See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Kerry and Gore give global warming skeptics cold shoulder — But As For Me
2. I Blame George Bush, Myself « In Other Words
3. Jules Crittenden » Hearts Warmed
4. The Gore Effect hits Washington « Right Minded Online
5. Al Gore Effect, but With the Wrong Person for Image « Rantings of mine
6. Obama’s Thermostat: Hype and Hypocrisy « Jane Q. Republican
7. Al Gore: Truth & Prosperity Denier « Pronk Palisades

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #605147
   On January 28th, 2009 at 5:07 pm, Flyoverman said:

   On January 28th, 2009 at 2:43 pm, thutmose18 said:
   “31,072 scientists who won’t be heard by Gore and Kerry”

   What about the millions of scientists that conservatives refuse to listen to?

   You do not listen to any of them. You critically review their findings. The data is on the side of those who validate that human activity is at best negigible in its impact on global temperatures.

   For example, NASA, who bows at the altar of global warming, has admitted that its data CONFIRMS that since 1995 7 planetary and lunar bodies in our solar system have experienced the same proportional overall temperature changes as measured on Earth.

   Each body is totally different with the exception of one thing. And that is ……they are illuminated and radiated by the Sun.

   Well GOLLLLLLLLLY ! ! !

2. #605155
   On January 28th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, Flyoverman said:

   In Memory of George Carlin:

   The planet is fine. Compared to the people, the planet is doing great. Been here four and a half billion years. Did you ever think about the arithmetic? The planet has been here four and a half billion years. We’ve been here, what? A hundred thousand? Maybe two hundred thousand? And we’ve only been engaged in heavy industry for a little over two hundred years. Two hundred years versus four and a half billion. And we have the CONCEIT to think that somehow we’re a threat? That somehow we’re gonna put in jeopardy this beautiful little blue-green ball that’s just a-floatin’ around the sun?

   The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through all kinds of things worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles; hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors; worlwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages… And we think some plastic bags, and some aluminum cans are going to make a difference? The planet… the planet… the planet isn’t going anywhere. WE ARE!

3. #605161
   On January 28th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, jdubya said:

   As a Global Warming doubter* and ardent carbon generating, tax-paying, small business owning, white male, I say let these environMENTALists have their flimsy tea party. I have noticed something special in these people- that fact that almost all of them have little to NO science or engineering background. And, those who do, pretty much allow a small, small minority the wherewithall to show the data and handle the reigns. Their practice of science is starting to leak at the seams as other, more legitimate scientists with no axe to grind, but truly the thinkers who see flimsy and weak practices, start to focus on the more recent activities (AKA: YELLOW FLAMING BALL OF FIRE IN THE SKY).

   I am predicting that very soon, these people will start to face reality: that Gore et. al. are merely charlatans and the masses will burn them in bonfires to stay warm.

   *(skeptics are more like artsy-fartsy thesbians with sweaters casually wrapped around the shoulders and tied in a delicate, yet wispy knot. Remember, the word skeptic was provided by the liberally leftist quiche eating Global Warming “Crusaders”)

4. #605209
   On January 28th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

   On January 28th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, jdubya said:
   …(AKA: YELLOW FLAMING BALL OF FIRE IN THE SKY).

   Yes, the proponents of man-caused global warming are no better than the Sun-worshippers in a modern day Apocalypto. They’re going to cut the heart out of our economy and liberty to appease the “Gods” (i.e. Al Gore and company)

5. #605214
   On January 28th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, desertdweller said:

   The only thing in “grave danger” is Al Gore’s investment portfolio, should the whole Global Warming scam fall apart.

6. #605366
   On January 28th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, CO2 Producer said:

   Colorforms™ could make a few bucks off an Al Gore calendar or notebook playset. It could have different backgrounds (arctic, desert, rainforest, Washington DC, United Nations, awards show, concert stadium, elementary school room, etc.) with pieces like Al Gore in his underwear, 3-piece suit, shorts, swimming trunks, snorkel, wagging finger, sandals, suit of armor and sword, parka, mittens, sweatband, mike and podium, polar bear, penguin, beard, idling limousine, solar panel, small aircraft (complete with contrail), breath vapor, copy of The Assault on Reason, incandescent bulb, recycling semi with stacks of newspapers, Kyoto Treaty, overhead screen with Powerpoint bar and line graphs, Nobel Prize, Academy Award, ice core sample, trembling masses, politician signing a bill with the word “green” in capital letters, dangling chad, sabertooth tiger, photo from the Dust Bowl era, pile of money, and much, much, much more. Hours of fun for the entire family. The possible combinations are endless.

   Man, this has really gotten old.

7. #605669
   On January 29th, 2009 at 1:49 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

   Sun-made Global Cooling (Not Man-made Global Warming)

8. #605738
   On January 29th, 2009 at 7:42 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

   thutmose18 said:

   What about the millions of scientists that conservatives refuse to listen to?

   Ccorkie challenged you and I do too; put up or shut up. I contend that there are very few scientists who support the notion that humans cause global warming and, of those so inclined, the great majority either work for the government or rely on continued government funding to eat.

   Come on thutmose18, WHO are these ‘millions of scientists’ … NAME EM!

   How many of your million are members of the National Academy of Science for example? How many of them have PHD’s in physics, climatology, geology, chemistry, etc? How many have conducted actual climate research and written peer reviwed papers on it?

   Here’s our list –

   It includes 3,697 scientists trained in specialties directly related to the physical environment of the Earth, 903 scientists trained in computer and mathematical methods, 5691 scientists trained in the fundamental physical and molecular properties of gases, liquids, and solids, 4796 scientists trained in the molecular interactions and behaviors of the substances of which the atmosphere and Earth are composed, 2924 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of living things on the Earth, 3069 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of human beings, 9992 scientists trained primarily in the many engineering specialties (like me!) required to maintain modern civilization and the prosperity required for all human actions including environmental programs.

   ETC…

   WHERE IS YOUR LIST OF MILLIONS? We’re waiting…

9. #605741
   On January 29th, 2009 at 7:51 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

   backwoods conservative said: If the black hole were at rest it would sink to the center of the earth, but it wouldn’t be at rest. It would be traveling at a velocity that far exceeds the escape velocity of the Earth.

   My bad, I didn’t know it would be moving fast after it was created. I assumed that two masses were accelerated in opposite directions then collided head on thus negating their momentum and leaving a near stationary black hole dangling there.

   I’m relieved to know it will be above escape velocity but let’s hope they don’t aim it at the Sun…. OOOPSIES!

10. #605800
    On January 29th, 2009 at 8:42 am, misterbee241 said:

    Kerry and Gore – sounds like a baggy pants comedy act from the ’30’s. Singing, dancing, snappy patter.

11. #605802
    On January 29th, 2009 at 8:43 am, misterbee241 said:

    Former Vice President Al Gore told lawmakers Wednesday morning that the earth is in “grave danger” and that the nation must break its dependence on oil.

    They were saying this in the 70’s when Kerry was killing commies in Cambodia.

12. #605856
    On January 29th, 2009 at 9:22 am, backwoods conservative said:

    On January 29th, 2009 at 7:51 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    My bad, I didn’t know it would be moving fast after it was created. I assumed that two masses were accelerated in opposite directions then collided head on thus negating their momentum and leaving a near stationary black hole dangling there.

    That would be akin to aiming two rifles at each other and having the bullets meet so precisely that their opposing momentums cancel out. What is more likely is one or more fragments flying off in odd directions.

    I just spent some time examining the PDF file of the actual paper (I’ll admit the mathematics is over my head, so I examined their conclusions), and they did consider the possibility of the black hole not achieving escape velocity. It seems there are two competing forces at work. One is the black hole’s ability to become more massive by accreting matter onto itself. The other is decay. In order for a black hole to become massive enough to destroy the Earth, it would have to accrete enough matter onto itself to overcome the decay rate. They found that a lower velocity made it less likely that the black hole would encounter enough matter to accrete onto itself before decay caused it to evaporate.

    One thing to remember is that while the gravitational effects of a black hole are tremendous on anything that gets too close to it, the force of gravity falls off considerably with distance. Objects that were not perilously close to the black hole would not be pulled into it any faster than a normal (and necessarily larger) object of the same mass. If the sun were to suddenly collapse into a black hole, the sun would occupy a smaller area of space, but the orbits of the planets would not be affected at all. The “cosmic vacuum cleaner” effect is one of the biggest myths about black holes.

    The result is that the mini black holes would have so little gravity (because of their tiny mass) that they would have to actually contact something to pull anything into itself. The conclusion of the research these guys did is that decay would win.

13. #605903
    On January 29th, 2009 at 9:52 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    backwoods conservative said: The conclusion of the research these guys did is that decay would win.

    Here is where I’m from Missouri; how do they know these things decay? Have they ever seen one decay? If it’s truly a black hole then I am having trouble with the idea that something can decay even though nothing can get out? So maybe this ‘decay’ is really this thing having unsuffcient mass to maintain it’s compactness so once it expands a little the show is over and it’s just another neutrino?

14. #605943
    On January 29th, 2009 at 10:18 am, backwoods conservative said:

    …how do they know these things decay?

    The answer to that is a bit complicated. It is true that the decay has not been observed, at least to the best of my knowledge.

    Quantum physics has taught us that on the subatomic scale, particles do not have a clearly defined location but are rather defined by a wave of probability of location. Quantum physics also has established that a vacuum is never flat and smooth from an energy level standpoint, but fluctuates. Virtual particles of matter and antimatter are created and annhilate each other.

    What would happen if a pair of these virtual particles formed at the event horizon of a black hole? That is the question Stephen Hawking asked himself. The conclusion he reached is that in some cases, the uncertainty in the location of the particles would cause the probability wave of one particle to cross over the boundary of the black hole’s event horizon. That particle could then escape, while its counterpart fell into the hole. This would result in a slight loss of mass for the black hole. Mathematical calculations led him to the conclusion that the smaller the black hole, the faster such “Hawking Radiation” would take place. Microscopic black holes would evaporate very quickly.

    Admittedly, that is all mathematical conjecture at this point, but considering the track record theoretical physicists have with predictions based on mathematics, including the existence of black holes, I’m inclined to believe they know what they’re talking about.

15. #606094
    On January 29th, 2009 at 11:58 am, babiesgrandma said:

    CO2 Producer said: with pieces like Al Gore in his underwear

    AHHHHH!H!H!H!H!HHHAHAHHHahahhahhh! My eyes! AHHAHSHHSHSHHHHAHHAHAHHH

16. #606141
    On January 29th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, Southpaw said:

    Mathematical calculations led him to the conclusion that the smaller the black hole, the faster such “Hawking Radiation” would take place.

    For a long time a doubted the existence of black holes, mainly because I had a hard time accepting the concept of an object of infinite density where nothing could escape. Hawkings theories changed my thinking on that.

    My question now is, if something accelerates toward the speed of light as it approaches the black hole, does it ever get there? Time slows down as you accelerate towards the speed of light. If we’re sucked into a black hole, will things start moving in slow motion and eventually we’ll be frozen in time for eternity? If so, I hope I’m doing something worthwhile, like posting on Michelle Malkin.

17. #606160
    On January 29th, 2009 at 12:31 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    On January 29th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, Southpaw said:

    My question now is, if something accelerates toward the speed of light as it approaches the black hole, does it ever get there? Time slows down as you accelerate towards the speed of light. If we’re sucked into a black hole, will things start moving in slow motion and eventually we’ll be frozen in time for eternity?

    That provides an example of what Einstein meant about time passing at different rates for different observers. For the person falling into the black hole, yes, time would flow normally and they would indeed get there. For an outside observer, the person falling into the black hole would appear to freeze in time at the event horizon.

18. #606205
    On January 29th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, Southpaw said:

    For the person falling into the black hole, yes, time would flow normally and they would indeed get there.

    Well, then I guess I don’t need to plan on doing anything special when the scientists go to work.

19. #606445
    On January 29th, 2009 at 3:44 pm, corkie said:

    On January 29th, 2009 at 10:18 am, backwoods conservative said:

    Quantum physics has taught us that on the subatomic scale, particles do not have a clearly defined location but are rather defined by a wave of probability of location.

    I know this isn’t germane to your discussion, but isn’t it more accurate to merely state that it is impossible to know both the exact position and the exact momentum of an object at the same time? – Which makes it more practical to model such issues in terms of probabilities?

    If fact, the uncertainty principle is described as ΔxΔp ≥ h. Notice that the uncertainty of position (represented by x) multiplied by the uncertainty of momentum (represented by p) may be equal to a constant. Therefore, the uncertainty of position may zero (Δx = 0 as long as Δp = ∞). In other words the location of the particle may be definitively determined as long as the uncertainty of momentum remains completely unknown.

    Although, this is just a simple engineering interpretation of the theory. Maybe the math and physics guys find this reprehensible.

    Admittedly, that is all mathematical conjecture at this point, but considering the track record theoretical physicists have with predictions based on mathematics, including the existence of black holes, I’m inclined to believe they know what they’re talking about.

    Concur with this 100%.

    I’m always amazed that the math and physics guys were able to successfully complete such a large amount of the development of “the bomb.” Most feats require much more engineering.

    Speaking of which, didn’t similar concerns exist about a “run away” reaction prior to the first test of the bomb?

20. #606547
    On January 29th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, Southpaw said:

    Here’s further discussion on this:
    More
    I guess I’m still skeptical. It seems like the theories are still being updated and debated.

    Something about the “Let’s plug this thing in and see what happens” mentality makes me a little uneasy. Start-up of this project has already been delayed because of malfunctions.

    Best case disaster scenario: The thing blows up and “only” destroys everything from France to Iran.

21. #606865
    On January 29th, 2009 at 9:42 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    On January 29th, 2009 at 3:44 pm, corkie said:

    I know this isn’t germane to your discussion, but isn’t it more accurate to merely state that it is impossible to know both the exact position and the exact momentum of an object at the same time? – Which makes it more practical to model such issues in terms of probabilities?

    You are correct. The more we know about one quantity, the less we know about the other. I see you know the subject matter pretty well. Of course, the wave nature of particles shows up very well in the double slit experiment. And it is that quality which makes Hawking Radiation possible, if my layman’s understanding of this stuff is correct.

22. #608673
    On February 1st, 2009 at 12:04 pm, NestingHawk said:

    Sombody was kind enough to suggest some books on the topic to me the last time I was here. I took down the names of the books but, unfortunately, not the kind soul who suggested them. I can’t really buy every book I want to read so I have a library first policy for most books and I’ve been having trouble getting to the library, but as the days get longer I hope to have an easier time getting there and getting the books. I, too, have serious misgivings about the LHC, and think they should wait.

    Even if it were proven to me that the LHC is perfectly safe beyond the shadow of a doubt, the scientists’ behavior has impressed me so much I would still want CERN to be shut down for six months so that most of them could go work at a soup kitchen. (At least whoever is in charge.) Their response to public concern about the project has not been to shut down long enough to be more certain or to shut down long enough to make some reasonable attempt to explain to people what’s going on or how they’re so sure.

    They seemed to figure out early on that the name-calling wasn’t getting them anywhere, but they still declare “I have more credentials than thou” and “I must be right because I have the biggest sneer” and basically “If you don’t take everything I say as gospel truth, you are a complete idiot.” They actually put up the fact that they have families as an argument on their website for the safety of the project, but I’m sure they think its safe. However, they’re in charge and their egos seem to be completely out of control.

    They obviously don’t even see why they should even have to answer to anyone without a doctorate in physics. One article actually had that they were advising their scientists to tell the public there was “no chance” on the assumption that the mere little sheep couldn’t possibly understand, upon explanation, that there is technically not “no chance” that the entire Earth could spontaneously turn into Cheeze Whiz when you play jump rope. It’s a question of extremely low odds.

    In short, I would not, based on their behavior on this point, willingly trust the people running CERN with the contents of my cutlery drawer. I know they’re very book-smart and everything, but their humility levels and their attitude toward the rest of humanity are just awful.