right prefer to think of Michelle as the bejeweled, smiling, all-wise goddess of the Web

  90. #599747
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:32 pm, Excessive Moderate said:

    Now, many of you may be wondering why someone who is of Asian decent would be so antagonistic toward Obama and his background.

    Most Asians that I know aren’t too happy with Affirmative Action, since they largely get by on merit, not skin color.

  91. #599749
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:34 pm, frostrt said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:02 pm, wighttrasch said:
    I don’t know about Mellow Yellow, but I do know that one night in Bangkok is like a year in any other place.
    Only because she blinded you with science.

    ————————————–

    And when it comes to conservative (or any other) women being called “whores” over their politics:

    “We’re Not Gonna Take It”!

  92. #599752
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:38 pm, frostrt said:

    Twisted Sister reference in my last post, for those of you not fortunate enough to have grown up in the ’80’s.

    I saw the Blinded With Science reference and just couldn’t help myself.

    :)

  93. #599754
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:39 pm, granite said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:34 pm, frostrt said:

    And when it comes to conservative (or any other) women being called “whores” over their politics:

    “We’re Not Gonna Take It”!

    Good one!

    I know I’m dating myself, but actual whores might also be thought to sing some lyrics from “Tommy”: “See me, feel me, touch me” (for money, that is).

    Sorry, couldn’t resist.

  94. #599755
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:40 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:29 pm, verogolfer said:
    We on the center, right and far-right prefer to think of Michelle as the bejeweled, smiling, all-wise goddess of the Web

    Would verogolfer be from Vero Beach by chance?

    Sorry – off topic.

    Do I now have to give Michelle money for the pure enjoyment I derive from this blog? Just wondering…

  95. #599757
    On January 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 pm, Marc said:

    In case anyone missed the superannuated old goat Tom Brokaw on Jan. 20, Brokaw was busy lecturing white Americans on their sins. He actually said: “I have worked in the South and also seen Watts and I say to all of you rednecks and racists: Take This!”
    It was hilarious. Here was a Park Avenue snob trying to pose as a barroom brawler. It was priceless!
    Brokaw bragged about all the time he has spent “with the brothers” in South LA. Yeah right Brokaw. Mr. Brokaw has never eaten in Roscoes and would not be able to find it with a GPS. Gosh, can’t anyone put Brokaw back in mothballs?

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook