Some B.O. Republicans gush over Obama meeting; Update: Say cheese!

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 27, 2009 02:38 PM

Several Republican House members used Twitter while meeting with President Obama earlier this afternoon to discuss the Generational Theft Act of 2009. For all the buzz about renewed GOP spine, it looks like there were some real bodice-ripping moments. Thrills went up legs. Drool buckets overfloweth. The Hill catalogued a few of the messages:

President Obama won praise from some of the House’s most conservative lawmakers as “engaging” and “respectful” during his meeting with congressional Republicans Tuesday.

Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) said that Obama was sincere and “impressive” during his meeting with Republicans Tuesday afternoon.

“There’s real desire in this room to figure a way back to prosperity,” Inglis wrote on Twitter. “[The president] and Republicans here [are] expressing deep concern about unemployment.”

“If [the] President carries this on it does open door for a new tone!” Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) exclaimed.

“Sharp differences are muted,” Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas) Twittered.

Inglis said that a comment by Obama that he would rather be a one-term president who addressed the economy than a two-term president who did not went particularly well.

“Sharp differences are muted.”

That sums up exactly what is wrong with the D.C. Republican establishment, doesn’t it?

***

Update: Triple-gag alert…

“Nearly as many House Republicans sought to get their photos taken with Obama as questioned him about the stimulus during their meeting.”

Posted in: fiscal stimulus

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Fiscal Suicide: #biteme « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  2. Testing GOP “Leadership” « The Forum
  3. GOPers Gush Over Obama After Meeting | The American Pundit
  4. Shut Up Hippy » Blog Archive » Some B.O. Republicans gush over Obama meeting; Update: Say cheese!
  5. What’s Wrong With the Obama Economic Stimulus? « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  6. Steynian 317
  7. The Wide Awake Cafe » Eight Days of Silence
  8. Steynian 317 « Free Canuckistan!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #603770
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    That sums up exactly what is wrong with the D.C. Republican establishment, doesn’t it?

    Hammer/nail

    Nothing else to see here. Move along.

  2. #603771
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, b-cat said:

    There is a one party system parading as a two party system. The last thing I want are Republicans a-twitter over meeting a Lib, who is already getting enough worship.

  3. #603772
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:42 pm, johnsteele said:

    Well, sounds like they have given up to the Force. We’re next. Resistance is futile, we will be assimilated.

  4. #603773
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:43 pm, sonofdy said:

    Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) exclaimed

    I was about to post something about full mouths that would have gotten me banned. sigh.

  5. #603777
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, chapoutier said:

    Maybe they were all just taken aback by the fact that he did not:

    1) slaughter them while shouting “Allahu Akbar!” or;

    2) Make them kiss his ring.

  6. #603781
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:47 pm, Fuller said:

    “Sharp differences are muted.”
    Yep! Wave the white flag.

  7. #603783
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, sonofdy said:

    chap, sounds like they did number 2 anyway…. Take that any way you want.

  8. #603785
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:50 pm, johnsteele said:

    Inglis said that a comment by Obama that he would rather be a one-term president who addressed the economy than a two-term president who did not went particularly well.

    And I have a beautiful bridge for sale over the East River in New York.

  9. #603786
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Not only are “sharp differences muted” I heard it was rumored( I can’t say for certainty) that there is a gag order placed on republicans by their leadership on saying anything negative about Obeyme. This is why I quit the Republican party.

    “Omnia relinquit servare republicam”

  10. #603787
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, sonofdy said:

    No, the client needs to print to pf2 using the comma 10cpi option. I didn’t mean pfx,10cpi literaly.

  11. #603788
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, sonofdy said:

    Opps, wrong window, sorry…

  12. #603789
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, tarpon said:

    They need to see the problems for America, before their own elections. Sadly, that is not going to be easy.

    How many of these critters go to Congress paupers, and a few short years later are millionaires.

  13. #603790
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:54 pm, chapoutier said:

    Opps, wrong window, sorry…

    I guess we should be relieved/disappointed that the other window wasn’t the email you were composing to Penthouse Forums.

  14. #603791
    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, sonofdy said:

    I guess we should be relieved/disappointed that the other window wasn’t the email you were composing to Penthouse Forums.

    What I said in the other window to my boss about this CSR would have got me banned. Fracking idiot.

  15. #603802
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:05 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    …he would rather be a one-term president who addressed the economy…

    Allow me:

    Dear Economy,

  16. #603808
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Maybe they were all just taken aback by the fact that he did not:

    2) Make them kiss his ring.

    They don’t mind kissing his ring – in fact Graham was hoping it was a butt cheek ring.

  17. #603812
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, Grayson said:

    Sounds like lots of cold showers were needed afterward. Maybe even a hose for some of them.

  18. #603815
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    butt cheek ring.

    Not sure if this is a hawaiian thing or not, but keep your perversions to yourself.

  19. #603817
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    butt cheek ring.
    Not sure if this is a hawaiian thing or not, but keep your perversions to yourself.

    Where do you think you hang your towel while you’re at the beach?

  20. #603818
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, in_awe said:

    So The One publicly rebuked Pelosi and Reid for the rules they are following that are disenfranchising conservatives in the House and Senate? We can now expect that Republicans will have a seat at the table and can substantively participate in crafting or amending legislation? That embedding socialist agenda items and pork in the stimulus plan will be rejected by Obama?

    Oh. Nevermind…

  21. #603819
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, walterc said:

    Inglis said that a comment by Obama that he would rather be a one-term president who addressed the economy than a two-term president who did not went particularly well.

    Finally something that he and I can agree on.

    Now let’s all join hands and sing.

  22. #603820
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, RedDog said:

    You guys are absolutely clueless. How is crazy deficit stimulus spending going to get us back to prosperity? You have no personal convictions about conservatism or knowledge of how economies work. You may have opinions but apparently no convictions. You will cowtow to this little Chavez and give him the political cover he craves.

    When Obama et al finish dragging America into socialist hell, he will be able to say it was a bipartisan effort. I hold Barney Frank and the other congressional Democrats personally responsible for the loss of one third of my retirement and now you want to roll over and give him the rest?

    The Democrats just got finished stealing $4 trillion of middle American wealth via the sub-prime boondoggle and you think they need more? Are you insane? Congratulations traitors. Enjoy your payoff. You BO/Vichy Republicans did ask for a payoff right? Or is the personal affront to your manhood payment enough? If I could beat you with a stick, I would.

  23. #603829
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, The Master said:

    Liberals are always “respectful” while they bend you over. Only when you resist do the talons come out.

  24. #603831
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, kwyoung said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, in_awe said:
    So The One publicly rebuked Pelosi and Reid for the rules they are following that are disenfranchising conservatives in the House and Senate? We can now expect that Republicans will have a seat at the table and can substantively participate in crafting or amending legislation? That embedding socialist agenda items and pork in the stimulus plan will be rejected by Obama?

    Oh. Nevermind…

    Rush hit the nail on the head yesterday when he defined bipartisanship according to Obama and Pelosi. Bipartisanship to Obama is when there are Republicans at the table in agreement with his plan. Bipartisanship according to Pelosi is when there are Republicans at the table.

  25. #603836
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, rplatt said:

    Are these Republican politicians as stupid as they appear? It’s too bad we can’t simply send everyone of the worthless slugs back to rocks they crawled from under.

  26. #603837
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:28 pm, MBuck said:

    Inglis said that a comment by Obama that he would rather be a one-term president who addressed the economy than a two-term president who did not went particularly well.

    Some morons’ll believe any da** thing, won’t they?

  27. #603842
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Update: Triple-gag alert…

    Those are three ugly black men.

    On January 27th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, chapoutier said:
    Maybe they were all just taken aback by the fact that he did not:

    2) Make them kiss his ring.

    I see your wish is coming true – already.

  28. #603844
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, zyzzyg said:

    That sums up exactly what is wrong with the D.C. Republican establishment, doesn’t it?

    Nope. No. Not ever.

    What exactly is wrong with being polite? I expect Republicans to be polite. I expect Democrats to be rowdy and disrespectful.

    There is a time and place to pick fights, Pres Obama going to the Hill to state his case and listen to what the loyal opposition had to say, was niether the time or place, to be disrespectful, or to pick a fight.

  29. #603847
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, cngerms said:

    Good grief! Not more “new tone!” May we dispense with the new tone and go back to shrill, please? There’s not enough Emetrol in 100 pharmacies to quell my wretching.

    No, wait. Forget I said ‘please’ and just knock it off, jerks!

  30. #603852
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The only things left for these SBR’s (Sponge Boy Republicans) to do, is, strip down to their scivvies and wave palm fronds over the BHO to keep the flies off.

  31. #603855
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:38 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Nearly as many House Republicans sought to get their photos taken with Obama

    Well why don’tcha just go ahead & grease up while yer at it?!

  32. #603859
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, cngerms said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, zyzzyg said:
    Pres Obama going to the Hill to state his case and listen to what the loyal opposition had to say…

    You’ve got to be kidding! Do you really believe he went to the Hill with the willingness to allow conservatives to change his mind? This is why we lose day in and day out. Our reps neither understand our enemy nor grasp the depravity of which they are capable. The whole problem is the repubs no longer pick fights. They just roll over and we get left the excrement sandwich.

  33. #603865
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, letget said:

    It would not hurt my feeling one bit to have an alien spaceship land in dc and haul the ENTIRE bunch off to the planet Quero. Gads, this is beyond belief what is happening to our Republic!
    L

  34. #603867
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, cngerms said:

    This meeting today reminds me of a battle scene in the movie “Braveheart.” Our republican nobles gather an unwilling army on the battlefield and then ride out to barter a deal of lands and titles for themselves. The peasant army is then left with more soil to till under the rule of more powerful masters. We need to be picking fights. We need to be in all out war while flushing the Dems unidirectional brand of bipartisanship. Does unfettered, taxpayer-supported abortions NOT induce a war cry from within you?

  35. #603871
    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    “Nearly as many House Republicans sought to get their photos taken with Obama as questioned him about the stimulus during their meeting.”

    Any of them have their fingers crossed?

    Just askin’.

  36. #603875
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:00 pm, swmntman said:

    “Sharp differences are muted,” Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas) Twittered.

    …but they are still sharp differences, right Mr. Burgess? Otherwise you have simply given in to the left. Anything to the left of Reagan Conservatism is nothing more than a shade of liberalism.

  37. #603880
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Keep movin’, movin’, movin’,
    Though they are approvin’,
    Keep them RINOs movin’ Sheepledrive!
    Don’t try to understand ‘em,
    Just string ‘em up and brand ‘em,
    ’cause soon we’ll be living on the street.
    Boy my brain’s a say’n tempt me’
    But my 401k is empty’,
    and now I’m a votin’ with my feet

    Move ‘em on, head ‘em up,
    Head ‘em up, move ‘em out,
    Move ‘em on, head ‘em out Sheepledrive!
    Set ‘em out, ride ‘em in
    Ride ‘em in, let ‘em out,
    Cut ‘em out, ride ‘em in Sheepledrive.

  38. #603881
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, golfmann said:

    Why are these people using Twitter anyway?

    Is this middle school civics?

  39. #603887
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    Wait, that’s redundant.

  40. #603891
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, RedDog said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, The Master said:
    Liberals are always “respectful” while they bend you over. Only when you resist do the talons come out.

    Talons dipped in curare…

  41. #603893
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Bipartisanship according to Pelosi is when there are Republicans at ON the table.

    More accurate.

  42. #603896
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:20 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart ineligible in the White House now

    or

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart Socialist in the White House now

    or

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart wrong in the White House now

    or

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart inexperienced in the White House now

    So, yeah.

  43. #603898
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, MtsEdge said:

    That embedding socialist agenda items and pork in the stimulus plan will be rejected by Obama?

    I think you are assuming that our latest crop of Repub “representatives” are representing anyone’s interests other than their own.

    “Sharp differences” don’t even seem to exist in this Congress…so long as everyone gets to sit at the table and gets a photo-op.

    Sigh.

  44. #603899
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, cngerms said:

    You’ve got to be kidding! Do you really believe he went to the Hill with the willingness to allow conservatives to change his mind?

    I don’t know if he went there to have his mind changed. He went there to listen, and maybe, just maybe he will incorporate a few new ideas. [Note: The condom clause in the bill has been deleted.] So, there is a chance in being heard might result in changes.

    This is why we lose day in and day out.

    Nope. No. Not ever.

    Being polite and having good manners is never why we loose.

  45. #603901
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, ajmontana said:

    eaglehaslanded said:
    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    When did they get their dog? I must have missed it. He’ll be the Smartest one in there.

  46. #603905
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, hatfield said:

    Time to flush the republican party. Time to start over. What a bunch of chokers.

  47. #603907
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, steveegg said:

    “Sharp differences are muted.”

    That sums up exactly what is wrong with the D.C. Republican establishment, doesn’t it?

    You could say that again. You could also call the “Republicans” the “slightly-less-liberal half of the bipartisan Party-In-Government” (shortened to the oh-so-apt P-I-G).

  48. #603912
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    One would think that this is first time they ever saw a biracial person in their entire lives. Good grief. Take your pictures, frame them and get back to work!!! Oh wait … that’s what got us in this mess in the first place. Better yet, take a vacation … a long vacation.

  49. #603913
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, nuss said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Keep movin’, movin’, movin’,
    Though they are approvin’,
    Keep them RINOs movin’ Sheepledrive!
    Don’t try to understand ‘em,
    Just string ‘em up and brand ‘em,
    ’cause soon we’ll be living on the street.
    Boy my brain’s a say’n tempt me’
    But my 401k is empty’,
    and now I’m a votin’ with my feet

    Move ‘em on, head ‘em up,
    Head ‘em up, move ‘em out,
    Move ‘em on, head ‘em out Sheepledrive!
    Set ‘em out, ride ‘em in
    Ride ‘em in, let ‘em out,
    Cut ‘em out, ride ‘em in Sheepledrive.

    PKAmmoTroup, that was brilliant…RAWHIDE

  50. #603915
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, Kevin K. said:

    johnsteele said: (#3)

    Well, sounds like they have given up to the Force. We’re next. Resistance is futile, we will be assimilated.

    They may have given up to the Dark Side, but I shall will not as the Force is strong in my family.
    ————–
    Dexter Alarius said: (#15)

    …he would rather be a one-term president who addressed the economy…

    Allow me:

    Dear Economy,

    ROTFL. Thank you.

  51. #603918
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Move ‘em on, head ‘em up,
    Head ‘em up, move ‘em out,
    Move ‘em on, head ‘em out Sheepledrive

    Excellent us of our language the PK, excellent.

    Next: Who is the Smart one in the White House; the butler? Telephone operators?
    Yes Obama is sharp enough as in the knife in the back.
    Despite their fine hunting skills eagles are primarily carrion feeders but do need fresh meat for their young.

  52. #603922
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, jjmurphy said:

    Are these Republican politicians as stupid as they appear?

    yes

  53. #603923
    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, cngerms said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, zyzzyg said:
    Being polite and having good manners is never why we loose.

    That’s not the reason why I suggested we lose. I stated, “We lose because the repubs neither understand their enemies nor grasp their depravity.” I am certainly not suggesting we be boorish and infantile; such as exclaiming, “I won” during a so-called bipartisan meeting. Being polite, professional, and well-mannered is one thing. Being sycophantic, obsequious, and nihilistic toward our own principles, which is how the meeting is described, is another ball of wax!
    BO didn’t resist the condom clause because of republican outcry. He resisted it due to opposition within his own party because even they realized it was moronic and wouldn’t fly with the public. If BO wanted real conservative input flowing into his administration, why didn’t he have dinner with real conservatives a week ago instead George Will, Bill Kristol, David Brooks and their inside-the-beltway ilk? I assure you all of BO’s actions are dog & pony shows meant to placate the opposition and nothing more. I’d challenge you to tell us of one occasion in which he reached across the aisle for a Senate vote. It never happened and we’re suckers to believe that it ever will. KNOW YOUR ENEMY!

  54. #603928
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:02 pm, Flyoverman said:

    What unprincipled invertabrates. The new symbol of the Republican Party should be the earth worm. They are happiest when kept in the dark and fed ……….

  55. #603931
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:04 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, jjmurphy said:

    Are these Republican politicians as stupid as they appear?

    yes

    Ya think?

  56. #603936
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, Trollman said:

    eaglehaslanded said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    Nope, Obama isn’t killing me. I made it out of the birth canal, and I’m too big to dump in a soiled linens closet.

  57. #603945
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, lgm said:

    Maybe these conservative Republicans are telling the truth. You are happy to believe them when the bash Democrats, but heaven forbid they should say a good word about Obama, then they are fibbing.

  58. #603948
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:21 pm, SalsaNChips said:

    …happily whistling and thinking warm fuzzy thoughts as they skip gaily into the rotating blades…

  59. #603951
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, sonofdy said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, lgm said:
    Maybe these conservative Republicans are telling the truth.

    I am sure they are telling the truth. The problem is that they are supposed to be the check on obamas spending. And they seem too busy kissing his ass to do thier jobs.

  60. #603957
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, lgm said:
    Maybe these conservative Republicans are telling the truth.

    Oh, I believe them.
    I’m sure The Prez was “engaging” and “respectful” and even “impressive”.

    I’m sure he also “express(ed) deep concern about unemployment”.

    We’re just skeptical that he will actually give any stock to Republican thoughts on the matter. He seems committed to repeating FDR’s mistakes and driving us into deeper recession or depression.

  61. #603958
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, cngerms said:

    Proof positive we are devoid of Republican leadership in Congress:

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/18049.html

  62. #603960
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, Grayson said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, sonofdy said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, lgm said:
    Maybe these conservative Republicans are telling the truth.

    I am sure they are telling the truth. The problem is that they are supposed to be the check on obamas spending. And they seem too busy kissing his ass to do thier jobs.

    In all fairness, kissing Obama’s ass is a full-time job, what with the wrestling for room and all.

  63. #603961
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, lgm said:

    ……but heaven forbid they should say a good word about Obama, then they are fibbing.

    It’s not personal. It’s business…..

    With respect,
    Vito Corleone

  64. #603962
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, cngerms said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, cngerms said:
    Proof positive we are devoid of Republican leadership in Congress:

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/18049.html

    I meant to say conservative leadership. Republicanism and conservatism are two seperate entities now.

  65. #603963
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Doesn’t it seem like the Prez has a more contentious relationship with Nancy Peloser than he has with the Republicans? What up?!

  66. #603964
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    To be precise: it kills me that there’s a smart collectivist in the White House, as opposed to an inarticulate one that at least was pro-American – which is what we had for the last eight years.

    A collectivist of any type is still a monstrous evil. Being smart only means that he’ll be more effective at enslaving us.

  67. #603966
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:38 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    Doesn’t it seem like the Prez has a more contentious relationship with Nancy Peloser than he has with the Republicans? What up?!

    Not sure, but if I was Nancy, I’d be VERY careful…

  68. #603971
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:41 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:38 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Doesn’t it seem like the Prez has a more contentious relationship with Nancy Peloser than he has with the Republicans? What up?!

    Not sure, but if I was Nancy, I’d be VERY careful…

    No, I don’t buy it. Pelosi is simply providing cover for Obama. It’s old-school leninist tactics: always have someone far, far more extreme than you, to make YOU look reasonable. Hire street thug anarchists if you must, so that the “bourgeois” will find you acceptable.

    She can propose all sorts of crazy things and be totally safe in her district. She’s the obvious choice.

    Note that Harry Reid is more circumspect.

  69. #603974
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, Flyoverman said:

    eaglehaslanded said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    ROTLFLMAO. I can honestly remember in 1977 Democrats saying the same thing contrasting President’s Ford and Carter.

    Eagle, you made my day!!

  70. #603977
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    P***ies! Bunch of no b*lls p***ies.

    This kind of spineless behavior is the very reason I am p*ssed at what was once a great political party.

    My nutless cat has more b*lls than all of the the RINOs in D.C..

  71. #603979
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:49 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    Yeah, GW Bush was real dumb…graduated Yale, Harvard, a business man, and was a governor of a state. A heck of a lot more experience than your “community organizer” with less than 2 years experience on a national level.

    Yep, we’re screwed for the next 4 years. All we can hope for is a house cleaning in 2010. And it can’t come soon enough with these nutty left wing executive orders Obama has already signed off on to please his dinky small constituency of the George Soros sheep.

  72. #603980
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:52 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    Seriously. You need to learn how to open up and say what’s really on your mind. ;-)

    I share your sentiment.

  73. #603982
    On January 27th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, cngerms said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, eaglehaslanded said:
    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    Oh, my mistake. When you say ’smart,’ you mean smart relative to Matt Damon and Kelly Bundy.

  74. #603984
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:02 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Pelosi is simply providing cover for Obama. It’s old-school leninist tactics: always have someone far, far more extreme than you, to make YOU look reasonable.

    Makes perfect sense. That would explain how Obama can talk like a conservative and push through legislation like a leftard.

  75. #603986
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, MtsEdge said:

    smart

    “cunning” is more like it

  76. #603988
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    “It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.”

    It wouldn’t kill you to leave your comfort zone in mommy and daddys basement and take a look at the real world….You know the one in which Obama is NOT the second coming.

  77. #603999
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, sergeantmajorbill said:

    Yesterday, on the sixth day of “his” presidency more than 80 thousand people were told they were going to lose their jobs.
    Now, since it happened on “his” watch, then he is responsible for it.
    Wasn’t that the logic used on President Bush?
    Just saying….

  78. #604000
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:21 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Why don’t eagle and lgm stay and play?
    COWARDS!!!!!!!!!!

  79. #604007
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:24 pm, Lee Hazel said:

    We have far to many McCains in congress.
    I am with Limbaugh and Michelle. I want Obama’s Socialist agenda to fail, fail miserably, and fail utterly.

    Capitalism and market driven economics have not failed. Greed, governmental culpability and just plain criminality has succeeded in a vacuum created by our voters.

    Add to this a slobbering, infantile, and woefully idiotic media and you have the makings of disaster.

    BHO’s monumental arrogance will sink his ship. How can someone trained by the politically corrupt and the criminal elite of Chicago do anything but fail.

    The market is busily taking its toll on the MSNBCs , the Olbermanns, the fumbling NYT, the morally corrupt Hollywood.

    The criminal conspiracy currently running our government at all levels as aided and abetted by a morally corrupt media will fail. A society capable of murdering 39 million of their own children cannot survive.

    PC is Thought Control
    LEE

  80. #604011
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, rocketman said:

    Conservative Republicans (not RINO’s) should be respectful and tactful when dealing with President O’Bummer and his liberal / socialist / marxist minions in congress. No laughing, rolling eyes, etc.
    ***
    Then when the time to vote or to filibuster comes they should act like the Texans did at the Alamo when the General Santa Ana and the Mexican Army showed up within cannon and rifle range of the walls.
    ***
    The Texans lost the battle in the end–after fighting as best they could. They bought enough time for Sam Houston to win the only battle that really counts in a war–the final one.
    ***
    Be really nice–and then cut them off at the knees when the chance occurs!
    ***
    John Bibb

  81. #604017
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:37 pm, Atlanta Media Guy said:

    So Obama doesn’t like Rush or Fox News. get ready for the fairness Doctrine. I have never heard a president speak about a radio host or news network ever! What have we gotten ourselves into? Elections do have consequences. I have sent a letter to Mr. Phil Gingrey, a Republican congressman from GA, about his comments on Rush this afternoon. Mr. Gingrey has given the MSM a bite they can use to get the Fairness Doctrine moving. grow a pair GOP and VOTE NO on this crap sandwich ‘The One” is trying to pass. He has the votes, why is he so scared that he has to get GOP involvement. TAX cuts will stimulate the econonmy. Not giving my hard earned money to ACORN or any other leftist organization with their hand out.

  82. #604020
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:41 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, cngerms said:

    That’s not the reason why I suggested we lose. I stated, “We lose because the repubs neither understand their enemies nor grasp their depravity.”

    Very well, and as much as I dislike parsing this is what you said.

    You’ve got to be kidding! Do you really believe he went to the Hill with the willingness to allow conservatives to change his mind? This is why we lose day in and day out. Our reps neither understand our enemy nor grasp the depravity of which they are capable.

    You stated that we ‘lose’ following the first sentence, not the last sentence. Suggesting that the first sentence is the reason for loosing. I accept your clarification.

    I am certainly not suggesting we be boorish and infantile; such as exclaiming, “I won” during a so-called bipartisan meeting. Being polite, professional, and well-mannered is one thing.

    Exactly, and that is one point I made.

    Being sycophantic, obsequious, and nihilistic toward our own principles, which is how the meeting is described, is another ball of wax!

    Our principles have been ravaged for the past eight years, and I am glad we are finally getting some ‘religion.’ I am unaware of any description of the meeting other than what MM gave us.

    BO didn’t resist the condom clause because of republican outcry. He resisted it due to opposition within his own party because even they realized it was moronic and wouldn’t fly with the public.

    However the condom clause was deleted it was a good thing. My bad for attributing it to Pres Obama. My hope is that more silly things in the bill will also be deleted. Whether it is done by Pres Obama pressuring the House Democrats, in the Senate, or during the conference. The more silliness trimmed, the better.

    If BO wanted real conservative input flowing into his administration, why didn’t he have dinner with real conservatives a week ago instead George Will, Bill Kristol, David Brooks and their inside-the-beltway ilk? I assure you all of BO’s actions are dog & pony shows meant to placate the opposition and nothing more.

    Not a true change of subject because it does involve meeting people. I am not sure of the reason he met with those people, or the reason he met with liberal journalist the following day. I think it is good form to meet. What is on the agenda and what is said are entirely different things.

    I’d challenge you to tell us of one occasion in which he reached across the aisle for a Senate vote. It never happened and we’re suckers to believe that it ever will.

    I understand that he did work with Sen Lugar on Nuclear Non-proliferation.

    KNOW YOUR ENEMY!

    Very true. Though I hope you are not suggesting that Pres Obama is the enemy.

  83. #604026
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:49 pm, jbh45 said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, Grayson said:
    Sounds like lots of cold showers were needed afterward. Maybe even a hose for some of them.

    yep, we are surely getting hosed…

  84. #604028
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:55 pm, FamilyMan said:

    zyzzyg said: Though I hope you are not suggesting that Pres Obama is the enemy.

    Well!
    Since your kind enough to ask.
    YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  85. #604031
    On January 27th, 2009 at 6:58 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    President Obama won praise from some of the House’s most conservative lawmakers as “engaging” and “respectful” during his meeting with congressional Republicans Tuesday.

    hitler and a few other despots were engaging and respectful then look what happened….

  86. #604037
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:09 pm, Freddy said:

    Obama has been in the job for one week now. Seems that the biggest item on his agenda has to be restoring confidence in the financial markets.

    So far, he has completely failed. Last nights statement regarding the ‘many comming years economic distress’ ranks right up there with Jimmy Carters ‘wear a sweater and sit in the dark’ message.

    The Republicans have no reason to attack Obama at this time. They just need let him twist in the wind on his own.

  87. #604038
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, Laree said:

    Col Jack Jacobs, advice for new President and his plans on speaking to Iran “Shut up About It”

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/01/julie-kafner-i-fav-col-jack-jacob-this.html

  88. #604039
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, pamscasa said:

    remember the “Stepford wives” a full assimilation of the town – deja vu

  89. #604067
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:47 pm, cngerms said:

    I just don’t see evidence we’re getting some “religion.” I have long followed the principle of ignoring what people say and watching what they do. Actions tell us everything. If a wife truly wants to know what her husband thinks of her, she only has to watch his actions and vice versa. The same applies in the Bible, God’s love is a demonstrative love. Everywhere the Bible speaks of God’s love, an action is associated with it. It is never just lip service. We’ve been getting nothing but lip service from the Repubs and the Dems because they think very little of us. The will of the people is disregarded and ignored with a never before seen arrogance and smugness. Absolutely and very definitively I consider BO and the Dems my political enemies. I reside in the camp that chooses NOT to advance the slaughter of children. I hang with the group who chooses not to redistribute the hard-earned wealth of America’s most productive. My team doesn’t denigrate our military and then use them for political expediency. We don’t hold the impoverished in a perpetual cycle of dependency and label it compassion.
    How you can read my “day in and day out” comment as commentary to the preceding question is a mystery. It was a leading statement followed by an explanation/exposition.
    Make no mistake, BO didn’t go to dinner a week ago or go to the Hill today to have his mind changed. A week ago, he went to dinner in order to win over the “inside the beltway” punditry; a wise divide and conquer strategy. We witnessed the same strategy today. He knows it works. I guess before we can know our enemies, we have to be able to recognize them first!

  90. #604074
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:56 pm, ErinF said:

    Conservatives need to divorce permanently from the GOP now! It’s now, or it’s never.

  91. #604075
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:56 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

    Wait, that’s redundant.

    Maybe – which member of Obama’s security team are you talking about?

  92. #604076
    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:59 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:56 pm, ErinF said:

    Conservatives need to divorce permanently from the GOP now! It’s now, or it’s never.

    I say It’s OUR party – send those spineless room temperature IQ RINOs over to the Democrats where they belong

  93. #604078
    On January 27th, 2009 at 8:03 pm, lgm said:

    tiredofit08 said (#85):

    hitler and a few other despots were engaging and…

    Oy! (as they say where I live) An engaging conservative (Reagan, for example) is good. An engaging liberal is Hitler.

  94. #604079
    On January 27th, 2009 at 8:08 pm, cngerms said:

    On January 27th, 2009 at 7:09 pm, Freddy said:
    The Republicans have no reason to attack Obama at this time. They just need let him twist in the wind on his own.

    I don’t believe the repubs can attack (launch an offensive). To do so requires a plan, and they have none. The repubs could, however, maintain a defensive strategy, but we’re not even witnessing that much. Granted, the voters decided the repubs defensive strength in November, however, attending a vital meeting and fawning all over the man as though he is the Incarnate Christ demonstrates only weakness to the opposition. BO doesn’t want to fight them, he wants to win them over and he’s succeeding because of their ignorance. The repubs never acted as though they were the majority years ago when the victory was theirs so it only stands to reason they’ll be even more slavish now.

  95. #604084
    On January 27th, 2009 at 8:13 pm, bear1909 said:

    Republicans in Washington are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.

    On a slightly off topic: why has there been no discussion or thread about BHo’s first interview as Prez going to El Arabiya where he outs his family’s Islamic line?

    Hmmm.

    Fear not though about all the BHo brouhaha and the economic stimulus….. we will get hit so hard by the IslamoNazi Jew Killers that all of this fighting over deck chairs on the Titanic will seem completely irrelevant to the love-ga-ga masses who are persuaded by this Muslim Devil in a suit.

    Bear1909 out.

  96. #604090
    On January 27th, 2009 at 8:29 pm, love2rumba said:

    “Sharp differences are muted.”

    They better get ‘em back before they lose their place at the dinner table.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Turkeys of the year

November 25, 2009 09:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments | 1 Trackback

The Stimulus Jobs Inflation Map

November 16, 2009 07:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The Stimulus Jobs Inflation Index

October 30, 2009 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Stimulus efficiency success story of the day

October 28, 2009 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

22 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Wealth redistribution watch: Cash for carts

October 19, 2009 02:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

28 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Put this on an Olympic scorecard: 9.8

October 2, 2009 09:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

The National Endowment for Obama

September 22, 2009 03:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: fiscal stimulus



Legal Insurrection

» Thanks, Global Warming
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook