It just kills you that there’s somebody smart in the White House now instead of a stupid republican.

Wait, that’s redundant.

The last line of your quote shows your invective isn’t genuine and that you are only here to instigate, something many of us have suspected for a long time now. Thank you for proving it.

I did not say do not take into consideration who is bad for the terrorists. I said we should make our own determination about who is bad for the terrorists,

Yes, which leaves us with half the country who is missing the self-preservation chip we spoke of earlier.

Personally, I dont think this even made the top five reasons most of his supporters (oh, my g-d look at his pecks)chose him…they were two busy repeating those creepy two words (i cant even bring myself to say them) ad nauseam and spitting venom on Palin (distraction) to even stop and take it into consideration… Remember folks, his best weapon for the foreign policy experience was Joe “Verbal Diarrhea” Biden, who has asks us to “Gird our Loins” for his Presidency.

OY.

Not taking into consideration “who’s bad for the terrorists” when choosing to elect perhaps the most powerful man in the free world – leaves us with Jimmy “panty waste” Carter II.

I did not say do not take into consideration who is bad for the terrorists. I said we should make our own determination about who is bad for the terrorists, rather than 1) assuming there is any such consensus in the “terrorist world” about such a thing 2) trying to discern their motives (are they motivated by fear of being killed by an aggressive President or motivated by a desire to pick a fight, engage us and become martyrs?)and 3) even if 1 and 2, taking their word for it. It is an exercise in futility.

Hence my suggestion to ignore them, and just go ahead and have an election rather than trying to discern the pulse of the jihadis and do the opposite.

Not taking into consideration “who’s bad for the terrorists” when choosing to elect perhaps the most powerful man in the free world – leaves us with Jimmy “panty waste” Carter II.

Makes me wonder, if the Iranian hostage crisis were happening today who would those 52 diplomats want as their POTUS? Tic tock.

Yes, I’m quite sure that the terrorists and their leaders are now shaking in their boots at our new Presidential pick (“I’m sorry, I don’t eat romaine, do you happen to have any arugula on hand”)…so much so, I hear tiny bearded men wearing Italian table cloths for hats are popping up from under rocks all over the dry countries across the Atlantic for a chance get their pictures taken with America’s latest mistake (with fingers crossed behind their backs).

I just hope in four years this means we’ll get the real deal, our Reagan Conservative –furthermore, just hoping this choice isnt at the heels of another “crisis” like let’s say, in response to 250 former Gitmo detainees unleashed on our streets who decided to blow themselves up in and around the general population.

Democrats are very good at ignoring the Muslims, which is why they still live in a 9/10 world.

Well, I am not going to try to discern which presidential candidate they love or hate more and then slavishly choose my guy based on that.

If that makes me a 9/10er, so be it.

Hence my suggestion to ignore them [Muslims]

Democrats are very good at ignoring the Muslims, which is why they still live in a 9/10 world.

Really hard to fashion a consistant argument around that type of crap policy.

Hence my suggestion to ignore them, and just go ahead and have an election rather than trying to discern the pulse of the jihadis and do the opposite.