Comments on: A few questions about President Obama’s first airstrike

By: The Irascible Chef » Hypocrites! Come Out and Plaaaaay!

The Irascible Chef » Hypocrites! Come Out and Plaaaaay! — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:57:29 +0000

[...] Remote-controlled US airstrikes killed 22 people at suspected terrorist hideouts inside Pakistan A few questions about President Obama’s first airstrike: [...]

By: Chief RZ

Chief RZ — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:11:45 +0000

I don’t remember reading about this in the MSM newspaper that I still take.

By: Obama’s War « FactReal

Obama’s War « FactReal — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:29:31 +0000

[...] 22 Remote-controlled US airstrikes killed 22 people at suspected terrorist hideouts inside Pakistan A few questions about President Obama’s first airstrike: ○ Where are the anti-war liberals? ○ Where are the baby-killer signs? ○ Why [aren't] the [...]

By: Sma' Talk Wi' T

Sma' Talk Wi' T — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:19:28 +0000

President OBOMBA Goes Unnoticed…

I’m not surprised that the liberal whackos are completely unaware that one of Obama’s first moves was to approve military bombing against Pakistan villages killing women and children. Liberals don’t know because the left didn’t make hay out of it u…

By: Looking Glass News 1-26-09 « lookingforlissa

Looking Glass News 1-26-09 « lookingforlissa — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:42:29 +0000

[...] (h/t Michelle) [...]

By: ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Free PR by Washington Post for Obama - Propaganda Disguised as “Analysis”

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:00:41 +0000

[...] already know that this is the case with the recent U.S. missile strike into Pakistan. So, where do the limits on the U.S. government come in if counterterrorism operations abroad [...]

By: Free PR by Washington Post for Obama - Propaganda Disguised as “Analysis” - scipio62’s blog - RedState

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:35:29 +0000

[...] already know that this is the case with the recent U.S. missile strike into Pakistan. So, where do the limits on the U.S. government come in if counterterrorism operations abroad [...]

By: Free PR by Washington Post for Obama - Propaganda Disguised as “Analysis” - scipio62’s blog - RedState

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:35:28 +0000

[...] already know that this is the case with the recent U.S. missile strike into Pakistan. So, where do the limits on the U.S. government come in if counterterrorism operations abroad [...]

By: Will Obama be Brought up on War Crimes Like the LEFT Wanted for George Bush? | Scared Monkeys

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:09:27 +0000

[...] Barack Obama … War Criminal … Baby Killer? [...]

By: Obama’s War! Afghan president: US forces killed 16 civilians « Riggword Weblog

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:50:12 +0000

[...] From Malkin: [...]

By: The War On Terror Is Over! « Beltway Snark

The War On Terror Is Over! « Beltway Snark — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:30:32 +0000

[...] Jump to Comments So sayeth WaPo. Which is certainly an odd thing to say, seeing as Obama air-raided a Pakistan village and killed at least 15 people. Yeah, you probably didn’t hear about that [...]

By: What happened to the peaceniks? « Right Minded Online

What happened to the peaceniks? « Right Minded Online — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:10:36 +0000

[...] Michelle Malkin » A few questions about President Obama’s first airstrike. [...]

By: Shut Up Hippy » Blog Archive » A few questions about President Obama’s first airstrike

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:41:59 +0000

[...] Read this post » [...]

By: CW4_KGP

CW4_KGP — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:19:51 +0000

On January 23rd, 2009 at 3:05 pm, sonofdy said:

Is it wrong to refer to special ops folks as “troops”?

No but they think they are a little more than “troops”. They issue arrogance with the green beret…

Wait, wait, wait. “Arrogance?” That would be what Pee-resident Obama and his cabinet, staff, etc., are possessed with.

Green Berets (as well as other SpecOps troops) are somewhat different. They can actually DELIVER what they promise. That’s not arrogance. Ask Rahmbone about arrogance. Ask that clown who will likely be SecTreas. There is more than enough of it in this administration; you need not assign it to people who are willing to die for you.

PS – not a SF troop.

By: chapoutier

chapoutier — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:11:40 +0000

While you say that you find it wrong for Obama as well,

Actually I just read the details of that case and the Obama administration is NOT supporting illegal wiretaps. It is supporting the Bush Administration’s position on an ancillary (but important) issue (involving the protection of state secrets from statutory preemption) in the same case.

The devil is always in the details, isn’t it?

you are not on here with the same vigor against what Das Fuhrer has done versus the way you were with Bush

Uhhh…care to show me where?

But in any case, what would assuage you

ARRRRRGHHHHH!!!!!

DAMN OBAMA!!!!

IMPEACHMENT NOW!

All better?