Comments on: What else is in Pelosi’s recession rescue toolbag?

By: Stupak Amendment Exposes Obamacare’s Dirty Little Secret: Eugenics | RedState

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:02:06 +0000

[...] Pelosi said funding for “family planning services” (code for abortion) saves money. How does it save money, Speaker Pelosi? By “weeding out” the [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » Nanny Nancy lines up the kiddie human shields

Michelle Malkin » Nanny Nancy lines up the kiddie human shields — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:08:02 +0000

[...] a reminder of how Nancy Pelosi really views those infant props – from January 2009: STEPHANOPOULOS: [...]

By: House Democrat Leader Aims At Root Cause of Our Economic Woes « Penraker

House Democrat Leader Aims At Root Cause of Our Economic Woes « Penraker — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:36:26 +0000

[...] Democrat Leader Aims At Root Cause of Our Economic Woes From ABC News this week. George Stephanopolous questions the inclusion of millions for contraception in the Stimulus bill: [...]

By: cheapseat

cheapseat — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:20:17 +0000

agenda lunacy over serving the country. do you suppose sh e gets funding from the NOW gang? nah!

By: AFBen

AFBen — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:32:04 +0000

What’s even scarier is that while the developed world is having a replacement birth rate crisis right now is to look at countries that have birthrates well above the 2.1/woman birthrate required to simply keep population steady. Places like Yemen, Indonesia, Somalia, Zimbabwe, etc. have birthrates upwards of 5/woman. Scary if you ask me.

By: AFBen

AFBen — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:32:04 +0000

By: chotii

chotii — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:03:50 +0000

I keep having a couple of thoughts that won’t go away:

The more educated people get, the fewer children they tend to have. Certain countries (Japan, Russia, France) are already well below their own replacement birth rate and NEED extensive immigration to make up the shortfall. Unfortunately, at least in France, these immigrants tend to be poor, less educated, generous breeders of children, and suckling at the government tit. They are not providing what the society needs, and the society is worse off. Japan does not seem to have a lot of immigration, and their population is heavily overbalanced with the elderly.

Encouraging education will go further toward achieving the desired goals than handing out free condoms or even free abortions: you get people capable of functioning in a greater number of roles than otherwise, and you still get fewer births.

Still, you have to have enough workers to support the elderly. They have to come from somewhere. Do we *really* want all our replacement people to come from immigration? If we do, we better do something to make legal immigration a whole lot easier….and maybe offer a bonus/fast-track to people with higher education.

By: garydt

garydt — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:33:16 +0000

What a hypocrite Nancy is. She is worried about population control and still advocates opening up the borders down Mexico way? How does she figure the population control will benefit the economy if she favors opening up the borders and inherits millions of illegals. I keep asking demos how does this help the environment?

By: garydt

garydt — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:33:14 +0000

By: The Nobama Blog » Blog Archive » Pelosi Stimulus Plan: Keep the Poor and Minorities From Having Babies

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:42:41 +0000

[...] Other Views: What else is in Pelosi’s recession rescue toolbag? [...]

By: San Fran Nan: Contraception will stimulate the economy | Tvn24h

San Fran Nan: Contraception will stimulate the economy | Tvn24h — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:35:43 +0000

[...] With staggeringly bizarre logic, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went on with George Stephanopoulus to defend her inclusion of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars toward family planning services. Her reasoning : PELOSI: Well, the family-planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now, and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those—one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government. [...]

By: San Fran Nan: Contraception will stimulate the economy « Wellsy’s World

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:12:51 +0000

[...] Fran Nan: Contraception will stimulate the economy With staggeringly bizarre logic, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went on with George Stephanopoulus to defend her inclusion of hundreds [...]

By: AFBen

AFBen — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:58:30 +0000

So, let me get this straight…They basically force us to suckle off the teat of the government through mandatory education and health care for every child. Then, they turn around and say it’s too expensive and that we should cease procreating? WHY NOT, INSTEAD, GET GOVERNMENT’S HAND OUT OF MY CHILI? WON’T THAT ALSO LOWER COSTS?

I’m not an extremely smart guy, but this just seems so obvious. The government is trying to force us all to become so dependent upon them. It’s disgusting.

By: graysonret

graysonret — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:50:34 +0000

Step 1) Roe vs Wade. Step 2) Mandatory abortions, or, as in China, 1 child per couple. Step 3) Euthanasia of social security/medicare recipients. Well, it won’t stimulate the economy, except for funeral homes, but it sure would reduce costs to the states and national government. What next after that? Gulags for political prisoners? Hopefully some will be saved being on food stamps and unemployed.

By: Nancy Pelosi–Brilliant, Ignorant, Stupid, Evil–You Decide? « Pronk Palisades

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:17:38 +0000

[...] Pelosi’s view of these same kiddie human shields as burdens on the economy who need to be, um, preempted with tax-subsidized contraceptive and family planning services. [...]