<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; too sloooow to stimulate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senator Collins on her Defection to the Dark Side &#171; A TowDog&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-614943</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Collins on her Defection to the Dark Side &#171; A TowDog&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-614943</guid>
		<description>[...] House Stimulus bill was analyzed by the Congressional Budget Office, who said it would be too slow to stimulate. The Senate added to the cost, does that make it a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] House Stimulus bill was analyzed by the Congressional Budget Office, who said it would be too slow to stimulate. The Senate added to the cost, does that make it a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin en Español</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-605781</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin en Español</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-605781</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;La &#8220;Ley de Expolio Intergeneracional&#8221; (revisi&#243;n de las propuestas econ&#243;micas de&#160;Obama)...&lt;/strong&gt;

En qué consisten las propuestas
El pasado 16 de enero tuvimos la oportunidad de recibir el detalle de las iniciativas que, en una homilía desde el Monte Olimpo, Zeus en persona, el Presidente Electo anunció el pasado mes de diciembre para reflotar l...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La &ldquo;Ley de Expolio Intergeneracional&rdquo; (revisi&oacute;n de las propuestas econ&oacute;micas de&nbsp;Obama)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>En qué consisten las propuestas<br />
El pasado 16 de enero tuvimos la oportunidad de recibir el detalle de las iniciativas que, en una homilía desde el Monte Olimpo, Zeus en persona, el Presidente Electo anunció el pasado mes de diciembre para reflotar l&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Stop, thief! Kill the bill, melt the phones</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-604897</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Stop, thief! Kill the bill, melt the phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-604897</guid>
		<description>[...] Monday night, the Congressional Budget Office sent out a full analysis of the House stimulus bill — elaborating on the partial number-crunching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monday night, the Congressional Budget Office sent out a full analysis of the House stimulus bill — elaborating on the partial number-crunching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is All of That Money Going to Go? &#124; Pirates! Man Your Women!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-604455</link>
		<dc:creator>Where is All of That Money Going to Go? &#124; Pirates! Man Your Women!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-604455</guid>
		<description>[...] Monday night, the Congressional Budget Office sent out a full analysis of the House stimulus bill — elaborating on the partial number-crunching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monday night, the Congressional Budget Office sent out a full analysis of the House stimulus bill — elaborating on the partial number-crunching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boehner Still Says No &#171; Beltway Snark</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-604418</link>
		<dc:creator>Boehner Still Says No &#171; Beltway Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-604418</guid>
		<description>[...] the Republicans&#8217; problem? They listen to that silly CBO office, who rightfully points out that 3/4 of what&#8217;s in the current bill wouldn&#8217;t do squat to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Republicans&#8217; problem? They listen to that silly CBO office, who rightfully points out that 3/4 of what&#8217;s in the current bill wouldn&#8217;t do squat to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-604343</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-604343</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Red State Skeptic said: 
Just because the CBO (not the OMB) thinks too much of the money may be spent a couple years down the line doesn’t mean it isn’t money well spent. If the recession is as bad as it seems, we will still need that stimulus money in 2010 and 2011 too. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to have stimulate the economy on a shorter term basis, but neither does it mean we shouldn’t spend the money in the long term either.

The stimulus is a no-brainer. The states need the money, the federal government has a much easier way of raising money than the states, cash is a lot cheaper to get than in years past, and because of the housing crash, services and raw materials are much, much cheaper right now than they will be when the economy gets better, when we would otherwise spend this money.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The stimulus is nothing but an emotional ploy that plays on Americans&#039; fears about the economy. It solves nothing. It builds nothing. It puts little, if any, actionable resources in the hands of the producers and those that create jobs.

There&#039;s this little thing that happens when the printing presses over at Treasury work over time: inflation. When you flush the market with too much cash, nothing, including services and products, are cheap. Short term political gain will mean long-term pain for the American people.

Are the roots of the sub-prime mortgage and banking fiasco being solved? What is happening to Freddie and Fannie? They&#039;ve already asked for more cash &#039;cause they have to either write down more of their toxic assets or get another &quot;loan&quot; (cough cough bailout) to prop &#039;em up.

How much longer to you think that countries like China and Saudia Arabia (and other Gulf nations) will prop up our economy? Will they continue to buy our treasury notes at the expense of their own currency? Or will they trade in what they have to keep things afloat at home?

You tell me, economic genius. You seem like another naive, uneducated liberal dope not grounded in reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Red State Skeptic said:<br />
Just because the CBO (not the OMB) thinks too much of the money may be spent a couple years down the line doesn’t mean it isn’t money well spent. If the recession is as bad as it seems, we will still need that stimulus money in 2010 and 2011 too. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to have stimulate the economy on a shorter term basis, but neither does it mean we shouldn’t spend the money in the long term either.</p>
<p>The stimulus is a no-brainer. The states need the money, the federal government has a much easier way of raising money than the states, cash is a lot cheaper to get than in years past, and because of the housing crash, services and raw materials are much, much cheaper right now than they will be when the economy gets better, when we would otherwise spend this money.</p></blockquote>
<p>The stimulus is nothing but an emotional ploy that plays on Americans&#8217; fears about the economy. It solves nothing. It builds nothing. It puts little, if any, actionable resources in the hands of the producers and those that create jobs.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s this little thing that happens when the printing presses over at Treasury work over time: inflation. When you flush the market with too much cash, nothing, including services and products, are cheap. Short term political gain will mean long-term pain for the American people.</p>
<p>Are the roots of the sub-prime mortgage and banking fiasco being solved? What is happening to Freddie and Fannie? They&#8217;ve already asked for more cash &#8217;cause they have to either write down more of their toxic assets or get another &#8220;loan&#8221; (cough cough bailout) to prop &#8216;em up.</p>
<p>How much longer to you think that countries like China and Saudia Arabia (and other Gulf nations) will prop up our economy? Will they continue to buy our treasury notes at the expense of their own currency? Or will they trade in what they have to keep things afloat at home?</p>
<p>You tell me, economic genius. You seem like another naive, uneducated liberal dope not grounded in reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greysheepdog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603987</link>
		<dc:creator>greysheepdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603987</guid>
		<description>http://readthestimulus.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://readthestimulus.org/" rel="nofollow">http://readthestimulus.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FamilyMan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603954</link>
		<dc:creator>FamilyMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Red State said;all the tax-cutting in the world isn’t going to get the economy on the right track for several years. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Red State said;all the tax-cutting in the world isn’t going to get the economy on the right track for several years. </p></blockquote>
<p>Prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FamilyMan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603952</link>
		<dc:creator>FamilyMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603952</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;redstate said;  but most economists &lt;/blockquote&gt;BS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>redstate said;  but most economists </p></blockquote>
<p>BS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GOP to Vote No On Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603934</link>
		<dc:creator>ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GOP to Vote No On Stimulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603934</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin has the letter sent out of the full analysis from the Congressional Budget Office&#8230;pdf here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin has the letter sent out of the full analysis from the Congressional Budget Office&#8230;pdf here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Package: Tax Cuts Versus Spending - Page 2 - BuckeyePlanet Ohio State Forums</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603897</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Package: Tax Cuts Versus Spending - Page 2 - BuckeyePlanet Ohio State Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603897</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by buckeyegrad   Different numbers, same themes: Michelle Malkin ? New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: ?Stimulus? too sloooow to stimulate  Of particular note:    Sorry - but I don&#039;t read Michelle Malkin when she goes all porno with slow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by buckeyegrad   Different numbers, same themes: Michelle Malkin ? New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: ?Stimulus? too sloooow to stimulate  Of particular note:    Sorry &#8211; but I don&#8217;t read Michelle Malkin when she goes all porno with slow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tpitman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603895</link>
		<dc:creator>tpitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603895</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On January 27th, 2009 at 11:16 am, Surveyor said:

The guy’s name is actually Bob Sunshine?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe his middle name is &quot;Ray&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On January 27th, 2009 at 11:16 am, Surveyor said:</p>
<p>The guy’s name is actually Bob Sunshine?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe his middle name is &#8220;Ray&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Bill Triggers Legislative Logjams, Perpetuates Credit Crisis&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603861</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Bill Triggers Legislative Logjams, Perpetuates Credit Crisis&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603861</guid>
		<description>[...] The stimulus package is also contributing to the credit-freeze that left some businesses unable to borrow from banks to meet payrolls. Banks are reluctant to lend money without knowing who will be the winners and losers from provisions buried in the stimulus package, which has already grown to more than 600 pages. And the money in the stimulus package will be spent mostly in future years &#8212; like 2010, an election year &#8212; not this year, when economic relief is most needed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The stimulus package is also contributing to the credit-freeze that left some businesses unable to borrow from banks to meet payrolls. Banks are reluctant to lend money without knowing who will be the winners and losers from provisions buried in the stimulus package, which has already grown to more than 600 pages. And the money in the stimulus package will be spent mostly in future years &#8212; like 2010, an election year &#8212; not this year, when economic relief is most needed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Package: Tax Cuts Versus Spending - Page 2 - BuckeyePlanet Ohio State Forums</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603851</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Package: Tax Cuts Versus Spending - Page 2 - BuckeyePlanet Ohio State Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603851</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by buckeyegrad   Different numbers, same themes: Michelle Malkin ? New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: ?Stimulus? too sloooow to stimulate  Of particular note:    Sorry - but I don&#039;t read Michelle Malkin     __________________ 42-7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by buckeyegrad   Different numbers, same themes: Michelle Malkin ? New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: ?Stimulus? too sloooow to stimulate  Of particular note:    Sorry &#8211; but I don&#8217;t read Michelle Malkin     __________________ 42-7 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Package: Tax Cuts Versus Spending - BuckeyePlanet Ohio State Forums</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/27/new-cbo-report-echoes-earlier-analysis-stimulus-too-sloooow-to-stimuluate/comment-page-1/#comment-603832</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Package: Tax Cuts Versus Spending - BuckeyePlanet Ohio State Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22109#comment-603832</guid>
		<description>[...] for the Bill - there&#039;s always a CBO report on such legislation.    Different numbers, same themes: Michelle Malkin ? New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; too sloooow to stim...  Of particular note:   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Bill &#8211; there&#8217;s always a CBO report on such legislation.    Different numbers, same themes: Michelle Malkin ? New CBO report echoes earlier analysis: &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; too sloooow to stim&#8230;  Of particular note:   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

