Contraceptive funding thrown under Obama’s bus

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 26, 2009 11:27 PM

Goody. Panicky President Obama wants the Dems to eliminate Pelosi’s pet contraceptive funding from the Generational Theft Act of 2009. Only $800 billion more in needless, unstimulating stimulus spending to kill.

The left-wing blogs are having a snit fit.

It’s a start:

House Democrats are likely to jettison family planning funds for the low-income from an $825 billion economic stimulus bill, officials said late Monday, following a personal appeal from President Barack Obama at a time the administration is courting Republican critics of the legislation.

Several officials said a final decision was expected on Tuesday, coinciding with Obama’s scheduled visit to the Capitol for separate meetings with House and Senate Republicans.

The provision has emerged as a point of contention among Republicans, who criticize it as an example of wasteful spending that would neither create jobs nor otherwise improve the economy.

Under the provision, states no longer would be required to obtain federal permission to offer family planning services — including contraceptives — under Medicaid, the health program for the low-income.

Democrats considered the politically-potent change as congressional budget experts estimated it would take slightly longer for the overall legislation to achieve an impact on the economy than the administration projects…

…Several Democrats said Monday night that Obama had spoken personally with Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., about removing the provision. Waxman is chairman of the committee with jurisdiction over Medicaid and a close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

The Democrats who described the likely reversal did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to disclose developments not yet made public.

Obama’s request to House Democrats underscores the administration’s desire to signal a spirit of bipartisanship, a recurring theme for the president in his first week in office.

San Fran Nan was unavailable for comment.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. San Fran Nan: Contraception will stimulate the economy « Wellsy’s World
  2. The Nobama Blog
  3. PAXALLES
  4. Want to Help Stimulate the Economy? Here is a condom! (3rd Update) | Caffeinated Thoughts
  5. Obama staffers, surrogates and affiliates were among those whose communications with Blago were served with subpoenas. « Goodtimepolitics
  6. Contraceptive funding thrown under Obama’s bus « Jim Blazsik
  7. “It’s Bush’s fault….I think.” « Mark Epstein
  8. Nancy Pelosi Rocks My Socks « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  9. Obama Looking to Squash Contraception from Stimulus | Axis of Right
  10. Pelosi’s “No Child In The Womb” Program Is Thrown Under The Bus « The Chronicles Of Two Rogue Jews
  11. Contraceptive Pork Going By The Wayside? « Beltway Snark
  12. Who knew Obama’s plans all hinged on genocide?
  13. Pelosi and Birth Control — She Misses the Point « Grand Rants
  14. Michelle Malkin » Obama nominee: Taxpayer-funded abortion is a free speech right
  15. Michigan Taxes Too Much » For Granholm, Pelosi - Baby Bellies futures look good!
  16. Obama Calls Reversal, Asks Pelosi to Remove Abortions from Stimulus « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  17. -New Stimulus Bill: $Millions on Condoms and Family Planning? | ANSWERS For The Faith
  18. The Other McCain: Hey, it worked!
  19. Surprise! Nancy Pelosi An Embarrassment To The President « Jane Q. Republican
  20. Boehner to worthless cunt - “No” < jimreport.com
  21. Testing GOP “Leadership” « The Forum
  22. “Screw-The-Taxpayer Plan” - Transterrestrial Musings
  23. Bloodthirsty Liberal » Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Tail
  24. Today’s Blogs: January 27, 2009
  25. Blogstitution » Blog Archive » Name that Act!
  26. Leaning Straight Up » The stimulus price continues to rise. Can we afford it?
  27. The Wide Awake Cafe » Eight Days of Silence
  28. Steynian 317 « Free Canuckistan!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #603598
    On January 27th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, sbw999 said:

    I’ve always been surprised that Dems are so pro-abortion, since (I would venture to guess) about 90% of aborted fetuses would grow up to be reliable democrat votes.

  2. #603600
    On January 27th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Wow–over 80 comments & no lgm?! What gives…?

  3. #603614
    On January 27th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    “It’s ALL for the children.” Uh, right, is it for the children that are conceived or are not conceived? Or is it for the children that not murdered in the womb or for the 1.2 million a year?

    Either way, SAN FRAN NAN is doing it all for the children…

  4. #603651
    On January 27th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, b-cat said:

    The left-wing blogs are having a snit fit.

    Isn’t that a given?

  5. #603664
    On January 27th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Let’s try that post again…

    “It’s ALL for the children.”

    Uh, right. Is it for the children that are conceived or those that are not conceived? Or is it for the children that not murdered in the womb or for the 1.2 million babies a year that are murdered in the womb, largely for profit, by Planned Parenthood?

    Either way, SAN FRAN NAN is doing it all for the children…

  6. #603674
    On January 27th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    The Democrats who described the likely reversal did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to disclose developments not yet made public.

    HAHAHHAAHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    Your Democrats are cowards.

    /dimocrap translator on

    I don’t want to have an opinion – ever. I really don’t want to have an opinion if the left-wing nut jobs who voted to let me keep my job will be PO’ed at me.

    /off

  7. #603678
    On January 27th, 2009 at 1:20 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Wow–over 80 comments & no lgm?! What gives…?

    Yes, I am disappointed. I wanted to give the conservative-atheist point of view on the whole thing and make smoke pour out of his ears.

  8. #603743
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, PaKeystoner said:

    Now it’s time to go after the money for ACORN! It doesn’t belong in the bill either.

  9. #603761
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, CJ said:

    I can see a certain diabolical leftist logic in funding contraception through the “economic stimulus” package. After all, it won’t be a “Generational Theft Act” if there is no future generation to inherit the debt.

  10. #603813
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    No, CJ, you overlooked the obvious. The crooks in Congress will import a whole new generation from elsewhere and continue to hold them in bondage to the state. In other words, the leftists will become the new plantation managers in a “brave new world” where they rule over peasants who never knew anything about the great nation that was America.

    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, CJ said:
    I can see a certain diabolical leftist logic in funding contraception through the “economic stimulus” package. After all, it won’t be a “Generational Theft Act” if there is no future generation to inherit the debt.

  11. #603874
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, CJ said:

    The crooks in Congress will import a whole new generation from elsewhere

    From where? Don’t forget, Obama is going to finance abortions in other countries.

    See, we can be as irresponsible as we want. Except for the climate change stuff. Gotta go green ‘cuz we can’t destroy the planet for the cockroaches who will inherit.

  12. #604001
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:21 pm, Freddy said:

    Seems to me that this is actually about San Francisco cash values. With a 9 to 1 federal kickback, this measure was going to plow a lot of cash into the SF medical system. All SF would need to do is to DROP existing coverage by a factor of 10, and they would still have the same amount of cash for the program as they use today. Meantime, they could take the rest of the money from this cash cow and plow it into something usefull, like the free health care that the mayor has promised.

    This is all about Nancy Pelosi handing a lot of cash to another democrat. In this case, a pathetic mayor that dreams of being governor.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Calling Dianne DeGette’s bigotry and ignorance out

November 18, 2009 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

121 Comments | 1 Trackback

The Stimulus Jobs Inflation Map

November 16, 2009 07:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The House Democrats’ backroom abortion funding deal

November 4, 2009 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

The Stimulus Jobs Inflation Index

October 30, 2009 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Stimulus efficiency success story of the day

October 28, 2009 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

22 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

The friends of Dede Scozzafava

October 22, 2009 09:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Abortion, fiscal stimulus



Legal Insurrection

» Calling For Sparkman Apologies

American Thinker

» The Wilding of Sarah Palin

Legal Insurrection

» Hacked E-mails Skeptic No More
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook