Senate roll call vote: Taxpayer funding of overseas abortions reinstated

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 28, 2009 01:41 PM

Here’s the Senate roll call vote on the so-called Mexico City Policy. Congrats! Your tax dollars will fund overseas abortions once more.

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress – 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

Question: On the Amendment (Martinez Amdt. No. 65 )
Vote Number: 19 Vote Date: January 28, 2009, 12:13 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Amendment Rejected
Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 65 to H.R. 2 (Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009)
Statement of Purpose: To restore the prohibition on funding of nongovernmental organizations that promote abortion as a method of birth control (the “Mexico City Policy”).
Vote Counts: YEAs 37
NAYs 60
Not Voting 2

Florida’s junior senator, Republican Mel Martinez, called on his Senate colleagues today to reinstate a policy that prohibits U.S. tax dollars from going to international organizations responsible for performing and promoting abortions.

During the debate on reauthorizing the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), Martinez offered an amendment to reinstate the policy. The amendment was defeated by a vote of 37 to 60.

“The core of this argument is whether U.S. taxpayers ought to be forced to fund efforts abroad that utilize abortion as a means of family planning,” said Martinez. “If we want to continue fostering a culture of life, where every life is considered sacred, every child is celebrated, and life at all stages is given the dignity it deserves, then we will reinstate this policy.”

The Mexico City Policy was first implemented in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan. President Obama rescinded the policy Friday.

(link)

Posted in: Abortion

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Senate roll call vote: Taxpayer funding of overseas abortions reinstated — But As For Me
  2. Fiscal Suicide: 20 Things That Suck « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  3. GrassrootsPA » SPECTER & CASEY VOTE TO REINSTATE TAXPAYER FUNDING OF OVERSEAS ABORTIONS…
  4. First Week in Review « The Rational Actor
  5. Hope and Change. Hope for Who? | EyeHackerBlog.com
  6. Senate Approves Reinstatement Of Taxpayer Funded Overseas Abortions | Right Soup
  7. Senate Approves Funding of Overseas Abortions « Being Fed
  8. Limbaugh Has A RIGHT To Speak And Be Heard, Abortion, Bail-Out and Nancy « Dianej’s Weblog
  9. Nightly Ramble: Snowbound | BitsBlog
  10. Genocidal Imperialism « The Forum
  11. Worrisome executive moves in first days of the Obama presidency « Wellsy’s World
  12. “Your tax dollars will fund overseas abortions once more.” « Gunservatively!
  13. Blog @ MoreWhat.com
  14. Republicans Want Your Kids To Get Herpes! | Democrat=Socialist
  15. End it now.
  16. Obama wants to take from the rich and give it to….the government. « Riggword Weblog

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:43 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Snowe and Specter never fail to disappoint.

  2. #2
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:47 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Wow, as if we have nothing better to do with our tax dollars.

    So much for accountability.

  3. #4
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, genso said:

    I don’t get this. This is as much an act of war against another culture as sending in the military. Don’t those on the left get that? Where is the outrage? Kill em’ with a bomb or with an abortion. What is the difference?

  4. #5
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, jellibean said:

    “The core of this argument is whether U.S. taxpayers ought to be forced to fund efforts abroad that utilize abortion as a means of family planning,” said Martinez.

    Even w/o appealing to a Pro-Life argument, paying for abortions in other countries is completely ridiculous since we can’t even pay for our own policies.

    I wonder if other countries will send money to us to pay for our domestic initiatives… *eyeroll*

  5. #6
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, JT said:

    If I were the Catholic Church, I’d start excommunicating every Catholic nay voter. Time to stop playing nice.

  6. #7
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, sonofdy said:

    So in a time of domestic economy crisis, the one decides it is important to spend money on… drum roll… FORGIEN abortions!!!

    Yes your tax money will now pay for and entirely different countries women to have abortions thus stimulating nothing.

  7. #8
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:51 pm, teachem2 said:

    I guessed correctly which Rs voted with the Dems … the usual suspects: Collins, Snowe, and Specter.

  8. #9
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:51 pm, teachem2 said:

    I guessed correctly which Rs voted with the Dems … the usual suspects: Collins, Snowe, and Specter.

    Don’t forget Murkowski

  9. #10
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Same stuff, different day…sigh.

  10. #11
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Byantine said:

    When the economy continues to stink or even get worse, will Democrat voters wake up and see that their President and Senate would rather fund overseas abortions than use that money to help Americans?

    Not holding my breath.

  11. #12
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, davidjamesduprey said:

    First vote for our new Senator, Gillibrand, and she proves to be a loyal Democrat!

  12. #13
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, bradley said:

    I always wonder about those “not voting” senators. WHAT are they in Congress for, but to vote on bills? Maybe for each non-vote they should be docked a month’s pay. THAT would get them off the stick.

  13. #14
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, Byantine said:

    davidjamesduprey said:

    First vote for our new Senator, Gillibrand, and she proves to be a loyal Democrat!

    Yup. I never bought the hype over her. A Democrat from NY is a Democrat from NY is a Democrat from NY.

  14. #15
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, Send_Me said:

    I realize the futility of my asking, but how on earth is this remotely Constitutional? Unless this somehow falls under “To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States” (this would only apply if unborn children were somehow involved in a counterfeiting scheme); “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water” (this would only apply if unborn children somehow posed a national security threat); or “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes” (I suppose one could argue that Planned Parenthood has turned abortions into a profitable commercial enterprise), this is in no way Constitutional.

  15. #16
    On January 28th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Here’s the Senate roll call vote on the so-called
    Mexico City Arbeit Macht Frei Policy.

    Congrats! Your tax dollars will fund overseas abortions once more.

    Fixed it

  16. #18
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Byantine said:

    Send_Me said:

    I realize the futility of my asking, but how on earth is this remotely Constitutional?

    I don’t have the answer to it, but I’d love to see someone throw this at a court and see if it sticks.

    We wonder why so many liberal agendas get pushed in this country. Well, the legal profession is dominated by liberals. You got a bunch of liberal lawyers suing on behalf of liberal causes while liberal judges are presiding. Result: Liberal laws.

    It’s time for conservatives to organize, litigate, lobby and use the left’s tactics against them

  17. #19
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Now we know for sure which party is the
    PARTY OF DEATH

  18. #20
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, rplatt said:

    The nation is experiencing a financial crisis and the brain dead congress is funding worldwide slaughter houses for the unborn.

    Isn’t this a wonderful country?

  19. #21
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, Byantine said:

    FamilyMan said:

    Now we know for sure which party is the
    PARTY OF DEATH

    It took you that long to figure this out?

    :P

  20. #22
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Send_Me said: how on earth is this remotely Constitutional?

    OH! Send Me
    Don’t ask such pertinent questions.

  21. #24
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, mchristian said:

    It’s for the children, and to save the planet and save money.

  22. #25
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Byantine said:
    PARTY OF DEATH
    It took you that long to figure this out?

    No. But I do like the sound of that handle.
    The Democratic party is THE PARTY OF DEATH It has a good ring to it, don’t ya think?

  23. #26
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Hangfire said:

    I don’t understand. Is money for abortions in a foreign country a form of disaster relief? Is it humanitarian aid?

  24. #29
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, Paul Revere said:

    I thought liberals were against killing brown people? I’m confused! :shock:

  25. #30
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    I heard that if it came down to a tie, Obama ordered Joe Biden to vote “Present”

  26. #31
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Nancy must be getting all stimulated again.

  27. #32
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, ErinF said:

    I’m done with my stinky senators Snowe and Collins.

  28. #33
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, CJ said:

    the so-called Mexico City Policy.

    Hispanic voters went for Obama 66-32. They believed the lie about conservatives hating Hispanics because conservatives want to stop illegal immigration. Well, guess what, guys. Now you get to fund the genocide of your own relatives.

    Enjoy your hope and change.

  29. #34
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, vickisoup said:

    I can’t even watch the news or read these blogs anymore. My heartache just deepens with every day.
    :(

  30. #35
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:39 pm, mchristian said:

    Paul Revere said: I thought liberals were against killing brown people? I’m confused!

    Haven’t you been listening to these moralists all these years? These are not people, they are not babies, they are cell clusters.

  31. #36
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:43 pm, FireBlogger said:

    Democrats are on Daddy’s credit card.

    There will be no end to spending.

  32. #37
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, right_on said:

    “We are the world!” – Barack Obama, 2008

    “We are the world!” – Assorted Singers, World Aid Concert 1983(?)

    “I have found the enemy, and he is us!” – Pogo (cartoon) 2004

    “We have found the enemy, and he is us!” – Democrat Party leadership, 2000-2008

    “No child left behind!” – G.W. Bush

    “…to be punished with a child…” – Barack Obama, 2008

    Yet…when a pregnant woman is killed by a drunk driver, the drunk driver is charged with two counts of vehicular manslaughter?

    Yet…when Islamic peoples use children as human shields, and those children are killed (along with the terrorist fathers and mothers) in a retaliatory bomb strike, those lives suddenly become precious?

    Yet…the American people, and ‘others’ that live here, are struggling to make ends meet, are losing their jobs, homes, self-esteem, and faith in their government, but it is more important to send taxpayer money overseas to abort/kill/eliminate the unborn in other Christian countries, than to use all available funds for Americans?

    And here I thought there was a crisis here at home!

  33. #38
    On January 28th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, Socky said:

    So, after his first act as POTUS was to make terrorists more comfortable, Obama then proceeds to fund the killing of millions of brown and black babies.

  34. #39
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:02 pm, gco said:

    Haven’t you been listening to these moralists all these years? These are not people, they are not babies, they are cell clusters.

    The shorthand term is “mistakes.” About 48 years ago, a Kenyan man and a typical white woman (whose typical white mother died just recently after being run over by a bus) made a mistake, for which we’re all going to pay. That mistake must really hate his life, because he feels compelled to spare millions of unborn all over the world the burden (in his mind) of living. Also, I guess there was no salvation to be found for him in pot and cocaine. Go figure.

  35. #40
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:05 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Yet…when a pregnant woman is killed by a drunk driver, the drunk driver is charged with two counts of vehicular manslaughter?

    Pro-aborts have always fought those kinds of charges, including when a boyfriend/husband/father beats or kills a woman.

    Acknowledging the humanity of the unborn child who is the victim of a violent crime forces them to acknowledge that a chlid killed by abortion is also human.

    So they recognize there’s an inconsistency, and try to reconcile it by getting drunk drivers/abusers/thugs off the hook for murdering an unborn child.

    Of course, this also indicates their respect for a woman’s “choice” is only limited to abortion; they clearly don’t respect the lives of women who choose to have a baby and lost that baby due to a crime…

    “America begins by dictating” is what Obama told Arab television in his interview. Seems now that America begins by killing off the unborn.

  36. #41
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, NDgal said:

    Man I hate our two Senators. I will never understand why we keep voting them in. We are a socially conservative state and these two fools always vote party line.

    I do recall one of them speaking out against the amnesty bill though, so maybe there is “hope” for “change” after all. Oh wait, who am I kidding. They’ll be voting for the “stimulus” as well I’m sure.

  37. #43
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    My email to Bob Casey:

    Well Great! We Americans are now re-funding abortions overseas. Glad to see you got your priorities straight! You sicken me. May God forgive you because I sure won’t.

    We can’t hold terrorists without granting them government defense, but we sure as hell can pay to kill children all over the world?

    I will be listening for the collapse of a building. When I hear it, I will know that your church caved in when you entered. Maybe you can wash down your communion Host with not wine, but Obama Kool-Aid. Don’t choke on it.

    (The one to Spector is coming next!)

  38. #44
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, Socky said:
  39. #45
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:20 pm, mchristian said:

    My former senator, Pete Domenici, was a mostly conservative guy. Now, in addition to our Bingaman, we have a Udall. Udalls can be counted on for two things. They will always vote for the environmentalist agenda, no matter how scientifically insupportable, and they will always, despite their Mormon religion, vote for abortion without restriction.

  40. #46
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Inspired by UberInfide67:

    What’s the difference between an Islamic terrorist held in Gitmo and a fetus held in a womb?

    The terrorist is afforded due process.

  41. #47
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, torabora said:

    Isn’t Murkowski supposed to be in prison or sumptin’?

    Spectre? meh what did you expect…

    Collins/Snowe… Is it open season on RINO’s yet?

    And ZERO DemocRATS voting to protect the innocent. Damn them all to hell.

  42. #48
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Casey of Pennsylvania voted to kill brown and black babies.

    His father, then governor of Pennsylvania, was denied permission to speak to the 1992 Democrat Convention that nominated Bill Clinton, because he opposed abortion.

    His son claimed to be pro-life. I assumed the Dems would allow one token pro-life voter. I see Nelson of Nebraska voted for life, but I don’t think he was the one Democratic token, allowed to vote in a way pleasing to the moderate constituents back home after the whip is sure the vote won’t matter.

    But Casey of Pennsylvania proves that there really is no such thing as a moderate or pro-life Democrat. He is a lying, hypocritical piece of scum.

    BTW, I don’t live in PA, but if Santorum challenges either Specter in the primary or Casey in the general election when their terms expire, I will send him money. Ditto Toomey.

  43. #49
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, Flyoverman said:

    And ZERO DemocRATS voting to protect the innocent. Damn them all to hell.

    One did. Nelson of Nebraska. Hat Tip to Senator Nelson.

  44. #50
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    A lot of votes are going to split this way over the next several years. I guess murdering 1.2 to 1.5 million babies in America isn’t enough for the leftists in the Senate. How many babies do they need to murder before they are propitiated?

    A note of interest. In the days before Roe vs. Wade, the estimates of the number of women who died as a result of abortions each year was between 39 and 250. This is a tragedy but is murdering 1.2 to 1.5 million babies instead the morally superior choice?

  45. #51
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Murkowski is the daughter of a former governor. Like Caroline Kennedy, but her father was still alive when she assumed her throne.

  46. #52
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    At this point, we should change the constitution to forbid such familial dynasties in the Senate, House and the Presidency. One Kennedy is one too many. We have had to live through half a dozen of them because of JFK’s untimely death. Had he lived I doubt his relatives could have managed to gain so many offices on their own in view of what would have been a mediocre legacy.

  47. #53
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:36 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Murkowski, while a member of the state House, was appointed by her father, Governor Frank Murkowski, to his own unexpired Senate seat in December 2002, which he had vacated after being elected governor.

    (from Wiki)

  48. #54
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:38 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Murkowski

    She is a member of a bunch of pro-RINO and pro-abortion groups, and is probably corrupt in her own right, judging from the Wiki right-up.

    Maybe Governor Palin should run against another corrupt Murkowski in 2010…

  49. #55
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    A note of interest. In the days before Roe vs. Wade, the estimates of the number of women who died as a result of abortions each year was between 39 and 250. This is a tragedy but is murdering 1.2 to 1.5 million babies instead the morally superior choice?

    Roe v. Wade has done nothing to make abortion safer. First, prior to Roe, 90% of abortions were performed by an actual doctor, nurse, or other medically-trained person.

    Second, it only changed the type of abortion that ended up being fatal and mostly protects abortionists from criminal prosecution, rather than protecting women from quacks and unsafe procedures.

    See here for indepth information:

    http://realchoice.0catch.com/library/deaths/legaldeaths.htm

  50. #57
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Socky said:

    There’s an extreme amount of cognitive dissonance in the left-wing position on abortion.

    The typical cop-out position is “I’m not pro-abortion, but I believe women should have the choice.”

    What the hell is that? Do these same people say, “I’m against child molesting, but I believe guys in trenchcoats should have that choice?”

    And what about the other cop out. “I believe abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.” Which begs the question, “Why rare?” If abortion isn’t immoral, if it is “just a clump of cells,” like an ingrown toenail, then why should anyone care how many abortions happen?

    You really have to be sort of crazy to buy into the rationalizations the left offers.

  51. #58
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, swmntman said:

    NDgal said: I will never understand why we keep voting them in. We are a socially conservative state…

    Yeah, I was born and grew up there (Mandan) and could never understand how we voted for a Republican president and Democrat Senate/House. I knew Conrad a little bit – very smart as a Tax Commissioner but very, very lousy Senator. Great people up there but I’m afraid even that is changing. Very disappointing.

  52. #59
    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:58 pm, emjem24 said:

    Just a question: why is the US interfering in another country’s family planning policies? Why can’t other countries take care of their family planning options?

    I mean, the birth rate in Europe is pretty much stagnant and a lot of people are getting killed in Mexico through drug cartel violence. Why do they need our help?

  53. #61
    On January 28th, 2009 at 4:00 pm, Viper1 said:

    Yep, just one more in a long line of reasons to revisit that old declaration… of Independence.

    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation….

  54. #62
    On January 28th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Interestingly enough, abortion statistics are not well monitored. Women who suffer complications after an abortion are rarely identified as such in medical records and reporting.

    If 1% of women suffer complications from 1.2 million abortions every year that means 12,000 women suffer from legalized abortion. Even if the complication rate is 1/2% then there are 6,000 complications from abortions every year! Safe? Not by a long shot!

    Abortion clinics charge $200 to $250 for abortions the last time I saw a figure. That is at least $240,000,000 every year. Murdering babies is a HUGE industry.

    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    A note of interest. In the days before Roe vs. Wade, the estimates of the number of women who died as a result of abortions each year was between 39 and 250. This is a tragedy but is murdering 1.2 to 1.5 million babies instead the morally superior choice?

    Roe v. Wade has done nothing to make abortion safer. First, prior to Roe, 90% of abortions were performed by an actual doctor, nurse, or other medically-trained person.

    Second, it only changed the type of abortion that ended up being fatal and mostly protects abortionists from criminal prosecution, rather than protecting women from quacks and unsafe procedures.

    See here for indepth information:

    http://realchoice.0catch.com/library/deaths/legaldeaths.htm

  55. #64
    On January 28th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Senator Kyl and that other guy from Arizona vote for life, thanks given.

    “I believe abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.”

    Well that was not their first lie nor their last. But when you murder the unborn by the millions and support those who do what does a mere lie matter?

    They talk of Choice—they chose death, murder and the denigration of human life. What choice did they give us? So let us all hold hands, sing stupid hippy songs and decide who next to “help leave with dignity”.

    Obama’s next book Late Term Abortions for Fun and Profit: watch that little guy die a slow, ugly death all by himself with forward by Miss Hillary.

  56. #65
    On January 28th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, NDgal said:

    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, swmntman said:

    I live in Mandan now, but didn’t grow up here. At least we were a red state again this time around, I was getting worried until I heard they were closing up Obabma shop here.

  57. #66
    On January 28th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, terristeelmagnolia said:

    I am SOOO disappointed in John Ensign of NV

  58. #67
    On January 28th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, Leatherneck said:

    The religion of Molach has just grown. Lucifer loves to watch humans murder their own children.

  59. #68
    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, mchristian said:

    emjem24 said: Just a question: why is the US interfering in another country’s family planning policies? Why can’t other countries take care of their family planning options?

    I think you mean, can’t they kill their babies without our help?

  60. #72
    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Why is it the trolls who frequent this blog can get worked up about Palin clothes but when our tax dollars are going to be spent to kill babies abroad, nada?

    I would just love – one time – to have lgm and his ilk scream out how stupid this decision is. Just frigging once. You can bet your a$$ if Bush was behind this they would be screaming. Oh, it overturned a Bush policy – what the hell am I thinking?

  61. #73
    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I don’t understand why election to the Senate causes so many conservatives to move left and to waffle on core convictions.

    This is one of the single greatest arguments for term limits. Involvement in government turns people into leftists and advocates of more government.

    12 years in the Senate is too long for anyone.

  62. #74
    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, Defector01 said:

    that was a pretty solid party line vote

  63. #76
    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, cicerokid said:

    “Congrats! Your tax dollars will fund overseas abortions once more.”

    That’s what you think.

  64. #77
    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, bear1909 said:

    The New President BHo is a moral reprobate. Case closed.

    So with a tax cheat supervising the IRS, and a Political Clown for President presiding over human fetus killing with our tax money…..how long before the millions who didnt vote for this Sight Gag pull off the largest tax revolt since the Boston Tea Party?

    President BHo is handing us a golden opportunity to re-write history as he bloviates pufferies galore and surrenders to Islam and the Russians within 36 hours of one another.

    ROFLMAO. I cant wait for the formation of a true radical conservative political party in this country that spanks this Yahoo and sends him back to whichever country he is from. It sure aint Ammurrrika.

    Respect your enemies to be sure. But dont give them an inch.

    BHo is broke and doesnt even realize it ROFLMAO.

  65. #78
    On January 28th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This is sad – a bunch people in the wealthiest country in the world who eat too much, complain too much and have too many resources – are complaining because people living in poverty are aborting their pregnancies.

    Instead of complaining why don’t you folks adopt these kids?

  66. #79
    On January 28th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On January 28th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This is sad – a bunch people in the wealthiest country in the world who eat too much, complain too much and have too many resources – are complaining because people living in poverty are aborting their pregnancies.

    Instead of complaining why don’t you folks adopt these kids?

    I’d like for you to explain how one goes about adopting aborted babies.

    You have the floor.

  67. #80
    On January 28th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    If BHO keeps this up the next four years will be awful in every way. At this pace he will make Carter look like a genius in the next 9 months.

    Frankly, I think this was Carter’s plan all along. Getting BHO elected will allow Carter to say, “See, I am NOT the worst president in history.”

    BHO is already turning into one of the caricatures Paul Shanklin, white comedian, parodies on a regular basis. Every time Rush makes a joke these clowns incorporate it into their plans. The only problem is the JOKE is on US!

    Join the Constitution Party at http://www.constitutionparty.org. I don’t see another option.

  68. #81
    On January 28th, 2009 at 6:39 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 28th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, cicerokid said:

    “Congrats! Your tax dollars will fund overseas abortions once more.”

    That’s what you think.

    We do what we can do. Have a plan you could share? I have a few, but I don’t wish to share right here right now.

  69. #82
    On January 28th, 2009 at 7:12 pm, cicerokid said:

    My wife is from the Philippines. This gives me some options.

    http://www.vbresort.com

  70. #83
    On January 28th, 2009 at 7:22 pm, cicerokid said:

    Paying for murder is against my religion. I will move before becoming a part of this.

  71. #84
    On January 28th, 2009 at 7:29 pm, 24Klady said:

    With millions of U.S. citizens out of work, millions of homes being respossessed, companies struggling to stay in business and we’re going to be taxed to abort children in other countries. Gut wrentching.

    Other than food aid, why the devil are we still giving foreign aid to anyone? It’s nothing more than blackmail and be able to claim we have friends in the world. I can’t think of any friends we truly have in the world besides Israel, and that’s about to go in the toilet with ‘Bambi’s new found muslim friends.

  72. #85
    On January 28th, 2009 at 8:02 pm, cicerokid said:

    We had an allie in the Philippines until this loser came into office. I don’t think funding overseas abortions will go over very well in a country with about 80 million Catholics.

  73. #86
    On January 28th, 2009 at 8:12 pm, sandydog said:

    I see by the record that my Alaska State senators, Lisa “My daddy got me this job” Murkowski (R for RINO) and Mark “Marxist” Begich(he’s been a Senator for, oh, two WEEKS now) voted to use my tax dollars to fund the killing the unborn in other lands.
    MY, that makes me proud!
    They’re just doing the jobs illegal aliens won’t do, I guess.

  74. #88
    On January 28th, 2009 at 9:00 pm, bear1909 said:

    US foreign aid policy: feed and breed, AND feed and dont breed.

    Looks like we got it covered.

    BHo is an AHo.

  75. #89
    On January 28th, 2009 at 9:48 pm, joetimek said:

    So much for Bob Casey Jr. following in dear old dad’s footsteps. This guy is a sheep following the herd of idiots.

  76. #90
    On January 28th, 2009 at 9:51 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    DemoNcrats!

  77. #91
    On January 28th, 2009 at 10:00 pm, jangar said:

    Kill em’ with a bomb or with an abortion. What is the difference?

    Abortion is the holy sacrament of the Democrat party.

    If I were the Catholic Church, I’d start excommunicating every Catholic nay voter

    And stifle tithes?

    I guessed correctly which Rs voted with the Dems … the usual suspects: Collins, Snowe, and Specter.

    You mean Sphincter

  78. #92
    On January 28th, 2009 at 10:01 pm, jangar said:

    BHo is an AHo.

    To the core.

  79. #93
    On January 28th, 2009 at 10:19 pm, jangar said:

    On January 28th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, Socky said:
    Off Topic: Obama the Genius mistakes window for door.

    Perhaps he has more experience entering thru windows…bad habit and all, you know.

  80. #94
    On January 29th, 2009 at 12:16 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On January 28th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, Ilovemycountry said:
    This is sad – a bunch people in the wealthiest country in the world who eat too much, complain too much and have too many resources – are complaining because people living in poverty are aborting their pregnancies.

    Instead of complaining why don’t you folks adopt these kids?

    I can say this with complete certainty:

    What a friggin stoopid post.

    We prosper so we should kill babies overseas using our tax dollars? How, pre tell, does this stimulate OUR economy?

    Adopt? You first. Oh, you prefer they be killed.

    Adopt? Seriously, you have no idea how hard it is to get babies out of a foreign country. I know from experience. It takes a special person (which I am betting by your post does not refer to you).

    It is way easier to keep idiots numbed with Idol and Dancing than it is to get people to understand we have no business going into other countries with fists full of dollars to kill babies.

    I am doing my part to keep them alive. Are you doing yours or just complaining?

  81. #95
    On January 29th, 2009 at 6:04 pm, SparkyMcMuffin said:

    I fully expected to see Sen. Hatch’s name in the Nays. So glad he came through for me this time. He’s been letting me down an awful lot lately.

  82. #96
    On January 30th, 2009 at 12:03 am, garydt said:

    I see Ilove My Country has not responded but I bet he would be screaming if he knew the procedures to abortions were applied to animals and pets. He would would be appauled and demand that they be stopped but its ok as long as its done to a human. I honestly believe the devil has blinded these folks to common sense and what is good.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Pundit & Pundette

» Friday various & sundry

protein wisdom

» Finally!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook