<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today was a good day for conservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: House Stimulus Vote: Quick Blog Reax &#124; The Political Class</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-608768</link>
		<dc:creator>House Stimulus Vote: Quick Blog Reax &#124; The Political Class</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-608768</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: Today was a good day for conservatism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: Today was a good day for conservatism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nail49</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-607110</link>
		<dc:creator>nail49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-607110</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now Democratic strategists are saying: no matter what concessions we make, Republicans don’t cooperate. Let’s ignore them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This cartoon shows how the Dems are treating the GOP.

From Townhall:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall.com/cartoons/2009/01/29/5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://townhall.com/cartoons/2009/01/29/5&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now Democratic strategists are saying: no matter what concessions we make, Republicans don’t cooperate. Let’s ignore them.</p></blockquote>
<p>This cartoon shows how the Dems are treating the GOP.</p>
<p>From Townhall:</p>
<p><a href="http://townhall.com/cartoons/2009/01/29/5" rel="nofollow">http://townhall.com/cartoons/2009/01/29/5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nail49</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-607102</link>
		<dc:creator>nail49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-607102</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama made important changes to the stimulus package because of Republican input — more tax cuts, cutting aid to mass transit, etc. Now Democratic strategists are saying: no matter what concessions we make, Republicans don’t cooperate. Let’s ignore them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And why, exactly, should the person being marched to the guillotine HAVE to stay in step with the executioner?

The Dems gave up one or two very minor things and that makes it all OK!

NOT!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama made important changes to the stimulus package because of Republican input — more tax cuts, cutting aid to mass transit, etc. Now Democratic strategists are saying: no matter what concessions we make, Republicans don’t cooperate. Let’s ignore them.</p></blockquote>
<p>And why, exactly, should the person being marched to the guillotine HAVE to stay in step with the executioner?</p>
<p>The Dems gave up one or two very minor things and that makes it all OK!</p>
<p>NOT!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason L.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-607032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-607032</guid>
		<description>For the last two years, it has felt like the 1980s and Tip O&#039;Neil all over again.  Ms. Pelosi was a good student of Thomas P.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last two years, it has felt like the 1980s and Tip O&#8217;Neil all over again.  Ms. Pelosi was a good student of Thomas P&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opposing Views on the Stimulus &#171; John Patrick Kreiss</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606720</link>
		<dc:creator>Opposing Views on the Stimulus &#171; John Patrick Kreiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606720</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to view Michelle Malkin&#8217;s post.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to view Michelle Malkin&#8217;s post.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606692</link>
		<dc:creator>mattm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606692</guid>
		<description>Now lets keep it up for the next 2 years and take back the House and Senate then two more and take back the White House! Yarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggghhhhhhhh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now lets keep it up for the next 2 years and take back the House and Senate then two more and take back the White House! Yarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggghhhhhhhh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606544</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606544</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What is with the lefts massive liberal hate for this woman??? I thought they were bad with bush, but Gov Palin seems to make them all go off thier meds.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Yeah...can you imagine if she becomes President?  You think Bush Derangement Syndrome was bad...she would be crucified!  I&#039;m afraid it might be too dangerous for her to even think about running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What is with the lefts massive liberal hate for this woman??? I thought they were bad with bush, but Gov Palin seems to make them all go off thier meds.</p></blockquote>
<p> Yeah&#8230;can you imagine if she becomes President?  You think Bush Derangement Syndrome was bad&#8230;she would be crucified!  I&#8217;m afraid it might be too dangerous for her to even think about running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606539</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606539</guid>
		<description>Hey, Eaglehasfarted...there were about 47 million people who did NOT vote for your messiah.  What about the will of those people?  I know you feel the will of the people only applies to liberals, but there are a lot of pissed off conservatives out there...millions! The chickens will eventually come home to roost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Eaglehasfarted&#8230;there were about 47 million people who did NOT vote for your messiah.  What about the will of those people?  I know you feel the will of the people only applies to liberals, but there are a lot of pissed off conservatives out there&#8230;millions! The chickens will eventually come home to roost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick&#8217;s Blog &#187; Republicans rejoice in their irrelevance</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick&#8217;s Blog &#187; Republicans rejoice in their irrelevance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606470</guid>
		<description>[...] sees this as the first step for Republicans to regain their footing as credible conservatives: Today was a good day for conservatism Michelle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sees this as the first step for Republicans to regain their footing as credible conservatives: Today was a good day for conservatism Michelle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charging Elephants .com &#187; Michelle Malkin Mistaken (partly)</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606406</link>
		<dc:creator>Charging Elephants .com &#187; Michelle Malkin Mistaken (partly)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606406</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle, but I think a couple of conclusions you might have reached on the revival of conservatism might be a bit premature. I admire your work and almost universally agree with your opinions. In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle, but I think a couple of conclusions you might have reached on the revival of conservatism might be a bit premature. I admire your work and almost universally agree with your opinions. In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606316</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606316</guid>
		<description>Okay, lgm has offered his two cents worth for the week.  &quot;Anybody got change?&quot;

Name five specific cuts the GOP asked for and Obama implemented in this bill?  And giving &quot;tax cuts&quot; to illegal immigrants and others who don&#039;t pay taxes IS NOT A TAX CUT.  IT IS WELFARE!  

If you think your world is &quot;complete&quot; then you should consult with your doctor about adjusting your meds.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 29th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, lgm said: 

Not so. Obama made important changes to the stimulus package because of Republican input — more tax cuts, cutting aid to mass transit, etc. 

You should stick you head out of the conservative blogosphere cave — visit Ezra Klein or tpm — you’ll get a more complete picture of the world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, lgm has offered his two cents worth for the week.  &#8220;Anybody got change?&#8221;</p>
<p>Name five specific cuts the GOP asked for and Obama implemented in this bill?  And giving &#8220;tax cuts&#8221; to illegal immigrants and others who don&#8217;t pay taxes IS NOT A TAX CUT.  IT IS WELFARE!  </p>
<p>If you think your world is &#8220;complete&#8221; then you should consult with your doctor about adjusting your meds.  </p>
<blockquote><p>On January 29th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, lgm said: </p>
<p>Not so. Obama made important changes to the stimulus package because of Republican input — more tax cuts, cutting aid to mass transit, etc. </p>
<p>You should stick you head out of the conservative blogosphere cave — visit Ezra Klein or tpm — you’ll get a more complete picture of the world.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606314</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606314</guid>
		<description>Gotta watch the approval polls.  The only thing that will stop the porkulous is public opinion.

Unlike W in his second term, Obamachev isn&#039;t going to squander his political capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta watch the approval polls.  The only thing that will stop the porkulous is public opinion.</p>
<p>Unlike W in his second term, Obamachev isn&#8217;t going to squander his political capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606300</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606300</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 29th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, lgm said:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s been over a month since I&#039;ve seen you link here to TPM.  I thought you were in remission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 29th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, lgm said:</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s been over a month since I&#8217;ve seen you link here to TPM.  I thought you were in remission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socky</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606294</link>
		<dc:creator>Socky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606294</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Dear One&#039;s response to Republican requests for changes to the Spending Bill were two words: &quot;I won.&quot; 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tehresistance.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/harry-reids-dictatorship-of-bad-ideas/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It&#039;s been four months&lt;/a&gt; since Harry Reid allowed a Republican to offer an amendment to a bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Dear One&#8217;s response to Republican requests for changes to the Spending Bill were two words: &#8220;I won.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://tehresistance.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/harry-reids-dictatorship-of-bad-ideas/" rel="nofollow">It&#8217;s been four months</a> since Harry Reid allowed a Republican to offer an amendment to a bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/today-was-a-good-day-for-conservatism/comment-page-3/#comment-606289</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22233#comment-606289</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mister P&lt;/strong&gt; said (#138):

&lt;blockquote&gt;With the Democrats there is no such thing as Republican influence. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not so.  Obama made important changes to the stimulus package because of Republican input -- more tax cuts, cutting aid to mass transit, etc.  Now Democratic strategists are saying: no matter what concessions we make, Republicans don&#039;t cooperate.  Let&#039;s ignore them.

You should stick you head out of the conservative blogosphere cave -- visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ezra Klein&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tpm&lt;/a&gt; -- you&#039;ll get a more complete picture of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mister P</strong> said (#138):</p>
<blockquote><p>With the Democrats there is no such thing as Republican influence. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not so.  Obama made important changes to the stimulus package because of Republican input &#8212; more tax cuts, cutting aid to mass transit, etc.  Now Democratic strategists are saying: no matter what concessions we make, Republicans don&#8217;t cooperate.  Let&#8217;s ignore them.</p>
<p>You should stick you head out of the conservative blogosphere cave &#8212; visit <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein" rel="nofollow">Ezra Klein</a> or <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/" rel="nofollow">tpm</a> &#8212; you&#8217;ll get a more complete picture of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
